Performance of bioelectrochemical process using steel wool and carbon cloth electrodes to remove phenol in the aquatic environment

authors:

avatar Somayyeh Dehghani , avatar A rezaee@modares.ac.ir , * , avatar Zohreh Moghiseh , avatar Batoul Mohebrad

Koomesh: Vol.18, issue 3; 380-387
published online: December 28, 2016
article type: issue_documents_importer
received: September 02, 2016
accepted: November 02, 2016

how to cite: Dehghani S, rezaee@modares.ac.ir A, Moghiseh Z, Mohebrad B. Performance of bioelectrochemical process using steel wool and carbon cloth electrodes to remove phenol in the aquatic environment. koomesh. 2016;18(3):e151128. 

Abstract

Introduction: Phenolic compounds are industrial chemicals that they are interested in due to the many health and environmental concerns. The aim of this study was to examine bio-electrochemical system performance to remove phenol from synthetic wastewater using a carbon cloth (as a bio-cathode) and steel wool (as a bio - anode) electrodes with a fixed bed. Materials and methods: The present study was an experimental study in laboratory scale. It was carried out in batch mode using1literplexiglass reactor. After starting up the system, effective parameters on process efficiency, including the C/N ratio, initial phenol concentration, applied current and reaction time were evaluated. Also, electrical conductivity, pH and redox potential (EC /pH /ORP) were studied during the reaction. Results: The results showed that with increasing the applied current from 2 mA to 6 mA (0.9 to 1.2 V), the bioelectrochemical degradation efficiency was promoted from 65% to 96.26%. The phenol removal was obtained 100% in C/N=5. The energy and power consumption were calculated 0.01- 0.14KWh/m3 and 0.02-0.23, respectively. Conclusion:  The experiments indicated the efficient removal of phenol in wastewater by electrochemical bioreactor using carbon cloth (as bio-cathode) and steel wool (as bio-anode) electrodes.This efficiency was due to the high bioelectrodes conductivity, more  surface area for biofilm formation, operating current density and power consumption reduction. The performance of this reactor can also be considered to eliminate other biodegradable organic compounds

References

  • 1.

    Ailijiang N, Chang J, Liang P, Li P, Wu Q, Zhang X, Huang X. Electrical stimulation on biodegradation of phenol and responses of microbial communities in conductive carriers supported biofilms of the bioelectrochemical reactor. Bioresour Technol 2016; 201: 1-7.

  • 2.

    Bruce RM, Santodonato J, Neal MW. Summary review of the health effects associated with phenol. Toxicol Ind Health 1987; 3: 535-368.

  • 3.

    El-Ashtoukhy E, El-Taweel Y, Abdelwahab O, Nassef E. Treatment of petrochemical wastewatercontaining phenolic compounds by electrocoagulation using a fixed bed electrochemical reactor. Int J Electrochem Sci 2013; 8: 1534-1550.

  • 4.

    Al-Khalid T, El-Naas MH. Aerobic biodegradation of phenols: a comprehensive review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 2012; 42: 1631-1690.

  • 5.

    Yadav DK, Joshi A, Harjit J. Determination of Phenolic Compounds in Vegetables by Spectrophotometric Method. Environments 2016; 16: 17.

  • 6.

    Senthilvelan T, Kanagaraj J, Panda RC, Mandal A. Biodegradation of phenol by mixed microbial culture: an eco-friendly approach for the pollution reduction. Clean Technol Environ Policy 2014; 16: 113-126.

  • 7.

    Rozich AF, Colvin RJ. Effects of glucose on phenol biodegradation by heterogeneous populations. Biotechnol Bioeng 1986; 28: 965-971.

  • 8.

    Basha KM, Rajendran A, Thangavelu V. Recent advances in the biodegradation of phenol: a review. Asian J Exp Biol Sci 2010; 1: 219-234.

  • 9.

    Gregory KB, Lovley DR. Remediation and recovery of uranium from contaminated subsurface environments with electrodes. Environ Sci Technol 2005; 39: 8943-8947.

  • 10.

    Wick LY, Shi L, Harms H. Electro-bioremediation of hydrophobic organic soil-contaminants: A review of fundamental interactions. Electrochim Acta 2007; 52: 3441-3448.

  • 11.

    Jiang L, Ruan Q, Li R, Li T. Biodegradation of phenol by using free and immobilized cells of Acinetobacter sp. BS8Y. J Basic Microbiol 2013; 53: 224-230.

  • 12.

    Bajracharya S, Sharma M, Mohanakrishna G, Benneton XD, Strik DP, Sarma PM, et al. An overview on emerging bioelectrochemical systems (BESs): Technology for sustainable electricity, waste remediation, resource recovery, chemical production and beyond. Renewable Energy. 2016.

  • 13.

    Hamelers HV, Ter Heijne A, Sleutels TH, Jeremiasse AW, Strik DP, Buisman CJ. New applications and performance of bioelectrochemica systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010; 85: 1673-1685.

  • 14.

    Liu S, Song H, Wei S, Liu Q, Li X, Qian X. Effect of direct electrical stimulation on decolorization and degradation of azo dye reactive brilliant red X-3B in biofilm-electrode reactors. Biochem Engin J 2015; 93: 294-302.

  • 15.

    She P, Song B, Xing X-H, Van Loosdrecht M, Liu Z. Electrolytic stimulation of bacteria Enterobacter dissolvens by a direct current. Biochem Engin J 2006; 28: 23-29.

  • 16.

    Friman H, Schechter A, Nitzan Y, Cahan R. Phenol degradation in bio-electrochemical cells. Int Biodeter Biodegrad 2013; 84: 155-160.

  • 17.

    Mashkour M, Rahimnejad M. Effect of various carbon-based cathode electrodes on the performance of microbial fuel cell. Biofuel Res J 2015; 2: 296-300.

  • 18.

    Frackowiak E, Beguin F. Carbon materials for the electrochemical storage of energy in capacitors. Carbon 2001; 39: 937-950.

  • 19.

    Mousavi S, Ibrahim S, Aroua MK, Ghafari S. Development of nitrate elimination by autohydrogenotrophic bacteria in bio-electrochemical reactorsA review. Biochem Engin J 2012; 67: 251-264.

  • 20.

    Zeyoudi M, Altenaiji E, Ozer LY, Ahmed I, Yousef AF, Hasan SW. Impact of continuous and intermittent supply of electric field on the function and microbial community of wastewater treatment electro-bioreactors. Electrochimica Acta 2015; 181: 271-279.

  • 21.

    De Silva CL. Removal of Phenol from Oil/Gas Wastewater by Catalytic Supercritical Water Treatment: Ohio University; 2016.

  • 22.

    Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Twentieth ed 1995.

  • 23.

    Sun H, Xu S, Zhuang G, Zhuang X. Performance and recent improvement in microbial fuel cells for simultaneous carbon and nitrogen removal: A review. J Environ Sci 2016; 39: 242-248.

  • 24.

    Huang B, Feng H, Wang M, Li N, Cong Y, Shen D. The effect of C/N ratio on nitrogen removal in a bioelectrochemical system. Bioresour Technol 2013; 132: 91-98.

  • 25.

    Olszanowski A, Piechowiak K. The use of an electric field to enhance bacterial movement and hydrocarbon biodegradation in soils. Polish J Environ Stud 2006; 15: 303-309.

  • 26.

    Acua AJ, Pucci OH, Pucci GN. Electrobioremediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soil from patagonia argentina. New Technol Oil Gas Industry 2012; p: 29-48.

  • 27.

    Cheela SV, Kumar SG, Padma D, Subbarao CV. Biodegradation of phenol using pure and mixed Culture Bacteria. 2015.

  • 28.

    Moussavi G, Mahmoudi M, Barikbin B. Biological removal of phenol from strong wastewaters using a novel MSBR. Water Res 2009; 43: 1295-1302.

  • 29.

    Saratale RG, Hwang KJ, Song JY, Saratale GD, Kim DS. Electrochemical oxidation of phenol for wastewater treatment using Ti/PbO 2 electrode. J Environ Engine 2015; 142: 04015064.

  • 30.

    Cong VH, Sakakibara Y, Komori M, Kishimoto N, Watanabe T, Mishima I, et al. Recent developments in electrochemical technology for water and wastewater treatments. J Water Environ Technol 2016; 14: 25-36.##.