Effect of Extensible and Non-extensible Lumbosacral Orthoses on the Pain, Disability, back Muscle Endurance and the Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon in Patients with Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

1Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Orthotics & Prosthetics, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3School of Behavior and Brain Science, Department of Neuroscience, The University of Texas, Dallas, Texas

Koomesh:Vol. 26, issue 3; e150894

Published online:Dec 26, 2024

Article type:Research Article

How to Cite:Shayan GhahramaniKhosro Khademi KalantariSamira NabizadehFatemeh AzadiniaEffect of Extensible and Non-extensible Lumbosacral Orthoses on the Pain, Disability, back Muscle Endurance and the Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon in Patients with Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.koomesh.26(3):e150894.https://doi.org/10.69107/koomesh-150894.

Abstract

Background: Relaxation of paraspinal muscles at the end of flexion range of motion known as flexion-relaxation phenomenon is not present in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Persistent activation of erector spinae muscles throughout flexion in CLBP patients (i.e. lack of FRR) may be a muscular adaptation and or protective strategy indicating patients’ attempt to enhance trunk stiffness and subsequently provide spine stability. It is hypothesized that loss of deep intrinsic muscles control can lead to erector spine muscles hyperactivity. Lumbosacral orthoses (LSO) are expected to decrease erector spinae muscle activity through providing passive trunk stiffness and trunk stability, and thereby return the normal flexion-relaxation pattern.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effects of extensible and non-extensible lumbosacral orthoses (LSO) on clinical outcomes and erector spinae muscles performance in patients with CLBP.

Methods: A randomized clinical trial without a control group, recruiting 40 patients with CLBP was conducted. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups: extensible or non-extensible LSO. Pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale: VAS), physical function (Oswestry Disability Index: ODI), fear of movement (Kinesiophobia), back extensors endurance, and flexion-relaxation ratios were measured at baseline, and after four weeks of intervention in both groups.

Results: Based on mixed-model ANOVA, time × group interactions were not significant for any of the outcome measures. The main effect of time (pre versus post) was significant for pain (F = 62.06, P < 0.001, η_p² = 0.62), physical activity (F = 48.27, P < 0.001, η_p² = 0.56), fear of movement (F = 9.79, P = 0.003, η_p² = 0.2), and back extensors endurance (F = 22.44, P < 0.001, η_p² = 0.37). However, no significant effect of group was observed for any of the outcome measures.

Conclusion: Wearing an LSO, extensible or non-extensible, for 4 weeks significantly improved pain, physical function, kinesiophobia, and extensors endurance. There was no adverse effect on muscle performance, however, it was not able to return normal flexion relaxation pattern in this population.

Keywords

comments

Crossmark

Checking

Share on

Comments

Number of Comments:0

Cited by

CrossRef 0

Metrics

Get Permission (article level)

Purchasing Reprints

Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here ( https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.

Search Relations

Author(s):

Shayan Ghahramani:[PubMed][Scholar]
Khosro Khademi Kalantari:[PubMed][Scholar]
Samira Nabizadeh:[PubMed][Scholar]
Fatemeh Azadinia:[PubMed][Scholar]