academic journalism

Medical Malpractice Cases in Kerman Province, Iran (2010 - 2014)


avatar Mohammad Mahdi Hayatbakhsh Abbasi 1 , * , avatar Abbas Amyan 2 , avatar Shahryar Safari 3 , avatar Mohammad Mostafa Tahghighi 3 , avatar Fatemeh Karami Robati 4 , avatar Ahmad Alinaghi Langari 4

1 Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Institute of Basic and Clinical Physiology Sciences, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

2 Kerman Legal Medicine Organization, Kerman, Iran

3 Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

4 Clinical Research Unit, Afzalipour Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

How to Cite: Hayatbakhsh Abbasi M M , Amyan A, Safari S , Tahghighi M M , Karami Robati F, et al. Medical Malpractice Cases in Kerman Province, Iran (2010 - 2014). J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci.24(2):e98290.
doi: 10.5812/jkums.98290.


Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences: 24 (2); e98290
Published Online: August 3, 2020
Article Type: Research Article
Received: September 24, 2019
Revised: July 8, 2020
Accepted: July 22, 2020



Medical malpractice is a major cause of patient complaints and dissatisfaction, which is an alarming event for healthcare professional and medical practitioners.


The present study aimed to investigate medical malpractice cases in Kerman province, Iran.


This cross-sectional, retrospective study was performed to analyze the complaint cases reported in Kerman Medical Council and Kerman Legal Medicine Organization during 2010 - 2014. Physician data were recorded on age, gender, academic degree, specialty, work experience, place of failure, and type of medical malpractice. Data analysis was performed in SPSS.


In total, 551 complaint cases were investigated, 167 of which (31%) were medical malpractice cases. The most common medical malpractices were imprudence (44.31%) and carelessness (41.31%). In addition, most of the medical malpractice cases occurred in governmental hospitals (64.07%). In most of the cases, physicians with specialty degrees were convicted of medical malpractice (73.65%), and the highest number of the medical malpractices was observed in ophthalmology (20.95%).


Despite the significant advancement in medical affairs, the rate of patient complaints and medical malpractices has increased noticeably.

1. Background

The protection of patient safety is one of the most important duties of physicians (1). Medical practitioners must perform all diagnostic procedures, including full biographies or accurate physical examinations, using clinical and paraclinical tests, and consulting with the other colleagues in visiting patients if needed. Furthermore, they should initiate treatment after accurate diagnosis. Physicians may commit medical malpractice if they fail to follow diagnostic and treatment steps (e.g., accurate examination, timely diagnosis, correct treatment and surgery, follow-up, consultation, and necessary guidance) in accordance with the medical scientific and technical standards (2), which could lead to severe health consequences in patients.

Medical malpractice is of various types, such as imprudence, carelessness, lack of skills, and lack of respect to the governmental system. Imprudence is considered to be the most common medical malpractice, which is defined as the abandonment of action due to negligence, delinquency, and absent-mindedness (3). In fact, imprudence occurs when the physician takes an action that should not be taken (4).

Carelessness refers to the cases where the physician does not pay proper attention to the treatment and makes mistake, which in turn leads to physical and psychological damages in the patient. Occasionally, the lack of necessary skills may prevent physicians from showing a specific ability due to inexperience or the lack of the necessary medical knowledge. For instance, some surgeons may fail to repair artery rupture, which is likely to occur during surgeries.

Lack of respect to the governmental system is another classification of medical malpractice. The governmental system encompasses specific regulations regarding medical professionals and the associated disciplines. These rules and regulations are set by the Medical Council in accordance with the instructions of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education, circulars of educational therapy centers, and other laws, regulations, circulars, and instructions legislated by legislators or qualified medical authorities (5).

The basis of the medical malpractice claim is the occurrence of injuries in patients due to negligent actions or omission. Negligence might result from the errors in diagnosis, treatment, aftercare, and health management. If the patient proves the negligence, the physician must compensate financially (6).

If patients are not warned about treatment conditions prior to therapeutic practices, they will eventually complain of their unfulfilled expectations and demands. Complaints regarding physicians are among the most challenging issues in the medical profession; such stressful conditions could lead to distrust in the medical community, wasting of the time and energy of physicians and judicial authorities, and high costs imposed on the individuals and organizations. Overall, they pose significant risks on the healthcare system (7, 8).

According to the literature, the rate of patient complaints has been on the rise across the world despite the significant advancement of medical practices and use of modern facilities in medical centers (9, 10). According to the statistics in the United States, the rate of patient complaints has increased recently (11, 12). The results of a study in this regard showed that per 25 hospitalized cases, one patient may be injured due to medical malpractice. Each year, 48,000 - 98,000 hospitalized patients die due to medical errors (11). The increased rate of patient complaints has diverse causes, some of which include the increased knowledge and awareness of patients regarding their health conditions and individual rights, their unrealistic expectations of the treatment outcomes, use of more sophisticated diagnostic and therapeutic devices, increased number of physicians, population growth and frequent visits to physicians, insufficient knowledge of physicians regarding the legal issues, improper relations between physicians and patients, and failure to observe medical ethics (2, 13, 14).

Unfortunately, patient complaints against physicians have been on the rise in Iran. According to the statistics of the Legal Medicine Organization, complaints about medical malpractices have increased significantly in recent years (15).

2. Objectives

The investigation of medical malpractice cases could provide valuable data regarding the number of complaints, high-risk groups for complaints, and management of such claims by the relevant authorities. In addition, the assessment of the rate of medical errors at hospitals and therapy centers demonstrates the strengths and weaknesses of physicians. As such, medical staff (especially physicians) could avoid medical malpractices by recognizing the most common complaint cases and medical malpractices and paying more attention to these cases. Furthermore, this is an effective step toward maintaining the occupational safety of physicians and health of patients by planning to reduce patient complaints. Finding a solution to this problem not only reduces the costs at the public sector and hospitals, but it also strengthens the relations between physicians and patients, which plays a pivotal role in improving the performance and efficiency of physicians.

The present study aimed to investigate the frequency of the medical complaints reported in Kerman Medical Council and Kerman Legal Medicine Organization and the confirmed cases of medical malpractice in Kerman province, Iran.

3. Methods

This cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted to investigate the complaint cases reported in Kerman Medical Council and Kerman Legal Medicine Organization during 2010 - 2014. The inclusion criterion was the physicians who had been complained against. The records of the physicians were reviewed after obtaining the required permit to access the files and after providing the research commitment to maintain the confidentiality of their information. Data were recorded in a data collection form, and all the information about the physicians and patients remained completely confidential and anonymous. The data of the physicians were collected on their age, gender, academic degree, specialty, work experience, place of failure, and type of medical malpractice. Data analysis was performed in SPSS.

4. Results

In total, 551 complaint cases were assessed, which were reported in Kerman Medical Council (n = 320; 58%) and Kerman Legal Medicine Organization (n = 231; 42%) during 2010 - 2014. The frequency of the complaints about male and female physicians was 413 (74.95%) and 138 cases (25.05%), respectively. The mean age of the physicians who were complained against was 50 years, and the maximum age range was 40 - 60 years (72%). The mean work experience of the physicians was 23 years (range: 5 - 48 years), and the highest number of the complaints belonged to the physicians with the work experience of 20 - 25 years.

No medical malpractice was detected in 384 complaint cases (69.69%), and the physicians were guilty in only 167 cases (31%; 43% at Kerman Medical Council and 57% at Kerman Legal Medicine Organization). Most of the medical malpractices of the physicians included imprudence (44.31%), carelessness (41.31%), and lack of skills (14.31%). The frequency of medical malpractices in the male and female physicians was 126 (75.44%) and 41 cases (24.55%), respectively. The mean age of the guilty physicians was 51 years, and the maximum age range was 35 - 65 years (80%). The mean work experience of the physicians with medical malpractice was 24 years, with the maximum work experience of 35 years (15%). Notably, it was not possible to determine the age and work experience of the physicians in 11 cases.

Among 167 cases of medical malpractice, the minimum and maximum number of the cases belonged to the years 2010 (n = 28) and 2014 (n = 41), respectively (Figure 1). The academic degree of most of the physicians who had been complained against was the specialty degree (74.04%). In addition, most of the cases that had been convicted of medical malpractice in the treatment in the final judgment were the physicians with the specialty degree (73.65%) (Table 1). The highest rate of complaints was reported in the specialties of gynecology (17.2%), orthopedics (16.3%), and general surgery (15.7%). The highest number of the medical malpractice cases was also observed in the specialty field of ophthalmology (20.95%) (Table 2).

Figure 1. Frequency distribution of complaints and medical malpractices during 2010 - 2014
Table 1. Frequency Distribution of Complaints and Medical Malpractices Based on Academic Degree
Academic DegreeComplaints, No. (%)Medical Malpractices, No. (%)
General practitioner (GP)52 (9.43)24 (14.37)
Specialist408 (74.04)123 (73.65)
Fellowship14 (2.54)4 (2.39)
Resident12 (2.17)6 (3.59)
Subspecialist65 (11.79)10 (5.98)
Total551 (100)167 (100)
Table 2. Frequency Distribution of Complaints, Medical Malpractices, and Type of Medical Malpractices Based on Specialty
Academic DegreeComplaints, No. (%)Medical Malpractices, No. (%)Lack of Skills, No. (%)Imprudence, No. (%)Carelessness, No. (%)
Pediatrics14 (2.5)2 (1.19)01 (0.6)1 (0.6)
Internal medicine21 (3.8)1 (0.59)01 (0.6)0
Radiology10 (1.8)1 (0.59)1 (0.6)00
Neurosurgery24 (4.3)0000
Urology12 (2.1)6 (3.59)03 (1.8)3 (1.8)
Dermatology6 (1.1)2 (1.19)002 (1.19)
Pathology1 (0.1)1 (0.59)01 (0.6)0
Cardiology8 (1.4)2 (1.19)01 (0.6)1 (0.6)
Emergency medicine6 (1.1)1 (1.19)002 (1.19)
Anesthesiology19 (3.4)11 (6.58)09 (5.38)2 (1.19)
Psychiatry3 (0.5)0000
Otorhinolaryngology25 (4.5)5 (2.99)005 (3)
Ophthalmology60 (10.8)35 (20.95)10 (6)9 (5.38)16 (9.6)
Obstetrics and gynecology95 (17.2)25 (14.97)3 (1.8)10 (6)12 (7.18)
General surgery87 (15.7)24 (14.37)3 (1.8)11 (6.58)10 (6)
Orthopedics90 (16.3)26 (15.56)6 (3.6)15 (9)5 (3)
Infectious diseases7 (1.2)0000
Neurology10 (1.8)0000
GP52 (9.43)24 (14.37)1 (0.6)13 (7.78)10 (6)
Total551 (100)167 (100)24 (14.37)74 (44.31)69 (41.31)

In the investigation of 167 medical malpractice cases, the types of medical malpractice included 74 cases of imprudence (44.31%), 69 cases of carelessness (41.31%), and 24 cases of lack of skills (14.37%) (Table 2). The frequency of patient complaints was determined to be 161 cases of maim (29.21%), 165 cases of death (29.94%), and 225 cases without maim (40.83%).

Among 167 investigated medical malpractice cases, the status of the plaintiff after the medical malpractice was 79 cases of maim (47.30%), 52 cases of death (31.13%), and 36 cases without maim (21.55%). The frequency distribution of the complaints based on the status of the plaintiff was observed in the governmental hospitals (teaching/non-teaching; 67.31%), private hospitals (12.88%), treatment centers (governmental/private; 12.34%), and private clinics of the physicians (7.44%). In most of the cases, medical malpractices had occurred in governmental hospitals (64.07%), followed by treatment centers (19.16%), private hospitals (11.37%), and private clinics of the physicians (5.38%).

5. Discussion

The rising trend of medical malpractice is a global phenomenon (16), which should be investigated profoundly and accurately. In fact, medical malpractices and complaints are a warning to healthcare professional and physicians (17). The detailed investigation of the causes of medical malpractices could largely contribute to the medical community as it could reduce the rate of complaints and prevent their increase. Therefore, medical malpractices of physicians cannot be neglected (18). In the present study, the frequency of the medical malpractices in the male and female physicians was estimated at 75.44% and 24.55%, respectively. The most frequent complaints and medical malpractice cases had occurred in 2014, while the least frequent incidents were reported in 2010. The ascending trend of the complaints against the physicians and confirmed medical malpractices were evident in the current research, which is consistent with the previous studies in this regard (19-21). In the United States, specialized lawyers are often recruited in this area due to the high frequency of medical malpractices.

According to the results of the present study, the highest frequency of the complaints was observed in specialized physicians in gynecology and orthopedics. This is in line with the findings of Siabani et al. and Raeissi et al. (17, 22). Even the slightest deviation from the scientific standards in gynecology could lead to severe and fatal complications since gynecology and midwifery directly affect maternal, embryonic, and neonatal health (14).

Every activity requires proper skills and adequate experience. Physicians should accept the duties in which they have sufficient expertise and experience. Furthermore, they should perform all therapeutic procedures meticulously and accurately. In the present study, the physicians were guilty in 31% of the complaint cases, which is consistent with the study by Pakis et al. (23). According to the findings of Raeissi et al., approximately 36% of the total number of the complaints was confirmed as medical malpractice, and physicians were acquitted in 2,542 cases (64%) (22). In another research, Hwang et al. reported that among 946 medical malpractice claims, only 14.1% of the verdicts were against clinicians (24).

According to the current research, most of the medical malpractice cases by the physicians occurred due to imprudence and carelessness, and 85% of the physicians injured the patients due to the negligence of the essential medical procedures and inattention to the treatment. Consistent with our findings, Haghshenas et al. stated that most of the medical malpractices of physicians involved imprudence and carelessness (25); this could be due to the inappropriate organization of healthcare systems. Some effective solutions in this regard include the better organization of healthcare systems, increasing the level of treatment insurance coverage, determining and intensifying penalties, and more careful observation of medical ethics. In contrast with our findings, Raeissi et al. reported that most of the failures in medical practice occurred due to the lack of skills (30.4%), followed by negligence (29.2%) (22).

In the current research, the academic degree of more than 70% of the guilty physicians was specialty, and most of the medical malpractice cases were observed in ophthalmology. According to a study conducted in Iran, 1,869 complaints were filed against physicians, 155 of which were in ophthalmologists (26). This is because ophthalmology is an invasive field, and the therapeutic processes in this field involve higher risk levels. In other words, the patients who require surgery tend to have more unstable conditions, which in turn lead to the higher frequency of medical malpractices in this field.

According to the results of the present study, half of the complaints were recorded after the death and maim of the patients, and the remaining were registered without damage. This is consistent with the study by Haghshenas et al., which indicated that maim was the most frequent cause of patient complaints (25). In the research by Hwang et al., 46.3% of patients named in the claims had either died or been gravely injured (24). It is possible to reduce patient complaints by offering the necessary scientific and reasonable comments to the patient regarding the possible injuries and complications of any procedures, efficacy rate of the conducted therapeutic procedures, and inevitable complications of therapeutic interventions through honesty, commitment, and modesty. Furthermore, the abilities of physicians must improve in relation to patients through implementing training workshops and emphasis on the provision of significant information about the treatment procedure. The number of patient complaints could also be reduced by considering moral and religious standards without the involvement of physicians in the cases where they lack the required expertise (25).

In the current research, approximately 50% of the medical malpractices caused maim, and 31.13% resulted in the death of the patients. This finding is inconsistent with the results obtained by Bastani et al. (2), which demonstrated that 82.86% of malpractice cases led to death, while impairment occurred in 17.14% of the cases. Therefore, physicians should be careful about the treatment procedure and consider all the aspects of care meticulously.

The present study indicated that more than half of the patient complaints and most of the medical malpractices (64.07%) occurred in governmental hospitals. According to Rafiezade et al., most of the medical malpractices occurred in the private clinics and treatment centers of physicians (27). In the research by Özdemir et al., 36.8% of the claims were placed in private clinics and hospitals (21). These findings are inconsistent with the present study, which could be due to the higher rate of medical errors in the governmental hospitals providing educational activities. Furthermore, patients refer to governmental centers more commonly due to the high costs of treatment in private healthcare centers. The rate of patient complaints and medical malpractices increases with the higher number of clients in healthcare centers.

5.1. Conclusion

According to the results, medical malpractices and complaints have been on the rise in recent years. Most of the medical malpractice cases were observed in the physicians with specialty degrees due to carelessness and imprudence. The reduced number of patient complaints and medical malpractices decreases treatment costs and enhances the efficiency and practice of physicians. Therefore, it is recommended that continuous retraining be provided in order to improve scientific status of physicians. In addition, solutions must be found to prevent profiteering complaints, and physicians should visit a reasonable and standard number of patients and perform surgeries during one work shift so as to prevent medical malpractices.



  • 1.

    Chegini Z, Janati A, Babaie J, Pouraghaei M. Exploring the barriers to patient engagement in the delivery of safe care in Iranian hospitals: A qualitative study. Nurs Open. 2020;7(1):457-65. doi: 10.1002/nop2.411. [PubMed: 31871731]. [PubMed Central: PMC6917972].

  • 2.

    Bastani M, Hejazi A, Zarenejad M, Shahriary S, Sahmeddini MA. [Malpractice cases of anesthesiology leading to death or impairment referring to Shiraz forensic medicine commissions during 2006-2011]. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences. 2014;21(122):61-7. Persian.

  • 3.

    Michela Chiarello M, Brisinda G. A new item in Italian law: Revenge malpractice. A commentary on legal & ethical dilemmas in incidental findings during surgery - Review article. Int J Surg. 2020;76:51-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.033. [PubMed: 32105894].

  • 4.

    Arhan M, Onal IK, Odemis B, Ibis M, Sasmaz N. Colonoscopy-induced ischemic colitis in a young patient with no risk factor. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(1):250-1. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.28. [PubMed: 19098885].

  • 5.

    Bookman K, Zane RD. Surviving a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2020;38(2):539-48. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2020.01.006. [PubMed: 32336339].

  • 6.

    Birkhoff JM, Pezzoni B, Badino P, Iorio S, Gorini I. Lithographic lecture notes. A tool of forensic medicine teaching. Observation on the lessons of Paolo Pellacani (1884-1885), forensic physician at the University of Pavia. Acta Biomed. 2020;91(1):118-21. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i1.7228. [PubMed: 32191664].

  • 7.

    Waterman AD, Garbutt J, Hazel E, Dunagan WC, Levinson W, Fraser VJ, et al. The emotional impact of medical errors on practicing physicians in the United States and Canada. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007;33(8):467-76. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33050-x. [PubMed: 17724943].

  • 8.

    Gluck PA. Medical error theory. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008;35(1):11-7. vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2007.12.006. [PubMed: 18319125].

  • 9.

    Niles NJ. Basics of the US health care system. Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2019.

  • 10.

    Al Mazroea AH, Alturki AM. Frequency of medical errors complaints against medical health centers in Al Madinah Al Munawarah region of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research & Allied Sciences. 2017;6(2):308-12.

  • 11.

    James JT. A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care. J Patient Saf. 2013;9(3):122-8. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182948a69. [PubMed: 23860193].

  • 12.

    Li H, Wu X, Sun T, Li L, Zhao X, Liu X, et al. Claims, liabilities, injures and compensation payments of medical malpractice litigation cases in China from 1998 to 2011. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:390. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-390. [PubMed: 25218509]. [PubMed Central: PMC4261607].

  • 13.

    Onal G, Civaner MM. For what reasons do patients file a complaint? A retrospective study on patient rights units' registries. Balkan Med J. 2015;32(1):17-22. doi: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2015.15433. [PubMed: 25759767]. [PubMed Central: PMC4342133].

  • 14.

    Sinha R, Jalote I, Sinha M, Raje S, Rao G. Surgical complications in 448 gynecological 3D laparoscopic surgeries adopting the Clavien—Dindo classification. Gynecological Surgery. 2016;13(4):333-8. doi: 10.1007/s10397-016-0973-1.

  • 15.

    Shahabedin Sadr S, Ghadyani MH, Avish S, Ramim T. [Medical malpractice frequency in the psychiatric field, in Medical Council of Iran, from 2001 to 2010: a brief report]. Tehran Univ Med J. 2014;72(5). Persian.

  • 16.

    Taghizadeh Z, Pourbakhtiar M, Azimi K, Ghadipasha M, Soltani K. Claims about medical malpractices resulting in neonatal and maternal impairment in Iran. J Forensic Leg Med. 2019;66:44-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.06.008. [PubMed: 31220788].

  • 17.

    Siabani S, Alipour AA, Siabani H, Rezaei M, Daniali S. [A survey of complaints against physicians reviewed at Kermanshah]. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci. 2009;13(1):74-83. Persian.

  • 18.

    Fayaz AF. Complains About Medical Malpractices in Aja Hospitals Submitted to Tehran Medical Council and Forensics. Journal of Archives in Military Medicine. 2015;3(1). doi: 10.5812/jamm.24423.

  • 19.

    Madea B, Preuss J. Medical malpractice as reflected by the forensic evaluation of 4450 autopsies. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;190(1-3):58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.05.013. [PubMed: 19524380].

  • 20.

    Hanganu B, Iorga M, Muraru ID, Ioan BG. Reasons for and Facilitating Factors of Medical Malpractice Complaints. What Can Be Done to Prevent Them? Medicina (Kaunas). 2020;56(6). doi: 10.3390/medicina56060259. [PubMed: 32471166]. [PubMed Central: PMC7353843].

  • 21.

    Özdemir MH, Can İÖ, Koçak N. Malpractice claims in ophthalmology: A 10-year review. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2014;44(1):1-5. doi: 10.4274/tjo.83584.

  • 22.

    Raeissi P, Taheri Mirghaed M, Sepehrian R, Afshari M, Rajabi MR. Medical malpractice in Iran: A systematic review. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019;33:110. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.33.110. [PubMed: 31934570]. [PubMed Central: PMC6946923].

  • 23.

    Pakis I, Yayci N, Karapirli M, Gunce E, Polat O. Autopsy profiles of malpractice cases. J Forensic Leg Med. 2009;16(1):7-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2008.05.012. [PubMed: 19061842].

  • 24.

    Hwang CY, Wu CH, Cheng FC, Yen YL, Wu KH. A 12-year analysis of closed medical malpractice claims of the Taiwan civil court: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(13). e0237. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010237. [PubMed: 29595675]. [PubMed Central: PMC5895413].

  • 25.

    Haghshenas MR, Vahidshahi K, Amiri A, Rezaee M, Rahmani N, Pourhossen M, et al. [Study the frequency of malpractice lawsuits referred to forensic medicine department and medical council, Sari, 2006-2011]. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2012;21(86):253-60. Persian.

  • 26.

    Ghanbari H, Salehi A. [Comparison of astigmatism after cataract surgery with separate & running sutures]. J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci. 2003;5. Persian.

  • 27.

    Rafiezade M, Manouchehri R, Nasajizavare M. [Determination of malpractice frequency in General Practionares in Legal Medicine organization in Tehran 2003-2005]. Legal medicine Magazine. 2007;13:152-7. Persian.

Copyright © 2020, Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.