ARTICLE AUTHORS
ARTICLE INFO
academic journalism

Evaluation of Microsurgery Results in Patients with Peripheral Nerve Injury, Talegani and Shafa Hospitals, kermanshah, Iran. (1992-1999)

AUTHORS

avatar keykhosro mardanpour 1 , * , avatar M Rahbar 1

1 Iran

How to Cite: mardanpour K, Rahbar M. Evaluation of Microsurgery Results in Patients with Peripheral Nerve Injury, Talegani and Shafa Hospitals, kermanshah, Iran. (1992-1999). J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci. 2007;11(3):e80510.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences: 11 (3); e80510
Published Online: December 19, 2007
Article Type: Research Article
Received: March 06, 2006
Accepted: October 10, 2006
READ FULL TEXT

Abstract

Background & Objectives: Patients with peripheral nerve injury make up five percent of referrals to medical centers owing to accidents. Since peripheral nerve injury can lead to functional defect, therefore, there are many factors that should be considered for obtaining the best result of managements, e.g. degree of nerve injury, age, kind of nerve injury and date of surgery being out of our control. It is more than likely the best result of management could be obtained through the best technique of surgery_ substitution of old techniques for the most modern one, Microsurgery.  In this study, we have tried to report the result of management of 69 patients with peripheral nerve injury undergone microsurgery technique.
Materials and Methods: In this survey, 69 patients with an average age of 2.5 to 59 have been studied within 7 years. The patients were suffering from 82 traumas leading to upper extremity peripheral nerve injury. All nerve injuries, have been repaired via "end to end coaptation microsurgery technique" in form of perineuronal, fasicular, group fasicular nerve repair, or mix of the three methods, using 9-0, 10-0 Nylon string for most patients.All the patients were followed up through physical history, physical exam like Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament, Two -Point Discrimination, Moberg pick-up test, and performing EMG and NCV tests 35 months after microsurgery.
Results: 83% of patients were male. About half, underwent operation less than one week after accident. Sensory and functional recoveries were evaluated by using a modified British scale. We considered sensory recovery “good” for grades S3+ and S4 observed in 56 injured nerves, and functional recovery “good” for grades M3 and M4 in 48 injured nerves.
Conclusion: Having used microsurgery technique for peripheral nerve injury repair, only 20 percent of injured nerves had a complete sensory and functional recovery contributed to some variable factors such as delay to the repair of nerve, degree of nerve injury and age of patients.

Fulltext

The full text of this article is available on PDF

© 2007, Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
COMMENTS

LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: