1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Materials and Chemicals
3.2. Extraction of Dipterocarpus alatus
3.3. Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration In Vitro
3.4. Tape-Stripping Mouse Model
3.5. Skin Staining by Hematoxylin and Eosin
3.6. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Effects of Dipterocarpus alatus Extracts on MSSA and MRSA In Vitro
| Test Compounds | MIC (µg/mL) | MBC (µg/mL) |
|---|---|---|
| Bark crude extract | ||
| MSSA | 500 | 1000 |
| MRSA | 500 | 1000 |
| Leaves crude extract | ||
| MSSA | 500 | 500 |
| MRSA | 500 | 1000 |
| Twig crude extract | ||
| MSSA | 250 | 500 |
| MRSA | 250 | 500 |
| Oleo-resin crude extract | ||
| MSSA | > 1000 | > 1000 |
| MRSA | > 1000 | > 1000 |
| Wood crude extract | ||
| MSSA | 500 | 500 |
| MRSA | 500 | 500 |
| Tetracycline | ||
| MSSA | ≤ 0.0625 | 2 |
| MRSA | 4 | 16 |
| Erythromycin | ||
| MSSA | ≤ 0.0625 | 0.5 |
| MRSA | ≤ 64 | > 64 |
| Oxacillin | ||
| MSSA | ≤ 0.0625 | 2 |
| MRSA | > 64 | > 64 |
| Dipterocarpol | ||
| MSSA | 500 | 500 |
| MRSA | 500 | 1000 |
| α,β-Gurjunene | ||
| MSSA | 500 | 500 |
| MRSA | 250 | 250 |
4.2. Antibacterial Effects of Dipterocarpus alatus Extracts on MRSA-Induced Superficial Skin Infection in Mice
| Number of MRSA Coloniesa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 2 | Day 4 | Day 6 | Day 8 | |
| Control | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| MRSA-non-treatment | 86.90 ± 79.79b | 14.63 ± 13.34b | 10.83 ± 12.25b | 9.75 ± 11.06b |
| MRSA-twig | 1.10 ± 1.29c | 0.00 ± 0.00c | 0.00 ± 0.00c | 0.00 ± 0.00c |
| MRSA-oleo-resin | 12.60 ± 20.13b, c | 3.88 ± 4.32c | 0.50 ± 0.84c | 0.00 ± 0.00c |
| MRSA-wood | 14.80 ± 14.02b, c | 0.25 ± 0.46c | 0.17 ± 0.41c | 0.00 ± 0.00c |
| MRSA-α,β-gurjunene | 27.10 ± 23.19b, c | 2.50 ± 3.12c | 2.83 ± 2.79c | 0.25 ± 0.50c |
| MRSA-dipterocarpol | 21.50 ± 27.23b, c | 0.25 ± 0.46c | 1.00 ± 1.26c | 0.00 ± 0.00c |
| MRSA-tetracycline | 131.70 ± 167.21b | 11.13 ± 10.34b | 24.00 ± 31.59b | 12.00 ± 18.74b |
aValues are expressed as mean ± SD.
bP < 0.05 vs. control on the same day.
cP < 0.05 vs. MRSA-non-treatment on the same day.
4.3. Wound Healing Effects of Dipterocarpus alatus Extracts on MRSA-Induced Superficial Skin Infection in the Mouse Model
Mouse superficial wound appearance. Mouse superficial wounds were established by repeated tape stripping to remove the epidermis. Wounds were infected with 1 × 106 MRSA and treated daily with 10% ethanol in propylene glycol (non-treated control), 20 mg/mL Dipterocarpus alatus twig/oleo-resin/wood extract in 10% ethanol in propylene glycol, 4 mg/mL α,β-gurjunene, 1.1 mg/mL dipterocarpol, or 160 µg/mL tetracycline for nine days along with a non-infected control group (eight groups, 9 - 10 mice in each group). The wounds of all mice were photographed on days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9.
Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) of mouse superficial wounds. Mouse superficial wounds were established by repeated tape stripping to remove the epidermis. Wounds were infected with 1 × 106 MRSA and treated daily with 10% ethanol in propylene glycol (non-treated control), 20 mg/mL Dipterocarpus alatus twig/oleo-resin/wood extract in 10% ethanol in propylene glycol, 4 mg/mL α,β-gurjunene, 1.1 mg/mL dipterocarpol, or 160 µg/mL tetracycline for nine days along with a non-infected control group (eight groups, 9 - 10 mice in each group). The TEWL from the superficial wounds was measured on days 1, 2, 5, and 7 and presented as mean ± SD. #P < 0.05 vs. MRSA-non-treatment on the same day by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.
4.4. Effects of Dipterocarpus alatus Extracts and Dipterocarpol on Wound Histology
Histology of wounds with H&E staining. Mice were sacrificed on days 1, 4, and 8 and tissues were cut into 5-μm sections, stained with H&E, and mounted. E indicates epidermis, black arrows indicate fibrin accumulation, and squares indicate areas with neutrophil infiltration. The tissues were photographed at 400x magnification.


