https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.29237

Characterization of Resistance to Aminoglycosides in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated From a Tertiary Care Hospital in Tehran, Iran

authors:

avatar Fateh Rahimi 1 , *

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, IR Iran
Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology: Vol.9, issue 1; e29237
published online: January 2, 2016
article type: Research Article
received: April 13, 2015
revised: July 6, 2015
accepted: July 29, 2015

how to cite: Rahimi F. Characterization of Resistance to Aminoglycosides in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated From a Tertiary Care Hospital in Tehran, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2016;9(1):e29237. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.29237.

Abstract

Background:

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the most common nosocomial pathogens which can cause a broad spectrum of infections.

Objectives:

The current study aimed to describe the frequency and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of clonal groups of gentamicin-resistant strains of MRSA isolated from a tertiary care hospital in Tehran, Iran.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 301 S. aureus isolates were collected during January to November 2012. All of the isolates were identified at the species level and typed using the Phene-Plate (PhP) system. The antibiotic susceptibility patterns of the MRSA strains and the presence of different aminoglycoside resistance genes were determined.

Results:

Of the 301 S. aureus isolates, 90 (29.9%) strains were confirmed as MRSA, and they showed high resistance to penicillin, ciprofloxacin, kanamycin, tobramycin, erythromycin, and tetracycline. On the other hand, 43 of the 90 strains (47.8%) were resistant to gentamicin. Aac (6’)-Ie + aph (2’’), ant (4’)-Ia, aph (3’)-IIIa, and ant (6)-Ia were detected in 65.6%, 42.2%, 20%, and 47.8% of the gentamicin-resistant strains, respectively. Diverse PhP types consisting of seven common types and four single types were identified among the strains.

Conclusions:

Our results illustrated the presence of clonal groups of highly gentamicin-resistant strains of MRSA in hospitals in Tehran. The PhP typing method provided useful information for both clonal dissemination and determining the epidemiological links of the clonal groups of the MRSA strains.

1. Background

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most common nosocomial pathogens which can cause a broad spectrum of infections, ranging from mild skin infections to severe abscesses, sepsis, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, urinary tract infections (UTI), and fatal necrotizing pneumonia (1). Staphylococcus aureus strains have the ability to become resistant to different classes of antimicrobial agents such as methicillin (2). Resistance to methicillin in S. aureus was first reported in 1961, just one year after its introduction, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has spread extensively worldwide during the last few decades (3). Resistance to methicillin is due to the presence of the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) element, which is composed of regulatory genes such as the mecA, C, I and R gene complex, and the ccr (cassette chromosome recombinase) gene complex, encoding the recombinase gene (4). Based on the presence of different regulatory and structural genes, 11 genetic classes of SCCmec have been recognized. The most important feature of MRSA isolates is their resistance to a broad spectrum of antimicrobial agents, which makes infections by these bacteria difficult to treat (5, 6).

Aminoglycosides are one of the classes of antibiotics that play an important role in the treatment of staphylococcal infections (7). The main mechanism of resistance to aminoglycosides is the inactivation of antibiotics by aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs) that are encoded by genetic elements (7, 8). The aac (6’)-Ie + aph (2’’), ant (4’)-Ia, aph (3’)-IIIa, and ant (6)-Ia genes that encode aminoglycoside-6'-N-acetyltransferase/2"-O-phosphoryltransferase, aminoglycoside-4'-O-nucleotidyltransferase I, aminoglycoside-3'-O- phosphoryltransferase III, and streptomycin modifying enzyme, respectively, are hence the most important genes in this regard. Resistance to gentamicin, kanamycin, and tobramycin in staphylococci is mediated by a bi-functional enzyme displaying AAC (6') and APH (2") activity. The ANT (4')-IA enzyme inactivates neomycin, kanamycin, tobramycin, amikacin, and kanamycin, while the APH (3')-III, enzyme inactivates neomycin (8, 9).

Different genotyping and phenotyping methods are available for the typing of bacteria, and they are useful in studies of the stability and diversity of bacterial populations in investigations. The genotyping methods are highly discriminative, useful, and flexible, although they are very expensive and laborious, especially when comparing data obtained from many isolates (10). Phenotyping involves methods used in studying the biochemical characterization of bacteria. The Phene-Plate (PhP) system is an automated phenotyping method based on the quantitative measurement of the kinetics of biochemical reactions formed by bacterial metabolism in the presence of different substrates. Compared to genotyping methods such as PFGE and MLST, PhP typing is a very simple, rapid, and cheap method that provides the necessary information required for the subtyping of bacteria. However, for some cases in which PhP typing could not be performed, genotyping is required in order to obtain the necessary information (10, 11).

2. Objectives

This study aimed to describe the frequency and the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of clonal groups of gentamicin-resistant strains of MRSA isolated from a tertiary care hospital in Tehran, Iran.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Sample Collection and Identification of Bacteria

During January to November 2012, a total of 301 S. aureus strains were collected from a tertiary care hospital in Tehran, Iran. This hospital is ranked as one of the top hospitals in the country and it is located in the center of Tehran. All specimens were collected from hospitalized patients who showed infections 72 hours after admission to the hospital. Of the 301 strains, 139, 99, 23, 21, ten, and nine were isolated from wounds, urine, blood, sputum, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and eyes, respectively. All of the isolates were cultured on HiCrome aureus agar (Himedia, India) and then identified at the species level using species-specific nucA gene primers as described previously (12). The DNA of all the S. aureus strains was extracted using the boiling method as described previously (13). Moreover, a High Pure PCR Template Preparation kit (Roche, Germany) was employed for DNA extraction from the MRSA strains.

3.2. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

All of the 301 S. aureus strains were tested for susceptibility to oxacillin (1 µg) and cefoxitin (30 µg) (Mast Diagnostics, Merseyside, United Kingdom) on Muller-Hinton agar (Merck, Germany) according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (14). The susceptibility of the MRSA strains to 15 different antibiotics was determined. The antibiotics used were: kanamycin (30 μg), amikacin (30 μg), penicillin (5 μg), minocycline (30 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), tobramycin (10 μg), rifampin (5 μg), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (1.25 - 23.75 μg), linezolid (10 μg), quinupristin-dalfopristin (15 μg), ciprofloxacin (30 μg), neomycin (30 µg), gentamicin (10 μg), and tetracycline (30 μg). The minimum inhibitory concentrationsof oxacillin, gentamicin, and vancomycin were evaluated using a broth microdilution assay according to the guidelines of the CLSI (15).

3.3. Detection of Aminoglycoside-Resistant Genes

The presence of aac (6’)-Ie/aph (2”), ant (4’)-Ia, aph (3’)-IIIa, and ant (6)-Ia genes among the MRSA strains was examined using specific primers in a PCR assay as described previously (7, 16).

3.4. PhP Typing

All of the MRSA strains were typed using high resolution PhP-CS plates (PhPlate AB, Stockholm, Sweden). The biochemical fingerprinting method was performed as reported by Rahimi et al. (3).

4. Results

4.1. Identification and Antibiotic Resistance

Of the 301 S. aureus strains isolated from the clinical samples, 90 strains (29.9%) were confirmed as MRSA using phenotypic and genotypic methods. These isolates originated from wounds (46%), urine (30%), sputum (13%), and blood (11%), respectively. The isolates were recovered from hospitalized patients and so were classified as hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA) strains. All of the isolates showed resistance to cefoxitin disc. The MRSA strains were resistant to penicillin (100%), ciprofloxacin (100%), tobramycin (99%), kanamycin (99%), erythromycin (97%), tetracycline (90%), clindamycin (89%), and amikacin (82%) (Figure 1). All of the strains were susceptible to vancomycin, linezolid, and quinupristin-dalfopristin.

Antibiotic Resistance Among the MRSA Strains
AN, amikacin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CD, clindamycin; E, erythromycin; GM, gentamicin; K, kanamycin; LZD, linezolid; MN, minocycline; N, neomycin; P, penicillin; TN, tobramycin; T, tetracycline; RP, rifampin; TS, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim; VA, vancomycin; SYN, quinupristin-dalfopristin.

AN, amikacin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CD, clindamycin; E, erythromycin; GM, gentamicin; K, kanamycin; LZD, linezolid; MN, minocycline; N, neomycin; P, penicillin; TN, tobramycin; T, tetracycline; RP, rifampin; TS, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim; VA, vancomycin; SYN, quinupristin-dalfopristin.

Figure 1.

Antibiotic Resistance Among the MRSA Strains

Overall, 22 antibiotic resistance patterns were identified among the MRSA strains, of which 1.1% were resistant to at least three different antibiotics (Table 1). Of these, 73.3% of the isolates showed resistance to ten to 12 antibiotics. Moreover, six strains (6.7%) were resistant to all of the antibiotics tested except for vancomycin, linezolid, and quinupristin-dalfopristin.

Table 1.

Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of the MRSA Isolates

No. of AntibioticsValues aPattern
Three antibiotics1 (1.1)
P, CIP, TS1 (1.1)1
Eight antibiotics4 (4.4)
P, CIP, TN, K, E, CD, TS, RP4 (4.4)2
Nine Antibiotics13 (14.4)
P, CIP, TN, K, T, AN, N, RP, GM2 (2.2)3
P, CIP, TN, K, E, CD, AN, N, TS2 (2.2)4
P, CIP, TN, K, E, CD, AN, N, RP2 (2.2)5
P, CIP, TN, K, E, T, TS, RP, MN1 (1.1)6
P, CIP, TN, K, E, T, CD, TS, MN2 (2.2)7
P, CIP, TN, K, E, T, CD, TS, RP2 (2.2)8
P, CIP, TN, K, E, T, CD, RP, MN2 (2.2)9
Ten antibiotics18 (20)
P, CIP, TN, K, E, T, AN, N, TS, GM4 (4.4)10
P, CIP, TN, K, E, T, CD, AN, N, RP8 (8.9)11
P, CIP, TN, K, E, T, CD, TS, RP, MN4 (4.4)12
P, CIP, TN, K, E, T, AN, TS, MN, GM2 (2.2)13
Eleven antibiotics20 (22.2)
P, CIP, TN, K, E, T, CD, AN, N, RP, GM2 (2.2)14
P, CIP, TN, K, E, T, CD, AN, N, RP, MN13 (14.4)15
P, CIP, TN, K, E, T, CD, AN, N, TS, GM3 (3.3)16
P, CIP, TN, K, E, T, CD, AN, N, TS, RP2 (2.2)17
Twelve antibiotics28 (31.1)
P, CIP, TN, K, E, T, CD, AN, N, TS, RP, GM6 (6.7)18
P, CIP, TN, K, E, T, CD, AN, N, TS, RP, MN4 (4.4)19
P, CIP, TN, K, E, T, CD, AN, N, TS, MN, GM16 (17.8)20
P, CIP, TN, K, E, T, CD, AN, N, RP, MN, GM2 (2.2)21
Thirteen antibiotics6 (6.7)
P, CIP, TN, K, E, T, CD, AN, N, TS, RP, MN, GM6 (6.7)22

aData are presented as No. (%).

The MIC range varied from 16 to 512 µg/mL, with 33% and 26% of strains having an MIC of 128 µg/mL and 256 µg/mL for oxacillin, respectively. Moreover, one strain had an MIC of 16 µg/mL. Also, for vancomycin, the MICs ranged from 0.06 to 0.5 µg/mL. Further, most of the strains (22.2%) had an MIC of 128 µg/mL for gentamicin, whilst 11 strains showed an MIC ≥ 16 µg/mL. Seven (7.8%), ten (11.1%), and 12 (13.3%) strains had an MIC of 1024, 512, and 256 µg/mL, respectively.

4.2. Detection of Aminoglycoside-Resistance Genes

All of the aminoglycoside-resistant strains were tested for the presence of different genes, with aac (6’)-Ie + aph (2’’) being found among 59 (65.6%) strains (Table 2) and hence being the most prevalent resistance.

Table 2.

Frequency of Aminoglycoside Resistance Genes Among the MRSA Strains

PatternAminoglycoside-Resistant GenesPhenotypesValuesa
Aac (6’)-Ie + aph (2’’)ant (6)-Iaant (4’)-Iaaph (3’)-IIIa
1++++GM, K, AN, TN14 (15.6)
2+++-GM, K, AN, TN21 (23.3)
3++--GM, K, AN, TN4 (4.4)
4+--+GM, K, AN, TN1 (1.1)
5+---GM, K, AN, TN19 (21.1)
6-+++K, AN, TN, N1 (1.1)
7-++-K, AN, TN, N2 (2.2)
8-+--K, AN, TN, N1 (1.1)
9---+K, AN, TN, N2 (2.2)
10----K, AN, TN, N25 (27.8)

aData are presented as No. (%).

Forty-three (47.8%) isolates harbored the ant (6)-Ia resistance gene, while ant (4’)-Ia was detected in 38 (42.2%) strains. Moreover, the aph (3’)-IIIa gene was present in 18 (20%) strains. Also, 14 isolates (15.6%) carried four detected resistance genes together, and none of the genes were positive in 25 (27.8%) strains. On the other hand, aac (6’)-Ie + aph (2’’), aph (3’)-IIIa and ant (6)-Ia were detected alone in 19 (21.1%), two (2.2%) and one (1.1%) isolates, respectively.

4.3. PhP Typing

The PhP typing of the 90 MRSA strains revealed the presence of diverse (diversity index, DI = 0.818) PhP types among the isolates, consisting of seven common types (CT) and four single types (ST) (data not shown). Amongst the PhP types, CT 3 was the dominant type, with 31% of the isolates classified in this pattern. CTs 4 and 2 were also found among 24% and 11% of the isolates, respectively. Moreover, CTs 3 and 4 were common among all strains with different origins. On the other hand, the four STs were common among strains isolated from wounds and urine. The least number of strains belonged to CTs 5 - 7, which contained six isolates (7%).

5. Discussion

In this study, the frequency of MRSA in Tehran was 29.9%. Previous studies have revealed that the rate of MRSA in Iran varies from 19% to 90% in different cities (3, 13, 17-23). The variation seen in the different reports concerning Iran could be in part due to different populations, different geographical locations, and the quality of hospital sampling carried out. Of the 15 antibiotics tested in this study, all of the isolates showed susceptibility to vancomycin, linezolid, and quinupristin-dalfopristin, which is consistent with other studies in Iran (3, 13, 17-23). Although vancomycin is frequently used in a hospital setting, no vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) or vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) isolates were found in this study, which suggests that the increased use of certain antibiotics is not sufficient to ensure the appearance of resistant strains. Yet, most of the isolates were resistant to penicillin (100%), ciprofloxacin (100%), kanamycin (99%), tobramycin (99%), erythromycin (97%), tetracycline (90%), and clindamycin (89%), which indicates that these antibiotics are no longer effective antibiotics against MRSA infections in Tehran. In previous studies (3, 17, 19-23), a high rate of resistance to these antibiotics was reported. These antibiotics are used extensively in hospitals for the treatment of different infections and so the high rate of resistance is not surprising.

The rates of resistance tosulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, rifampin, minocycline, and gentamycin in this study were also higher than those reported in other reports. This could be explained by the high level of these antibiotics being prescribed for the treatment of infections. Moreover, gentamicin is one of the most important antibiotics used in combination with other antibiotics worldwide for treatment of S. aureus infections (20, 24-26). In this study, similar to the findings of other reports (20, 24-27), the aac (6’)-Ie + aph (2’’) gene was dominant among the gentamicin-resistant strains of MRSA, and the isolates that were positive for this gene showed a high level resistance to gentamicin, which is consistent with other reports (16, 28-30). We also found 16 gentamicin-susceptible strains that harbored the aac (6’)-Ie + aph (2’’) gene. Although these isolates harbored the aac (6’)-Ie + aph (2’’) gene considered to be resistant to gentamicin and all aminoglycosides, we also found strains that were susceptible to gentamicin and showed resistance to other aminoglycosides, which is consistent with other reports (7). Hauschild et al. revealed that “detection of resistance genes in antibiotic susceptible strains is due to amplification of repressed antibiotic resistance gene or AME of these strains display lower enzymatic activity (7). Moreover, the prevalence rate of the ant (4’)-Ia gene was higher than in other reports (7, 16, 20, 26), which could be due to the high resistance to kanamycin, with 89 out of 90 strains being kanamycin-resistant. Also, we found a strain that was susceptible to all of the aminoglycoside antibiotics tested and was also not positive for all of the genes. Differences between reports from different countries could be due to differences among the isolates and different geographical regions. Our results illustrated that all of the aminoglycosides tested in this study are no longer effective agents against MRSA strains.

The results of the PhP typing showed the presence of diverse PhP types consisting of seven CTs and four STs, indicating that the presence of MRSA strains in this hospital in Tehran is attributable to the spread of a limited number of clonal types. CTs 3 and 4 were common between MRSA strains with different origins, which further supports the spread of these clonal types among strains collected from this hospital in Tehran. In another study in Tehran, more diverse PhP types (consisting of 18 CTs and 15 STs) were reported among the MRSA strains isolated from a tertiary care hospital (3). On the other hand, 16 CTs and 13 STs were identified in MRSA strains isolated from sewage treatment plants in Tehran (31). Javidnia et al. reported six CTs and 13 STs among MRSA strains in Tehran (19). Seven CTs identified in this study were also common among the MRSA isolates reported in other studies, in which CT 3 was the predominant type and its dissemination is consistent with previous studies in Tehran (3, 9, 31, 32). In this study, different PhP types were common among different samples, which indicates the prevalence of MRSA strains in different wards of the hospital and also highlights the presence of common CTs in this hospital. The MRSA strains isolated from wounds and urine were grouped in different CTs and showed the highest frequency. A certain PhP MRSA clonal type, i.e. CT 3 (comprising 31% of the isolates), was identified in various samples tested, indicating an epidemiological link between the MRSA strains isolated from different sources. The results indicate that MRSA strains are endemic in this hospital in Tehran; therefore, contamination of patients during the hospitalization process may be responsible for these infections.

As previously reported, the aminoglycoside-resistant HA-MRSA strains have spread widely through the community and identical HA-MRSA strains from different sources in Iran have been isolated, indicating the hospital origin of these strains. In conclusion, our results showed that the PhP typing method provided useful information for clonal dissemination and also for the epidemiological links of clonal groups of aminoglycoside-resistant strains of MRSA in hospitals in Tehran. Moreover, the presence of predominant clonal types among all strains isolated from different sources with different antimicrobial resistance patterns suggested that cross-infection was a factor in the maintenance of these strains in hospitals in Tehran.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Deurenberg RH, Stobberingh EE. The evolution of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Genet Evol. 2008;8(6):747-63. [PubMed ID: 18718557]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2008.07.007.

  • 2.

    Chambers HF, Deleo FR. Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7(9):629-41. [PubMed ID: 19680247]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2200.

  • 3.

    Rahimi F, Katouli M, Pourshafie MR. Characteristics of hospital- and community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Tehran, Iran. J Med Microbiol. 2014;63(Pt 6):796-804. [PubMed ID: 24648470]. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.070722-0.

  • 4.

    Novick RP, Christie GE, Penades JR. The phage-related chromosomal islands of Gram-positive bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(8):541-51. [PubMed ID: 20634809]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2393.

  • 5.

    Gould IM. Costs of hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and its control. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006;28(5):379-84. [PubMed ID: 17045462]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.09.001.

  • 6.

    Petrelli D, Repetto A, D'Ercole S, Rombini S, Ripa S, Prenna M, et al. Analysis of meticillin-susceptible and meticillin-resistant biofilm-forming Staphylococcus aureus from catheter infections isolated in a large Italian hospital. J Med Microbiol. 2008;57(Pt 3):364-72. [PubMed ID: 18287301]. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.47621-0.

  • 7.

    Hauschild T, Sacha P, Wieczorek P, Zalewska M, Kaczynska K, Tryniszewska E. Aminoglycosides resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from a University Hospital in Bialystok, Poland. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2008;46(2):225-8. [PubMed ID: 18519242]. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10042-008-0034-3.

  • 8.

    Schmitz FJ, Fluit AC, Gondolf M, Beyrau R, Lindenlauf E, Verhoef J, et al. The prevalence of aminoglycoside resistance and corresponding resistance genes in clinical isolates of staphylococci from 19 European hospitals. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999;43(2):253-9. [PubMed ID: 11252331].

  • 9.

    Vakulenko SB, Mobashery S. Versatility of aminoglycosides and prospects for their future. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16(3):430-50. [PubMed ID: 12857776].

  • 10.

    Kuhn I, Burman LG, Haeggman S, Tullus K, Murray BE. Biochemical fingerprinting compared with ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of DNA for epidemiological typing of enterococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33(11):2812-7. [PubMed ID: 8576324].

  • 11.

    Katouli M, Kuhn I, Wollin R, Mollby R. Evaluation of the PhP system for biochemical-fingerprint typing of strains of Salmonella of serotype Typhimurium. J Med Microbiol. 1992;37(4):245-51. [PubMed ID: 1404322]. https://doi.org/10.1099/00222615-37-4-245.

  • 12.

    Zouharova M, Rysanek D. Multiplex PCR and RPLA Identification of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxigenic strains from bulk tank milk. Zoonoses Public Health. 2008;55(6):313-9. [PubMed ID: 18489539]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01134.x.

  • 13.

    Rahimi F, Bouzari M, Maleki Z, Rahimi F. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern among Staphylococcus spp. with emphasis on detection of mecA gene in methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2009;4(3):143-50.

  • 14.

    Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 22th informational supplement. Wayne; Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute. 2012.

  • 15.

    Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard M7-A9. Wayne; Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute. 2012.

  • 16.

    Turutoglu H, Hasoksuz M, Ozturk D, Yildirim M, Sagnak S. Methicillin and aminoglycoside resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from bovine mastitis and sequence analysis of their mecA genes. Vet Res Commun. 2009;33(8):945-56. [PubMed ID: 19685276]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-009-9313-5.

  • 17.

    Fatholahzadeh B, Emaneini M, Gilbert G, Udo E, Aligholi M, Modarressi MH, et al. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) analysis and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates in Tehran, Iran. Microb Drug Resist. 2008;14(3):217-20. [PubMed ID: 18694326]. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2008.0822.

  • 18.

    Japoni A, Jamalidoust M, Farshad S, Ziyaeyan M, Alborzi A, Japoni S, et al. Characterization of SCCmec types and antibacterial susceptibility patterns of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Southern Iran. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2011;64(1):28-33. [PubMed ID: 21266752].

  • 19.

    Javidnia S, Talebi M, Saifi M, Katouli M, Rastegar Lari A, Pourshafie MR. Clonal dissemination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in patients and the hospital environment. Int J Infect Dis. 2013;17(9):e691-5. [PubMed ID: 23622783]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2013.01.032.

  • 20.

    Mohammadi S, Sekawi Z, Monjezi A, Maleki MH, Soroush S, Sadeghifard N, et al. Emergence of SCCmec type III with variable antimicrobial resistance profiles and spa types among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from healthcare- and community-acquired infections in the west of Iran. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;25:152-8. [PubMed ID: 24909489]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2014.02.018.

  • 21.

    Rahimi F, Bouzari M, Katouli M, Pourshafie M. Prophage Typing of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Tehran, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2012;6(1):80-5. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.4616.

  • 22.

    Rahimi F, Bouzari M, Katouli M, Pourshafie MR. Prophage and antibiotic resistance profiles of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in Iran. Arch Virol. 2012;157(9):1807-11. [PubMed ID: 22684535]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-012-1361-4.

  • 23.

    Rahimi F, Bouzari M, Katouli M, Pourshafie MR. Antibiotic Resistance Pattern of Methicillin Resistant and Methicillin Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in Tehran, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2013;6(2):144-9. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.4896.

  • 24.

    Emaneini M, Taherikalani M, Eslampour MA, Sedaghat H, Aligholi M, Jabalameli F, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic evaluation of aminoglycoside resistance in clinical isolates of staphylococci in Tehran, Iran. Microb Drug Resist. 2009;15(2):129-32. [PubMed ID: 19432516]. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2009.0869.

  • 25.

    Fatholahzadeh B, Emaneini M, Feizabadi MM, Sedaghat H, Aligholi M, Taherikalani M, et al. Characterisation of genes encoding aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes among meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from two hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;33(3):264-5. [PubMed ID: 19084382]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.09.018.

  • 26.

    Yadegar A, Sattari M, Mozafari NA, Goudarzi GR. Prevalence of the genes encoding aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes and methicillin resistance among clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in Tehran, Iran. Microb Drug Resist. 2009;15(2):109-13. [PubMed ID: 19496674]. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2009.0897.

  • 27.

    Ida T, Okamoto R, Shimauchi C, Okubo T, Kuga A, Inoue M. Identification of aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes by susceptibility testing: epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Japan. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(9):3115-21. [PubMed ID: 11526138].

  • 28.

    Ardic N, Sareyyupoglu B, Ozyurt M, Haznedaroglu T, Ilga U. Investigation of aminoglycoside modifying enzyme genes in methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Microbiol Res. 2006;161(1):49-54. [PubMed ID: 16338590]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2005.05.002.

  • 29.

    Choi SM, Kim SH, Kim HJ, Lee DG, Choi JH, Yoo JH, et al. Multiplex PCR for the detection of genes encoding aminoglycoside modifying enzymes and methicillin resistance among Staphylococcus species. J Korean Med Sci. 2003;18(5):631-6. [PubMed ID: 14555812].

  • 30.

    Klingenberg C, Sundsfjord A, Ronnestad A, Mikalsen J, Gaustad P, Flaegstad T. Phenotypic and genotypic aminoglycoside resistance in blood culture isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci from a single neonatal intensive care unit, 1989-2000. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;54(5):889-96. [PubMed ID: 15471996]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkh453.

  • 31.

    Rahimi F, Bouzari M. Biochemical Fingerprinting of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Sewage and Hospital in Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8(7). eee19760. [PubMed ID: 26421131]. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.19760v2.

  • 32.

    Rahimi F, Karimi S. Characteristics of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated From Poultry in Iran. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2015;10(4). ee30885. https://doi.org/10.5812/archcid.30885.