It is a great challenge to treat infections caused by
P. aeruginosa, due to its resistance against drugs. Different antibiotics including beta lactames, aminoglycosides and quinolones are applied to treat the infections caused by
P. aeruginosa. Antibiotic resistance pattern of these bacteria (
P. aeruginosa) is changing quickly. However, studies showed that the resistance of
P. aeruginosa against antibiotics fluctuates, especially regarding imipenem (
16). Carbapenems and beta lactam antibiotics are using considerably to treat infections due to multidrug-resistant
P. aeruginosa since they are resistant against most of the beta lactamases and have great membrane permeability (
17). However, in last decades, warnings about an increase in
P. aeruginosa resistance against antimicrobial agents are reported. These organisms have various self-protection ways against antibiotics.
One of the most important ways for resistance against imipeneme is generation of MBL enzymes (
18,
19). VIM, IMP, and SPM from MBL family are quite prevalent in
P. aeruginosa (
20). Since various reports indicate the increased resistance of
P. aeruginosa isolates against antibiotics (especially imipeneme), proper use of these antibiotics and time-consuming identification of isolates generating MBL should be considered. It leads to successful treatment and prevents propagation of resistant genes, which can be seriously harmful for societies (
21). There are different methods to identify MBL-generative species. The present study used E-test tapes. These tapes contain EDTA, which is a MB inhibitor (
22,
23).
In the current study, seven out of nine isolates, which were positive in E-test (phenotypic method), contained VIM-1 gene and two isolates were negative in both phenotypic and genotypic (PCR) methods, indicating the presence of other factors such as lack of opr D, which results in membrane permeability change, efflux pumps or chromosomal Ampc beta lactamase. Two isolates, positive in phenotypic method, were reported negative in PCR reaction indicating that other genes are involved in this process. Among the isolates containing VIM-1 gene, four species (57%) were isolated from the patients hospitalized in ICU for approximately a long time and had undergone antibiotic therapy. It indicates the presence and propagation of the above mentioned gene under such circumstances. In the current investigation, IMP-1 and SMP-1 genes were not observed in any of the strains resistant to imipenem. The study by Shahcheraghi et al. on 243
P. aeruginosa species isolated from Imam Khomeini Hospital in Tehran, showed that 15 isolates contained VIM-1 gene (
24). Also, Sepehriseresht et al. reported that 94 out of 483 species of
P. aeruginosa isolated from the patient lesions were resistant and intermediate resistant species and carried vim1, vim2, ipm1, and ipm2 genes by PCR (
25).
The results of the above mentioned researches are nearly consistent with those of the present study indicating that VIM-1 is the predominant MBL in Iran. Another research showed that 34 out of 111 (43%) species isolated carried VIM gene (
6,
26) and their results are not consistent with those of the current study. It can be said that the prevalence of MBL in the species isolated from that hospital was more than expected. Since Imam Musa Kazem Hospital is a burn center, a great amount of imipenem is prescribed there and resistance against this antibiotic has reached 94.9%. Therefore, it is not unexpected to find genes driving drug resistance, especially MBL ones located more on dynamic elements (plasmide or transpozone) are propagated more in this center.
The current study showed that fortunately the prevalence of MBL in Zahedan is less than other cities. However it should be noted that according to the studies in most areas of the world, the prevalence is incremental and if preventive measures are not taken, there will be major clinical problems. Since most of integrones containing VIM-1 gene coding aminoglycosides destructing enzyme, the importance of the problem is intensified (
27). Therefore diagnostic methods should be routinely used to determine these species in clinical laboratories; also synthesis of more effective antimicrobial compounds with new effecting mechanisms should be noted.