sonography of the abdominal muscles thickness during rest and contraction before and after food consumption

authors:

avatar Alireza Akbarzadeh bagheban , avatar Nahid Tahan , avatar Mohammad Ali Mohseni Bandpei , * , avatar Saeed Mikaeili

Koomesh: Vol.18, issue 2; 243-249
published online: September 28, 2016
article type: Research Article
received: August 02, 2015
accepted: November 08, 2016

how to cite: Akbarzadeh bagheban A, Tahan N, Mohseni Bandpei M A, Mikaeili S. sonography of the abdominal muscles thickness during rest and contraction before and after food consumption. koomesh. 2016;18(2):e151132. 

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasound imaging is a non-invasive method for observing changes in muscle thickness of the abdominal muscles. Accurate measurements depend on the control of all potential sources of error. In this study we investigated whether the level of stomach fullness might be a source of error not only in the resting thickness but also in contractile thickness (abdominal hallowing maneuver) abdominal muscles. Materials and Methods: Thirty healthy male subjects ranging in age from 18 to 26 years volunteered for this study. Ultrasound image of the four abdominal muscles on both sides were obtained at rest (at the end of exhalation) and during abdominal hallowing maneuver before and after food consumption. Abdominal muscle thickness was assessed using a 3.5 MHZ linear head transducer in B-mode condition. Results: The mean thickness for right and left rectus abdominis, external oblique, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis muscles at rest before food consumption were 10.8-10.7, 6.2-6.1, 8.6-8.3, 4.1-4.1 mm, respectively and after food consumption were 10.3-10.3, 5.6-5.5, 7.3-7.3, 3.4-3.6 mm, respectively. The mean thickness for right and left rectus abdominis, external oblique, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis muscles during Abdominal Hollowing Maneuver before food consumption were 11-10.8, 6.1-6.3, 10-10. 5.3-5.5 mm, respectively and after food consumption were 10.5-10.6, 5.7-5.7, 8.8-8.7, 4.4-4.5 mm, respectively. Conclusion: After food consumption the thicknesses of all abdominal muscles in both sides are decreased, and therefore, food consumption must be considered when measuring abdominal muscle thickness using sonography

References

  • 1.

    Gracovestky S, Farfan H, Helleur C. The abdominal mechanism. Spine 1985; 10: 317-324.

  • 2.

    Hodges P. Is there a role for transversus abdominis in lumbo-pelvic stability? Man Ther 1999; 4: 74-86.

  • 3.

    Bergmark A. Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in mechanical engineering. Acta Orthop Scand Supple 1989; 230: 1.

  • 4.

    Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Ehsani F, Behtash H, Ghanipour M. Occupational low back pain in primary and high school teachers: prevalence and associated factors. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2014; 37: 702-708.

  • 5.

    Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Watson M. Electromyographic power spectral analysis of the paraspinal muscles: Reliability Study. Physiotherapy 2001; 87: 470-478.

  • 6.

    Ghamkhar L, Emami M, Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Behtash H. Application of rehabilitative ultrasound in the assessment of low back pain: A literature review. J Back Musculoskel Rehabili 2011; 15: 465-477.

  • 7.

    Javanshir Kh, Amiri M, Mohseni Bandpei MA, Rezasoltani A, Fernandez-de-las-penas C. Ultrasonography of cervical muscles: A critical review of the literature. J Manipulative Physiolo Ther 2010; 33: 630-637.

  • 8.

    Javanshir K, Rezasoltani A, Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Amiri M, Ortega-Santiago R, Fernndez-de-Las-Peas C. Ultrasound assessment of bilateral longus colli muscles in subjects with chronic bilateral neck pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 90: 293-301.

  • 9.

    Mohseni Bandpei MA, Nakhaee M, Mousavi MA, Shakourirad A, Safari MR, Vahab Kashani R. Application of ultrasound in the assessment of plantar fascia in patients with plantar fasciitis: A systematic review. Ultrasound Med Bio 2014; 40: 1737-1754.

  • 10.

    Nabavi N, Mosallanezhad Z, Haghighatkhah MR, Mohseni Bandpeid MA. Reliability of rehabilitative ultrasonography to measure transverse abdominis and multifidus muscle dimensions. Iran J Radiol 2014; 11: 1-4.

  • 11.

    Javanshir K, Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Rezasoltani A, Amiri M. Ultrasonography of longus colli muscle: A reliability study on healthy subjects and patients with chronic neck pain. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2011; 15: 50-56.

  • 12.

    Bunce S, Moore A, Hough A. M-mode ultrasound: a reliable measure of transversus abdominis thickness? Clin Biomech 2002; 17: 315-317.

  • 13.

    Pietrek M, Sheikhzadeh A, Hagins M, Nordin M. Evaluation of abdominal muscles by ultrasound imaging: reliability, and comparison to electromyography. Eur Spine J 2000; 9: 309.

  • 14.

    Whittaker JL, Teyhen DS, Elliott JM, Cook K, Langevin HM, Dahl HH, Stokes M. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging: understanding the technology and its applications. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2007; 37: 434-449.

  • 15.

    Whittaker JL, Warner MB, Stokes MJ. Ultrasound imaging transducer motion during clinical maneuvers: respiration, active straight leg raise test and abdominal drawing in. Ultrasound Med Bio 2010; 36: 1288-1297.

  • 16.

    Ainscough-Potts AM, Morrissey MC, Critchley D. The response of the transverse abdominis and internal oblique muscles to different postures. Man Ther 2006; 11: 54-60.

  • 17.

    McEvoy MP, Cowling AJ, Fulton IJ, Williams MT. Transversus abdominis: changes in thickness during an incremental upper limb exercise test. Physiother Theory Pract 2007; 24: 265-273.

  • 18.

    Endleman I, Critchley DJ. Transversus abdominis and obliquus internus activity during pilates exercises: measurement with ultrasound scanning. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 2205-2212.

  • 19.

    Kordi R, Rostami M, Noormohammadpour P, Mansournia MA. The effect of food consumption on the thickness of abdominal muscles, employing ultrasound measurements. Eur Spine J 2011; 20: 1312-1317.

  • 20.

    Cresswell A, Grundstrm H, Thorstensson A. Observations on intra abdominal pressure and patterns of abdominal intra muscular activity in man. Acta Physiol Scand 1992; 144: 409-418.

  • 21.

    Dehghan Manshadi F, Parnianpour M, Sarrafzadeh J, Azghani MR, Kazemnejad A. Abdominal hollowing and lateral abdominal wall muscles activity in both healthy men and women: An ultrasonic assessment in supine and standing positions. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2011; 15: 108-113.

  • 22.

    Costa LO, Maher CG, Latimer J, Smeets RJ. Reproducibility of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging for the measurement of abdominal muscle activity: a systematic review. Phys Ther 2009; 89: 756-769.

  • 23.

    Teyhen DS, .Miltenberger CE, Delters HM, Deltoro YM, Pulliam JN, Childs J, et al. The use of ultrasound imaging of the abdominal drawing-in maneuver in subjects with low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005; 35: 346-355.

  • 24.

    Rankin G, Stokes M, Newham D. Abdominal muscle size and symmetry in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve 2006; 34: 320-326.

  • 25.

    Mew R. Comparison of changes in abdominal muscle thickness between standing and crook lying during active abdominal hollowing using ultrasound imaging. Man Ther 2009; 14: 690-695.

  • 26.

    Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Ehsani F, Behtash H, Ghanipour M. Occupational low back pain in primary and high school teachers: prevalence and associated factors. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2014; 37: 702-708.

  • 27.

    Yaghoubi Z, Kahrizy S, Parnian Pour M, Faghizhzade S. Short effects of two common stabilization exercise on back and abdominal muscle recruitment and lumbar curvature in non-specific chronic low back pain patients: a crossover clinical trial study. Koomesh 2014; 15: 511-521. (Persian).

  • 28.

    Hemmati S, Rajabi R, Karimi N, Jahandideh AA. Effects of consecutive supervised core stability training on pain and disability in women with nonspecific chronic low back pain. Koomesh 2011; 12: 244-252. (Persian).

  • 29.

    Javadian Y, Akbari M, Talebi G, Taghipour-Darzi M, Janmohammadi N. Influence of core stability exercise on lumbar vertebral instability in patients presented with chronic low back pain: A randomized clinical trial. Caspian J Intern Med 2015; 61: 98-102.

  • 30.

    Rahmani N, Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Vameghi R, Salavati M, Abdollahi I. Application of ultrasonography in the assessment of skeletal muscles in children with and without neuromuscular disorders: a systematic review. Ultrasound Med Biol 2015; 41: 2275-2283.

  • 31.

    Mannion AF, Pulkovski N, Gubler D, Gorelick M, ORiordan D, Loupas T, et al. Muscle thickness changes during abdominal hollowing: an assessment of between-day measurement error in controls and patients with chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2008; 17: 494-501.

  • 32.

    Vasseljen O, Dahl H, Mork P, Torp H. Muscle activity onset in the lumbar multifidus muscle recorded simultaneously by ultrasound imaging and intramuscular electromyography. Clin Biomech 2006; 21: 905-913.

  • 33.

    Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Rahmani N, Behtash H, Karimloo M. The effect of pelvic floor muscle exercise on women with chronic non-specific low back pain. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2011; 15: 75-81.

  • 34.

    Konitzer LN, Gill NW, Koppenhaver S. Investigation of abdominal muscle thickness changes after spinal manipulation in patients who meet a clinical prediction rule for lumbar stabilization. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011; 41: 666-674.

  • 35.

    Pinto RZ, Ferreira PH, Franco MR, Ferreira M. The effect of lumbar posture on abdominal muscle thickness during an isometric leg task in people with and without non-specific low back pain. Man Ther 2011; 16: 578-584.##.