https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.55961

Molecular Diagnosis of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon spp. in Wild Rats of Southwest of Iran

authors:

avatar Mehdi Tavalla 1 , 2 , * , avatar Forough Kazemi 2 , 3 , avatar Masoumeh Mardani - Kateki 2 , 3 , avatar Rahman Abdizadeh 4

Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
Student Research Committee, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
Department of Medical Parasitology, School of Medicine, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Rahmatiyeh, Shahrekord, Iran
Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology: Vol.11, issue 3; e55961
published online: February 12, 2018
article type: Research Article
received: July 8, 2017
revised: January 4, 2018
accepted: January 30, 2018

How To Cite Tavalla M, Kazemi F, Mardani - Kateki M, Abdizadeh R. Molecular Diagnosis of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon spp. in Wild Rats of Southwest of Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2018;11(3):e55961. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.55961.

Abstract

Background:

Microsporidiosis is considered as an opportunistic infection in immunodeficient patients.

Objectives:

Due to the increasing prevalence of parasitic infections and immunodeficiency diseases as well as the transmission risk of microsporidia from animals to human, the aim of this study was to evaluate molecular diagnosis of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon spp. by the multiplex/nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and staining methods in wild rats of Ahvaz city, southwest of Iran.

Methods:

Initially, 160 stool samples were collected from wild rats in different parts of Ahvaz city. The samples were stained by the modified trichrome staining and explored microscopically. The DNA was extracted using the DNA stool kit and examined by multiplex/nested PCR. For differentiating the species of Encephalitozoon, the multiplex/nested PCR products were explored by the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method using the restriction enzyme of Mnl1.

Results:

Of 160, 26 cases were suspected positive for microsporidia spore by the staining. Also, of 160, 18 cases were positive by the multiplex/nested PCR method, that 14 and 4 samples were detected as E. bieneusi and E. intestinalis, respectively. Of 14 E. bieneusi samples, 12 and 2 cases were detected as genotype D and M, respectively.

Conclusions:

The findings revealed a relatively high prevalence of microsporidia infection in wild rats of the city and these animals can be a source of microsporidiosis. Due to the zoonotic potential of the microorganisms, high - risk individuals should be receiving the information about the risk of direct and indirect contact with the infected animals.

1. Background

Microsporidiosis is considered as an opportunistic infection in immunodeficient patients such as patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), transplant recipients, children, elderly, people with ophthalmic lenses, and passengers (1). The phylum microorganisms includes about 1200 species and 150 genera. Enterocytozoon bieneusi as well as Encephalitozoon species (E. hellem, E. intestinalis and E. cuniculi) are the most frequent causes of human microsporidiosis (2). The microorganisms are an obligate intracellular parasite that can infect a wide spectrum of invertebrate and vertebrate hosts (3, 4). The life cycle of this parasite consists of 3 separate stages: infectious stage, replicating or growing stage, schizogony and spore formation stage, or sporogony (5). Microsporidia can be the cause of the wide spectrum of symptoms such as keratoconjunctivitis, myositis, hepatitis, sinusitis, chronic diarrhea, disseminated infections (1), nausea, severe weight loss, and confusion (6).

It is reported that microsporidia is most likely transferred by water contaminated via the stool of an animal (7). Microsporidia have been detected in various animals and humans and it is indicator of the zoonotic potential, however, valid documents for the transmission from animals to humans are lacking (8). It is reported that some patients with ocular microsporidiosis were exposed to pet birds (9). Also, exposure to other animals might be a significant link in the epidemiology of zoonotic microsporidiosis (8, 10).

2. Objectives

The research in Iran, on the prevalence of the microorganisms, have been performed, including the prevalence investigations in various animals and pigeons (11, 12), in liver transplant recipient patients (13), and HIV+/AIDS patients (14); however, the current study is a novel research in wild rats. Although, the parasites are self - limited in immunocompetent people, it can be life - threatening in immunodeficient patients (3, 7). For this reason, it is due to the increasing prevalence of parasitic infections and immunodeficiency diseases as well as the transmission risk of microsporidia from animals to human; hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate the identification of E. bieneusi and Encephalitozoon spp. in wild rats of Ahvaz city, southwest of Iran.

3. Methods

3.1. Ethics Statement

All animal experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran (CMRC code number 5883).

3.2. Sample Collection

Initially, 160 stool samples were collected from wild rats in different parts of Ahvaz city in 2012 - 2014. For this purpose, the Sherman trap was employed. In each sample, the trap was installed at sunset and collected before sunrise (15). The wild rats (Rattus norvegicus and R. rattus) were hunted in 5 points of Ahvaz city (South, North, East, West and Central). After entrapment, the rats were transferred to the Department of Parasitology, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. After killing of rats through euthanasia and collecting the stool samples, a part of the stool sample was used for the staining. The rest of the feces were mixed with twice the volume of potassium dichromate 2.5% and kept at 4 °C (16).

3.3. Samples Examination by Staining

The stool samples were stained by the modified trichrome (weber). The slides were fixed with methanol and placed in trichrome color for 240 minutes. After decolorization with acid - alcohol, and washing with 95% ethanol, the slides were placed in absolute ethanol. To identify the spores, the slides were examined by an optical microscope at magnification of x100 together with immersion oil. The positive samples were identified by dorsal vacuoles in microsporidia spore (17).

3.4. Extraction of DNA

The DNA was extracted by DNA stool kits (Bioneer, South Korea) and the extracted DNA was stored at -20 °C. This kit consisted of spin column, where the column absorbed the parasite DNA. After washing it twice with special buffers, the purified DNA was obtained (17).

3.5. Molecular Detection

The extracted DNA was examined by the multiplex/nested PCR method, where the microsporidial genera of Enterocytozoon and Encephalitozoon were identified by this method. At this stage, we used specific primers that were designed by Katzwinkel et al. (18). These primers were designed based on small subunit ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene where the primers were used for the identification of different species of microsporidia. The primers were purchased from the Bioneer Company and stored at -20 °C. Table 1 shows the primary and secondary primers for multiplex/nested PCR method. The amplified fragment length by the primers was 500 bp and 300 bp for the microsporidial genera of Enterocytozoon and Encephalitozoon, respectively. At first, the samples were examined with the primary and secondary primers by multiplex/nested PCR method. Then, for differentiating the species of Encephalitozoon, the multiplex/nested PCR products were explored by RFLP method using the restriction enzyme of Mnl1 (17).

Table 1.

The Primary and Secondary Primers Used for Multiplex/Nested PCR Method (18)

The Primary PrimersThe Secondary Primers
MSP-1: TGAATGKGTCCCTGTMSP-3: GGAATTCACACCGCCCGTC(A,G)(C,T) TAT
MSP-2A: TCACTCGCCGCTACTMSP-4A: CCAAGCTTATGCTTAAGT(C,T)(A,C)AA(A,G)GGGT
MSP-2B: GTTCATTCGCACTACTMSP-4B: CCAAGCTTATGCTTAAGTCCAGGGAG

3.6. Sequencing

For genotyping, the positive samples of RFLP were sequenced by Bioneer Company (Daejeon, South Korea). Afterwards, the specified sequence was compared against the sequence of the registered isolates available in the GenBank library (NCBI) and homology between them was examined by BLAST software (17).

4. Results

4.1. Staining

Figure 1 demonstrates microsporidia spore in the feceal samples obtained from wild rats. Of 160, 26 specimens were suspected positive for the parasite spore by the staining.

Microsporidia spore in the feacal sample of wild rats of Ahvaz city that was stained by modified trichrome. The arrows are indicator of microsporidia spore. The slides were explored at magnification of x100, microscopically.
Microsporidia spore in the feacal sample of wild rats of Ahvaz city that was stained by modified trichrome. The arrows are indicator of microsporidia spore. The slides were explored at magnification of x100, microscopically.
Figure 1.

Microsporidia spore in the feacal sample of wild rats of Ahvaz city that was stained by modified trichrome. The arrows are indicator of microsporidia spore. The slides were explored at magnification of x100, microscopically.

4.2. Molecular Analysis

Figure 2 indicates electrophoresis of the SSU rRNA gene PCR products on Agarose gel 2% and Figure 3 shows electrophoresis of the RFLP products on agarose gel 3%. Table 2 demonstrates the findings of molecular diagnosis and genotyping of the stool samples of wild rats. Based on Table 2, 2 species of wild rats were R. rattus (14 samples) and R. norvegicus (146 samples). Of the 160 samples, 18 cases were positive for the microorganism by the Multiplex/nested-PCR method. Therefore, 14 and 4 samples were detected as E. bieneusi and Encephalitozoon spp, respectively. Encephalitozoon species consisted of 4 E. intestinalis, only.

The electrophoresis of the SSU rrna gene PCR products on agarose gel 2%, the amplified fragment length was 500 bp and 300 bp for gender of Enterocytozoon and Encephalitozoon, respectively. M: 100bp DNA marker, sample 1: Positive control for Encephalitozoon spp., 2: Negative control, 3: Positive control for E. Bineusi, 4 - 6: Positive samples for Encephalitozoon spp., 7 - 10: Positive samples for E. Bineusi.
The electrophoresis of the SSU rrna gene PCR products on agarose gel 2%, the amplified fragment length was 500 bp and 300 bp for gender of Enterocytozoon and Encephalitozoon, respectively. M: 100bp DNA marker, sample 1: Positive control for Encephalitozoon spp., 2: Negative control, 3: Positive control for E. Bineusi, 4 - 6: Positive samples for Encephalitozoon spp., 7 - 10: Positive samples for E. Bineusi.
Figure 2.

The electrophoresis of the SSU rrna gene PCR products on agarose gel 2%, the amplified fragment length was 500 bp and 300 bp for gender of Enterocytozoon and Encephalitozoon, respectively. M: 100bp DNA marker, sample 1: Positive control for Encephalitozoon spp., 2: Negative control, 3: Positive control for E. Bineusi, 4 - 6: Positive samples for Encephalitozoon spp., 7 - 10: Positive samples for E. Bineusi.

The electrophoresis of the RFLP products on agarose gel 3%, for differentiating the species of Encephalitozoon, the multiplex/nested PCR products were explored by RFLP method using the restriction enzyme of Mnl1, M: 100 bp DNA Marker, 1: Encephalitozoonintestinalis (160 and 60 bp), 2: E. hellem (180 and 80 bp), 3: E. Cuniculli (210 and 90 bp), 4: Encephalitozoon spp. Without enzyme.
The electrophoresis of the RFLP products on agarose gel 3%, for differentiating the species of Encephalitozoon, the multiplex/nested PCR products were explored by RFLP method using the restriction enzyme of Mnl1, M: 100 bp DNA Marker, 1: Encephalitozoonintestinalis (160 and 60 bp), 2: E. hellem (180 and 80 bp), 3: E. Cuniculli (210 and 90 bp), 4: Encephalitozoon spp. Without enzyme.
Figure 3.

The electrophoresis of the RFLP products on agarose gel 3%, for differentiating the species of Encephalitozoon, the multiplex/nested PCR products were explored by RFLP method using the restriction enzyme of Mnl1, M: 100 bp DNA Marker, 1: Encephalitozoonintestinalis (160 and 60 bp), 2: E. hellem (180 and 80 bp), 3: E. Cuniculli (210 and 90 bp), 4: Encephalitozoon spp. Without enzyme.

Table 2.

The Findings of Molecular Diagnosis and Genotyping of the Stool Samples of Wild Rats in Ahvaz City, Southwest of Iran

SamplesNumberPositiveE. bieneusi (Genotype)Encephalitozoon spp.E. intestinalisE. hellemE. cuniculi
Rattus norvegicus1461711 (D) 2 (M)4400
R. rattus1411 (D)0000
Total16018144400

4.3. Sequencing and Genotyping

Aaccording to Table 2, of the 14 positive samples of E. bieneusi, 12 and 2 cases were identified as genotype D and M, respectively. Only a case of microsporidia (E. bieneusi with genotype D) was observed in the R. rattus species and 17 cases were detected in the R. norvegicus species. The data of nucleotide sequences indicated in the article are available in GenBank at accession numbers KY972247 - KY972264.

5. Discussion

Infectious diseases can threaten the public health (19). The infections are one of the major causes of mortality in patients with impaired immune systems. Among them, microsporidiosis is considered as an opportunistic infection in immunodeficient patients (1). In the past, this view was that E. bieneusi, E. intestinalis, and E. hellem can be seen only in humans, however, afterwards, E. bieneusi and E. intestinalis were also detected in a wide range of domestic and wild animals (20). On the other hand, E. hellem was identified in the birds (21). There are also E. cuniculi in various animals. These data indicated that the 4 main species infecting humans have the zoonotic nature (22). Accordingly in this study, we investigated microsporidiosis in wild rats in 5 regions of Ahvaz (north, south, east, west and central). Due to the direct and indirect relationship with humans, rats were selected.

The specie of E. bieneusi is the most frequent specie isolated from immunodeficient patients, animals (8), and even immunocompetent people (14, 23). In the current study, also, these microorganisms had the highest prevalence in wild rats. The results of this study showed that of 160, 14 samples were positive for E. bieneusi and of the 14 samples, 12 cases were detected as genotype D. Consistent with our findings, genotype D has been reported as the most frequent genotype in most studies (24). In Thailand, Leelayoova et al., in 2006, demonstrated that genotype D with 36.4% had the highest prevalence of genotype in AIDS patients and the phylogenetic analysis suggests the zoonotic potential of the parasite (25). Our findings, besides other studies, indicate that genotype D is in most of the immunodeficient patients and animals that could be associated with the widespread potential of the genotype. Also, E. bieneusi has been identified in chickens, grey parrots, pigeons, cockatiels, lovebirds, finches, and falcons (26-29).

According to the results of the study, of 14 E. bieneusi species, 2 cases were identified as genotype M. Also, previous studies showed that genotype M was observed in animals (30). On the other hand, our findings show that 4 cases were detected as Encephalitozoon species, which included 4 E. intestinalis. Encephalitozoon intestinalis is the 2nd most frequent microsporidial parasite of human (8) and these results are consistent with our findings. Also, in several investigations, the microorganism was identified in immunodeficient patients (8). These studies along with our study show that there is the transmission risk of certain genotypes to new host; this genotype was not seen in the host previously. In contrast to the studies and our study, in 2009, Kasickova et al., reported that microsporidial DNA was detected in 115 fecal samples (40.1%) but no E. intestinalis positive samples were detected (31).

The current study was a novel research in wild rats and significant in terms of health, due to the fact that the microsporidial species were isolated from wild rats of Ahvaz city, southwest of Iran. Due to the direct and indirect relationship of rats with humans, these animals are an important source of pollution. Therefore, for the design of proper precautions for microsporidiosis, it is important that the high - risk people, such as immunodeficient patients, should be receiving the information about the risk of direct and indirect contact with these animals. On the other hand, it is recommended to investigators to evaluate the various hosts such as the wild animals or domestic animals as well as the role of the animals and the mechanisms of the transmission in high - risk people. Hence, it is essential to evaluate the wide spectrum of epidemiological and molecular investigations on the hosts.

6. Conclusion

In conclusion, the findings revealed a relatively high prevalence of microsporidia infection in wild rats of the city and these animals can be a source of microsporidiosis. Due to the zoonotic potential of the microorganisms, high - risk individuals should be receiving the information about the risk of direct and indirect contact with the infected animals.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Omalu I, Duhlinska D, Anyanwu G, Parn V, Inyama P. Human microsporidial infections. Online J Health Allied Scs. 2006;3(2).

  • 2.

    Sak B, Kasickova D, Kvac M, Kvetonova D, Ditrich O. Microsporidia in exotic birds: intermittent spore excretion of Encephalitozoon spp. in naturally infected budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). Vet Parasitol. 2010;168(3-4):196-200. [PubMed ID: 20006443]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.11.012.

  • 3.

    Franzen C, Muller A. Molecular techniques for detection, species differentiation, and phylogenetic analysis of microsporidia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12(2):243-85. [PubMed ID: 10194459].

  • 4.

    Weber R, Bryan RT, Schwartz DA, Owen RL. Human microsporidial infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1994;7(4):426-61. [PubMed ID: 7834600].

  • 5.

    Didier ES, Snowden KF, Shadduck JA. Biology of microsporidian species infecting mammals. Adv Parasitol. 1998;40:283-320. [PubMed ID: 9554077].

  • 6.

    Lindsay DS, Weiss LM. Opportunistic infections: toxoplasma, sarcocystis, and microsporidia. 9. Springer Science & Business Media; 2004.

  • 7.

    Samie A, Obi CL, Tzipori S, Weiss LM, Guerrant RL. Microsporidiosis in South Africa: PCR detection in stool samples of HIV-positive and HIV-negative individuals and school children in Vhembe district, Limpopo Province. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101(6):547-54. [PubMed ID: 17412378]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.02.005.

  • 8.

    Deplazes P, Mathis A, Weber R. Epidemiology and zoonotic aspects of microsporidia of mammals and birds. Contrib Microbiol. 2000;6:236-60. [PubMed ID: 10943515].

  • 9.

    Yee RW, Tio FO, Martinez JA, Held KS, Shadduck JA, Didier ES. Resolution of microsporidial epithelial keratopathy in a patient with AIDS. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(2):196-201. [PubMed ID: 1848925].

  • 10.

    Haro M, Izquierdo F, Henriques-Gil N, Andres I, Alonso F, Fenoy S, et al. First detection and genotyping of human-associated microsporidia in pigeons from urban parks. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71(6):3153-7. [PubMed ID: 15933015]. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.6.3153-3157.2005.

  • 11.

    Jamshidi S, Tabrizi AS, Bahrami M, Momtaz H. Microsporidia in household dogs and cats in Iran; a zoonotic concern. Vet Parasitol. 2012;185(2-4):121-3. [PubMed ID: 22035849]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.10.002.

  • 12.

    Pirestani M, Sadraei J, Forouzandeh M. Molecular characterization and genotyping of human related microsporidia in free-ranging and captive pigeons of Tehran, Iran. Infect Genet Evol. 2013;20:495-9. [PubMed ID: 24427811].

  • 13.

    Agholi M, Hatam GR, Motazedian MH. Microsporidia and coccidia as causes of persistence diarrhea among liver transplant children: incidence rate and species/genotypes. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013;32(2):185-7. [PubMed ID: 22982981]. https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0b013e318273d95f.

  • 14.

    Mirjalali H, Mirhendi H, Meamar AR, Mohebali M, Askari Z, Mirsamadi ES, et al. Genotyping and molecular analysis of Enterocytozoon bieneusi isolated from immunocompromised patients in Iran. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;36:244-9. [PubMed ID: 26423670]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2015.09.022.

  • 15.

    Kassiri H, Sharififard M. A biosystematic and morphometric investigation of the characters of rodents (Mammalia: Rodentia) as reservoir hosts for zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in an endemic focus of Sistan-Baluchistan Province, Iran. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2015;10(1). e60117. https://doi.org/10.5812/archcid.18823.

  • 16.

    Cama VA, Pearson J, Cabrera L, Pacheco L, Gilman R, Meyer S, et al. Transmission of Enterocytozoon bieneusi between a child and guinea pigs. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(8):2708-10. [PubMed ID: 17537930]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00725-07.

  • 17.

    Tavalla M, Mardani-Kateki M, Abdizadeh R, Nashibi R, Rafie A, Khademvatan S. Molecular identification of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon spp. in immunodeficient patients in Ahvaz, Southwest of Iran. Acta Trop. 2017;172:107-12. [PubMed ID: 28438442]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.04.015.

  • 18.

    Katzwinkel-Wladarsch S, Lieb M, Helse W, Loscher T, Rinder H. Direct amplification and species determination of microsporidian DNA from stool specimens. Trop Med Int Health. 1996;1(3):373-8. [PubMed ID: 8673842].

  • 19.

    Safi M, Tavalla M, Mardani M, Afrisham R. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections among applicants for health cards attending Ahvaz East Health Center during 2012–2013. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2016;6(2):151-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2222-1808(15)61002-7.

  • 20.

    Reetz J, Wiedemann M, Aue A, Wittstatt U, Ochs A, Thomschke A, et al. Disseminated lethal Encephalitozoon cuniculi (genotype III) infections in cotton-top tamarins (Oedipomidas oedipus)--a case report. Parasitol Int. 2004;53(1):29-34. [PubMed ID: 14984833]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2003.10.003.

  • 21.

    Gatti S, Sacchi L, Novati S, Corona S, Bernuzzi AM, Moura H, et al. Extraintestinal microsporidiosis in AIDS patients: clinical features and advanced protocols for diagnosis and characterization of the isolates. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1997;44(6):79S. [PubMed ID: 9508459].

  • 22.

    Haro M, Del Aguila C, Fenoy S, Henriques-Gil N. Intraspecies genotype variability of the microsporidian parasite Encephalitozoon hellem. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(9):4166-71. [PubMed ID: 12958242].

  • 23.

    Abdelmalek R, Anane S, Chabchoub N, Essid R, Aoun K, Chaabene TB, et al. [Microsporidia and cryptosporidia coinfection in an HIV-infected newborn]. Arch Pediatr. 2011;18(5):562-4. [PubMed ID: 21458971]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2011.02.016.

  • 24.

    Thellier M, Breton J. Enterocytozoon bieneusi in human and animals, focus on laboratory identification and molecular epidemiology. Parasite. 2008;15(3):349-58. [PubMed ID: 18814706]. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2008153349.

  • 25.

    Leelayoova S, Subrungruang I, Suputtamongkol Y, Worapong J, Petmitr PC, Mungthin M. Identification of genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi from stool samples from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in Thailand. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(8):3001-4. [PubMed ID: 16891527]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00945-06.

  • 26.

    Bart A, Wentink-Bonnema EM, Heddema ER, Buijs J, van Gool T. Frequent occurrence of human-associated microsporidia in fecal droppings of urban pigeons in amsterdam, the Netherlands. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(22):7056-8. [PubMed ID: 18805997]. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01429-08.

  • 27.

    Lobo ML, Xiao L, Cama V, Magalhaes N, Antunes F, Matos O. Identification of potentially human-pathogenic Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in various birds. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(11):7380-2. [PubMed ID: 16936045]. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01394-06.

  • 28.

    Graczyk TK, Sunderland D, Rule AM, da Silva AJ, Moura IN, Tamang L, et al. Urban feral pigeons (Columba livia) as a source for air- and waterborne contamination with Enterocytozoon bieneusi spores. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(13):4357-8. [PubMed ID: 17483269]. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00202-07.

  • 29.

    Haro M, Henriques-Gil N, Fenoy S, Izquierdo F, Alonso F, Del Aguila C. Detection and genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in pigeons. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2006;53 Suppl 1:S58-60. [PubMed ID: 17169068]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2006.00173.x.

  • 30.

    Pirestani A, Hosseini SM, Hajian M, Forouzanfar M, Moulavi F, Abedi P, et al. Effect of ovarian cyclic status on in vitro embryo production in cattle. Int J Fertil Steril. 2011;4(4):172-5. [PubMed ID: 24851178].

  • 31.

    Kasickova D, Sak B, Kvac M, Ditrich O. Sources of potentially infectious human microsporidia: molecular characterisation of microsporidia isolates from exotic birds in the Czech Republic, prevalence study and importance of birds in epidemiology of the human microsporidial infections. Vet Parasitol. 2009;165(1-2):125-30. [PubMed ID: 19679398]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.06.033.