Logo

Psychometric properties of Persian version the self-efficacy for exercise scale for older adults

Author(s):
Valiolah KashaniValiolah Kashani,*, Peyman HonarmandPeyman Honarmand

Koomesh:Vol. 19, issue 3; 565-576
Published online:Sep 01, 2017
Article type:Research Article
Received:Jun 02, 2016
Accepted:May 01, 2017
How to Cite:Valiolah KashaniPeyman HonarmandPsychometric properties of Persian version the self-efficacy for exercise scale for older adults.koomesh.19(3):e152902.

Abstract

References

  • 1.
    Blair SN, Brodney S. Effects of physical inactivity and obesity on morbidity and mortality: current evidence and research issues. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: S646-S662.
  • 2.
    Rhodes RE, Plotnikoff RC. Can current physical activity act as a reasonable proxy measure of future physical activity? Evaluating cross-sectional and passive prospective designs with the use of social cognition models. Prev Med 2005; 40: 547-555.
  • 3.
    GHahremani L NM. Comparison of predicted exercise intention and behavior based on self-efficacy theory and the theory of planned behavior. Faculty of Health and Nutrition, Shiraz Univ Med Sci 2012. (Persian).
  • 4.
    Organization WH. The world health report 2002: reducing risks, promoting healthy life: World Health Organization; 2002.
  • 5.
    Afzali M, Baradaran Eftekhary M, Hejazi F, Khojasteh T, Tabrizi R, Faridi T. Social mobilization for health promotion in the elderly. Hakim Res J 2007; 9: 1-6. (Persian).
  • 6.
    Orlick T, Partington J. Mental links to excellence. Sport Psychol 1988; 2: 105-130.
  • 7.
    Duncan RM, Cheyne JA. Incidence and functions of self-reported private speech in young adults: A self-verbalization questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement 1999; 31: 133.
  • 8.
    Simar asl N FM, GHolipur A. Explaining the positive impact of psychological factors in the organization. J Manag Sci 2010; 17: 23-45.
  • 9.
    Tahmassian K, Anari A. The Relation between domains of self-efficacy and Depression in adolescence. 2009. (Perjsian).
  • 10.
    Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84: 191.
  • 11.
    Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory: Prentice-Hall, Inc; 1986. (Persian).
  • 12.
    Hoy WK, Tarter CJ, Hoy AW. Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement. Am Educ Res J 2006; 43: 425-446.
  • 13.
    Zimmerman BJ. Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemp Educ Psychol 2000; 25: 82-91.
  • 14.
    Vazirniya T. Family and Elderly. Nursing and Midwifery (Mashhad) 1999; 2: 14. (Persian).
  • 15.
    Hellstrom K, Lindmark B, Wahlberg B, Fugl-Meyer AR. Self-efficacy in relation to impairments and activities of daily living disability in elderly patients with stroke: a prospective investigation. J Rehab Med 2003; 35: 202-207.
  • 16.
    Chang SH, Crogan NL, Wung SF. The self-care self-efficacy enhancement program for Chinese nursing home elders. Geriatr Nurs 2007; 28: 31-36.
  • 17.
    Singh B, Udainiya R. Self-efficacy and well-being of adolescents. J Indian Acad Appl Psychol 2009; 35: 227-232.
  • 18.
    Judge TA, Erez A, Bono JE, Thoresen CJ. Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? J Personal Soc Psychol 2002; 83: 693.
  • 19.
    Muris P. A brief questionnaire for measuring self-efficacy in youths. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 2001; 23: 145-149.
  • 20.
    Tipton RM, Worthington EL. The measurement of generalized self-efficacy: A study of construct validity. J Per Assess 1984; 48: 545-548.
  • 21.
    Lee LL, Perng SJ, Ho CC, Hsu HM, Lau SC, Arthur A. A preliminary reliability and validity study of the Chinese version of the self-efficacy for exercise scale for older adults. Int J Nurs Studies 2009; 46: 230-238.
  • 22.
    Vispoel WP, Chen P. Measuring Self-Efficacy: The State of the Art. 1990.
  • 23.
    Resnick B, Jenkins LS. Testing the reliability and validity of the self-efficacy for exercise scale. Nurs Res 2000; 49: 154-159.
  • 24.
    McAuley E. Self-efficacy and the maintenance of exercise participation in older adults. J Behav Med 1993; 16: 103-113.
  • 25.
    McAuley E, Lox C, Duncan TE. Long-term maintenance of exercise, self-efficacy, and physiological change in older adults. J Gerontology 1993; 48: P218-P24.
  • 26.
    McAuley E. The role of efficacy cognitions in the prediction of exercise behavior in middle-aged adults. J Behav Med 1992; 15: 65-88.
  • 27.
    Resnick B, Luisi D, Vogel A, Junaleepa P. Reliability and validity of the self-efficacy for exercise and outcome expectations for exercise scales with minority older adults. J Nurs Measur 2004; 12: 235-248.
  • 28.
    Choi M, Ahn S, Jung D. Psychometric evaluation of the Korean Version of the Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale for older adults. Geriatr Nurs 2015; 36: 301-305.
  • 29.
    Durand-Bush N, Salmela JH, Green-Demers I. The ottawa mental skills assessment tool (OMSAT-3*). The Sport Psychologist 2001.
  • 30.
    Zeidabadi R, Rezaie F, Motashareie E. Psychometric properties and normalization of persian version of ottawa mental skills assessment tools (OMSAT-3). Sport Psychol Rev 2014; 3: 63-82. (Persian).
  • 31.
    Mels G. LISREL for Windows: Getting started guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International 2006.
  • 32.
    Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications; 2015.
  • 33.
    Kontodimopoulos N, Pappa E, Niakas D, Tountas Y. Validity of SF-12 summary scores in a Greek general population. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007; 5: 55.
  • 34.
    Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity1. Person Psychol 1975; 28: 563-575.
  • 35.
    Terry PC, Lane AM, Fogarty GJ. Construct validity of the Profile of Mood StatesAdolescents for use with adults. Psychol Sport Exerc 2003; 4: 125-139.
  • 36.
    Hashim HA, Zulkifli EZ, Yusof HA. Factorial validation of Malaysian adapted Brunel Mood Scale in an adolescent sample. Asian J Sports Med 2010; 1: 185.
  • 37.
    Burgess PW, Alderman N, Evans J, Emslie H, Wilson BA. The ecological validity of tests of executive function. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1998; 4: 547-558.
  • 38.
    Schutz R, Gessaroli M, Singer R, Murphey M, Tennant L. Use, misuse, and disuse of psychometrics in sport psychology research. Handbook Res Sport Psychol 1993; 901-917.
  • 39.
    Kashani V, Shiri H, Manaseri H. Psychometric properties and normalization of persion version of mental toughness scale (MTS). Res Univ Sport 2015; 7: 83-98.
  • 40.
    Bartlett MS. Tests of significance in factor analysis. Br J Stat Psychol 1950; 3: 77-85.
  • 41.
    Kaiser HF. A note on guttman's lower bound for the number of common factors1. Br J Stat Psychol 1961; 14: 1-2.
  • 42.
    Raykov T. Behavioral scale reliability and measurement invariance evaluation using latent variable modeling. Behav Ther 2004; 35: 299-331##.
comments

Leave a comment here

Share on
Metrics

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.
Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles