A number of studies have considered the presence of fungi in the air of Iran (
10,
11). Although a large body of literature suggests that soils are important sources of fungi in different parts of the world (
2,
3,
12,
13) but in the scientific literature, there are few epidemiological data in terms of fungal flora of soil in Iran. Adimi (1987) upon conducting a study on the presence of medically important fungi in Tehran and suburb soil stated that two important fungi, i.e., H. capsulatum and S. schenckii were isolated for the first time (
5). Furthermore, some sporotrichosis cases have been reported from Iran (
14,
15). Taking into account the mentioned considerations, because of two unexpected reports of histoplasmosis from Iran (
6,
7) and the previous achieved results (
5) as well as vicinity of Tehran and Qazvin province the present study looked at human pathogenic fungi in the soil in Qazvin. In the current study, although the main purpose was to assess pathogenic fungi from the soil in the aforementioned areas, the most common yielded microorganisms were saprophytic soil-borne fungi. According to Denning et al., a relationship between asthma and allergenic fungi present in the air such as Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Alternaria and Penicillium species has been proved. He stated that many people get inflicted by depression, disability or even die due to asthma each year (
16). Cladosporium and Alternaria species were widely distributed in the soil and most frequently found in outdoor air. Their ability to sporulate extensively and getting airborne make them important fungal allergens. These two black saprophytic fungi were frequently observed during the current study (36%), and can be a potential cause for pheohyphomycosis in predisposed people. Pheohyphomycosis can be produced through inhalation of these fungi from air by predisposed persons (
12). On the other hand, one of the Cladosporium species can cause chronic subcutaneous infection as well. In spite of these two fungi, Ulocladium spp. and Drechslera spp. were also the other members of black fungi isolated infrequently in the study, the former one can be very allergenic and the latter one is mostly a plant pathogen (
13). The very high incidence of black fungi isolated in this study is in contrast to an Iranian study in which only 3.7% of the total fungal isolation was related to Cladosporium spp. (
2).
Aspergillus spp. and Penicillium spp. are two very important and ubiquitous soil-borne fungi and in the current investigation they outnumbered the other detected fungi by 42.4% of total. Regarding Aspergillus spp., various species are the causative agents of diseases such as otomycosis, keratomycosis, onychomycosis, mycetoma etc., and some species can cause pulmonary aspergillosis in person’s compromised or defective immune systems. Some other species are able to produce mycotoxins as well as allergenic in atopic individuals. The prevalence of Penicillium spp. (19.90%), as third predominant soil-borne fungus in Qazvin is in sharp contrast with findings of Hedayati et al., in which Penicillium spp. accounted for 52% of fungal isolates recovered from soil samples of hospitals in Sari, Iran (
2).
Of the identified potential pathogens, Rhizopus and Mucor spp. were two rapid growing fungi isolated from 12.2% of soil samples, which can cause infection in immunosuppressed, malnourished or severely burned people (
12,
13).
In the current study, Scopulariopsis species recorded the lowest frequency of isolation. This soil-borne fungus is most often in association with onychomycosis, otomycosis and occasionally with respiratory tract in immunocompromised patients and drug addicts. Most species can release arsenic gaseous compounds, which can cause arsenic poisoning (
12,
13).
With regard to the importance of keratinophilc fungi to human, particularly their potency for adhesion to skin, about 2% of isolated fungi was related to Chrysosporium spp. This observation is in agreement with that of Simpanya and Baxter (1996) who showed that 2.1% of 236 soil samples from New Zealand were contaminated with Chrysosporium species (
17). The low incidence of Chrysosporium in the current study differed from some Iranian studies cited by Hedayati et al., Moallaei et al., Shadzi et al. and Mahmoudabadi and Zarrin (
2-
4,
18), namely that the incidence of this keratinophilic fungus has been 3.7%, 8.40%, 41.6% and 54.2%, respectively. It is noteworthy that obtained results during this research project indicated that soil sources have a high percentage of non keratinophilc fungi including dermatophytic ones and pathogenic fungi were yielded. The explanation for this may lie in the time that the sample collection was performed and if the study were carried out all year long different results could be yieldedin this regard.
Although detection of allergenic and pathogenic fungiin the soil does not necessarily indicate that all may cause problems, it alerts to the potential risk of diseases and sensitivity in individuals. This study can possibly reveal soil-borne agents engaged in different allergic reactions in susceptible persons in Iran. Familiarity with the epidemiology of common fungal species may increase early identification of systemic opportunistic fungal infections in immune compromised cases. Furthermore, the results of the current study contribute towards a better understanding of the incidence pattern of soil-borne fungi, which may be helpful for physicians, allergists, as well as epidemiologists.