Logo
J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci

Image Credit:J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci

Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion Occurring After Second Dose of Sinopharm COVID-19 Vaccine: A Case Report

Author(s):
Leyla RezaeiLeyla Rezaei1,*
1Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran


Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences:Vol. 26, issue 4; e129793
Published online:Feb 08, 2023
Article type:Case Report
Received:Jul 12, 2022
Accepted:Jan 11, 2023
How to Cite:Leyla RezaeiBranch Retinal Vein Occlusion Occurring After Second Dose of Sinopharm COVID-19 Vaccine: A Case Report.J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci.26(4):e129793.https://doi.org/10.5812/jkums-129793.

Abstract

1. Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has infected millions of people and caused more than 1 million deaths worldwide, leading to the immediate demand for vaccination (1, 2). The inactivated Sinopharm’s China National Biotec Group developed the Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine to prevent the COVID-19 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV 2). The vaccine has been tolerable and immunogenic in healthy people, with 2 doses injected 21 days apart (3). Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccination is universal, and its complications are not entirely known. The Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine caused a branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) three weeks after the second dose. This event could have been coincidental to its use, although there are conditions, which can suspect the relationship in a natural cause-and-effect association.

2. Case Presentation

A 75-year-old female with sudden blurred vision in her left eye was referred to our clinic. She was non-obese, without a history of smoking, diabetes mellitus, or hypertension, and had no pathological or family history. Three weeks prior, she had received the second dose of the Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine. Her vision reduced from the third day after vaccination, but she ignored it, and her vision reduction has progressed to blindness. The patient was PCR negative for SARS-Cov2.

Her best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 1m counting finger in the left eye and 10/10 in the right eye. The fundus examination demonstrated superior hemiretinal hemorrhage in the left eye Figure 1.

Fundus examination showed superior hemiretinal hemorrhage in the left eye.
Figure 1.

Fundus examination showed superior hemiretinal hemorrhage in the left eye.

The fluorescein angiography (FA) was performed on admission indicating the superior arcade blockage due to retinal and pre-retinal hemorrhage, dilation, tortuosity of the superior vein, vascular staining, and macular edema in the left eye. Fluorescein angiography of the right eye was normal. Topcon macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed on the same day, showing a cystoid macular edema (CME), increased macular retinal thickness, and serous retinal detachment (central retinal thickness (CRT): 649 µm, average retinal thickness: 567.1 µm, and total volume 16.03 mm3). Optical coherence tomography of the right eye was normal.

The left eye was diagnosed with vaccine-induced CRVO. In addition, CBC panel, d-dimer, antithrombin III, homocysteine, coagulation protein C and S, pre and postprandial glycemia, lipid profile, creatinine, and ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure, were asked. In the end, blood reports showed no abnormalities.

Antithrombotic treatment of 80 mg/d low-dose entrocoated ASA was administered, accompanied by an intravitreal Aflibercept (Eylea) injection monthly and ongoing, starting from 05/09/2021.

At the three-week follow-up, superior hemiretinal hemorrhage decreased on the fundus photograph, and the BCVA of the left eye improved to 2/10. Macular edema, retinal hemorrhage, and height of serous retinal detachment decreased on OCT Figure 2.

Macular edema, retinal hemorrhage, and height of serous retinal detachment decreased on OCT in the three-week follow-up.
Figure 2.

Macular edema, retinal hemorrhage, and height of serous retinal detachment decreased on OCT in the three-week follow-up.

Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) of the left eye showed decreasing in vessel density and disruption in the foveal avascular zone, vascular tortuosity, dilation, and telangiectasia, and capillary non-perfusion in the superficial capillary plexus (SCP), and the deep capillary plexus (DCP). Dark irregular areas without vessel signal in OCTA correspond to CME Figure 3.

OCTA of the left eye showed decreased vessel density and disrupted foveal avascular zone, vascular tortuosity, dilation and telangiectasia, and capillary non-perfusion in SCP and DCP. Dark irregular areas without vessel signal in OCTA correspond to CME.
Figure 3.

OCTA of the left eye showed decreased vessel density and disrupted foveal avascular zone, vascular tortuosity, dilation and telangiectasia, and capillary non-perfusion in SCP and DCP. Dark irregular areas without vessel signal in OCTA correspond to CME.

Fluorescein angiography of the left eye showed decreasing vessel tortuosity and dilation, vascular staining, and retinal blockage due to lowering corresponding retinal vessels (Figure 4).

FA of the left eye showed decreasing vessel tortuosity and dilation, vascular staining, and retinal blockage due to the lowering of corresponding retinal vessels.
Figure 4.

FA of the left eye showed decreasing vessel tortuosity and dilation, vascular staining, and retinal blockage due to the lowering of corresponding retinal vessels.

3. Discussion

Many thromboembolic adverse events have been reported after COVID-19 vaccinations, including systemic inflammation, platelet dysfunction, and endothelial dysfunction (4), although there is evidence of ophthalmic complications.

To the best of our knowledge, there are no reported cases in the world literature reporting BRVO related to COVID-19 vaccination. Cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, increased body mass index, glaucoma, diabetes mellitus, and hematologic disorders are common risk factors for BRVOs (5-7). Our patient had no previous history of any of these situations.

This old-aged woman experienced vision reduction from the third day after the second dose of the Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine, but she ignored the condition. The vision reduction progressed to blindness, and she was referred three weeks after vaccination. The pathophysiology, in this case, is currently unclear, and causality may be revealed in future studies.

3.1. Conclusions

In general, the present case may show a Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccination-induced BRVO. Therefore, BRVO should be added to the possible ophthalmic complications after Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccination. After vaccinations, patients with symptomatic eye conditions ought to consult an ophthalmologist. In the end, further research and observations are warranted.

Footnotes

References

comments

Leave a comment here


Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.