A comparative study of repetition of long sentences skill in Persian-speaking multiple sclerosis patients and healthy subjects

parvane rahimifar; Majid Soltani; negin moradi; Nastaran Majdi nasab; Mahmoud latifi

Koomesh

Journal of Semnan University of Medical Sciences

Current Issue Archive In Press Accepted Manuscripts Search

Journal Information Editors & Boards Indexing and Listing Sources Journal Metrics Open Peer Review (OPR)Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement Support Contact Us Reviewer and AE Registration Form

APC

Authors Guide Submit Manuscript

A comparative study of repetition of long sentences skill in Persian-speaking multiple sclerosis patients and healthy subjects

Author(s):

parvane rahimifar,

Majid Soltani

^,*,

negin moradi,

Nastaran Majdi nasab,

Mahmoud latifi

Koomesh:Vol. 19, issue 1; 122-128

Published online:Mar 28, 2017

Article type:Research Article

Received:Jun 02, 2016

Accepted:Nov 09, 2016

How to Cite:parvane rahimifarMajid Soltaninegin moradiNastaran Majdi nasabMahmoud latifiA comparative study of repetition of long sentences skill in Persian-speaking multiple sclerosis patients and healthy subjects.koomesh.19(1):e151328.

Abstract

Introduction: People with progressive neurological diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS) not only experience speech production deficiencies but also language disorders. Inability in repetition of long sentences is a language difficulty. Ability in repetition of long sentence is a clinical marker of language and cognitive impairment and it can help speech and language therapists to design and implement treatment plans. Therefore, this study carried out with the aim of comparing repetition skill of long sentences in Persian-speaking MS patients and healthy people. Materials and Methods: This is a descriptive- epidemiologic study in which repetition of long sentences was carried out on 20 MS patients from the MS Society of Khuzestan (Iran). The age range of the participants was between 21-54 years (mean age 39.55) and 20 healthy people (mean age 39.50). Data includinf long sentence repetition skill, the number of errors in functional word omission, and content word omission, and number of spoken words were obtained and analyzed. Results: Results showed that there was a significant different between MS patients and the control group in the mean of long sentence repetition skill (P=0.0001), the number of errors in functional word omission (P=0.004) the number of errors in content word omission (P=0.005) and number of spoken words (P=0.001). Conclusion: Results of this study showed that repetition of long sentence skill and some of the syntactic skills have impaired in MS patients. The results can help speech and language therapists in clinical assessment and interventional programs for MS patients

Keywords

Language Disorders

Cognitive Dysfunction

References

1.
Motahari F, Seyed S, Zeinali R. The impact of mental practice on sleep quality, fatigue, functional balance and gaiting in patient with multiple sclerosis: A case report. Koomesh 2016; 17: 944-949.
2.
Motaharinezhad F, Parvaneh S, Bakhtiary AH, Alizadeh N, Ghahari S. The effect of mood and cognition on relationship between sleep disturbances and fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis. Koomesh 2016; 17: 613-619.
3.
Moghadasi M. Edalat Manesh MA, Moeini A, Namatollahzadeh M. Effects of eight weeks resistance training on brain derived neurotrophic factor in female patients with multiple sclerosis. Koomesh 2015; 17: 152-159.
4.
Masoudi R, Abedi HA, Abedi P, Mohammadianinejad SE. Iranian family caregivers challenges and issues in caring of multiple sclerosis patients: A descriptive explorative qualitative study. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2014; 19: 416-423.
5.
Masoudi R, Abedi H, Abedi P, Mohammadianinejad E. Experiences of Iranian multiple sclerosis patients and their caregivers regarding care and treatment outcomes. JJCDC 2013; 3: 21-31. (Persian).
6.
Sahraian MA, Khorramnia S, Ebrahim MM, Moinfar Z, Lotfi J, Pakdaman H. Multiple sclerosis in Iran: a demographic study of 8,000 patients and changes over time. Eur Neurol 2010; 64: 331-336.
7.
Beatty W, Monson N. Lexical processing in Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1989; 2: 145-152.
8.
Kujala P, Portin R, Ruutiainen J. Language functions in incipient cognitive decline in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 1996; 141: 79-86.
9.
Lethlean JB, Murdoch BE. Naming errors in multiple sclerosis: Support for a combined semantic/perceptual deficit. J Neurol 1994; 8: 207-223.
10.
Friend KB, Rabin BM, Groninger L, Deluty RH, Bever C, Grattan L. Language functions in patients with multiple sclerosis. Clin Neuropsychol 1999; 13: 78-94.
11.
Drake M, Allegri R, Carra A. [Language abnormalities in patients with multiple sclerosis]. Neurologia 2002; 17: 12-16.
12.
McDonald WI, Ron MA. Multiple sclerosis the disease and its manifestations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 1999;354(1390):1615-22.
13.
Tanya M, Eleanor Ross K. Perceptions of the impact of speech, language, swallowing and hearing difficulties onnquality of life of a group of South African persons with multiple sclerosis. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2002; 54: 201-221.
14.
Feinstein A. The Clinical Neuropsychiatry of Multiple Sclerosis. 2ed, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
15.
Ebrahimipour M, Shahbeigi S, Jenabi M, Amiri Y, Kamali M. Verbal fluency performance in patients with multiple sclerosis. Iran J Neurol 2008; 7: 138-142.
16.
Arrondo G, Sepulcre J, Duque B, Toledo J, Villoslada P. Narrative speech is impaired in multiple sclerosis. Eur Neurol J 2010; 2: 11-40.
17.
Jamalpour S, Baharlooie N, Ashtari F, Shamsian F, Sedehi M. Comparison some of the syntactic skills in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis and normal adults resident in Esfahan Province. J Res Rehabil Sci 2013; 9: 866-875. (Persian).
18.
Laakso K, Brunnegrd K, Hartelius L, Ahlsn E. Assessing high-level language in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. Clin lingui Phon 2000; 14: 329-349.
19.
Lethlean JB, Murdoch BE. Performance of subjects with multiple sclerosis on tests of high-level language. Aphasiology 1997; 11: 39-57.
20.
Riches NG, Loucas T, Baird G, Charman T, Simonoff E. Sentence repetition in adolescents with specific language impairments and autism: An investigation of complex syntax. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2010; 45: 47-60.
21.
Crosson B. Assessment of subtle language deficits in neuropsychological batteries: Strategies and implications. Ecological validity of neuropsyhological testing Delray, FL: GR Press/St Lucie press, Inc 1996.
22.
Lezak M. Verbal fluency, neuropsychological Assessment3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York; 1995.
23.
Devescovi A, Cristina Caselli M. Sentence repetition as a measure of early grammatical development in Italian. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2007; 42: 187-208.
24.
Strauss E, Sherman EM, Spreen O. A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary: Oxford University Press, USA; 2006.
25.
Hasanati F, Agharasouli Z, Mahmoudi Bakhtiyari B, Kamali M. Sentence repetition test for measurement of grammatical development in Farsi speaking children. Audiology 2011; 20: 73-81.
26.
Lethlean J, Murdoch B. Language problems in multiple sclerosis. J Med Speech-lang Pathol 1993; 1: 47-59.
27.
Zandi b. Language learning. Tehran, The organization for researching and composing university textbooks in the humaniies (SAMT); 2002. (persion).
28.
Duffy JR. Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.
29.
Nilipour R, Raghibdoust S. Manifestations of aphasia in Persian. J Neurol 2001; 14: 209-230.
30.
soltani M, Rahimifar P, Moradi N, Madjdi Nasab N, Latifi M. Equivalent intercultural and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the high- level language test (BESS). 2016. (persion).
31.
Murdoch BE, Theodoros DG. Speech and language disorders in multiple sclerosis. London: Whurr; 2000.
32.
Alloway TP, Gathercole SE. The role of sentence recall in reading and language skills of children with learning difficulties. Learn Ind Differenc 2005; 15: 271-282.##.

comments