The attention needed for balance controlling in young patients with flatfoot

authors:

avatar Rozita Hedayati ORCID , * , avatar Abdolhamid hajihasani , avatar solale ramezanpour , avatar Fatemeh Ehsani ORCID

Koomesh: Vol.18, issue 1; 25-34
published online: September 28, 2016
article type: issue_documents_importer
received: November 03, 2015
accepted: August 02, 2016

how to cite: Hedayati R, hajihasani A, ramezanpour S, Ehsani F. The attention needed for balance controlling in young patients with flatfoot. koomesh. 2016;18(1):e151142. 

Abstract

Introduction: Regarding to the importance of foot in maintenance of balance, it seems that flat foot can affect complex postural and balance control. In this study dual-task paradigm has been used to investigate the amount of attention   needed for balance controlling in patients with flat foot than subjects with normal foot arch. Materials and Methods: 30 participants (15 male ;15 female, mean ages 22/30±2/61 years) with flat foot and 30 participants (15 male ;15 female, mean ages 22.30 ± 1.70 years) with normal foot arch were placed in two groups. Static & Dynamic balance tests were performed by Biodex Balance System SD under condition of single leg stance, in two forms of open and closed eyes. Measured parameters were total, anterior-posterior and medial-lateral stability indices. Results: The within group comparison of single and dual tasks in control and flatfoot groups in static (open & closed eyes) and dynamic (open eyes) balance tests did not show any significant differences (P>.0.05). The within group comparison of single and dual tasks in two groups in dynamic balance condition with closed eyes showed significant differences (P

References

  • 1.

    Volpon JB. Footprint analysis during the growth period. J Pediatr Orthop 1994; 14: 83-85.

  • 2.

    Stewart SF. Human gait and the human foot: an ethnological study of flatfoot: Part II. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1970; 70: 20-25.

  • 3.

    Hogan MT, Staheli LT. Arch height and lower limb pain: an adult civilian study. Foot Ankle Int 2002; 23: 43-47.

  • 4.

    Razeghi M, Batt ME. Foot type classification: a critical review of current methods. Gait Posture 2002; 15: 282-291.

  • 5.

    Nawoczenski DA, Saltzman CL, Cook TM. The effect of foot structure on the three-dimensional kinematic coupling behavior of the leg and rear foot. Phys Ther 1998; 78: 404-416.

  • 6.

    Jones BS. FLAT FOOT: A PRELIMINARY REPORT OF AN OPERATION FOR SEVERE CASES. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British Volume 1975; 57-B(3): 279-282.

  • 7.

    Johanson MA, Donatelli R, Wooden MJ, Andrew PD, Cummings GS. Effects of three different posting methods on controlling abnormal subtalar pronation. Phys Ther 1994; 74: 149-158.

  • 8.

    Cote KP, Brunet ME, Gansneder BM, Shultz SJ. Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability. J Athl Train 2005; 40: 41-46.

  • 9.

    Lin CH, Lee HY, Jason Chen JJ, Lee HM, Kuo MD. Development of a quantitative assessment system for correlation analysis of footprint parameters to postural control in children. Physiol Meas 2006; 27: 119-130.

  • 10.

    Al Abdulwahab SS, Kachanathu SJ. The effect of various degrees of foot posture on standing balance in a healthy adult population. Somatosens Mot Res 2015; 32: 172-176.

  • 11.

    Khramtsov PI, Kurganski AM. Functional stability of the vertical posture in children depending on foot arch condition. Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk 2009; 5: 41-44.

  • 12.

    Tsai LC, Yu B, Mercer VS, Gross MT. Comparison of different structural foot types for measures of standing postural control. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2006; 36: 942-953.

  • 13.

    Huang HJ, Mercer VS. Dual-Task methodology: applications in studies of cognitive and motor Performance in adults and children. Pediatr Phys Ther 2001; 13: 22-30.

  • 14.

    Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A. Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture 2002; 16: 1-14.

  • 15.

    Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M. Attentional demands and postural control: the effect of sensorycontext. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000; 55: M10-M16.

  • 16.

    Abernethy B. Dual-task methodology and motor skills research: Some applications and methodological constraints. J Human Move Studi 1988; 14: 101-132.

  • 17.

    Kida T, Kaneda T, Nishihira Y. Dual-task repetition alters event-related brain potentials and task performance. Clin Neurophysiol 2012; 123: 1123-1130.

  • 18.

    Maki BE, McIlroy WE. Cognitive demands and cortical control of human balance-recovery reactions. J Neural Transm 2007; 114: 1279-1296.

  • 19.

    Uemura K, Yamada M, Nagai K, Tanaka B, Mori S, Ichihashi N. Fear of falling is associated with prolonged anticipatory postural adjustment during gait initiation under dual-task conditions in older adults. Gait Posture 2012; 35: 282-286.

  • 20.

    Kerr B, Condon SM, McDonald LA. Cognitive spatial processing and the regulation of posture. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1985; 11: 617-622.

  • 21.

    Bakhtiary AH, Fatemi E, Soltani AR. Genu varum deformity may increase postural sway and falling risk. Koomesh 2012; 13: 330-338 (Persian).

  • 22.

    Zendeh del A, Hedayati R, Bakhtiary AH, Mirmohammadkhani M, Hajihasani A. The effect of whole body vibration on torque of evertor and invertor muscles of ankle in low arched feet. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2014; 24: 189-204. (Persian).

  • 23.

    Harrison PL, Littlewood C. Relationship between pes planus foot type and postural stability. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther 2010; 4: 21-24.

  • 24.

    Mcpoil TG, Cornwall MW, Medoff L, Vicenzino B, Forsberg K. Arch height change during sit-to-stand: an alternative for the navicular drop test. J Foot Ankle Res 2008; 1: 12-16.

  • 25.

    Murley GS, Menz HB, Landorf KB. A protocol for classifying normal- and flat-arched foot posture forresearch studies using clinical and radiographic measurements. J Foot Ankle Res 2009; 2: 39-43.

  • 26.

    Xiong S, Goonetilleke RS, Witana CP, Weerasinghe TW, Au EY. Foot arch characterization: A review, a new metric, and a comparison. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2010; 100: 14-24.

  • 27.

    Nilsson MK, Friis R, Michaelsen MS. Classification of the height and flexibility of the medial longitudinal arch of the foot. J Foot Ankle Res 2012; 5: 16-22.

  • 28.

    Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. Neuropsychological Assessment: Oxford University Press, USA; 2004.

  • 29.

    Conti S, Stone D. Rehabilitation of the ankle after sprains and fractures. Foot Ankle Surg 1998; 4: 193-199.

  • 30.

    Bagheri SR, Sarmadi A, Dadashi L. Learning effects of the biodex balance system during assessments of postural task with in test-retest measurments. Koomesh 2012; 13: 354-363 (Persian).

  • 31.

    Cobb SC, Tis LL, Johnson BF, Higbie EJ. The effect of forefoot varus on postural stability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2004; 34: 79-85.

  • 32.

    Huxhold O, Li SC, Schmiedek F, Lindenberger U. Dual-tasking postural control: Aging and the effects of cognitive demand in conjunction with focus of attention. Brain Res Bull 2006; 69: 294-305.

  • 33.

    Lajoie Y, Teasdale N, Bard C, Fleury M. Upright standing and gait: are there changes in attentional requirements related to normal aging? Exp Aging Res 1996; 22: 185-198.

  • 34.

    Bernard-Demanze L, Dumitrescu M, Jimeno P, Borel L, Lacour M. Age-related changes in posture control are differentially affected by postural and cognitive task complexity. Curr Aging Sci 2009; 2: 139-149.

  • 35.

    Negahban H, Karimi M, Goharpey S, Mehravar M, Namnik N. Posture-cognition interaction during quiet standing in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Physiother Theory Pract 2015; 31: 540-546.

  • 36.

    Salavati M, Mazaheri M, Negahban H, Ebrahimi I, Jafari AH, Kazemnejad A, Parnianpour M. Effect of dual-tasking on postural control in subjects with nonspecific low back pain. Spine 2009; 34: 1415-1421.

  • 37.

    Stins JF, Michielsen ME, Roerdink M, Beek PJ. Sway regularity reflects attentional involvement in postural control: Effects of expertise, vision and cognition. Gait Posture 2009; 30: 106-109.

  • 38.

    Justine M, Ruzali D, Hazidin E, Said A, Bukry SA, Manaf H. Range of motion, muscle length, and balance performance in older adults with normal, pronated, and supinated feet. J Phys Ther Sci 2016; 28: 916-922.