https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jnms.3.2.11

Social support in the pregnant and non-pregnant women and its associated dimensions

authors:

avatar Najmeh Hamzavi Zarghani 1 , avatar Mahin Nazari ORCID 2 , * , avatar Zeinab Shayeghian 3 , avatar Shohreh Shahmohammadi 1

Department of Health Education, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Department of Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Research Center for Social Determinants of Endocrine Health, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences: Vol.3, issue 2; 11-18
published online: June 15, 2016
article type: Research Article
received: August 22, 2015
accepted: October 23, 2015

How To Cite Hamzavi Zarghani N, Nazari M, Shayeghian Z, Shahmohammadi S. Social support in the pregnant and non-pregnant women and its associated dimensions. J Nurs Midwifery Sci. 2016;3(2):e141231. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jnms.3.2.11.

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Social support is considered as a facilitator of health behaviors in women. This study aimed to evaluate and
compare the status of social support and its associated dimensions in pregnant and non-pregnant women.
Methods: This analytical study was conducted on 310 pregnant and non-pregnant women referring to the health-care centers of
Zarqan city in Shiraz, Iran in 2011. Participants were selected via convenience sampling. Data collection tools included demographic
questionnaire and Social Support Appraisals (SS-A) scale. Data analysis was performed in SPSS V.16 using descriptive (frequency,
percentage, mean, and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (Chi-square, T-test, and Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlationcoefficient).
Results: In non-pregnant women, mean of the total social support was 40.08±2.80, and mean scores of support from friends, spouse,
family and others were 12.08±1.33, 14.02±1.56, 14.53±0.96 and 13.54±1.09 respectively. Among pregnant women these values were
39.52±2.85, 11.72±1.59, 14.54±1.12, 14.38±1.06 and 13.41±1.18, respectively. The total support and support from friends were
significantly higher in non-pregnant women compared to pregnant women (P = 0.05 and P = 0.03, respectively). On the other hand,
support from the spouse was significantly higher in pregnant women compared to non-pregnant women (P = 0.01). Moreover, a
significant correlation was observed between the total scores of social support and employment status of spouse among pregnant
women (P<0.01). Also, significant associations were found between social support and employment status of spouse (P<0.01),
mother’ availability (P<0.05), and education status (P<0.05). Family support in pregnant women had a significant relationship with
the employment status of spouse (P<0.05), father’s availability (P<0.01), and mother’s availability (P<0.05). In addition, there was a
significant correlation between the social support from others and employment status of the pregnant women (P<0.05).
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, there were significant differences in the total scores of social support and mean
scores of support from the spouse and friends between pregnant and non-pregnant women. It seems that physical and psychological
changes during pregnancy largely influence the perception of expecting mothers towards social support.

Fulltext

Full-text is available in PDF format.