Abstract
Keywords
1. Background
In recent years, people’s access to and use of various medications has increased throughout the world due to the spread of diseases, advances in medical and pharmaceutical sciences, and medical covers. Iran is one of the biggest medication users, and is considered among the first 20 countries in the world, and next to China, ranks second in Asia (1). The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 7700 kg of antibiotics are produced in the world every day. In terms of used vials in Iran, antibiotics are the most used medication group in the country, and make up for 15% of the total share of medication use (2). The high level of antibiotic use in medical settings, especially hospitals, leads to much contact between bacteria and antibiotic groups and makes bacteria resistant (3). Therefore, the main cause of the rising bacterial resistance to antibiotics in Iran is the haphazard administration and use of antibiotics (4). The WHO has reported the spread of antibiotic resistance as one of the three big risk factors threatening public health in 21 century. Antibiotic resistance can be transferred in the environment from pathogenic to non-pathogenic bacteria. Transfer of resistant genes occurs through plasmid, integrin, and transposons (5). Escherichia coli is one of the bacteria susceptible to antibiotic resistance, and is regarded as one of the indicators of fecal contamination. This bacterium is part of the natural human intestinal microflora, and one of the key members of Enterobacteriaceae family. Escherichia coli can cause various health problems as a non-pathogenic or a pathogenic bacterium in human and other organisms. Although no antibiotic is required for the treatment of this bacterium, many strains of this bacterium have shown resistance to multiple antibiotics, and this can be regarded as a major health concern (6). Hence, there is a need for careful epidemiological monitoring of this bacterium. Generally, the resistance rate of this bacterium is increasing, and various strains of this bacterium are causing certain diseases throughout the world (7).
Although many studies have been conducted to identify antibiotic resistance of important bacteria such as Escherichia coli, few studies have investigated environmental samples. Given that pathogenic bacteria and fecal coliforms mainly enter the sewage collection systems and treatment plants before entering the natural habitat, and these systems are regarded as a suitable place for monitoring antibiotic resistance of bacteria, the present study was conducted to determine antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli in inlet and outlet sewage of Hamadan Sewage Treatment Plant.
2. Methods
The present descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted over six months from April to September 2017. E. coli sensitivity to antibiotics was determined by disc diffusion method and according to CLSI standards. In the present study, antibiogram discs used included amoxicillin, cefixime, sulfamethoxazole, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, and imipenem. Serial dilutions were prepared from the samples in sterile normal saline, so that 1 mL was taken from each sample under sterile conditions, and serial dilutions from 1 - 10 to 10 - 10 were prepared in sterile test tubes containing 9 mL of normal saline (sodium hydroxide and potassium dihydrogen phosphate) with pH of 7.2. Then, 0.1 mL from each dilution was cultured by spread method in two plates containing Agar EMB (eosin methylene blue agar). Cultured plates were then incubated at 37°C. Next, pure cultures were prepared from colonies that appeared similar to E. coli colonies, and E. coli colonies were identified using IMVIC method. The antibiogram test was carried out using bacterial suspension in normal saline, and comparison of its turbidity with half-McFarland standard. The prepared suspensions were densely cultured using sterile swabs on the plate containing Mueller Hinton agar (Merck) culture medium. Then, plates were incubated at 30°C for 16 - 20 hours. Next, the diffusion around each disc was measured by a millimeter ruler and the results were interpreted using CLSI standard table. The resistant and sensitive bacteria were determined according to the non-growth halo created. Based on CLSI tables and diameter of the halo formed around the disc, antibiogram of the cultured samples was divided into three categories: Resistant, intermediate, and susceptible. Regarding E. coli in the presence of CP antibiotic, these values have been determined < 15 mm for resistant bacteria, between 16 mm and 20 mm for intermediate bacteria, and > 21 mm for susceptible bacteria. For IPM, these values are < 19 mm for resistant, between 20 mm and 22 mm for intermediate, and > 21 mm for susceptible bacteria. For E, < 13 mm for resistant, between 14 mm and 22 mm for intermediate, and > 23 mm for susceptible bacteria. For AMX, < 13 mm for resistant, between 14 mm and 17 mm for intermediate, and > 18 mm for susceptible bacteria. For CFM, < 15 mm for resistant, between 16 mm and 18 mm for intermediate, and > 19 mm for susceptible bacteria. For SXT, < 10 mm for resistant, between 11 mm and 15 mm for intermediate, and > 16 mm for susceptible bacteria.
3. Results
The pattern of antibiotic resistance of E. coli isolated from municipal sewage (inlet and outlet) is presented in Table 1. According to the results, antibiotic resistance of E. coli to CP, IPM, E, AMX, CFM, and SXT was 9, 18, 82, 100, 82, and 55 respectively at inlet, and 30, 50, 100, 100, 60, and 40 respectively at outlet (Table 1).
The Pattern of Antibiotic Resistance of E. coli Isolated from Inlet and Outlet of Hamadan Sewage Treatment Planta
Antibiotic | Dose, µg | Susceptible | Intermediate | Resistance | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Influent | Effluent | Influent | Effluent | Influent | Effluent | ||
CP | 5 | 18 (73) | 17 (70) | 4 (18) | 0 (0) | 2 (9) | 7 (30) |
IPM | 10 | 14 (55) | 5 (20) | 6 (27) | 7 (30) | 4 (18) | 12 (50) |
E | 15 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 4 (18) | 0 (0) | 20 (82) | 24 (100) |
AMX | 10 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 24 (100) | 24 (100) |
CFM | 5 | 2 (9) | 5 (20) | 2 (9) | 5 (20) | 20 (82) | 14 (60) |
SXT | 10 | 2 (9) | 10 (40) | 9 (36) | 4 (20) | 13 (55) | 10 (40) |
Using the multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index can provide a significant potential in differentiating the source of bacteria in terms of medication resistance. In the present study, MAR index for the isolated E. coli was found using Equation 1. MAR values for E. coli isolated from inlet and outlet sewage are presented in Figure 1.
MAR values in inlet and outlet of Hamadan Sewage Treatment Plant
4. Discussion
According to the present study results, most cases of E. coli antibiotic resistance in the sewage inlet to Hamadan Sewage Treatment Plant related to AMX with 100% and CFM and E with 82%, and the highest susceptibility related to CP with 73%. Also, most cases of E. coli antibiotic resistance in the sewage outlet to the sewage treatment plant related to AMX and E with 100%, and the highest susceptibility related to CP with 70%, which agrees with the study conducted by Mohammedi et al. (8). In agreement with the present study results, Jha in Japan showed that E. coli has the least resistance to CP (9). In a study conducted by Hadi et al. on antibiotic resistance of the bacteria isolated from municipal and hospital wastewaters in the city of Hamadan, the results showed the percentage of E. coli resistance to the studied antibiotics was between 1.81% and 51.02% (10), which is far less than the resistance found in the present study in 2017. In the present study, E. coli resistance to the antibiotics examined varied from 8% to 100% at inlet to Hamadan Sewage Treatment Plant, and from 30% to 100% at outlet from this plant. The difference could be due to the greater use of various antibiotics in Hamadan hospitals compared to 2010 and transfer of these antibiotics through hospital wastewaters to municipal sewage. MAR index for E. coli was 0.58 at inlet and 0.63 at outlet of Hamadan Sewage Treatment Plant. These values can be compared to those found in a study by Parveen et al. (11), which determined MAR value of 0.13 for E. coli isolated from municipal sewage. In the study by Hadi et al. (10) MAR value for municipal sewage was also found 0.13, which is less than that found in the present study. It can be seen that MAR value for E.coli found in the present study is greater than those found in studies conducted by Parveen et al. and Hadi et al., and this is very likely to be due to higher concentration and diversity of antibiotics in Hamadan municipal wastewaters compared to other studies, which leads to increased transfer of resistance factors in bacteria and accelerates multiplicity of resistance (11). Comparing the present study results to those obtained by Hadi et al. in 2010 shows a significant increase in E. coli antibiotic resistance over the last seven years, where E. coli resistance to common antibiotics such as AMX and E is very high, probably due to uncontrolled use of these antibiotics. Persistence of this trend can increase the likelihood of antibiotics becoming ineffective in bacterial infections, and entails spread of infections in the society. Lack of scientific supervision over self-administered antibiotics and easy access to these medications seem to be the key factors for reducing microbial resistance.
Acknowledgements
References
-
1.
Shokoohi R, Leili M, Dargahi A, Vaziri Y, Khamutian R. Common antibiotics in wastewater of Sina and Besat Hospitals, Hamadan, Iran. Arch Hyg Sci. 2017;6(2):152-9.
-
2.
Musey MK. Evaluation of the fate of ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin in domestic wastewater. The ASA-CSSA-SSSA International Annual Meetings. 2006.
-
3.
Rodriguez-Mozaz S, Chamorro S, Marti E, Huerta B, Gros M, Sanchez-Melsio A, et al. Occurrence of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in hospital and urban wastewaters and their impact on the receiving river. Water Res. 2015;69:234-42. [PubMed ID: 25482914]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.11.021.
-
4.
Ohlsen K, Ternes T, Werner G, Wallner U, Loffler D, Ziebuhr W, et al. Impact of antibiotics on conjugational resistance gene transfer in Staphylococcus aureus in sewage. Environ Microbiol. 2003;5(8):711-6. [PubMed ID: 12871238]. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00459.x.
-
5.
Bouki C, Venieri D, Diamadopoulos E. Detection and fate of antibiotic resistant bacteria in wastewater treatment plants: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013;91:1-9. [PubMed ID: 23414720]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.01.016.
-
6.
Almasi A, Pirsaheb M, Shokoohizadeh MJ, Khamutian R, Dargahi A, Mohajeri P, et al. [Prevalence of enterotoxigenic and enteropathogenic E. coli isolated from municipal, hospital, and industrial (dairy and slaughterhouse) wastewater treatment plants in Kermanshah city]. J Health. 2017;8(3):246-55. Persia.
-
7.
Mirzaee M, Pourmand MR, Chitsaz M, Mansouri S. Antibiotic resistance to third generation cephalosporins due to CTX- M- Type extended- spectrum B-Lactamases in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli. Iran J Publ Health. 2009;38(1):10-7.
-
8.
Mohammadi M, Ghasemi E, Mokhayeri H, Pournia Y, Boroun H. Antimicrobial resistance patterns of E. coli detected from hospitalized urine culture samples. Asian J Biol Sci. 2010;3(4):195-201. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajbs.2010.195.201.
-
9.
Jha N, Bapat SK. A study of sensitivity and resistance of pathogenic micro organisms causing UTI in Kathmandu valley. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2005;3(2):123-9. [PubMed ID: 16415607].
-
10.
Hadi M, Shokoohi R, Ebrahimzadeh Namvar A, Karimi M, Solaimany Aminabad M. [Antibiotic resistance of isolated bacteria from urban and hospital wastewaters in Hamadan city]. Iran J Health Environ. 2011;4(1):105-14. Persian.
-
11.
Parveen S, Murphree RL, Edmiston L, Kaspar CW, Portier KM, Tamplin ML. Association of multiple-antibiotic-resistance profiles with point and nonpoint sources of Escherichia coli in Apalachicola Bay. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63(7):2607-12. [PubMed ID: 9212410]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC168557].