Joint prediction of occurrence of heart block and death in patient with myocardial infarction with artificial neural network model

How to Cite:Negin-sadat MirianMorteza SedehiSoleiman KheiriA. li AhmadiJoint prediction of occurrence of heart block and death in patient with myocardial infarction with artificial neural network model.koomesh.19(1):e151342.

Abstract

Introduction: When it is desired to examine occurrence of two events simultaneously, it is common to use bivariate statistical models such as bivariate logistic regression. Due to the limitations of classical methods in real situations, other methods such as artificial neural networks (ANN) are concerned. The aim of this study was comparing the predictive accuracy of bivariate logistic regression and artificial neural network models in diagnosis of death occurrence and heart block in myocardial infarction patients. Material and Methods: In this study, data was taken from a census in a cross-sectional study in which 263 patients with myocardial infarction cases who admitted to Hajar hospital heart care in 2013 to 2014. Gender, type of stroke, history of diabetes, previous history of hypertension, lipid disorders, history of heart disease, cardiac output fraction, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fasting and non-fasting blood sugar, cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density cholesterol, smoking, type of treatment, the troponin enzymes and insurant type were considered as explanatory variables and occurrence of death and heart block were used as dependent variables. Bivariate logistic regression and neural network model was fitted. Both models were predicted and the accuracy of them were compared. Models were fitted by MATLAB2013a and Zelig in R3.2.2. Results: Predictive accuracy of bivariate logistic regression model was 77.7% for the training and 78.48% for the test data. In ANN model, LM and OSS algorithms had best performance with 83.69% and 83.15% predictive accuracy for training data and 84.81% and 83.54% for testing data, respectively. Conclusion: This research showed that the neural network method is more accurate than bivariate logistic regression to joint predicting the occurrence of death and heart block in patients with myocardial infarction.

Keywords

Artificial Neural Network

Bivariate Logistic Regression

Myocardial Infarction

شبکه عصبی مصنوعی

رگرسیون لجستیک دومتغیره

سکته قلبی

References

1.
Regan M, Catalano P. Likelihood models for clustered binary and continuous outcomes Application to Developmental toxicology. Biometrics 1999; 55: 760-768.
2.
Teixeira-Pinto A, Normand T. Correlated bivariate continuous and binary outcomes issues and applications. Stat Med 2009; 28: 753-773.
3.
Anderson A. An introduction to neural network, Cambridge, MA: MIT press; 1995: 795-851.
4.
Gupta P, Bikrampal K. Accuracy enhancement of heart disease diagnosis system using neural network and genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci Softw Eng 2014; 4: 160-166.
5.
Menhaj MB, editor. Fundamentals of neural networks. 8th ed. Amir Kabir Univ pub; 2012 (Persian).
6.
Babaei M, Mohammad Khan Kermanshahi S, Alhani F. Influence of discharge planning on anxiety levels in patients with myocardial infarction. Koomesh 2011; 12: 272-278.
7.
Anman EM, Braunwald E. Acute myocardial infarction. In: Braunwald E, Zips D, Libby P, editors. Heart Disease, 6th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Com; 2001; P: 1114-1219.
8.
Ahmadi A, Soori H, Mehrabi Y, Etemad K, Khaledifar A. Epidemiologic pattern of myocardial infarction and modeling risk factors relevant to in-hospital mortality: the first results from Iranian Myocardial Infarction Registry. Kardiologia Polska 2015; 73: 451-457.
9.
Asgari M R, Jafarpoor H, Soleimani M, Ghorbani R, Askandarian R, Jafaripour I. Effects of early mobilization program on depression of patients with myocardial infarction hospitalized in CCU. Koomesh 2015; 16: 175-118.
10.
Sadri P, Khaledifar A, Ahmadi A. Survey of the incidence rate of complete bundle branch block in patients with acute myocardial infarction in CCU ward in Hagar hospital. [Dissertation] Shahre Kord. Shahre kord Univ Med Sci 2013-14 (Persian).
11.
Kay JW, Titterington DM, editors. Statistics and neural networks: Advanced at the interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.
12.
Wang S. An insight into the standard back propagation neural network model for regression analysis. J Mgmt Sci 1998; 26: 133-140.
13.
Sedehi M, Mehrabi Y, Kazemnejad A, Joharimajd V, Hadaegh F. Artificial neural network design for modeling of mixed bivariate outcomes in medical research data. Iranian J Epidemiol 2010; 6: 28-39. (Persian).
14.
Parsaeian M, Mohammad K, Mahmoudi M, Zeraati H. Comparison of logistic regression and artificial neural network in low back pain prediction: second national health survey. Iran J Public Health 2012; 41: 86-92.
15.
Hosseini Teshnizi S, Ayatollahi SM. A comparison of logistic regression model and artificial neural networks in predicting of students academic failure. Acta Inrorm Med 2015; 23: 296-300.
16.
Sedehi M, Mehrabi Y, Kazemnejad A, Johari-majd V, Hadaegh F. Design of artificial neural network for joint predicting of metabolic syndrome and HOMA-IR. Daneshvar 2009; 17: 29-36. (Persian).
17.
Adeli M, et al. Application of artificial neural network model in predicting the mixed response of atherosclerosis disease. RJMS 2013; 20: 20-28. (Persian).
18.
Biglarian A, Hajizadeh E, Kazemnejad A, Zali MR. Application of artificial neural network in predicting the survival rate of gastric cancer patients. Iran J Public Health 2011; 40: 80-86.##.

comments