Utilization of reliable methods for identifying carbapenemase-producing strains and determining their antibiotic resistance pattern could have a very important role in treatment of infections caused by these strains. This could be an important step in the control of hospital infections, in order to prevent patients’ mortality and to reduce health care costs (
3,
13). Since no study has so far been carried out for the evaluation of the frequency of
P. aeruginosa-producing KPC carbapenemase in Iran, in the present study, the presence of KPC carbapenemase was examined in
P. aeruginosa isolated from clinical samples of patients hospitalized at hospitals of Arak University of Medical Sciences, using the genotypic method of PCR. The efficiency of MHT and boronic acid phenotypic methods for identification of KPC enzyme was compared with the PCR.
Due to their wide range of activities, carbapenems are commonly used to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria, particularly Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBLs)-producing bacteria and AmpC enzyme-producing strains (
14). Spread of carbapenemase-producing bacteria throughout the world in the recent years has been considered as a major threat to public health. Among carbapenemases, KPC has a high frequency and has been commonly found in
K. pneumoniae and Enterobacter (
15). The enzyme is encoded by a gene located on mobile elements such as plasmids; this results in KPC gene transfer among bacteria. Furthermore, the KPC enzyme hydrolyses beta-lactam drugs, including monobactams, carbapenems, and third-generation cephalosporins (
16). The presence of this enzyme in
P. aeruginosa was first reported in Colombia, during year 2007 (
17) and subsequently in other countries such as Puerto Rico (
18), Trinidad and Tobago (
19), the United States, and China (
3,
6). Recent studies from Iran have also indicated the prevalence of KPC-producing bacteria (
20). The highest prevalence of KPC gene in Iran, examined by PCR, was reported in
K. pneumoniae by Hashemizadeh et al. as 11.9% (
21). In the present study, 13 isolates (12%) of
P. aeruginosa were positive for KPC, using PCR. This could indicate horizontal transfer of KPC genes among bacteria isolated from nosocomial infections in Iran. The prevalence of KPC in
P. aeruginosa was 4.1% in Puerto Rico; this was lower than the present study (
22). The pattern of antibiotic resistance in 13 KPC-producing isolates in the present study was such that they were all resistant to ceftazidime, gentamicin, amikacin, and ciprofloxacin. Thus, carbapenemase detection cannot be performed by antibiotic profiles in the laboratory. Phenotypic resistance caused by carbapenemase is affected by many factors such as strain, expression level, type, or enzyme variant, as well as the presence of other resistance mechanisms such as reduced permeability, secretory pumps, and other activities of beta-lactamases (
4). In the present study, the disk diffusion method showed that of 13 KPC-producing isolates, six and five were resistant to imipenem and meropenem, respectively.
The Modified Hodge Test is a sensitive phenotypic method for detection of carbapenemases, however, it cannot identify the enzyme type. Instead of the standard strain of
E. coli ATCC 25922, Pasteran et al. (
10) used the standard strain of
K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603 (lacking carbapenemases and sensitive to carbapenem) for the MHT. When the common indicator strain (
E. coli ATCC 25922) was used,
P. aeruginosa inhibited the growth of
E. coli standard strains; this resulted in an unexplainable test and decreasing of the test sensitivity and specificity. This problem was resolved through exchanging the indicator strain with the standard strain of
K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603. Of the 13 KPC-positive isolates obtained using the MHT method, 10 isolates were considered as KPC-producing strains. The results of the phenotypic method of boronic acid inhibitory effect on Group A carbapenemases identified 11 isolates, out of 13 KPC-positive isolates. The important point in interpretation of the results of phenotypic methods applied in the present study was their positivity in the strains being KPC negative in PCR. This represents the possible presence of other carbapenemase groups such as GES enzymes and various groups of metallo-beta-lactamase in the mentioned strains (given their resistance to imipenem and meropenem).
As a result, unlike the study carried out by Azimi et al. in Iran (
20), who only used the MHT phenotypic method to assess the prevalence of KPC-producing strains, using only the MHT method and its positivity in the examined isolates cannot be a reason for the presence KPC, and positive results can be caused by other carbapenemases, and in some cases, by CTX-M ESBLs along with a decrease in porins expression. Therefore, a definite confirmation of KPC-producing strains requires PCR followed by sequencing. The boronic acid method can detect KPC-producing strains, as well as GES amongst isolates. In isolates with AmpC overexpression and change in porins, boronic acid method may lead to false-positive results (
9,
23). Comparison of the two phenotypic methods used in this study showed that boronic acid is more sensitive than MHT in identification of KPC-producing strains (84.6% vs. 77%).