Relationship between the forward head and thoracic hyper-kyphosis deformities with body image in non-athletes females

authors:

avatar Foad Seidi , * , avatar Leila sadat Ghasabi , avatar Elahe Fadaee

Koomesh: Vol.18, issue 1; 102-109
published online: September 28, 2016
article type: issue_documents_importer
received: December 01, 2015
accepted: June 05, 2016

how to cite: Seidi F, Ghasabi L S, Fadaee E. Relationship between the forward head and thoracic hyper-kyphosis deformities with body image in non-athletes females. koomesh. 2016;18(1):e151151. 

Abstract

Introduction: The state of health and illness in each of physical or mental dimensions can influence on the other dimension. Thus, it is essential to study interaction between physical deformities and mental variations. Nevertheless, this issue already is not considered sufficiently. The objective of present research was to study the relationship between deformities of the spine including forward head and thoracic hyper-kyphosis with body imagein non-athletes females. Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty non-athletes female who their ages ranged from 25 to 30 years old, were participated in this study. These participants were divided into two groups, with each group had 60 members and were associated with one of the deformities including forward head and thoracic kyphosis. The angle ofthoracic kyphosis was measured by flexible ruler and forward head was measured by photogrammetry method. Results: Data in both descriptive and inferential statistics were analyzed using SPSS version 19. The relationship between the spine deformities was assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient. Results show that although there was a significant relationship between body image and kyphosis abnormality in non-athlete girl student (r = 0.951, p = 0.008) but there was also no significant relationship between body image and forward head (r = 0.29, p = 0.21). Conclusion: It seems that in deformities such as thoracic kyphosis that is physically evident and is well known by most people body image weakness is more. So, lack of awareness about forward head posture may decrease the person’s sensitivity to their appeareance. Although psychological, economical, business, lifestyle and cultural as well as factors other relevant factors most be considered.

References

  • 1.

    Cash T. The body image workbook: an eight-step program for learning to like your looks: New Harbinger Publications; 2008.

  • 2.

    Hoseini M. Compared with healthy body image of people with scoliosis unknown hyperkyphosis. M.sc, tehran; University of Tehran 2012. (Persian).

  • 3.

    Peterson-Kendall F, Kendall-McCreary E, Geise-Provance P, McIntyre-Rodgers M, Romani W. Muscles testing and function with posture and pain. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.

  • 4.

    Burton AK. Regional lumbar sagittal mobility; measurement by flexicurves. Clin Biomech 1986; 1: 20-6.

  • 5.

    John C, Ford A, David H. Vertebral Column Adoms orthopedic principle, 11th ed. Londont. 2001; 177-222.

  • 6.

    Harman K, Hubley-Kozey CL, Butler H. Effectiveness of an exercise program to improve forward head posture in normal adults: a randomized, controlled 10-week trial. J Man Manip Ther 2005; 13: 163-176.

  • 7.

    Baker AD. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014; p: 289-292.

  • 8.

    Balague F, Troussier B, Salminen J. Non-specific low back pain in children and adolescents: risk factors. Eur Spine J 1999; 8: 429-438.

  • 9.

    Mosburger H, Egel S. Determine of pain exercise: perceived competence, trait anxiety, trait depression and moderate effects. Pers Individ Dif 2000; 12: 1261-1266.

  • 10.

    Canales JZ, Cords TA, Fiquer JT, Cavalcante AF, Moreno RA. Posture and body image in individuals with major depressive disorder: a controlled study. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 2010; 32: 375-380.

  • 11.

    Walker C. Research on psychological aspects of scoliosis/kyphosis. J Prosthet Orthot 2003; 15: S53-S58.

  • 12.

    Babekir N, Crawford A, Durrani A. P39. Does scheuermann's kyphosis have a psychological impact? Spin J 2007; 7: 101S.

  • 13.

    Alizadeh M, Farokhi A, Yasrebi M, Rahnama N. Relationship of thoracic Kyphosis deformity to depression, anxiety, aggression and introversion. Cell Mol Biol Lett 2004; 2: 73-76. (Persian).

  • 14.

    Samadi H, Rajabi R, Shahi Y. Investigating the relationship between the degree of kyphosis and psychological factors in male students of Tehran University. Jfmh 2008; 37: 55-61. (Persian).

  • 15.

    Ghafori F, Hovanlo F, Asghari A. Arshadi R. Kyphosis relationship with depression and anxiety among students athletes and non-athletes of the university of Tehran. 2006; 12: 107-122. (Persian).

  • 16.

    Seidi F, Rajabi R, Ebrahimi T, Tavanai A, Moussavi S. The Iranian flexible ruler reliability and validity in lumbar lordosis measurement. J Sports Sci 2009; 2: 95-99.

  • 17.

    Teixeira F, Carvalho G. Reliability and validity of thoracic kyphosis measurements using flexicurve method. Braz J Phys Ther 2007; 11: 199-204.

  • 18.

    Seidi F, Rajabi R, Ebrahimi I, Alizadeh MH, Minoonejad H. The efficiency of corrective exercise interventions on thoracic hyper-kyphosis angle. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2014; 27: 7-16.

  • 19.

    Hutton R. Physical examination of the spine and extremities: Prentice Hall; 1976.

  • 20.

    Saad KR, Colombo AS, Joo SMA. Reliability and validity of the photogrammetry for scoliosis evaluation: a cross-sectional prospective study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009; 32: 423-430.

  • 21.

    Saad KR, Colombo AS, Ribeiro AP, Joo SM. Reliability of photogrammetry in the evaluation of the postural aspects of individuals with structural scoliosis. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2012; 16: 210-216.

  • 22.

    Thigpen CA, Padua DA, Michener LA, Guskiewicz K, Giuliani C, Keener JD, Stergiou N. Head and shoulder posture affect scapular mechanics and muscle activity in overhead tasks. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2010; 20: 701-709.

  • 23.

    Mendelson BK, Mendelson MJ, White DR. Body-esteem scale for adolescents and adults. J Pers Assess 2001; 76: 90-106.

  • 24.

    Yaghmale F. Content validity and its estimation. J Med Educ 2009; 3: 1-3.

  • 25.

    Letafatkar A, Abdolvahabi Z. General corrective exercises (along with corrective exercises). Avay Zohore 2009; 1 ed. (Persian).

  • 26.

    Hoseini M, Rezvankhah N, Alizadeh MH. Is there a relationship between body image and women hyperlordosis? Jfmh. 2012; 6: 52-59. (Persian). ##.