The approach and function of university students to research process: A cross sectional study

Hassan Babamohamadi; Faezeh Deihim Far; Hajar Chaharpashlo; Masoumeh Hamidi; Mehdi Kahouei

Koomesh

Journal of Semnan University of Medical Sciences

Current Issue Archive In Press Accepted Manuscripts Search

Journal Information Editors & Boards Indexing and Listing Sources Journal Metrics Open Peer Review (OPR)Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement Support Contact Us Reviewer and AE Registration Form

APC

Authors Guide Submit Manuscript

The approach and function of university students to research process: A cross sectional study

Author(s):

Hassan Babamohamadi,

Faezeh Deihim Far,

Hajar Chaharpashlo,

Masoumeh Hamidi,

Mehdi Kahouei

^,*

Koomesh:Vol. 19, issue 2; 412-420

Published online:Jul 06, 2017

Article type:Research Article

Received:Sep 02, 2016

Accepted:Dec 06, 2016

How to Cite:Hassan BabamohamadiFaezeh Deihim FarHajar ChaharpashloMasoumeh HamidiMehdi KahoueiThe approach and function of university students to research process: A cross sectional study.koomesh.19(2):e151094.

Abstract

Introduction: The approach and function of students can consider as a basis for future intervention in order to improve and enhance their attitude and function. So, this study purposed to detect the attitude and function of university students to research process in Semnan University of medical sciences. Materials and Methods: A cross sectional study was designed to measure the attitude and function of 190 students of Semnan University of medical sciences (Seman, Iran) toward the research process. Data were gathered by a Likert handmade questionnaire with 27 items. Finally, data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Results showed 60 percent of students were interested to research process. The students’ attitude was positive to following items: “promoting science by research in human world”, “meaning of research as integrating factor of past experience with science for a better future”, and “scientific research as a complementary for learning”. The most practice of students was related to items such as: “accompanying with teachers in research projects”, “presence in scientific congress or seminars”, and “membership in the student research center and research methodology workshops”. Also, least students’ function was related to items such as “paper publication in scientific journals”, “participation in research, and “as a main researcher in research projects”. Conclusion: In regards of interesting of students to research process, holding classes of research methodology, collaboration of faculty members with students, and removing limitations to research acivities, can change the attitude and of students.

Keywords

References

1.
Chehrei A, Kahbazi M, Salehi B, Zarganj-fard A, Dorreh F, Soltani P, et al. The effect of clinical research center, on clinical researches of Arak University of medical science. J Arak Univ Med Sci 2006; 9: 12-22. (Persian).
2.
Saeidinia A, Fallah Karkan M, Heidarzadeh A, Taeifeh N, Farahmand porkar N. Knowledge, attitude and practice of Guilan University of medical sciences toward research. Ann Biol Res 2013; 4: 89-94. (Persian).
3.
Jowett SM, Macleod J, Wilson S, Hobbs FD. Research in primary care: extent of involvement and perceived determinants among practitioners form one English region. Br J Gen Prac 2000; 50: 387-389.
4.
Rosemann T, Szecsenyi J. General practitioners' attitudes towards research in primary care: qualitative results of a cross sectional study. BMC Family Pract 2004; 5: 31.
5.
Ruchina AV, Kuimova MV, Polyushko DA, Sentsov AE, Jin ZX. The role of research work in the training of master students studying at technical university. Proc Soc Behav Sci 2015; 215: 98-101.
6.
Khoneifar H, Bordabar H, Foruoghi-Ghomi F. Explanation of moral and cultural components in research. A quart J Ehtical Knowledge 2011; 2. (Persian).
7.
Sotodehasl N, Gorbani R, Rashidy-Pour A. Restrictive factors in medical research in the viewpoint of students of Medical Sciences University of Semnan. Koomesh 2015; 17: 267-276.
8.
Varkevisser CM, Pathmanathan I, Brownlee A. Designing & conducting health system research project. World Health Org Int dev Res Centre 2003; 3.
9.
Burgoyne LN, Oflynn S, Boylan GB. Undergraduate medical research: the student perspective. Med Edu Online 2010; 15: 5212.
10.
Anbari Z, Jadidi RA. Comparing of barriers to research activities among students of Arak university of medical sciences, and appropriate strategies for student research management. Iranian J Med Educ 2013; 13: 435-448. (Persian).
11.
Azizi N. Checking of strategies to improve the research performance of faculty members in humanities sciences. Cultural Strat 2011; 21: 7-33. (Persian).
12.
Sereshti M, Kazemian A, Daris F. Research barriers from the viewpoint of faculty members and employees of Shahrekord University of medical sciences. Educ Strategy Med Sci 2010; 3: 51-57. (Persian).
13.
Griffin MF, Hindocha S. Publication practices of medical students at British medical schools: Experience, attitudes and barriers to publish. Med Teach 2011; 33: 1-8.
14.
Mabvuure NT. Twelve tips for introducing students to research and publishing: a medical students perspective. Med Teach 2012; 34: 705-709.
15.
Mirkheshti N, Hosseini N, Khaloei M, Hadadgar A. Medical students' attitude towards research at the completion of basic science courses. Iranian J Med Educ 2014; 14: 342-349. (Persian).
16.
Sanagoo A, Mohaddeseh Yousefipour M, Mahasti Jouybari L. A mechanism for increasing the performance of medical students. J Qual Res Health Sci 2012; 1: 59-69. (Persian).
17.
Sotodehasl N, Gorbani R, Rashidy-Pour A. Viewpoints of faculty members of Semnan University of Medical Sciences about research barriers. Koomesh 2014; 16: 1-7.
18.
Unnikrishnan B, Kanchan T, Holla R, Kumar N, Rekha T, Mithra P, et al. Medical students' research - facilitators and barriers. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8: XC01-XC04.
19.
Mehralizade S. Vakili A. Poorhoseini M. View of academics of faculty of medicine of Semnan university of medical sciences towards student research. Med Educ Dev 2012; 6: 11-16. (Persian).
20.
Mirzamohammadi MH, Bijanvand F. Barriers of participation of Shahed University postgraduate students about research activity and writing papers. Daneshvar (Raftar) 2010; 17: 49-66. (Persian).
21.
Ghaffarzadeh Sh, Nazari H, Ghasemi R, Ahmadi Doyran Z. Status of research among medical students of Urmia university medical sciences in (Knowledge, Attitude and Practice). J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac 2011; 9: 400-406. (Persian).
22.
Memarpour M, Poostforoush Fard A, Ghasemi R. Evaluation of attitude to, knowledge of and barriers toward research among medical science students. Asia Pacific Family Med 2015; 14: 2-7.
23.
Ley TJ, Rosenberg LE. The physician-scientist career pipeline in 2005: Build it, and they will come. JAMA 2005; 294: 1343-1351.
24.
Javadian Y. Medical students attitudes towards the importance of research. J Qazvin Univ Med Sci 2002; 22: 64-67. (Persian).
25.
Alamdari AK, Afshoon E. The view point of faculty members on research barriers at Yasuj University. J Armaghan Danesh 2003; 8: 27- 34. (Persian).
26.
Changiz T, Adibi P, Hosseini M, Tootoonchi M. Viewpoints of supervisors about the problems in the process of dissertations for general medicine program Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Iranian J Med Educ 2003; 3: 23-33. (Persian).
27.
Smith FG, Harasym PH, Mandin H, Lorscheider FL. Development and evaluation of a research project program for medical students at the University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine. Acad Med 2001; 76: 189-194.
28.
Ejaz K, Shamim MS, Shamim MS, Hussain SA. Involvement of medical students and fresh medical graduates of Karachi, Pakistan in research. J Pak Med Assoc 2011; 61: 115-120.##.

comments