article information

Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology: Vol.8, issue 10; e22413
published online: October 12, 2015
article type: Research Article
received: August 10, 2014
revised: February 28, 2015
accepted: April 27, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.22413
Crossmark

Nasal Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: Frequency and Antibiotic Resistance in Healthy Ruminants

authors:

avatar Heidar Rahimi 1 , avatar Habib Dastmalchi Saei 1 , * , avatar Malahat Ahmadi 1

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, Urmia, IR Iran

how to cite: Rahimi H, Dastmalchi Saei H, Ahmadi M. Nasal Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: Frequency and Antibiotic Resistance in Healthy Ruminants. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8(10):e22413. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.22413.

Abstract

Background:

Staphylococcus aureus is a significant pathogen that can colonize the nares of different animals, causing a wide range of infections in various hosts.

Objectives:

We intended to determine the prevalence of S. aureus in the nasal cavity of healthy ruminants and also to investigate the presence of antibiotic resistance genes.

Materials and Methods:

In the present study, healthy cattle (n = 79), sheep (n = 78) and goats (n = 44) were screened for nasal carriage of S. aureus by the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Staphylococcus aureus isolates were further assessed for the presence of blaZ (encoding penicillin resistance), mecA (encoding methicillin resistance), tetK and tetM (encoding tetracycline resistance), and ermA and ermC (encoding macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance) genes.

Results:

The proportion of S. aureus-positive nasal swabs from cattle, sheep and goats were four (5.06%), 11 (14.1%) and 11 isolates (25%), respectively. The blaZ gene was detected in 20 out of 26 S. aureus isolates (76.9%), including four cattle (100%), nine sheep (81.8%) and seven goats (63.6%). Two of the four cattle isolates possessing the blaZ gene also had the tetK gene. Of the nine sheep isolates harboring the blaZ gene, one possessed the mecA and tetK genes together. Of the seven goat isolates with blaZ gene, one harbored the tetM gene. None of the S. aureus isolates were positive for the ermA and ermC genes.

Conclusions:

In contrast to cattle, S. aureus is frequently present in the nose of sheep and goats, which may represent the primary reservoir of S. aureus in small ruminant flocks. This study also showed that nasal isolates of S. aureus from healthy ruminants might be a potential reservoir of antimicrobial-resistance.

1. Background

Staphylococcus aureus is a commensal and a major opportunistic pathogen that causes a wide variety of diseases in humans and animals, with a high impact on public health and the livestock industry (1, 2). This organism is recognized worldwide as a major pathogen causing mastitis in lactating cows, sheep and goats (3). Although the udder is considered to be the main source of infection, other areas such as the nares are probable sources of contamination for udder and milk in dairy farms (4). Recently, isolation of S. aureus from the nares of farm animals has been frequently reported (5-7).

Antimicrobial resistance profile of S. aureus is also of great concern. β-lactams, macrolides and tetracyclines are commonly used antibiotics for the treatment of staphylococcal infections and the level of resistance to these antibiotics is growing quickly among staphylococci (8). Resistance genes for penicillin (blaZ, which encodes β-lactamase), methicillin (mecA, which encodes a low-affinity penicillin-binding protein [PBP2a]), erythromycin (ermA and ermB, which encode ribosomal methylases), and tetracycline (tetK and tetM, which encode a tetracycline efflux pump and a ribosomal protection protein, respectively) have been frequently reported among isolates of S. aureus (9-11).

Several studies have provided evidence of transmission of antibiotic-resistant S. aureus (of particular concern Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)) among animals, farm environments, and farmers (12-14). Additionally, transfer of antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to humans (or their resistance genes) via the food chain (15), poultry (16), meat and dairy products (17, 18), has already been reported. This may represent a zoonotic risk factor for human colonization or difficult-to-treat infections. Therefore, more attention needs to be paid to detection of antibiotic-resistant S. aureus in order to achieve an effective treatment for S. aureus infections. In human medicine, S. aureus nasal carriage has been extensively studied in patients and healthy individuals (19, 20). In Iran, resistance and nasal carriage of S. aureus in healthy children (21) and health care workers (22) have also been studied. The latter research also concluded that S. aureus could be transmitted from health care workers to hospitalized patients. However, neither the S. aureus nasal carriage rate nor its antimicrobial susceptibly patterns are known in ruminants.

2. Objectives

The aims of the present study were to determine the frequency of nasal carriage of S. aureus among healthy ruminants and to investigate the genes involved in resistance to penicillin (blaZ), methicillin (mecA), tetracycline (tetK and tetM) and erythromycin (ermA and ermC) by the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Sample Collection

During the period between January 2011 and May 2012, a total of 201 nasal swab samples were taken from healthy ruminants including 79 cattle, 78 sheep and 44 goats housed in three different areas (Khorramabad, Noor Abad, and Urmia) of Iran. For all animals, cotton swabs were inserted into the anterior nares of both left and right nostrils and were softly rolled against the inner walls. The Urmia University of Veterinary Ethical Committee approved the animal protocol for this study (K2-427). One swab was used to take a sample from both nostrils and then stored in Tryptone Soy Broth (TSB) (Merck, Germany) at 4°C prior to laboratory analysis. Cultures were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours and then streaked directly on plates of Mannitol Salt Agar (MSA) (Merck, Germany) and incubated at 37°C for 18 to 48 hours (23). The suspected S. aureus colonies were purified on sheep blood agar plates and then identified by standard biochemical tests including Gram staining, catalase reaction, oxidase reaction, mannitol fermentation and coagulase production (24). Staphylococcus aureus isolates were stored in TSB containing 15% glycerol at -20°C until needed.

3.2. DNA Extraction

For DNA extraction, S. aureus isolates were grown over night at 37°C in Brain Heart Infusion broth (BHI, Merck, Germany). Cells were pelleted and suspended in 200 μL of sterile Tris-Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (TE) buffer (pH 8.0). Next, DNA was extracted using the Genomic DNA purification Kit (Thermo Scientific, Germany) with some modifications. The extracted DNA was then stored at -20°C.

3.3. Genotypic Determination of Staphylococcus aureus

Identification of the S. aureus species was confirmed by PCR amplification of the nuc gene using primers and protocol described by Brakstad et al. (25).

3.4. Polymerase Chain Reaction Amplification of the Antibiotic Resistance Genes

Polymerase Chain Reaction amplification of antibiotic resistance genes was carried out in a CORBETT thermocycler (Model CP2-003, Australia) using PCR master kit (SinaClon, Iran) with 25 μL mixtures including 12.5 μL of 2X master mix, 1 μM of each primer and 4 μL of extracted DNA. Sterile water was added instead of nucleic acids for the negative control. The mecA PCR program included denaturation at 94°C for five minutes followed by 40 cycles at 94°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 30 seconds, 72°C for one minutes. A final extension at 72°C for five minutes completed the amplification (26). The blaZ amplification was performed under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94°C for five minutes followed by 35 cycles at 94°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 30 seconds, 72°C for 30 seconds with a final extension of 72°C for 10 minutes (27). The PCR conditions for tet (K and M) and also erm (A and C) genes were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for three minutes followed by 30 cycles at 94°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 30 seconds, 72°C for 30 seconds with a final extension at 72°C for four minutes (28). The PCR primers used to detect the studied antibiotic resistance genes were synthesized by the SinaClon Company of Tehran, Iran (Table 1).

Table 1.

Oligonucleotide Sequences of the Primers Used in This Study

Target GeneSequence 5' - 3'PCR ProductReference
mecA
FAAAATCGATGGTAAAGGTTGGC532 bp(26)
RAGTTCTGCAGTACCGGATTTGC
blaZ
FAAGAGATTTGCCTATGCTTC518 bp(27)
RGCTTGACCACTTTTATCAGC
tetK
FGTAGCGACAATAGGTAATAGT360 bp(28)
RGTAGTGACAATAAACCTCCTA
tetM
FAGTGGAGCGATTACAGAA158 bp(28)
RCATATGTCCTGGCGTGTCTA
ermA
FAAGCGGTAAACCCCTCTGA190 bp(28)
RTTCGCAAATCCCTTCTCAAC
ermC
FAATCGTCAATTCCTGCATGT299 bp(28)
RTAATCGTGGAATACGGGTTTG

3.5. Agarose Gel Electrophoresis

The PCR products were separated on 1.2% (w/v) agarose gel (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) containing 0.5 µg/mL ethidium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). Electrophoresis was performed in 0.5x Tris/Borate/EDTA (TBE) buffer at 100 V for one hour. The resulting PCR products were visualized under UV light using a transilluminator (BTS-20M, Japan) and the 100 bp DNA ladder plus was used as the molecular size marker.

4. Results

Among the 201 nasal samples of ruminants tested in this study, 26 were positive for S. aureus recovery. The amount of S. aureus-positive nasal swabs corresponding to cattle, sheep and goats were four (5.06%), 11 (14.1%) and 11 (25%) isolates, respectively.

Using the PCR assay, detection of determinants of resistance to methicillin (mecA), penicillin (blaZ), tetracyclines (tetK and tetM), and MLSB (ermA and ermC) was done through successful amplification of a unique DNA fragment of the expected sizes (Figures 1, 2 and 3).

Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of Polymerase Chain Reaction Product of mecA Gene
Lane M: 100 bp DNA marker (Fermentas, Germany); Lane 1: positive control of amplified 532-bp DNA (S. aureus ATCC 33591); Lane 2: negative control (reaction mixture without DNA); Lanes 3 - 6: representative S. aureus nasal isolates negative for mecA; Lane 7: the only S. aureus isolate positive for the mecA gene.

Lane M: 100 bp DNA marker (Fermentas, Germany); Lane 1: positive control of amplified 532-bp DNA (S. aureus ATCC 33591); Lane 2: negative control (reaction mixture without DNA); Lanes 3 - 6: representative S. aureus nasal isolates negative for mecA; Lane 7: the only S. aureus isolate positive for the mecA gene.

Figure 1.

Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of Polymerase Chain Reaction Product of mecA Gene

Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of Polymerase Chain Reaction Product of Blaz Gene
Lane M: Gene ruler, 100 bp DNA ladder plus marker (Fermentas, Germany); Lane 1: positive control of amplified 518-bp DNA (S. aureus ATCC 29213); Lane 2: negative control (reaction mixture without DNA); Lanes 3 - 9: representative S. aureus nasal isolates positive for the blaZ gene.

Lane M: Gene ruler, 100 bp DNA ladder plus marker (Fermentas, Germany); Lane 1: positive control of amplified 518-bp DNA (S. aureus ATCC 29213); Lane 2: negative control (reaction mixture without DNA); Lanes 3 - 9: representative S. aureus nasal isolates positive for the blaZ gene.

Figure 2.

Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of Polymerase Chain Reaction Product of Blaz Gene

Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of Polymerase Chain Reaction Products of tet (K and M) and erm (A and C) Genes
Lanes M: 100 bp DNA marker (Fermentas, Germany); Lane 1: positive control for tetK gene of amplified 360-bp DNA (S. aureus ATCC BAA-39); Lane 2: negative control (reaction mixture without DNA); Lanes 3 - 5: S. aureus isolates positive for tetK gene; Lane 6: positive control for tetM gene of amplified 158-bp DNA fragment (S. aureus T0131); Lane 7: negative control (reaction mixture without DNA); Lanes 8 - 10: representative S. aureus nasal isolates negative for tetM; Lane 11: the only S. aureus isolate positive for tetM gene; Lane 12: positive control for ermA gene of amplified 190-bp DNA (S. aureus T0131); Lane 13: negative control for ermA gene; Lanes 14 - 16: representative S. aureus nasal isolates negative for ermA gene; Lane 17: positive control for ermC gene of amplified 299-bp DNA (S. aureus 71193); Lane 18: negative control for ermC gene; Lanes 19 - 21: representative S. aureus nasal isolates negative for ermC gene.

Lanes M: 100 bp DNA marker (Fermentas, Germany); Lane 1: positive control for tetK gene of amplified 360-bp DNA (S. aureus ATCC BAA-39); Lane 2: negative control (reaction mixture without DNA); Lanes 3 - 5: S. aureus isolates positive for tetK gene; Lane 6: positive control for tetM gene of amplified 158-bp DNA fragment (S. aureus T0131); Lane 7: negative control (reaction mixture without DNA); Lanes 8 - 10: representative S. aureus nasal isolates negative for tetM; Lane 11: the only S. aureus isolate positive for tetM gene; Lane 12: positive control for ermA gene of amplified 190-bp DNA (S. aureus T0131); Lane 13: negative control for ermA gene; Lanes 14 - 16: representative S. aureus nasal isolates negative for ermA gene; Lane 17: positive control for ermC gene of amplified 299-bp DNA (S. aureus 71193); Lane 18: negative control for ermC gene; Lanes 19 - 21: representative S. aureus nasal isolates negative for ermC gene.

Figure 3.

Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of Polymerase Chain Reaction Products of tet (K and M) and erm (A and C) Genes

Table 2.

The Frequencies of Resistance Genes Amongst Twenty-Six S. aureus Nasal Isolates From Ruminants

Animal OriginNumber of IsolatesAntibiotic Resistance Gene
blaZmecAtet (K, M)erm (A, C)
Cattle
2+---
2+-tetK-
-----
Sheep
8+---
1++tetK-
2----
Goat
6+---
1+-tetM-
4----

5. Discussion

The colonized S. aureus in the ruminant’s nasal cavities may be considered as a probable source of staphylococcal infections (4, 6, 29). In this study, a total of 26 S. aureus isolates were identified from 201 nasal swabs (12.9%) of ruminants including cattle, sheep and goats, by culture as well as species specific PCR. The frequency detected in the present study was, however, lower than the 43.7% reported for the same species in Saudi Arabia (23).

The present study indicated a relatively low prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage (5.06%) in healthy cattle. This finding agrees with earlier reports from Norway and Sweden that evaluated potential sources of S. aureus in dairy herds (6, 30). However, this study showed a higher percentage of S. aureus nasal carriage in healthy sheep and goats. Such results are also similar to those previously reported for Norwegian dairy goats (6, 29) and dairy sheep (4, 6). Although the percentage of S. aureus nasal carriage in cattle was remarkably lower than those observed in sheep and goats, yet the reason for this is not clear. This variation could at least partly be due to differences in nasal physiology and self-care behaviors such as nose licking in cattle.

The high prevalence of S. aureus in the nasal cavity of small ruminants may be a predisposing factor for subsequent Intra-Mammary Infection (IMI), which needs additional comparative studies. In this regard, the nasal cavity of small ruminants has been proposed as the primary reservoir of S. aureus by some researchers (4, 6, 29).

Emergence of drug resistance organisms, especially MRSA, is a particular concern to both animal health and public health. There is now increasing evidence that MRSA can colonize and cause infection in companion animals as well as animals of the food chain (31). Furthermore, a few studies have reported a lower prevalence of MRSA in bovine and ovine mastitis (32, 33). Therefore, efforts should be made to characterize possible reservoirs in order to reduce the spread of MRSA. It has been shown that MRSA can colonize nares of ruminants (23). Similar to the results of other studies (34, 35), MRSA was not isolated from any of the cattle nasal swabs. However, this finding was inconsistent with the findings of Spohr et al. (36). In contrast to a previous study (37), none of the nasal isolates from goats carried the mecA gene. In the present study, only one out of 26 (3.84%) isolates harbored the mecA gene, which originated from sheep. This result is consistent with the findings of Gharsa et al. (7) where five of 163 healthy sheep (3%) carried MRSA in their nares. As, zoonotic transfer of MRSA has been reviewed between different animals and humans (38), more research should be done in this field in different parts of Iran to apply necessary management and health measures to prevent the spread of MRSA strains.

In the current study, a total of 20 out of 26 S. aureus nasal isolates possessed the blaZ gene. In similar studies conducted in Tunisia to assess S. aureus nasal carriage in sheep (7), cattle and goats (41), lower rates of blaZ-carrying S. aureus were identified. Differences in antibiotic regimens used in treating infections may explain these discrepancies among countries. Extensive use of β-lactam group of antibiotics for the treatment of animals in Iran (39) might explain the development of penicillin resistance among microbial strains isolated from farms animals in several reports from Iran (40, 41). These results indicate the need for effective transmission control of penicillin resistance in ruminants.

In Iran, tetracycline class of antibiotics remain as the first-line treatment of infections in livestock (42). Of the 26 isolates tested, four (15.4%) were positive for the presence of tet (K and M) genes, of which two isolates were obtained from cattle, while the other two isolates were from sheep and goats. Our results are in contrast with the results of Gharsa et al. (43), where no tetK and tetM genes were detected in cattle and goats nasal S. aureus isolates, yet similar to those reported for sheep isolates (7). It should be noted that the tet+ isolates harbored tetK more frequently than tetM, indicating that the tetracycline resistance mechanism is commonly mediated by the tetracycline efflux pump. This can be explained by their typical genetic locations, for example the tetK gene on small multicopy plasmids and tetM on conjugative transposon Tn916, which contribute to the spread of these determinants (44).

In this study, the ermA and ermC genes were not detected in any of the S. aureus isolates. This finding is consistent with previous studies on S. aureus isolates from nasal cavity of cattle and goats (34). However, in a study carried out by Gharsa et al. (7), 5.47% of the S. aureus isolates from nasal cavity of healthy sheep were positive for the ermC gene (7).

In general, the resistance gene patterns observed for S. aureus isolates from the nasal cavity of ruminants seems to reflect the patterns of drug therapy in these animal species. This was confirmed by veterinarians in the studied regions where the treatment plan of ruminant clinical infections is mainly based on using roughly 50% penicillin, 30% tetracycline, 20% other antibiotics including tylosin and gentamicin, and seldom use of macrolide antibiotics.

The presence of resistance genes among nasal isolates of S. aureus from ruminants in this study indicates that these species can serve as a cause of infection for humans. Transmission of S. aureus and its methicillin resistant variant between animals and humans has been frequently reported via direct contact (45) or indirect routes such as the environment and food chain (14, 46).

In conclusion, our findings show that the nares of healthy ruminants may represent a reservoir for antibiotic resistant S. aureus, underscoring the need for further extensive research to devise contextual control and prevention strategies. To our knowledge, this is the first survey in Iran examining the prevalence and resistance characteristics of S. aureus nasal isolates from ruminants.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Luzzago C, Locatelli C, Franco A, Scaccabarozzi L, Gualdi V, Vigano R, et al. Clonal diversity, virulence-associated genes and antimicrobial resistance profile of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from nasal cavities and soft tissue infections in wild ruminants in Italian Alps. Vet Microbiol. 2014;170(1-2):157-61. [PubMed ID: 24565474]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.01.016.

  • 2.

    Peton V, Le Loir Y. Staphylococcus aureus in veterinary medicine. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;21:602-15. [PubMed ID: 23974078]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2013.08.011.

  • 3.

    Vautor E, Magnone V, Rios G, Le Brigand K, Bergonier D, Lina G, et al. Genetic differences among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from dairy ruminant species: a single-dye DNA microarray approach. Vet Microbiol. 2009;133(1-2):105-14. [PubMed ID: 18640795]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.06.006.

  • 4.

    Vautor E, Abadie G, Guibert JM, Chevalier N, Pepin M. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in dairy sheep. Vet Microbiol. 2005;106(3-4):235-9. [PubMed ID: 15778029]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.11.019.

  • 5.

    Nemeghaire S, Argudin MA, Haesebrouck F, Butaye P. Epidemiology and molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage isolates from bovines. BMC Vet Res. 2014;10:153. [PubMed ID: 25011427]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-153.

  • 6.

    Mork T, Kvitle B, Jorgensen HJ. Reservoirs of Staphylococcus aureus in meat sheep and dairy cattle. Vet Microbiol. 2012;155(1):81-7. [PubMed ID: 21903348]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.08.010.

  • 7.

    Gharsa H, Ben Slama K, Lozano C, Gomez-Sanz E, Klibi N, Ben Sallem R, et al. Prevalence, antibiotic resistance, virulence traits and genetic lineages of Staphylococcus aureus in healthy sheep in Tunisia. Vet Microbiol. 2012;156(3-4):367-73. [PubMed ID: 22176760]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.11.009.

  • 8.

    Fluit AC, Visser MR, Schmitz FJ. Molecular detection of antimicrobial resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14(4):836-71. [PubMed ID: 11585788]. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.14.4.836-871.2001.

  • 9.

    Wang Y, Wu CM, Lu LM, Ren GW, Cao XY, Shen JZ. Macrolide-lincosamide-resistant phenotypes and genotypes of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine clinical mastitis. Vet Microbiol. 2008;130(1-2):118-25. [PubMed ID: 18272297]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.12.012.

  • 10.

    Ardic N, Ozyurt M, Sareyyupoglu B, Haznedaroglu T. Investigation of erythromycin and tetracycline resistance genes in methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005;26(3):213-8. [PubMed ID: 16099625]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.06.013.

  • 11.

    Rosato AE, Kreiswirth BN, Craig WA, Eisner W, Climo MW, Archer GL. mecA-blaZ corepressors in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47(4):1460-3. [PubMed ID: 12654694].

  • 12.

    Loncaric I, Brunthaler R, Spergser J. Suspected goat-to-human transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 398. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(5):1625-6. [PubMed ID: 23447633]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03052-12.

  • 13.

    Lim SK, Nam HM, Jang GC, Lee HS, Jung SC, Kim TS. Transmission and persistence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in milk, environment, and workers in dairy cattle farms. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2013;10(8):731-6. [PubMed ID: 23746358]. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2012.1436.

  • 14.

    Peterson AE, Davis MF, Awantang G, Limbago B, Fosheim GE, Silbergeld EK. Correlation between animal nasal carriage and environmental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates at U.S. horse and cattle farms. Vet Microbiol. 2012;160(3-4):539-43. [PubMed ID: 22795260]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.06.032.

  • 15.

    Angulo FJ, Nargund VN, Chiller TC. Evidence of an association between use of anti-microbial agents in food animals and anti-microbial resistance among bacteria isolated from humans and the human health consequences of such resistance. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2004;51(8-9):374-9. [PubMed ID: 15525369]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0450.2004.00789.x.

  • 16.

    Huys G, D'Haene K, Van Eldere J, von Holy A, Swings J. Molecular diversity and characterization of tetracycline-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from a poultry processing plant. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71(1):574-9. [PubMed ID: 15640240]. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.1.574-579.2005.

  • 17.

    Normanno G, La Salandra G, Dambrosio A, Quaglia NC, Corrente M, Parisi A, et al. Occurrence, characterization and antimicrobial resistance of enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus isolated from meat and dairy products. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;115(3):290-6. [PubMed ID: 17321621]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.10.049.

  • 18.

    Ho J, O'Donoghue MM, Boost MV. Occupational exposure to raw meat: a newly-recognized risk factor for Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization amongst food handlers. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2014;217(2-3):347-53. [PubMed ID: 23999135]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.07.009.

  • 19.

    Olalekan AO, Taiwo SS, Smith SI, Shittu AO, Kolawole DO, Schaumburg F. Persistent Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in ambulatory human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in Nigeria: Risk factors and molecular features. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2014. [PubMed ID: 25655992]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2014.12.003.

  • 20.

    Lozano C, Gomez-Sanz E, Benito D, Aspiroz C, Zarazaga M, Torres C. Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage, virulence traits, antibiotic resistance mechanisms, and genetic lineages in healthy humans in Spain, with detection of CC398 and CC97 strains. Int J Med Microbiol. 2011;301(6):500-5. [PubMed ID: 21570348]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2011.02.004.

  • 21.

    Erami M, Soltani B, Taghavi Ardakani A, Moravveji A, Haji Rezaei M, Soltani S, et al. Nasal Carriage and Resistance Pattern of Multidrug Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Among Healthy Children in Kashan, Iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014;16(9). eeeee21346. [PubMed ID: 25593734]. https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.21346.

  • 22.

    Zeinali Nia N, Pourmand MR, Afrough P. Comparison of Hypervariable Region (HVR) of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Nasal Carriers and Clinical Samples. Jundishapur J Micro. 2013;6(9). eeeee7686. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.7686.

  • 23.

    Alzohairy M. Colonization and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among farm animals in Saudi Arabia. J Bacterio Res. 2011;3(4):63-8.

  • 24.

    Boerlin P, Kuhnert P, Hussy D, Schaellibaum M. Methods for identification of Staphylococcus aureus isolates in cases of bovine mastitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(2):767-71. [PubMed ID: 12574280].

  • 25.

    Brakstad OG, Aasbakk K, Maeland JA. Detection of nuc gene. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30(7):1654-60. [PubMed ID: 1629319].

  • 26.

    Murakami K, Minamide W, Wada K, Nakamura E, Teraoka H, Watanabe S. Identification of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29(10):2240-4. [PubMed ID: 1939577].

  • 27.

    Vesterholm-Nielsen M, Olhom Larsen M, Elmerdahl Olsen J, Moller Aarestrup F. Occurrence of the Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis in Denmark. Acta Vet Scand. 1999;40(3):279-86. [PubMed ID: 10605145].

  • 28.

    Strommenger B, Kettlitz C, Werner G, Witte W. Multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous detection of nine clinically relevant antibiotic resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(9):4089-94. [PubMed ID: 12958230].

  • 29.

    Mork T, Kvitle B, Mathisen T, Jorgensen HJ. Bacteriological and molecular investigations of Staphylococcus aureus in dairy goats. Vet Microbiol. 2010;141(1-2):134-41. [PubMed ID: 19733450]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.08.019.

  • 30.

    Capurro A, Aspan A, Ericsson Unnerstad H, Persson Waller K, Artursson K. Identification of potential sources of Staphylococcus aureus in herds with mastitis problems. J Dairy Sci. 2010;93(1):180-91. [PubMed ID: 20059917]. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2471.

  • 31.

    Petinaki E, Spiliopoulou I. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among companion and food-chain animals: impact of human contacts. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(7):626-34. [PubMed ID: 22550956]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03881.x.

  • 32.

    Fluit AC. Livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(8):735-44. [PubMed ID: 22512702]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03846.x.

  • 33.

    Goni P, Vergara Y, Ruiz J, Albizu I, Vila J, Gomez-Lus R. Antibiotic resistance and epidemiological typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains from ovine and rabbit mastitis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004;23(3):268-72. [PubMed ID: 15164968]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.07.016.

  • 34.

    Bagcigil FA, Moodley A, Baptiste KE, Jensen VF, Guardabassi L. Occurrence, species distribution, antimicrobial resistance and clonality of methicillin- and erythromycin-resistant staphylococci in the nasal cavity of domestic animals. Vet Microbiol. 2007;121(3-4):307-15. [PubMed ID: 17270365]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.12.007.

  • 35.

    Weese JS, Hannon SJ, Booker CW, Gow S, Avery BP, Reid-Smith RJ. The prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in feedlot cattle. Zoonoses Public Health. 2012;59(2):144-7. [PubMed ID: 21824380]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2011.01428.x.

  • 36.

    Spohr M, Rau J, Friedrich A, Klittich G, Fetsch A, Guerra B, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in three dairy herds in southwest Germany. Zoonoses Public Health. 2011;58(4):252-61. [PubMed ID: 20630047]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01344.x.

  • 37.

    Chu C, Yu C, Lee Y, Su Y. Genetically divergent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and sec-dependent mastitis of dairy goats in Taiwan. BMC Vet Res. 2012;8:39. [PubMed ID: 22455622]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-39.

  • 38.

    Weese JS, van Duijkeren E. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in veterinary medicine. Vet Microbiol. 2010;140(3-4):418-29. [PubMed ID: 19246166]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.01.039.

  • 39.

    Movassagh MH. Detection of beta lactam antibiotics residues in Iranian ultra high temperature milk by Beta star test. Annals Bio Res. 2011;2:95-8.

  • 40.

    Jamali H, Radmehr B, Ismail S. Short communication: prevalence and antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine clinical mastitis. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97(4):2226-30. [PubMed ID: 24534509]. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7509.

  • 41.

    Sahebekhtiari N, Nochi Z, Eslampour MA, Dabiri H, Bolfion M, Taherikalani M, et al. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from raw milk of bovine subclinical mastitis in Tehran and Mashhad. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2011;58(2):113-21. [PubMed ID: 21715281]. https://doi.org/10.1556/AMicr.58.2011.2.4.

  • 42.

    Aalipour F, Mirlohi M, Jalali M. Determination of antibiotic consumption index for animal originated foods produced in animal husbandry in Iran, 2010. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2014;12(1):42. [PubMed ID: 24468281]. https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-336X-12-42.

  • 43.

    Gharsa H, Ben Slama K, Gomez-Sanz E, Lozano C, Zarazaga M, Messadi L, et al. Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus from nasal samples of healthy farm animals and pets in Tunisia. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2015;15(2):109-15. [PubMed ID: 25700041]. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2014.1655.

  • 44.

    Chopra I, Roberts M. Tetracycline antibiotics: mode of action, applications, molecular biology, and epidemiology of bacterial resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2001;65(2):232-60. [PubMed ID: 11381101]. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.65.2.232-260.2001.

  • 45.

    Deiters C, Gunnewig V, Friedrich AW, Mellmann A, Kock R. Are cases of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex (CC) 398 among humans still livestock-associated? Int J Med Microbiol. 2015;305(1):110-3. [PubMed ID: 25434977]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.11.007.

  • 46.

    Verkade E, Kluytmans J. Livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus CC398: animal reservoirs and human infections. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;21:523-30. [PubMed ID: 23473831]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2013.02.013.