Abstract
Background:
Gingivitis and periodontitis cause the inflammation of the soft tissue around the teeth and destroy the supporting structures of the teeth. This is highly prevalent during pregnancy and lactation.Objectives:
The present study aimed to investigate the periodontal status in pregnant and lactating women in Ilam province, Iran in 2018 - 2019.Methods:
This descriptive-analytical study was conducted on 100 pregnant and lactating women who were selected via cluster and stratified sampling. Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire and the community periodontal index of treatment needs (CPITN). Data analysis was performed in SPSS version 24 using independent t-test, chi-square, and one-way ANOVA at the significance level of 0.05.Results:
The mean age of the pregnant and lactating women was 25.62 ± 5.52 and 29.08 ± 6.83 years, respectively. In total, 30% of the pregnant women had a healthy gingival, 18% had bleeding, 36% had a mass, and 16% had CPITN. As for the lactating women, 44% had a healthy gingival, 32% had bleeding, 20% had a mass, and 4% had an envelope. CPITN index II and III were significantly higher in the pregnant women compared to the lactating women. Among the pregnant women, there were 49 housewives and only one employee, while 50 of the lactating women were housewives.Conclusions:
According to the results, the sample population had an unfavorable periodontal status, and the pregnant women needed more oral health education.Keywords
1. Background
Pregnancy is a natural process associated with various changes in the body, including the mouth and teeth (1). These changes could lead to problems in the mouth and teeth if not treated in a timely manner (2). Pregnancy is considered to be a risky condition for dental treatments due to the unique nature of the physiological changes and potential risks to the developing fetus (3). Studies in this regard indicate that severe gingivitis in pregnant women is correlated with demographic factors and is a significant risk factor for complications such as preterm birth and low birth weight (4).
In a study, Miyazaki et al. reported a significant correlation between the mean increase in the probing depth and age, especially in the age group of 36 - 42 years (5). Furthermore, Agbelusi et al. observed a significant association between gestational age and the gingival index (6). Tilkaratne also reported that despite similar plaque levels in pregnant and non-pregnant women, the gingival index in pregnant women increased significantly during the first and second trimesters of pregnancy compared to the control group (7). The studies conducted by Gesase, Amar, and Yalcin have also demonstrated that the periodontal status in pregnant women may be affected by social and cultural factors such as education level and previous periodontal treatment (8).
Although pregnancy is not considered a medical disease, the associated physiological changes in women during this period and the health of the fetus propel special considerations regarding dental procedures during pregnancy. Dentists must obtain the vital information on the medical status, medications, and history of gestational diabetes, miscarriage, and hypertension before the treatment of pregnant women (9). Preventive treatment is an inherent element of dental treatments for pregnant women, which encompasses health education programs and plaque control. In addition, the timing of elective dental procedures in pregnant patients is important (10).
Half of all women experience gingivitis during pregnancy, which causes swelling, redness, bleeding, and gingival resorption (11). However, some pregnant women avoid brushing their teeth and using mouthwash due to nausea, which increases the risk of caries. In addition, many pregnant women do not seek preventive or restorative care since they assume that dental treatments could harm the fetus (12).
Periodontal infections are highly common during pregnancy and lactation (13). The prevalence of periodontal diseases increases at the beginning of the second month of pregnancy, reaches a peak in the eighth month, and decreases in the last month of pregnancy (7). Following childbirth and up to two months postpartum, the rate of these infections often returns to normal. However, the rate has been reported to remain higher during breastfeeding in some cases (14, 15).
Periodontal infections in pregnancy may have debilitating effects on the mother and neonate (16). The most common complications of periodontal infections in pregnant women are the increased risk of low birth weight (< 2,500 g), premature birth (gestational age of < 37 weeks), and preeclampsia (8). Several studies have investigated the correlation between the periodontal status and pregnancy outcomes, indicating that scaling and root planning during the second trimester of pregnancy reduce the risk of complications (17-19).
The community periodontal index of treatment needs (CPITN) is used for the epidemiological examination of periodontal diseases (20). Metabolic changes (e.g., hormonal changes) may also affect the oral metabolism of pregnant women as a predisposing factor to periodontal diseases (21). Gingivitis during pregnancy occurs due to increased progesterone and the subsequent impact on the gingival arteries. During pregnancy, estrogen secretion is 30 times higher, and progesterone secretion is 10 times higher than during menstruation (22).
2. Objectives
The present study aimed to investigate the periodontal status of pregnant and lactating women in Ilam province, Iran during 2018 - 2019.
3. Methods
This descriptive-analytical study was conducted on the pregnant and lactating women referred to 12 health centers in Ilam, Iran. Based on the study by Torabi et al. (23), the subjects were selected via cluster and stratified sampling from each center. In total, eight subjects were selected, including four pregnant and four lactating women. Those with systemic disorders (e.g., diabetes), cardiovascular diseases, corticosteroid consumption, and smoking habits were excluded.
3.1. Procedure
Data were collected using a questionnaire consisting of two sections. The first section included demographic data on age, gestational age of the fetus, education level, number of tooth brushing times, and economic status. The second section contained data on the periodontal status assessment based on the CPITN. Several indices cover the progression and etiology of periodontal disease and are used by clinicians to describe the changes in oral tissues (24). Ainamo et al. developed this index (25), and the World Health Organization (WHO) modified the index twice in 1987 and 1997. One of the two versions of this index is the partial CPITN, which examines 10 teeth, and the other version is the full-mouth CPITN, which evaluates 28 teeth (26). The CPITN is primarily a screening procedure, which requires clinical assessments for the presence or absence of periodontal pockets, calculus, and gingival bleeding. The depth of the probe is measured using a Williams calibrated probe and a mirror in the six areas surrounding the teeth, including the mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, midlingual, and distolingual areas. Inflammation, mass, and plaque indices were examined in the present study, and the patients were coded based on the following periodontal index scale:
Code 0: Healthy periodontal status; Code 1: Bleeding with direct/indirect vision after probing; Code 2: Presence of mass and bleeding during probing with the black band completely visible on the probe; Code 3: Presence of a thin periodontal pocket (3 - 5 mm) with the black band on the probe along the gingival margin; Code 4: Presence of a periodontal pocket (≥ 6 mm) with no black band detected on the gums
Data analysis was performed in SPSS version 24 using descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, and percentage) and analytical statistics (independent t-test, chi-square, and one-way ANOVA). In all the statistical analyses, the significance level was considered to be 0.05.
3.2. Ethical Considerations
Prior to conducting the research, the required permit was obtained from the Vice Chancellor for Research of Ilam University of Medical Sciences. Due to the necessity of confidentiality, the patients remained anonymous throughout the study, and the information was registered based on their file number.
4. Results
The mean age of the pregnant women was 25.5 ± 62.52 years (minimum: 17 years, maximum: 38 years), and the mean age of the lactating women was 29.08 ± 6.83 years (minimum: 17 years, maximum: 46 years). Overall, 42% of the pregnant women were in their first trimester, 24% were in their second trimester, and 34% were in their third trimester. Among the pregnant women, 49 cases were housewives, and only one patient was employed. As for the lactating women, all the 50 cases were housewives.
Regarding education level, the majority of the pregnant women (40%) had academic education, as well as 38% of the lactating women. In terms of economic status, the highest percentage (54%) had an average economic status among the pregnant women, and 72% of the lactating women had a similar status. Regarding health status, a mean of 38% of the pregnant women and 52% of the lactating women were normal.
Among the pregnant women, 30% had healthy gums (code 0), 18% had bleeding gums (code 1), 36% had a mass (code 2), and 16% had a pocket (code 3) based on the CPTIN. As for the lactating women, 44% had healthy gums (code 0), 32% had bleeding gums (code 1), 20% had a mass (code 2), and 4% had a pocket (code 3). Overall, the incidence of codes two and three was significantly higher in the pregnant women compared to the lactating women.
Scaling and referral to a physician (previous referrals) was reported in 56% of the pregnant women and 76% of the lactating women. Among the pregnant women, 52% used toothbrushes and dental floss, and 60% of the lactating women toothbrushes and dental floss as well. In our sample population, 37% of the women had a healthy periodontium, while 63% had periodontal disease (30% pregnant and 44% lactating). However, the rate of a healthy periodontium decreased with age, and the probability of periodontal diseases increased with aging in the pregnant women. In the lactating women, the rate of periodontal health was higher than the pregnant women, and a significant correlation was observed between age and CPITN in the pregnant women (Table 1).
CPITN of Pregnant and Lactating Women in Ilam City Based on Age
| Age (y) | CPITN | P-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Pregnant women | 0.047 | ||||
| < 25 | 12 (80) | 4 (44.4) | 6 (33.3) | 1 (1.25) | |
| 25 - 30 | 3 (20) | 3 (33.3) | 7 (38.9) | 4 (50) | |
| > 30 | 0 | 2 (22.2) | 5 (27.8) | 3 (37.5) | |
| Lactating women | 0.11 | ||||
| < 25 | 9 (40.9) | 4 (25) | 3 (18.8) | 0 | |
| 25 - 30 | 3 (13.6) | 8 (50) | 3 (30) | 2 (100) | |
| > 30 | 10 (45.5) | 4 (25) | 4 (40) | 0 | |
More than half of the pregnant women with different education levels had plaques and masses. Overall, 67% of the women with healthy gums had academic education, 33% had a high school diploma, and none of them had elementary or middle school education. A significant correlation was denoted between education level and CPITN. In the lactating women, the highest frequency was related to healthy gums in those with academic education, and plaques decreased in those with higher education. A significant correlation was observed between education level and CPITN in the lactating women (Table 2).
CPITN in Pregnant and Lactating Women in Ilam City Based on Education Level
| Education Level | CPITN | P-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Pregnant women | 0.01 | ||||
| Elementary school | 0 | 2 (22.2) | 5 (27.1) | 3 (37.5) | |
| Junior high school | 0 | 0 | 2 (11.1) | 3 (37.5) | |
| High school | 5 (33.3) | 2 (22.2) | 6 (33.3) | 2 (25) | |
| Academic | 10 (66.7) | 5 (55.6) | 5 (27.8) | 0 | |
| Lactating women | 0.03 | ||||
| Elementary school | 1 (4.5) | 2 (12.5) | 2 (20) | 2 (100) | |
| Junior high school | 3 (13.6) | 4 (25) | 0 | 0 | |
| High school | 7 (31.8) | 6 (37.5) | 4 (23.5) | 0 | |
| Academic | 11 (50) | 4 (25) | 4 (40) | 0 | |
In both the pregnant and lactating women, the status of the CPITN was better with the observance of oral hygiene, and a significant correlation was also denoted between the health status and CIPTN in both groups (Table 3).
Determination of CPITN in Pregnant and Lactating Women in Ilam City Based on Health Status
| Health Status | CPITN | P-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Pregnant women | 0.04 | ||||
| Poor | 1 (6.7) | 2 (22.2) | 9 (50) | 2 (25) | |
| Moderate | 5 (33.3) | 3 (33.3) | 6 (33.3) | 5 (6.5) | |
| Good | 9 (60) | 4 (44.4) | 3 (16.7) | 1 (12.5) | |
| Lactating women | 0.02 | ||||
| Poor | 1 (4.5) | 4 (25) | 3 (30) | 1 (50) | |
5. Discussion
Given the increasing prevalence of periodontal diseases in pregnant women and the need for special attention to this issue, the present study aimed to investigate the incidence of periodontal diseases in vulnerable populations, especially in Ilam province, which is considered deprived in terms of oral health and specialization. According to the findings, 70.0% of the pregnant women had periodontal diseases, which is consistent with the previous studies in this regard (27-29). Discrepancies may be due to the use of different indices, differences in sociocultural and economic levels, and growing health awareness in some communities.
The current research indicated that increased gestational age was associated with deteriorated CPITN, which is in line with the findings of Wandera et al. (30). Furthermore, periodontal disorders increased with aging, and a correlation was observed between the rate of moderate and severe gingivitis with aging. In the present study, the CPITN score was directly correlated with education level, and higher education levels were associated with better CPITN scores; this is consistent with another study in this regard (30, 31). Therefore, it was concluded that the CPITN was correlated with education level in both the pregnant and lactating women, and education plays a key role in reducing periodontal diseases.
In the present study, no significant difference was observed between the CPITN score and dental referral status; this difference was considered significant in the study by Torabi et al. (23). This could be because our participants did not receive extensive training on oral hygiene from their dentists. Our findings also demonstrated that the pregnant and lactating women with considerable oral hygiene had better CPITN scores, and significant correlation was also observed between the health status and CIPTN in both groups.
5.1. Limitations of the Study
The main limitations of our study were the small sample size and the refusal of some patients to participate in the study; we attempted to solve this issue by free visitation. In addition, the women in the two groups were not matched in terms of age, and further investigations in this regard should evaluate a narrower age group of women. It is also suggested that similar studies be carried out in other provinces if necessary and planning to control the oral health of pregnant and lactating women be incorporated into continuous training programs coherently. Other oral diseases that are prevalent during pregnancy should be examined as well.
5.2. Conclusions
According to the results, the prevalence of periodontal diseases was higher in the pregnant women compared to the lactating women, while the frequency of dental visits was lower in the pregnant women compared to the lactating women. Therefore, the population of pregnant women is at a relatively high risk of periodontal diseases. Given the severe complications of periodontal infections in the fetus and neonate, pregnant women need more oral health education and care.
References
-
1.
Gil-Montoya JA, Leon-Rios X, Rivero T, Exposito-Ruiz M, Perez-Castillo I, Aguilar-Cordero MJ. Factors associated with oral health-related quality of life during pregnancy: a prospective observational study. Qual Life Res. 2021. [PubMed ID: 33978891]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02869-3.
-
2.
Onigbinde O, Sorunke M, Braimoh M, Adeniyi A. Periodontal status and some variables among pregnant women in a Nigeria tertiary institution. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4(6):852-7. [PubMed ID: 25506475]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4250980]. https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.144876.
-
3.
Patil S, Kalburg N, Koregole A, Warad S, Patil S, Ashok NJJHSR. Periodontal health and pregnancy: Is she aware. J Health Sci Res. 2011;2:8-12.
-
4.
Nazari M, Mehrabi T, Hosseini SM, Alikhani MY. Bacterial contamination of adult house flies (Musca domestica) and sensitivity of these bacteria to various antibiotics, captured from Hamadan City, Iran. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(4):DC04-7. [PubMed ID: 28571138]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5449784]. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/23939.9720.
-
5.
Miyazaki H, Yamashita Y, Shirahama R, Goto-Kimura K, Shimada N, Sogame A, et al. Periodontal condition of pregnant women assessed by CPITN. J Clin Periodontol. 1991;18(10):751-4. [PubMed ID: 1752999]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1991.tb00067.x.
-
6.
Agbelusi GA, Akinwande JA, Shutti YO. Oral health status and treatment needs of pregnant women in Lagos State. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2000;7(3):96-100. [PubMed ID: 11257922].
-
7.
Tilakaratne A, Soory M, Ranasinghe AW, Corea SM, Ekanayake SL, de Silva M. Periodontal disease status during pregnancy and 3 months post-partum, in a rural population of Sri-Lankan women. J Clin Periodontol. 2000;27(10):787-92. [PubMed ID: 11034128]. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027010787.x.
-
8.
Gesase N, Miranda-Rius J, Brunet-Llobet L, Lahor-Soler E, Mahande MJ, Masenga G. The association between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study. Afr Health Sci. 2018;18(3):601-11. [PubMed ID: 30602993]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6307003]. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v18i3.18.
-
9.
Shamala A, Al-Maimooni E, Al-Matari S, Hiyat R, Al-wesabi M, Al-Maweri S, et al. Tooth loss and its association with frequency of pregnancy: A cross-sectional study among Yemeni women. Researchsquare. 2021. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-147421/v1.
-
10.
Sekhon TS, Grewal S, Gambhir RS. Periodontal health status and treatment needs of the rural population of India: A cross-sectional study. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015;6(1):111-5. [PubMed ID: 25810646]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4367019]. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.149102.
-
11.
Thanathornwong B, Suebnukarn S. Automatic detection of periodontal compromised teeth in digital panoramic radiographs using faster regional convolutional neural networks. Imaging Sci Dent. 2020;50(2):169-74. [PubMed ID: 32601592]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7314603]. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2020.50.2.169.
-
12.
Safavi S, Gholak KP. [Evaluation of periodontal status of pregnant women referring to Taleghani and 29 Bahman hospitals Via CPI index-Tabriz, 1380]. J Dent Sch Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci. 2003;21(4):536-43. Persian.
-
13.
Desai K, Desai P, Duseja S, Kumar S, Mahendra J, Duseja S. Significance of maternal periodontal health in preeclampsia. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015;5(2):103-7. [PubMed ID: 25992334]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4415327]. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.155734.
-
14.
Amar S, Chung KM. Influence of hormonal variation on the periodontium in women. Periodontol 2000. 1994;6:79-87. [PubMed ID: 9673172]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1994.tb00028.x.
-
15.
Kim EG, Park SK, Nho JH. Factors related to maternal oral health status: Focus on pregnant and breastfeeding women. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(6). [PubMed ID: 34200724]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8229509]. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9060708.
-
16.
Robison V, Bauman B, D'Angelo DV, Espinoza L, Thornton-Evans G, Lin M. The impact of dental insurance and medical insurance on dental care utilization during pregnancy. Matern Child Health J. 2021;25(5):832-40. [PubMed ID: 33389456]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-020-03094-z.
-
17.
Ren H, Du M. Role of maternal periodontitis in preterm birth. Front Immunol. 2017;8:139. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00139.
-
18.
Choi SE, Choudhary A, Ahern JM, Palmer N, Barrow JR. Association between maternal periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes: an analysis of claims data. Fam Pract. 2021. [PubMed ID: 34173655]. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmab037.
-
19.
Pockpa ZAD, Soueidan A, Koffi-Coulibaly NT, Limam A, Badran Z, Struillou X. Periodontal diseases and adverse pregnancy outcomes: Review of two decades of clinical research. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2021;19(1):77-83. [PubMed ID: 33491381]. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.b898969.
-
20.
Kallio P, Nordblad A, Croucher R, Ainamo J. Self-reported gingivitis and bleeding gums among adolescents in Helsinki. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1994;22(5 Pt 1):277-82. [PubMed ID: 7813175]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1994.tb02050.x.
-
21.
Balkaran R. Gestational diabetes and periodontal disease in Trinidad – A pilot study. Caribbean Med J. 2021. https://doi.org/10.48107/cmj2021.04.005.
-
22.
Rashidi Maybodi F, Haerian-Ardakani A, Vaziri F, Khabbazian A, Mohammadi-Asl S. CPITN changes during pregnancy and maternal demographic factors 'impact on periodontal health. Iran J Reprod Med. 2015;13(2):107-12. [PubMed ID: 26000000]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4426148].
-
23.
Torabi M, Najafi GA, Maskani AR. [Evaluation of CPITN index in pregnant women Kerman 2001-2002]. J Dent Sch Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci. 2006;24(1(67)):33-9. Persian.
-
24.
Dhingra K, Vandana KL. Indices for measuring periodontitis: A literature review. Int Dent J. 2011;61(2):76-84. [PubMed ID: 21554276]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00018.x.
-
25.
Ainamo J, Barmes D, Beagrie G, Cutress T, Martin J, Sardo-Infirri J. Development of the World Health Organization (WHO) community periodontal index of treatment needs (CPITN). Int dent J. 1982;32:281-91. [PubMed ID: 6958657].
-
26.
Bassani DG, da Silva CM, Oppermann RV. Validity of the "Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs" (CPITN) for population periodontitis screening. Cad Saude Publica. 2006;22(2):277-83. [PubMed ID: 16501740]. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2006000200005.
-
27.
Perez Barrionuevo AM, Gomez Real F, Igland J, Johannessen A, Omenaas E, Franklin KA, et al. Periodontal health status and lung function in two Norwegian cohorts. PLoS One. 2018;13(1). e0191410. [PubMed ID: 29351551]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5774767]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191410.
-
28.
Diab HA, Hamadeh GN, Ayoub F. Evaluation of periodontal status and treatment needs of institutionalized intellectually disabled individuals in Lebanon. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017;7(3):76.
-
29.
Noack B, Genco RJ, Trevisan M, Grossi S, Zambon JJ, De Nardin E. Periodontal infections contribute to elevated systemic C-reactive protein level. J Periodontol. 2001;72(9):1221-7. [PubMed ID: 11577954]. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.72.9.1221.
-
30.
Wandera M, Engebretsen IM, Okullo I, Tumwine JK, Astrom AN, Promise-Ebf Study Group. Socio-demographic factors related to periodontal status and tooth loss of pregnant women in Mbale district, Uganda. BMC Oral Health. 2009;9:18. [PubMed ID: 19615094]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2722607]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-9-18.
-
31.
Yalcin F, Eskinazi E, Soydinc M, Basegmez C, Issever H, Isik G, et al. The effect of sociocultural status on periodontal conditions in pregnancy. J Periodontol. 2002;73(2):178-82. [PubMed ID: 11895283]. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.2.178.