https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.27852

Antimicrobial Activity of Lactobacillus spp. Isolated From Fecal Flora of Healthy Breast-Fed Infants Against Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli

authors:

avatar Abolfazl Davoodabadi 1 , avatar Mohammad Mehdi Soltan Dallal 1 , 2 , * , avatar Elahe Lashani 2 , avatar Maryam Tajabadi Ebrahimi 3

Department of Pathobiology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
Food Microbiology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IR Iran
Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology: Vol.8, issue 12; e27852
published online: December 26, 2015
article type: Research Article
received: February 11, 2015
revised: April 12, 2015
accepted: May 24, 2015

how to cite: Davoodabadi A, Soltan Dallal M M, Lashani E, Tajabadi Ebrahimi M. Antimicrobial Activity of Lactobacillus spp. Isolated From Fecal Flora of Healthy Breast-Fed Infants Against Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8(12):e27852. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.27852.

Abstract

Background:

Among the enteric pathogens, diarrheagenic Escherichia coli are important causes of diarrhea in children in both developing and industrialized countries. Some Lactobacillus species are commonly used as probiotics, with effects especially against acute diarrhea in childhood.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to explore antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus strains isolated from fecal flora of healthy breast-fed infants against five diarrheagenic E. coli pathotypes such as enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) and enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC).

Materials and Methods:

Fecal samples were collected from seven healthy breast-fed infants between 1 to 18 months of age in Tehran city, Iran. Identification of Lactobacillus isolates was performed by biochemical and 16S rRNA gene sequencing methods. An agar well diffusion assay was used for detection of antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus isolates against five diarrheagenic E. coli pathotypes.

Results:

A total of 20 Lactobacillus isolates were identified from stool samples. Lactobacillus fermentum was the most frequently isolated strain, followed by L. plantarum and L. rhamnosus. Seven Lactobacillus strains including L. fermentum (four isolates), L. paracasei (one isolate), L. plantarum (one isolate) and L. rhamnosus (one isolate) had a mild inhibitory activity against diarrheagenic E. coli. The mechanism of inhibitory activity of Lactobacillus strains appeared to be due to the production of organic acids or hydrogen peroxide.

Conclusions:

Our findings show that Lactobacillus strains with human origin had a mild inhibitory activity against the diarrheagenic E. coli, and these strains may be useful as probiotic candidates in prevention of intestinal infections caused by diarrheagenic E. coli.

1. Background

Diarrheal disease is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality of infants in the developing world (1). A wide variety of microorganisms including bacteria, viruses, and parasites are the etiological agents of diarrhea (2). Among the bacteria, diarrheagenic Escherichia coli strains are most frequently associated with diarrhea in children in developing countries (3, 4). Diarrheagenic E. coli have been categorized to five major pathotypes: enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) and enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) (2).

Probiotic bacteria are defined as live microorganisms which when used in adequate amounts, have beneficial effects to the health of host (5). The emergence of bacterial pathogens with high resistance to antibiotics has caused scientists to suggest alternative disease prevention strategies such as the use of probiotics (6, 7). Some recent studies have documented the role of Lactobacillus in prevention and treatment of diarrheal infections caused by Shigella and Salmonella (8, 9). Lactobacillus species are found in plants, dairy products, as well as mouth, intestinal tract, and vagina of humans and many animals as normal flora (10, 11). Some studies reported that lactobacilli and bifidobacteria are dominant flora in the breast-fed infants (12). In separate studies, the antimicrobial activity of probiotic lactobacilli against diarrheagenic E. coli such as ETEC (13), EPEC (14), EHEC (15), EIEC (16), and EAEC (17) has been previously studied, but no study has investigated the antimicrobial activity of probiotic lactobacilli against all diarrheagenic E. coli pathotypes together.

2. Objectives

For this reason, we decided to explore antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus strains isolated from fecal flora of healthy breast-fed infants against five diarrheagenic E. coli pathotypes including EAEC, ETEC, EHEC, EPEC and EIEC.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Sample Collection

The study was conducted from April to December 2014. Fecal samples were collected from seven healthy breast-fed infants between 1 to 18 months of age at Farman Farmaian Health Care Center in Tehran city, Iran. The research ethics committee of Tehran university of medical sciences approved our study (No: 240.982) and informed parental consent was obtained.

3.2. Bacterial Isolation and Biochemical Identification

About one gram of each sample was cultured in Man, Rogosa, Sharpe broth (MRS broth, Scharlau, Spain) and incubated under anaerobic condition at 37°C for 48 - 72 hours, then was subcultured on MRS agar (Scharlau, Spain) plates and incubated under anaerobic condition at 37°C for 48 hours. Three to four colonies of each culture were selected for further characterization. Suspected colonies were tested by Gram stain and for catalase, fermentation of carbohydrates, hydrolysis of arginine, gas (CO2) production from glucose and growth at different temperatures (15°C , 45°C) (18-20).

3.3. Polymerase Chain Reaction Amplification

Total chromosomal DNA was extracted according to a previously described method (21). In the present study, bacterial universal 16S primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1522R (5′-GCAGCAGTAGGGAATCTTC-3′) (Bioneer, Korea) were used for identification of Lactobacillus isolates at the species level. 16S rRNA gene PCR was performed as described previously (22). The PCR products were sequenced (Bioneer, Korea) and the BLAST software (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) was used to compare the determined sequences with the sequences deposited in NCBI GenBank. L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 was used as positive control.

3.4. Antimicrobial Activity

Antimicrobial activity was carried out according to the agar well diffusion assay as described previously (23). Diarrheagenic E. coli were cultured in Luria broth (Scharlau, Spain) for 24 hours, and then microbial density was adjusted to 107 CFU/mL and cultured on nutrition agar. Lactobacillus isolates were grown in MRS broth for 20 hours. Cell free culture supernatants (CFCS) were obtained by centrifuging the culture broth at 10000 g for 10 minutes and 100 μL of the CFCS was placed into the wells of the nutrition agar and the nutrition agar plates were incubated at 37°C for 14 - 15 hours. The diameter of the clear zones around each well was measured. Lactobacillus isolates with clear zones less than 11 mm, 11 to 16 mm, 17 to 22 mm and more than 23 mm were grouped as negative (−), mild (+), strong (++), and very strong (+++) inhibitor isolates, respectively. The L. rhamnosus GG was used as positive control and sterile MRS broth was used as negative control. The antimicrobial activity was tested against references strains, including EAEC 042, ETEC H10407, EHEC O157:H7 EDL933, EPEC E2348/69 and EIEC 4608-58.

Two major mechanisms of antimicrobial activity are production of organic acids, which reduce the pH and the production of hydrogen peroxide. The production of bacteriocins may be another mechanism of antimicrobial activity (24). For these reasons, the pH of CFCS was measured and changed to 6.5 with NaOH (Merck, Germany, 2.5M) and then catalase (1 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was added to CFCS and incubated at 25°C for 1 hour. The stability of the inhibitory activity of Lactobacillus isolates was also investigated by a heat-treatment (100°C, 15 minutes) and also by enzymatic treatment of the CFCS. In enzymatic treatment assay, three proteolytic enzymes including trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), pepsin (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and proteinase K (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) were added to the CFCS with final concentrations of 200 mg/mL, 200 mg/ml and 1 mg/mL, respectively. The CFCS was incubated at 37 °C for 1 hour before the agar well diffusion assay (25).

4. Results

4.1. Isolation and Identification of Lactobacillus Species

A total of 20 colonies were isolated from 7 stool samples (2 - 3 colonies per sample). All the isolates were Gram positive and catalase negative. Primary identification of 20 Lactobacillus isolates was performed on the basis of biochemical profiles (carbohydrate fermentations, arginine hydrolysis, CO2 production and growth at different temperatures). Finally, the identification of the isolates was confirmed by sequencing of 16S rRNA gene (Figure 1). According to 16S rRNA sequencing, L. fermentum was the most frequently isolated species (10 isolates), followed by L. plantarum (3 isolates), L. rhamnosus (3 isolates), L. paracasei (2 isolates), L. acidophilus (1 isolate) and L. brevis (1 isolate).

16S RNA Gene Polymerase Chain Reaction Products (757 bp)
Lane M, 100 bp DNA marker (Sinaclon, Iran); Lane N, Negative control; Lane P, Positive control (L. acidophilus ATCC 4356); Lanes 1 - 6, Lactobacillus isolates. For the negative control PCR was conducted without adding DNA.

Lane M, 100 bp DNA marker (Sinaclon, Iran); Lane N, Negative control; Lane P, Positive control (L. acidophilus ATCC 4356); Lanes 1 - 6, Lactobacillus isolates. For the negative control PCR was conducted without adding DNA.

Figure 1.

16S RNA Gene Polymerase Chain Reaction Products (757 bp)

4.2. Antimicrobial Activity

Antimicrobial activity assay showed that seven Lactobacillus isolates (35%) had inhibitory activity against diarrheagenic E. coli (Table 1). L. fermentum S1 and L. fermentum S2 were obtained from a boy at the age of thirty-four days. L. fermentum S16 was isolated from a girl with four months of age. L. fermentum S8 was isolated from a boy with eight months of age. L. paracasei S14 was isolated from a girl at the age of three days. L. plantarum S17 was isolated from a girl at twelve months of age and L. rhamnosus S19 was isolated from a boy at ten months of age.

Table 1.

Antimicrobial Activity of Cell Free Culture Supernatants of the Lactobacillus Isolates Against Diarrheagenic Escherichia colia

CFCS of the Lactobacillus IsolatesETEC H10407EAEC 042EHEC EDL933EIEC 4608-58EPEC E2348/69
CFCS with no treatment
L. rhamnosus GG+b++++
L. fermentum S1+++++
L. fermentum S2 +++-+
L. fermentum S8+++++
L. fermentum S16+++++
L. paracasei S14+-+--
L. plantarum S17+++++
L. rhamnosus S19+++++
Heat (100°C, 15 min) or enzymatic treatment
L. rhamnosus GG+++++
L. fermentum S1+++++
L. fermentum S2 +++-+
L. fermentum S8+++++
L. fermentum S16+++++
L. paracasei S14+-+--
L. plantarum S17+++++
L. rhamnosus S19+++++
CFCS adjusted pH 6.5 and catalase (1 mg/mL)
L. rhamnosus GG-----
L. fermentum S1-----
L. fermentum S2-----
L. fermentum S8-----
L. fermentum S16-----
L. paracasei S14-----
L. plantarum S17-----
L. rhamnosus S19-----

aAbbreviation: CFCS, cell free culture supernatants.

bInterpretation of zone diameter of inhibition: –, less than 11 mm; +, 11 - 16 mm; ++, 17 - 22 mm; and +++, more than 23 mm.

Our Lacobacillus isolates, like positive control strain, had a mild inhibitory activity against the diarrheagenic E. coli. Cell free culture supernatants of all the Lactobacillus isolates with no treatment inhibited the growth of both ETEC H10407 and EHEC O157:H7 EDL933 (Figure 2). Among the seven Lactobacillus isolates, five isolates including three L. fermentum (S1, S8 and S16), L. plantarum S17 and L. rhamnosus S19 inhibited all the diarrheagenic E. coli. Heat-treatment or enzymatic treatment (trypsin, pepsin, proteinase K) of the CFCS did not affect the antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus isolates, but when the CFCS was adjusted to pH 6.5 and treated with catalase, the antimicrobial activity of the CFCS was disappeared.

Antimicrobial Activity of Cell Free Culture Supernatants of Lactobacillus Isolates
A, Antimicrobial activity with no treatment against ETEC H10407; B, EHEC O157:H7 EDL933. Well 1, L. fermentum S1; Well 2, L. fermentum S2; Well 3, L. fermentum S8; Well 4, L. fermentum S16; Well 5, L. paracasei S14; Well 6, L. plantarum S17; Well 7, L. rhamnosus S19; Well P, positive control (L. rhamnosus GG); Well N, negative control (sterile MRS broth).

A, Antimicrobial activity with no treatment against ETEC H10407; B, EHEC O157:H7 EDL933. Well 1, L. fermentum S1; Well 2, L. fermentum S2; Well 3, L. fermentum S8; Well 4, L. fermentum S16; Well 5, L. paracasei S14; Well 6, L. plantarum S17; Well 7, L. rhamnosus S19; Well P, positive control (L. rhamnosus GG); Well N, negative control (sterile MRS broth).

Figure 2.

Antimicrobial Activity of Cell Free Culture Supernatants of Lactobacillus Isolates

5. Discussion

Among the enteric pathogens, diarrheagenic E. coli are important causes of diarrhea in both developing and industrialized countries (2). Increasing antimicrobial resistance among the diarrheagenic E. coli has been reported in several studies (26, 27). Although antibiotics are useful in a wide variety of bacterial infections, emergence of antibiotic resistant bacteria necessitates the development of novel therapeutic and preventive approaches (28, 29). The prevention and treatment of bacterial infections with probiotics is an interesting field of current biomedical research. Lactobacillus strains with probiotic potential are used in food industry and also used as biotherapeutic agents (9).

In the present study, the most frequently isolated Lactobacillus species from fecal flora of infants were L. fermentum, followed by L. plantarum and L. rhamnosus. Arici et al. (30) reported that the most frequently isolated Lactobacillus species in the feces of infants and children less than 2 years of age are L. rhamnosus, L. paracasei and L. fermentum, respectively. In our study, in accordance with Arici et al. (30) L. rhamnosus and L. fermentum were isolated from infant faces, but in Arici et al. study (30) L. rhamnosus was the most recovered species. In another study by Mirlohi et al. (31) the L. acidophilus and L .plantarum were the most recovered species from the feces of healthy infants between 1 to 19 months. Variations in lactobacilli flora in infant feces may be due to differences in feeding (breast or formula) and the geographical zone. Also, variations in methodology may account for the differences, since identification of lactobacilli by traditional biochemical methods is very difficult (32, 33).

In our study, four Lactobacillus species including L. fermentum, L. paracasei, L. plantarum and L. rhamnosus had antimicrobial activity against diarrheagenic E. coli. In previous studies by Tsai et al. (34) and Lin et al. (17) have been previously reported that L .acidophilus RY2, L. salivarius MM1 and L. paracasei En4 isolated from healthy infant feces significantly inhibit the growth of EAEC and ETEC. The L. paracasei En4 in these studies, in accordance with our study had antimicrobial activity against EAEC and ETEC. Also, in another study by Michail and Abernathy (35), antimicrobial activity of L. plantarum 299v strain with intestinal flora origin against EPEC has been shown. Other Lactobacillus species with intestinal flora origin, such as L. acidophilus LB (36), L. casei DN-114 001 (14), L. fermentum (9) and L. helveticus R0052 (37) have been previously shown to inhibit infection by diarrheagenic E. coli such as EHEC or EPEC within the intestinal epithelial barrier.

When the CFCS of our Lactobacillus was adjusted to pH 6.5 and treated with catalase, the antimicrobial activity was disappeared, but heating or protease treatment did not destroy the antimicrobial activity of CFCS. However, some bacteriocins may be resistant to heat, these findings suggest that the production of bacteriocins or bacteriocin-like compounds did not involve in the mechanism of antimicrobial activity. The inhibition of diarrheagenic E. coli growth appeared to be due to the production of organic acids or hydrogen peroxide produced by the Lactobacillus strains. Several studies have reported that a pH-dependent mechanism was involved in the antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus strains (38, 39).

In conclusion, our findings suggest that Lactobacillus strains with human origin have a mild inhibitory activity against the diarrheagenic E. coli and these strains may be useful as probiotic candidates in prevention of intestinal infections caused by diarrheagenic E. coli.

References

  • 1.

    Parashar UD, Bresee JS, Glass RI. The global burden of diarrhoeal disease in children. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(4):236. [PubMed ID: 12764488].

  • 2.

    Nataro JP, Kaper JB. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11(1):142-201. [PubMed ID: 9457432].

  • 3.

    O'Ryan M, Prado V, Pickering LK. A millennium update on pediatric diarrheal illness in the developing world. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis. 2005;16(2):125-36. [PubMed ID: 15825143].

  • 4.

    Thapar N, Sanderson IR. Diarrhoea in children: an interface between developing and developed countries. Lancet. 2004;363(9409):641-53. [PubMed ID: 14987892]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(04)15599-2.

  • 5.

    Hotel AC, Cordoba A. Health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. Prevention. 2001;5(1):1-34.

  • 6.

    Amabile-Cuevas CF, Cárdenas-García M, Ludgar M. Antibiotic resistance. Am Sci. 1995:320-9.

  • 7.

    Austin B, Stuckey LF, Robertson PAW, Effendi I, Griffith DRW. A probiotic strain of Vibrio alginolyticus effective in reducing diseases caused by Aeromonas salmonicida, Vibrio anguillarum and Vibrio ordalii. J Fish Dis. 1995;18(1):93-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2761.1995.tb01271.x.

  • 8.

    Mirnejad R, Vahdati AR, Rashidiani J, Erfani M, Piranfar V. The antimicrobial effect of lactobacillus casei culture supernatant against multiple drug resistant clinical isolates of Shigella sonnei and Shigella flexneri in vitro. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013;15(2):122-6. [PubMed ID: 23682323]. https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.7454.

  • 9.

    Varma P, Dinesh KR, Menon KK, Biswas R. Lactobacillus fermentum isolated from human colonic mucosal biopsy inhibits the growth and adhesion of enteric and foodborne pathogens. J Food Sci. 2010;75(9):M546-51. [PubMed ID: 21535608]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01818.x.

  • 10.

    Paul DV, George MG, Dorothy J, Noel RK, Wolfgang L, Fred AR, et al. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2009.

  • 11.

    Noohi N, Ebrahimipour G, Rohani M, Talebi M, Pourshafie MR. Phenotypic characteristics and probiotic potentials of lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014;7(9). eee17824. [PubMed ID: 25485067]. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.17824.

  • 12.

    Edwards CA, Parrett AM. Intestinal flora during the first months of life: new perspectives. Br J Nutr. 2002;88 Suppl 1:S11-8. [PubMed ID: 12215177]. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN2002625.

  • 13.

    Wellock IJ, Fortomaris PD, Houdijk JG, Wiseman J, Kyriazakis I. The consequences of non-starch polysaccharide solubility and inclusion level on the health and performance of weaned pigs challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Br J Nutr. 2008;99(3):520-30. [PubMed ID: 17761008]. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114507819167.

  • 14.

    Parassol N, Freitas M, Thoreux K, Dalmasso G, Bourdet-Sicard R, Rampal P. Lactobacillus casei DN-114 001 inhibits the increase in paracellular permeability of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli-infected T84 cells. Res Microbiol. 2005;156(2):256-62. [PubMed ID: 15748992]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2004.09.013.

  • 15.

    Medellin-Pena MJ, Wang H, Johnson R, Anand S, Griffiths MW. Probiotics affect virulence-related gene expression in Escherichia coli O157:H7. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(13):4259-67. [PubMed ID: 17496132]. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00159-07.

  • 16.

    Resta-Lenert S, Barrett KE. Live probiotics protect intestinal epithelial cells from the effects of infection with enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC). Gut. 2003;52(7):988-97. [PubMed ID: 12801956].

  • 17.

    Lin PP, Hsieh YM, Tsai CC. Antagonistic activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus RY2 isolated from healthy infancy feces on the growth and adhesion characteristics of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. Anaerobe. 2009;15(4):122-6. [PubMed ID: 19655424]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2009.01.009.

  • 18.

    Sharpe ME, Fryer TF, Smith DG. Identification of the lactic acid bacteria. Identify Methods Microbiol. 1979;157:233-59.

  • 19.

    Jayne-Williams DJ. The application of miniaturized methods for the characterization of various organisms isolated from the animal gut. J Appl Bacteriol. 1976;40(2):189-200. [PubMed ID: 773917].

  • 20.

    Schillinger U, Lücke FK. Identification of lactobacilli from meat and meat products. Food Microbiol. 1987;4(3):199-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0740-0020(87)90002-5.

  • 21.

    Antonsson M, Molin G, Ardo Y. Lactobacillus strains isolated from Danbo cheese as adjunct cultures in a cheese model system. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003;85(1-2):159-69. [PubMed ID: 12810280].

  • 22.

    Yun JH, Lee KB, Sung YK, Kim EB, Lee HG, Choi YJ. Isolation and characterization of potential probiotic lactobacilli from pig feces. J Basic Microbiol. 2009;49(2):220-6. [PubMed ID: 18792047]. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.200800119.

  • 23.

    Rammelsberg M, Radler F. Antibacterial polypeptides of Lactobacillus species. J Appl Bacteriology. 1990;69(2):177-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1990.tb01507.x.

  • 24.

    Gonzaez L, Sandoval H, Sacristan N, Castro JM, Fresno JM, Tornadijo ME. Identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Genestoso cheese throughout ripening and study of their antimicrobial activity. Food Control. 2007;18(6):716-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2006.03.008.

  • 25.

    Coconnier MH, Lievin V, Bernet-Camard MF, Hudault S, Servin AL. Antibacterial effect of the adhering human Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LB. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41(5):1046-52. [PubMed ID: 9145867].

  • 26.

    Djie-Maletz A, Reither K, Danour S, Anyidoho L, Saad E, Danikuu F, et al. High rate of resistance to locally used antibiotics among enteric bacteria from children in Northern Ghana. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61(6):1315-8. [PubMed ID: 18356156]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkn108.

  • 27.

    Ochoa TJ, Ruiz J, Molina M, Del Valle LJ, Vargas M, Gil AI, et al. High frequency of antimicrobial drug resistance of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in infants in Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;81(2):296-301. [PubMed ID: 19635887].

  • 28.

    Vanderhoof JA, Whitney DB, Antonson DL, Hanner TL, Lupo JV, Young RJ. Lactobacillus GG in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in children. J Pediatr. 1999;135(5):564-8. [PubMed ID: 10547243].

  • 29.

    Viswanathan VK, Hodges K, Hecht G. Enteric infection meets intestinal function: How bacterial pathogens cause diarrhoea. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7(2):110-9. [PubMed ID: 19116615]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2053.

  • 30.

    Arici M, Bilgin B, Sagdic O, Ozdemir C. Some characteristics of Lactobacillus isolates from infant faeces. Food Microbiol. 2004;21(1):19-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-0020(03)00044-3.

  • 31.

    Mirlohi M, Soleimanian-Zad S, Sheikh-Zeinodin M. Identification of Lactobacilli from fecal flora of some Iranian infants. Iran J Pediatr. 2008;18(4):357-63.

  • 32.

    Mitsou EK, Kirtzalidou E, Oikonomou I, Liosis G, Kyriacou A. Fecal microflora of Greek healthy neonates. Anaerobe. 2008;14(2):94-101. [PubMed ID: 18207437]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2007.11.002.

  • 33.

    Guandalini S. Probiotics for prevention and treatment of diarrhea. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45 Suppl:S149-53. [PubMed ID: 21992955]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182257e98.

  • 34.

    Tsai CC, Lin PP, Hsieh YM. Three Lactobacillus strains from healthy infant stool inhibit enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli grown in vitro. Anaerobe. 2008;14(2):61-7. [PubMed ID: 18182312]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2007.11.003.

  • 35.

    Michail S, Abernathy F. Lactobacillus plantarum reduces the in vitro secretory response of intestinal epithelial cells to enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002;35(3):350-5. [PubMed ID: 12352526].

  • 36.

    Lievin-Le Moal V, Amsellem R, Servin AL, Coconnier MH. Lactobacillus acidophilus (strain LB) from the resident adult human gastrointestinal microflora exerts activity against brush border damage promoted by a diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli in human enterocyte-like cells. Gut. 2002;50(6):803-11. [PubMed ID: 12010882].

  • 37.

    Sherman PM, Johnson-Henry KC, Yeung HP, Ngo PS, Goulet J, Tompkins TA. Probiotics reduce enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7- and enteropathogenic E. coli O127:H6-induced changes in polarized T84 epithelial cell monolayers by reducing bacterial adhesion and cytoskeletal rearrangements. Infect Immun. 2005;73(8):5183-8. [PubMed ID: 16041036]. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.73.8.5183-5188.2005.

  • 38.

    Juarez Tomas MS, Saralegui Duhart CI, De Gregorio PR, Vera Pingitore E, Nader-Macias ME. Urogenital pathogen inhibition and compatibility between vaginal Lactobacillus strains to be considered as probiotic candidates. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159(2):399-406. [PubMed ID: 21862199]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.07.010.

  • 39.

    Servin AL. Antagonistic activities of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against microbial pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2004;28(4):405-40. [PubMed ID: 15374659]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsre.2004.01.003.