Effects of Linear and Non-linear Pedagogy on Motor and Cognitive Creativity

Mina Asadi; Parvaneh Shamsipour Dehkordi; Marzieh Entezari

doi:10.52547/ijmcl.5.1.1

Journal of Motor Control and Learning

Current Issue All Issues In Press Accepted Manuscripts Search

Editors & Boards Indexing and Listing Sources Journal Metrics Open Peer Review (OPR)Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement Journal Information Contact Us Support Reviewer and AE Registration Form

Authors Guide Submit Manuscript

https://doi.org/10.52547/ijmcl.5.1.1

Effects of Linear and Non-linear Pedagogy on Motor and Cognitive Creativity

Author(s):

Mina Asadi

¹,

Parvaneh Shamsipour Dehkordi

^2,*,

Marzieh Entezari

³

1Master of Science, Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

2Associate Professor, Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran Iran

3Ph.D in Motor Learning, Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

Journal of Motor Control and Learning:Vol. 5, issue 1; 1-9

Published online:Jan 04, 2023

Article type:Research Article

Received:Apr 28, 2022

Accepted:Dec 24, 2022

How to Cite:Mina AsadiParvaneh Shamsipour DehkordiMarzieh EntezariEffects of Linear and Non-linear Pedagogy on Motor and Cognitive Creativity.J Motor Control Learn.5(1):e144171.https://doi.org/10.52547/ijmcl.5.1.1.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of linear and non-linear pedagogy on motor and cognitive creativity with respect to the role of high and low memory inhibition.

Methods: 40 students (age mean 7 ± 0.51 years) were divided into four groups (high inhibition and nonlinear training, low inhibition and nonlinear training, high inhibition and linear training, low inhibition and linear training). The training sessions included 6 weeks, 3 sessions per week, and 60 minutes each session. In the pretest, Torrance's cognitive thinking test and Bertsch's motor creativity test were performed on them and fundamental movements were performed in both linear and nonlinear methods.

Results: The results of the 2 (type of training) × 2 (memory inhibition) analysis of covariance showed that in all components (fluency, originality and flexibility) of motor creativity and cognitive thinking, the nonlinear training group performed better than linear training (p ≤0.05). In fluency and originality of cognitive thinking, high memory inhibition groups were better than low memory inhibition groups (p ≤0.05). In the fluency of cognitive thinking, the nonlinear group had the highest score and the linear group had the lowest score.

Conclusion: The results showed that the use of nonlinear training is more effective than linear training in improving motor creativity and cognitive thinking.

Keywords

Fulltext

Full-text is available in PDF format.

comments

Crossmark

Checking

Share on

Comments

Number of Comments:0

Cited by

CrossRef 0

Metrics

Get Permission (article level)

Purchasing Reprints

Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here ( https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.

Search Relations

Author(s):

Mina Asadi:[PubMed][Scholar]
Parvaneh Shamsipour Dehkordi:[PubMed][Scholar]
Marzieh Entezari:[PubMed][Scholar]