Determination of validity and reliability of the Bayley scales in infant and toddler development

authors:

avatar Nadia Azari , avatar Farin Soleimani ORCID , * , avatar Roshanak Vameghi , avatar Firouzeh Sajedi , avatar Soheila Shahshahani , avatar Hossein Karimi , avatar Adis Kraskian , avatar Amin Shahrokhi , avatar Robab Teymouri , avatar Masoud Gharib

Koomesh: Vol.18, issue 1; 189-196
published online: September 28, 2016
article type: issue_documents_importer
received: March 06, 2016
accepted: July 02, 2016

how to cite: Azari N, Soleimani F, Vameghi R, Sajedi F, Shahshahani S, et al. Determination of validity and reliability of the Bayley scales in infant and toddler development. koomesh. 2016;18(1):e151162. 

Abstract

Introduction: For diagnosing children who are suspected to have developmental delay through developmental screening tests, we need a valid and reliable diagnostic tool. The Bayley scales is a well-known diagnostic developmental assessment on cognitive, communication and motor domains. The aim of this study was validity and reliability determination of the Bayley test. Materials and Methods: The method of this study was descriptive-analytic. The test was provided through translation- back translation and cultural adaptation. Content and face validity of tool was determined by experts’ opinions. 260 children aged 1 to 42 months were recruited for developmental assessment by Bayley. Reliability of test was calculated through three methods internal consistency, test-retest and inter-rater. Construct validity was calculated using factor analysis and comparison of the mean scores methods. Results: Participants were 260 children 15 days to 42 months, including 134 boys (51.5%). Cranach’s alpha coefficients were more than 0.76 for all domains. Pearson correlation coefficient in different domains, were at least 0.987 (P< 0.001) in test retest method and 0.991 (P

References

  • 1.

    Boyle CA, Boulet S, Schieve LA, Cohen RA, Blumberg SJ, Yeargin-Allsopp M, et al. Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US children, 19972008. Pediatrics 2011; 127: 1034-1042.

  • 2.

    Sajedi F, Doulabi MA, Vameghi R, Baghban AA, Mazaheri MA, Mahmodi Z, et al. Development of children in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global J Health Sci 2015; 8: 145.

  • 3.

    Mohammadi M, Sadollahi A, Ghorbani R. Prevalence of specific language impairment in 5 year-old children of an Iranian. Koomesh 2014; 15: 182-190.

  • 4.

    Zare Delavar S, Bakhshi E, Soleimani F, Biglarian A. Application of penalized logistic regression for detecting risk factors interactions of children with erebral Palsy. Koomesh 2015; 16: 159-165.

  • 5.

    Glascoe FP. Early detection of developmental and behavioral problems. Pediatr Rev 2000; 21: 272-280.

  • 6.

    Wu YT, Tsou KI, Hsu CH, Fang LJ, Yao G, Jeng SF. Brief report: Taiwanese infants' mental and motor development--6-24 months. J Pediatr Psychol 2008; 33: 102-108.

  • 7.

    Abubakar A, Holding P, Van Baar A, Newton C, van de Vijver FJ. Monitoring psychomotor development in a resourcelimited setting: an evaluation of the Kilifi Developmental Inventory. Ann Trop Paediatr 2008; 28: 217-226.

  • 8.

    Bayley N, Reuner G. Bayley scales of infant and toddler development: Bayley-III: Harcourt Assessment, Psych. Corporation; 2006.

  • 9.

    Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. SPINE 2000; 25: 3186-3191.

  • 10.

    Hunt SM, Bhopal R. Self report in clinical and epidemiological studies with non-English speakers: the challenge of language and culture. J Epidemiol Commun Health 2004; 58: 618-622.

  • 11.

    Gladstone M, Lancaster GA, Jones A, Maleta K, Mtitimila E, Ashorn P, et al. Can Western developmental screening tools be modified for use in a rural Malawian setting? Arch Dis Child 2008; 93: 23-29.

  • 12.

    Lipkin PH, Cartwright JD, Desch LW, Duby JC, Elias ER, Johnson CP, et al. Role of the medical home in family-centered early intervention services. Pediatrics 2007; 120: 1153-1158.

  • 13.

    Johnson S, Marlow N. Developmental screen or developmental testing? Early Human Develop 2006; 82: 173-183.

  • 14.

    Harris SR, Megens AM, Backman CL, Hayes VE. Stability of the bayley II scales of infant development in a sample of low-risk and high-risk infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005; 47: 820-823.

  • 15.

    Godamunne P, Liyanage C, Wimaladharmasooriya N, Pathmeswaran A, Wickremasinghe AR, Patterson C, et al. Comparison of performance of Sri Lankan and US children on cognitive and motor scales of the Bayley scales of infant development. BMC Res notes 2014; 7: 300.

  • 16.

    Deroma L, Bin M, Tognin V, Rosolen V, Valent F, Barbone F, et al. [Interrater reliability of the Bayley III test in the Italian Northern-Adriatic Cohort II]. Epidemiol Prev 2013; 37: 297-302.

  • 17.

    Zakaria S, Seok CB, Sombuling A, Ahmad MS, Hashmi SI. Reliability and validity for malay version of bayley scales of infant and toddler development-(bayley-III): preliminary study. Int Proc Economic Dev Res 2012; 40.

  • 18.

    Yu YT, Hsieh WS, Hsu CH, Chen LC, Lee WT, Chiu NC, et al. A psychometric study of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - 3rd Edition for term and preterm Taiwanese infants. Res Dev Disabil 2013; 34: 3875-3883.

  • 19.

    Acton BV, Biggs WS, Creighton DE, Penner KA, Switzer HN, Thomas JH, et al. Overestimating neurodevelopment using the Bayley-III after early complex cardiac surgery. Pediatrics 2011; 128: e794-e800.

  • 20.

    Anderson PJ, De Luca CR, Hutchinson E, Roberts G, Doyle LW. Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-III Scale. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010; 164: 352-356.

  • 21.

    Campbell SK, Zawacki L, Rankin KM, Yoder JC, Shapiro N, Li Z, et al. Concurrent validity of the TIMP and the Bayley III scales at 6 weeks corrected age. Pediatric physical therapy: the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association. 2013; 25: 395-401.

  • 22.

    Visser L, Ruiter SA, Van der Meulen BF, Ruijssenaars WA, Timmerman ME. Validity and suitability of the Bayley-III Low Motor/Vision version: A comparative study among young children with and without motor and/or visual impairments. Res Dev Disabil 2013; 34: 3736-3745.

  • 23.

    Soleimani F, Azari N, Kraskian-Mojembari A, Vameghi R, Shahshahani-Pour S, Sajedi F. Developing of the persian version of bayley scales of infant and toddlers development screening test and determine its validity and reliability. Quart J Rehab 2014; 14: 18-29.##.