The effect of epidural analgesia on the clinical maternal and neonatal outcomes in parturients: a prospective cohort study

authors:

avatar Masoomeh Nataj ORCID , avatar majid akrami , *

Koomesh: Vol.25, issue 3; 357-362
published online: September 02, 2023
article type: Research Article
received: March 04, 2023
accepted: July 02, 2023

how to cite: Nataj M, akrami M. The effect of epidural analgesia on the clinical maternal and neonatal outcomes in parturients: a prospective cohort study. koomesh. 2023;25(3):e152834. 

Abstract

Introduction: Epidural analgesia seems to be one of the most effective methods of controlling labor pain. However, no comprehensive agreement has been reached regarding its side effects. Therefore, the following study was designed to investigate the clinical maternal and neonatal outcomes. Materials and Methods: In a prospective cohort study, from November 2020 to October 2022, 600 primigravid patients were included in two equal epidural analgesia and control groups. The uterine atony, grade 3-4 perineal injury rate, fetal head descent, shoulder dystocia, duration of neonatal hospitalization, cesarean delivery, fever and headache, oxytocin administration, successful breastfeeding, instrumented vaginal delivery, the first-minute Apgar Score were compared between the two groups. The data were analyzed by SPSS-26 with the Chi-square test and T-test. Results: The duration of the active phase, uterine atony, grade 3-4 perineal injury rate and fetal head descent, shoulder dystocia, duration of neonatal hospitalization, and successful breastfeeding between the two groups were not statistically significant(P-value>0.05). Importantly, the incidence of cesarean delivery, fever, headache, and oxytocin administration was significantly higher in the epidural group (P-value <0.05). Regarding the comparison of neonatal outcomes, the use of instrumented vaginal delivery, the first-minute Apgar Score, and the frequency of hospitalization between the two groups were found to be significantly different (P-value 0.03, 0.02, 0.007 respectively). Conclusion: Although the probability of emergency cesarean delivery following epidural labor analgesia increases and the first-minute Apgar score decreases, the serious side effects of epidural labor analgesia seem to be few and its use is effective and safe in reducing labor pain.

References

  • 1.

    Melzack R. The myth of painless childbirth (the John J. Bonica lecture). Pain 1984; 19: 321-337.

  • 2.

    Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Spong CY, Dashe JS. Williams obstetrics, 24e: Mcgraw-hill New York, NY, USA; 2014.

  • 3.

    Negahban T, Ansari A. Does Fear of childbirth predict emergency cesarean section in primiparous women? J Hayat 2009; 14: 73-81. (Persian).

  • 4.

    Sharifzadeh M, Bolbol Haghighi N, Keramat A, Goli M, Motaghi Z. Effectiveness of midwifery counseling based on solution-focused approaches on fear of childbirth. Koomesh 1397; 20: 375-383. (Persian).

  • 5.

    Rafiei MR, Behnamfar F, Mousavi GA. Evaluation of the effect of epidural anesthesia with marcaine and fentanyl on labor course and neonatal apgar scores. Koomesh 1384; 7: 35-40. (Persian).

  • 6.

    Health Do. Statistical bulletin: NHS immunisation statistics, England: 2002-03: Department of Health; 2003.

  • 7.

    Osterman MJ, Martin JA, Menacker F. Expanded health data from the new birth certificate, 2006. 2009.

  • 8.

    Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, Alfirevic Z, Gates S, Newburn M, et al. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 2012.##https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2.

  • 9.

    AnimSomuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus nonepidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018.

  • 10.

    Soet JE, Brack GA, DiIorio C. Prevalence and predictors of women's experience of psychological trauma during childbirth. Birth 2003; 30: 36-46.

  • 11.

    Torricelli M, Voltolini C, Conti N, Bocchi C, Severi FM, Petraglia F. Weight gain regardless of pre-pregnancy BMI and influence of fetal gender in response to labor induction in postdate pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 26: 1016-1019.

  • 12.

    Hasegawa J, Farina A, Turchi G, Hasegawa Y, Zanello M, Baroncini S. Effects of epidural analgesia on labor length, instrumental delivery, and neonatal short-term outcome. J Anesth 2013; 27: 43-47.

  • 13.

    Leighton BL, Halpern SH. The effects of epidural analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S69-S77.##https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(02)70182-8.

  • 14.

    Guideline N. Induction of labour. Nat Collabour Centre Women Child Health Nat Instit Health Clin Excell 2008.

  • 15.

    Tsuzuki Y, Yamashita Y, Hattori Y, Li GH, Akatsuka S, Kotani T, et al. Pain-reducing anesthesia prevents oxidative stress in human term placenta. J Clin Biochem Nutr 2016; 15-138.

  • 16.

    Cambic C, Wong C. Labour analgesia and obstetric outcomes. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105: i50-i60.

  • 17.

    French CA, Cong X, Chung KS. Labor epidural analgesia and breastfeeding: a systematic review. J Hum Lact 2016; 32: 507-520.

  • 18.

    Sharpe EE, Arendt KW. Epidural labor analgesia and maternal fever. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2017; 60: 365-374.

  • 19.

    Herrera-Gmez A, Garca-Martnez O, Ramos-Torrecillas J, De Luna-Bertos E, Ruiz C, Ocaa-Peinado FM. Retrospective study of the association between epidural analgesia during labour and complications for the newborn. Midwifery 2015; 31: 613-616.

  • 20.

    Altman M, Sandstrm A, Petersson G, Frisell T, Cnattingius S, Stephansson O. Prolonged second stage of labor is associated with low Apgar score. Eur J Epidemiol 2015; 30: 1209-1215.

  • 21.

    Thorngren-Jerneck K, Herbst A. Low 5-minute Apgar score: a population-based register study of 1 million term births. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 65-70.

  • 22.

    Naito Y, Ida M, Yamamoto R, Tachibana K, Kinouchi K. The effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single Japanese institute. JA Clin Rep 2019; 5: 40.

  • 23.

    Sharma SK, Alexander JM, Messick G, Bloom SL, McIntire DD, Wiley J, et al. Cesarean delivery: a randomized trial of epidural analgesia versus intravenous meperidine analgesia during labor in nulliparous women. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 546-551.

  • 24.

    Djakovi I, Sabolovi Rudman S, Koec V. Effect of epidural analgesia on mode of delivery. Wien Med Wochenschr 2017; 167: 390-394.

  • 25.

    Srebnik N, Barkan O, Rottenstreich M, Ioscovich A, Farkash R, Rotshenker-Olshinka K, et al. The impact of epidural analgesia on the mode of delivery in nulliparous women that attain the second stage of labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020; 33: 2451-2458.

  • 26.

    Tawhid Sderholm N, Turkmen S. Impact of epidural analgesia in labour on neonatal and maternal outcomes. Open J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 8: 767-779.##https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2018.89080.

  • 27.

    Martnez AH, Almagro JJ, Garca-Suelto MM, Barrajon MU, Alarcn MM, Gmez-Salgado J. Epidural analgesia and neonatal morbidity: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15.

  • 28.

    Youssefzadeh AC, Tavakoli A, Panchal VR, Mandelbaum RS, Ouzounian JG, Matsuo K. Incidence trends of shoulder dystocia and associated risk factors: A nationwide analysis in the United States. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2023; 162: 578-589.

  • 29.

    Xu Q, Wu ZF, Yang NN, Shi M, Zhu ZQ. Impact of epidural analgesia during labor on breastfeeding initiation and continuation: a retrospective study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020; 33: 3816-3819.