Journal of Semnan University of Medical Sciences
Comparison of efficacy of oral ciprofloxacin versus IV eftriaxone in acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis
Authors
Abstract
Introdution: Acute pyelonephritis is one of the bacteri al infections which is treated th rough injection drugs. As, using IV antibiotics has a lot of exp ens e, thus this study was performed to compare the treatment efficacy of two regimens. IV an d oral regimen and alternating oral instead of IV tre atment. Materials and Methods: This clinical trial study was carried out on 54 patients with acute pyelonephritis without any complication in Fatemieh hospital from Au g. 2002. Randomly each patient was prescribed one of the two regimes: oral ciprotloxacin (Regimen I) and IV Ceft riaxon (Regimen II). Seven pa tients from Regimes I, due to th e incomplet e treatment with th e given medicine were set aside. And the rest o f the cases, 24 , 48 and 72 hours after beginning the treatment were ch ecked for disappearing or continuing the fev er and clinic a l symp toms. Chisqure and t tests were used in the meaningful level of 5% to analyse the data. Results: Age mean and standard deviation for regimen. o ne were 50.40 ± 18.7 and fo r II 33 .2 ± 22.4, showing no meaningful difference statistically. Both regimens were hemogenious from gender distribution. Response to treatment was 95% and 100% respectively and showing no meaningful differen ce statistically. But the duration response mean (st and a rd di viation ) to tre a tmen t in both regimen were 2.67 ± 0.49 days and 1.6 ± 0.63 respectively. And h aving meaningful difference statistically ( P =0.0(0). Conclusion: This study showing that o r a l ciprof!oxa cin is as effec t ive as IV ceftr ia xo n, however, the response speed to treatment has been less .
Copyright
© 2002, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Similar Articles
Comparing Ceftriaxone and Cefazolin for Treatment of Adult Acute Pyelonephritis; A Clinical Trial
Ebrahimzadeh A, Saadatjoo SA, Alipoor Tabrizi A. Comparing Ceftriaxone and Cefazolin for Treatment of Adult Acute Pyelonephritis; A Clinical Trial. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2010;5(2):. doi:
Evaluation of the ciprofloxacin effect on resistant isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in In-vitro and In-vivo
Shabani A, Masomi N, AlAgha S. Evaluation of the ciprofloxacin effect on resistant isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in In-vitro and In-vivo. koomesh. 2000;1(4):e151909. doi:
Daily vs. Every-Other-Day Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Children with Vesicoureteral Reflux: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Malakuti N, Mohajeri S, Raeisi Shahraki H, Salehifardjouneghani A. Daily vs. Every-Other-Day Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Children with Vesicoureteral Reflux: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2025;20(4):e165012. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jjnpp-165012
Comparison of Intravenous Ibuprofen with Intravenous Ketorolac in Renal Colic Pain Management; A Clinical Trial
Forouzanfar MM, Mohammadi K, Hashemi B, Safari S. Comparison of Intravenous Ibuprofen with Intravenous Ketorolac in Renal Colic Pain Management; A Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2019;9(1):e86963. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.86963
Paracetamol vs. Intravenous Morphine Plus Diclofenac in Renal Colic Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Shams-Vahdati S, Robaei N, Habibollah P, Jafari-Rouhi A, Mohammadi S, et al. Paracetamol vs. Intravenous Morphine Plus Diclofenac in Renal Colic Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Nephro-Urol Mon. 2018;10(4):e77193. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly.77193
- Scopus by DOI: 0
Last Update: 1 month ago
- Scopus by Title: 0
Last Update: 1 month ago
- Scopus by Title (Ref): 0
Last Update: 1 month ago
- CrossRef: 0
Last Update: 5 days ago