This study indicated relatively high prevalence of
Acanthamoeba spp. (T4) with different morphometric aspects but no more heterogeneity traits in rivers of West Azerbaijan, Northwest Iran. The high percentage of
Acanthamoeba spp., in different environmental sources represents a sanitary risk for public health, particularly contact lens users and immunocompromised/suppressed patients (
21).
In the present study,
Acanthamoeba spp. was isolated in 45% of cultured samples, which amongst them, 88.8% were confirmed by PCR. The difference between PCR and culture method is probably due to other free living amoeba cysts except
Acanthamoeba spp. Based on the morphological classification of Pussard and Pons (
18), 18 cases of the positive cultures were classified in group II, with the most frequency in the world. Although, 8 positive cases were members of group III and one case from group I and group II. The results of this study showed that none of the samples from tap water contain
Acanthamoeba spp., which is in contrast with some of the previous studies (
4,
22). This difference, maybe, resulted from the fact that the previous studies collected their samples from a storage tank of water while our samples were obtained directly from tap water (
4,
22).
Tap water is usually taken from a river or dam that it is cleaned at a purification station, such as Rand Water’s, and then supplied via pipelines to taps. Therefore, it can affect the
Acanthamoeba trophozoites. Another study on the water storage tanks in UK has shown that these water supplies promote colonization of domestic water with free-living amoebae, including
Acanthamoeba, and therefore increases the risk of infection with the amoebae. This accounts for the significantly greater incidence of
Acanthamoeba infection in the UK and supports advice to avoid using tap water in contact lens care routines (
23).
In the present study, in tap water samples the mean concentration of free residual chlorine was about 0.3 - 1 mg/L, which can be another reason that no
Acanthamoeba spp. was isolated from tap water samples. It has been reported that the trophozoites of
Acanthamoeba are sensitive to free residual chlorine, while the cysts are resistant to chlorine (
24). On the other hand, in normal environments such as chlorine-free water, the parasite lives as trophozoite, however in frigid environments it forms cyst. In the optimum water condition,
Acanthamoeba lives as a trophozoite since it is susceptible to chlorine. Therefore, it has been conceived that the growth of
Acanthamoeba in water with chlorine is difficult. Given the fact that river water is chlorine-free, rivers are a significant source of the organism. In the case of the river waters, we have isolated
Acanthamoeba species from 27 out of 44 (45%) river water samples by cultivation and morphologic assessment; also, 24 samples (40%) were reconfirmed by the molecular method. These results show that the contamination rate of river water in this area is very high and it maybe a result from the fact that these two rivers are exposed to air and soil, as well as other infectious sources, such as sewage, wastewater and feces of animals. These factors raise the contamination rate in the river water sources. Therefore, the residents of these areas often have an indirect contact with the
Acanthamoeba infection.
In Iran, infections with
Acanthamoeba spp. has increased in recent years, mainly due to poor hygiene in contact lens users (
4). The ten-year study on patients with amoebic keratitis has shown that the
Acanthamoeba infection is continually rising in Iran (
21). Niyyati et al., from drinking and recreational water, reported
Acanthamoeba in 17 (25.4%) of the 67 collected samples in East Azerbaijan, Northwest Iran. Most genotypes in this study were also reported as T4 (
25).
Bagheri et al. (2010) reported that half of their investigated samples collected from cold and warm tap water sources of hospitals in 13 cities of Iran were harboring
Acanthamoeba spp. (
4). In another study conducted by Hooshyar et al. (2013), it is shown that 32 (80%) out of 40 water samples collected from 20 stagnant waters in squares and parks in different regions of Qazvin city, Iran, were positive for free living amoebas by the culture method. Similar to our findings, PCR reactions were positive in 14 (43.8%) out of 32 culture samples (
16). Maghsood et al. (2005) isolated
Acanthamoeba spp. from water samples by molecular methods in different cities of Iran (
10). In the study conducted by Rezaeian et al. (2008),
Acanthamoeba spp. have been recovered from 58% collected samples from a variety of ecological habitats such as tap water, soil and dust in Tehran, Iran (
21).
Acanthamoeba spp. has been detected in 3% of samples taken from the James River in Virginia, USA (
26). In the Pusan province, Korea,
Acanthamoeba has been isolated from 5.8% of tap water samples (
22). In Spain, Lorenzo-Morales et al. (2005) reported that 59.5% of tap water samples were harboring
Acanthamoeba (
8). The observed difference in the prevalence of
Acanthamoeba in tap water in different countries might be due to the different water treatment strategies or the accuracy of the water treatment system in each country. In this study, no more new haplotypes were found in analyzed isolates, this can be associated with the structural features of 18S rRNA gene, which indicated as a conserved nucleus marker and it’s to be diploid. The findings of the present study provide the evidence for high prevalence of
Acanthamoeba spp. in rivers, which reflects a risk alert for threatening human health in northwest Iran, where placed with the co-border of Iraq country. In addition, a well hygienic status of tap water considering
Acanthamoeba spp. cannot be ignored in the region. This study can also serve as a platform for further explorations of water sources in Iran.