The effectiveness of individual interventions on smoking cessation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients

2Student Research Committee, Psychiatry and Behavioral Research Centre, Addiction Institute, Mazandaran University Of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran, Sari

3Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Addiction Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari

4Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran, Sari

5Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences:Vol. 7, issue 1; 13-21

Published online:Dec 27, 2019

Article type:Research Article

Received:Jul 22, 2019

Accepted:Sep 14, 2019

How to Cite:Ali SharifpourFatemeh TaghizadehMehran ZarghamiAbbas AlipourThe effectiveness of individual interventions on smoking cessation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.J Nurs Midwifery Sci.7(1):e140805.https://doi.org/10.4103/jnms.jnms_38_19.

Abstract

Context: Guided self‑change (GSC) is theory‑driven based on cognitive‑behavioral change models such as transtheoreticlal model (TTM) and can be applied with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) for behavioral change of smoking in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) smokers.
Aims: This study aimed to investigate the individual GSC, NRT, and GSC‑NRT on smoking cessation of COPD patients.
Settings and Design: This randomized clinical control trial study was carried out in Imam Khomeini Hospitals in Mazandaran province in 2016–2017.
Materials and Methods: Three‑ group block randomized controlled trial, comparing GSC (n = 20), NRT (n = 20), and GSC‑NRT (n = 20) in smoking cessation and other related variables COPD smokers with follow‑up to 29‑week.
Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive statistics, Chi‑square, and repeated measures ANOVA test were used to analyze the data.
Results: The GEE model revealed that GSC reduced the odds of quitting smoking rate compared to the NRT group (odds ratio = 0.31, 95% confidence interval: 0.022–0.545, ES = 0.20). Furthermore, the TTM questionnaire, the Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence, and spirometry variables were evaluated in the three groups. The recovery in nicotine dependency, the exhaled carbon monoxide and spirometry variables was more pronounced in the GSC and GSC‑NRT groups than in the NRT over 29 weeks after the treatments. Cons (PV = 0.009, ES = 0.52), pros (PV = 0.04, ES = 0.12), experiential process (PV = 0.005, ES = 0.18), counterconditioning (PV = 0.04, ES = 0.12), stimulus control (PV = 0.004, ES = 0.19), environmental‑reevaluation (PV = 0.0001, ES = 0.30), and habitual craving (PV = 0.004, ES = 0.19) were significant across the three groups.
Conclusion: The interventions in the GSC and combined GSC‑NRT groups were significantly more effective than in the NRT group in TTM variables, and GSC and combined GSC‑NRT were equally effective in smoking cessation rate.

Keywords

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Nicotine replacement therapy

Smoking cessation

Transtheoretical model

Fulltext

Full-text is available in PDF format.

comments

Crossmark

Checking

Share on

Comments

Number of Comments:0

Cited by

CrossRef 0

Metrics

Get Permission (article level)

Purchasing Reprints

Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here ( https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.

Search Relations

Author(s):

Ali Sharifpour:[PubMed][Scholar]
Fatemeh Taghizadeh:[PubMed][Scholar]
Mehran Zarghami:[PubMed][Scholar]
Abbas Alipour:[PubMed][Scholar]