Effectiveness of educational program based on prototype willingness model on preventing and decreasing anabolic-androgenic steroids among male bodybuilders

authors:

avatar Mohammad Hassan Saati Asr , avatar Rashid Heidari Moghadam , avatar Saeed Bashirian , avatar majid barati , *

Koomesh: Vol.20, issue 2; 263-273
article type: issue_documents_importer
received: August 02, 2017
accepted: January 02, 2018

how to cite: Saati Asr M H, Heidari Moghadam R, Bashirian S, barati M. Effectiveness of educational program based on prototype willingness model on preventing and decreasing anabolic-androgenic steroids among male bodybuilders. koomesh. 2024;20(2):e152957. 

Abstract

Introduction: The use of anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS) by athletes is a serious widespread public health problem. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of educational programs on prevention of AAS use among male bodybuilders in Hamadan based on Prototype Willingness Model (PWM) as a theoretical framework. Materials and Methods: In this quasi-experimental study, 76 male bodybuilders were randomly divided into two experimental (n=37) and control groups (n=39) in Hamadan, west of Iran in 2017. For this purpose, 5 gyms were randomly selected from Hamadan;#39s gyms. Then, gyms randomly allocated in the experimental (2 gyms) and control groups (3 gyms). Finally, participants of each group were selected through simple sampling method from each gym according to the inclusion criteria. Data was collected using a questionnaire, including the PWM constructs and demographic variables. The intervention comprised 5 sessions, applied on the experimental group during one month. Both groups were followed for two months after the intervention. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of demographic variables and PWM constructs before educational intervention (P>0.05). After the educational intervention, significant differences were observed in pre- and post-intervention score changes on subjective norms (P=0.040), prototypes (P=0.034), behavioral willingness (P

References

  • 1.

    Arazi H, Salehi A. Attitude and awareness of male bodybuilders toward adverse effects of anabolic-androgenic steroids in Qazvin, Iran. Iran J Epidemiol 2014; 9: 45-53. (Persian).

  • 2.

    Rashidlamir A DM, Taghizadeh V. Study the prevalence amount supplements are allowed authorizedand and unauthorized between athletes men bodybuilders and pavrlyftyng. Shomal J Manage Physiol Sport 2014; 2: 1-13. (Persian).

  • 3.

    Koh B, Freeman L, Zaslawski C. Alternative medicine and doping in sports. Australas Med J 2012; 5: 18.

  • 4.

    Street C, Antonio J, Cudlipp D. Androgen use by athletes: a reevaluation of the health risks. Can J Appl Physiol 1996; 21: 421-440.

  • 5.

    Bijeh N, Dehbashi M, Saghi M. Studying the amount of prevalence awareness and complications of anabolic steroids among the male athletes in Mashhad city. J Pract Stud Biosci Sport 2014; 2: 78-89. (Persian).

  • 6.

    Rashid Lamir A, Dehbashi M. Comparison of the effects of 17-alpha-alkyl steroids and 17-beta-hydroxy esters on the levels of liver enzymes and hematological factors in male bodybuilders. Horizon Med Sci 2016; 22: 21-26. (Persian).

  • 7.

    Jalilian F, Allahverdipour HA, Moeini B, Barati M, Moghimbeigi A, Hatamzadeh N. Relationof self-efficacy and perceived behavior control on Gym users anabolic steroid use related behaviors. Sci J Hamadan Univ Med Sci 2012; 19: 45-52. (Persian).

  • 8.

    Arazi H, Hosseini R. The prevalence of anabolic-androgenic steroids abuse, knowledge and attitue of their side effects, and attitude toward them among the bodybuilding athletes in Rasht. J Guilan Univ Med Sci 2011; 20: 34-41. (Persian).

  • 9.

    Jalilian F, Allahverdipour H, Moinei B, Moghimbeigi A, Barati M, Miraei-alavijeh M. Prevention of anabolic steroids use among Gym users: application of peer education approach. J Toloo-e-Behdasht 2011; 10: 45-56. (Persian).

  • 10.

    Atarodi A, Rohani Z. Prevalence of performance-enhancing drugs abuse and athletes knowledge of effects and side effects of them in male bodybuilders athletes. Zahedan J Res Med Sci 2012; 13: 46. (Persian).

  • 11.

    Botvin GJ. Preventing drug abuse in schools: Social and competence enhancement approaches targeting individual-leveletiologic factors. Addict Behav 2000; 25: 887-897.

  • 12.

    Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.

  • 13.

    Barati M, Allahverdipour H, Hidarnia A, Niknami S, BashirianS. Belief-based tobacco smoking scale: evaluating the psychometric properties of the Theory of Planned Behaviors Constructs. Health Promot Perspect 2015; 5: 59-71.

  • 14.

    Bashirian S, Barati M, Mohammadi Y, Mostafaei H. Factors associated with hookahuse among male high school students: the role of demographic characteristics and hookah user and non-user prototypes. J Res Health Sci 2016; 16: 217-223.

  • 15.

    Gerrard M, Gibbons FX, Houlihan AE, Stock ML, Pomery EA. A dual-process approach to health risk decision making: The prototype willingness model. Dev Rev 2008; 28: 29-61.

  • 16.

    Blanton H, Gibbons FX, Gerrard M, Conger KJ, Smith GE. Role of family and peers in the development of prototypes associated with substanceuse. J Fam Psychol 1997; 11: 271-288.

  • 17.

    Gerrard M, Gibbons FX, Reis-Bergan M, Trudeau L, Vande Lune LS, Buunk B. Inhibitory effects of drinker and nondrinker prototypes on adolescent alcohol consumption. Health Psychol 2002; 21: 601-609.

  • 18.

    Hukkelberg SS, Dykstra JL. Using the Prototype/Willingness model to predict smoking behaviour among Norwegian adolescents. Addict Behav 2009; 34: 270-276.

  • 19.

    Barati M, Allahverdipour H, Hidarnia A, Niknami S. Predicting tobacco smoking among male adolescents in Hamadan City, west of Iran in 2014: an application of the prototype willingness model. J Res Health Sci 2015; 15: 113-118.

  • 20.

    Moeini B, Hazavehei SM, Mousali A, Soltanian A, Barati M, Kafami V. Predicting factorsin intentional safe sexual behaviors among drug abusing men covered by rehabilitation centers in Hamadan (Iran): applying the theory of planned behavior. Koomesh 2016; 17: 888-894. (Persian).

  • 21.

    Heidarnia A, Barati M, Niknami S, Allahverdipour H, Bashirian S. Effect of aweb-based educational program on prevention of tobacco smoking among male adolescents: an application of Prototype Willingness Model. J Educ Community Health 2016; 3: 1-11. (Persian).

  • 22.

    Laure P, Binsinger C, Lecerf T. General practitioners and doping in sport: attitudes and experience. Br J Sports Med 2003; 37: 335-338.

  • 23.

    Barati M, Allahverdipour H, Moinei B, Farhadinasab A, Mahgub H. Evaluation of theory of planned behavior-based education in prevention of MDMA (ecstasy) use among university students. Med J Tabriz Univ Med Sci 2011; 33: 20-29. (Persian).

  • 24.

    Koiso T, Koyama H, Suzuki K, Ohsawa S. Evaluation of drug abuse prevention program by utilizing of CD-ROM material. J Sch Health 2006; 3: 7-14.

  • 25.

    Hopfer S, Shin Y, Davis D, Elek E, Kam J, Hecht M. A review of elementary school-based substance use prevention programs: Identifying program attributes. J Drug Educ 2010; 40: 11-36.

  • 26.

    Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991; 50: 179-211.

  • 27.

    Becker J, Haug S, Sullivan R, Schaub MP. Effectiveness of different web-based interventions to prepare co-smokers of cigarettes and cannabis for double cessation: a three-arm randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16: e273.

  • 28.

    Springvloet L, Lechner L, Candel MJ, de Vries H, Oenema A. Exploring individual cognitions, self-regulation skills, and environmental-level factors as mediating variables of two versions of a web-based computer-tailored nutrition education intervention aimed at adults: a randomized controlled trial. Appetite 2016; 98: 101-114.

  • 29.

    Lewis MA, Litt DM, Tomkins M, Neighbors C. Prototype willingness model drinking cognitions mediate personalized normative feedback efficacy. Prev Sci 2017; 18: 373-381.

  • 30.

    Gibbons FX, Gerrard M. Predicting young adults' health risk behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 1995; 69: 505-517.

  • 31.

    Rivis A, Sheeran P, Armitage CJ. Augmenting the theory of planned behaviour with the prototype/willingness model: Predictive validity of actor versus abstainer prototypes for adolescents' healthprotective and healthrisk intentions. Br J Health Psychol 2006; 11: 483-500.

  • 32.

    Sedighian M, Babazadeh T, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Allahverdipour H. Comparison of cognitive - emotional determinants of sexual high-risk behaviors amongst youth: An application of prototype willingness model. Koomesh 2017; 19: 533-542. (Persian).

  • 33.

    van Lettow B, de Vries H, Burdorf A, Boon B, Van Empelen P. Drinkerproto type alteration and cue reminders as strategies in a tailored web-based intervention reducing adults alcohol consumption: randomized controlled trial. J Med Int Res 2015; 17: e35.

  • 34.

    Davies EL, Martin J, Foxcroft DR. Developmentand acceptability of a co-produced online intervention to prevent alcohol misuse in adolescents: A think aloud study. J MIR Hum Factors 2015; 2: e13.

  • 35.

    Gibbons FX, Gerrard M, Ouellette JA, Burzette R. Cognitive antecedents to adolescent health risk: Discriminating between behavioral intention and behavioral willingness. Psychol Health 1998; 13: 319-339.

  • 36.

    Ranby KW, Aiken LS, MacKinnon DP, Elliot DL, Moe EL, McGinnis W, et al. A mediation analysis of the ATHENA intervention for female athletes: prevention of athletic-enhancing substance use and unhealthy weight loss behaviors. J Pediatr Psychol 2009; 34: 1069-1083.

  • 37.

    Ataei M, Hosseini SN, Ahmadi JT, Jalilian F, Mirzaei AM, Eslami AA, et al. Application of prototype/willingness model in describe ritalin abuse behavior among college students. J Health Syst Res 2014; 10: 335-344. (Persian).

  • 38.

    Sistani N, Khoi M, Taghdisi M. Promoting knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of the mothers in their Girls pubertal health based on peer education approach. J Babol Univ Med Sci 2010; 11: 33-39. (Persian).

  • 39.

    Gerrard M, Gibbons FX, Brody GH, Murry VM, Cleveland MJ, Wills TA. A theory-based dual-focus alcohol intervention for preadolescents: the strong african American families program. Psychol Addict Behav 2006; 20: 185-195.

  • 40.

    Nichols AJ. The influence of a school-based substance abuse prevention program in reducing smoking among sixth grade African American students in Louisiana[dissertation]. Louisiana: Louisiana State Univ, 2006.

  • 41.

    Karofsky PS, Zeng L, Kosorok MR. Relationship between adolescentparental communication and initiation of first intercourse by adolescents. J Adolesc Health 2001; 28: 41-45.

  • 42.

    DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, Crosby R, Cobb BK, Harrington K, Davies SL. Parent-adolescent communication and sexual risk behaviors among African American adolescent females. J Pediatr 2001; 139: 407-412.

  • 43.

    Allahverdipour H, Bazargan M, Farhadinasab A, Hidarnia A, Bashirian S. Effectiveness of skill-based substance abuse intervention among male adolescents in an Islamic country: case of the Islamic Republic of Iran. J Drug Educ 2009; 39: 211-222.

  • 44.

    Nilsson S, Allebeck P, Marklund B, Baigi A, Fridlund B. Evaluation of a health promotion programme to prevent the misuse of androgenicanabolic steroids among Swedish adolescents. Health Promot Int 2004; 19: 61-67.

  • 45.

    Siabani H, Siabani S, Rezaei M, Abbasi MR, Rahimi MA. Effect of education on performance-enhancing drug abuse by bodybuilders. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci 2008; 12: 26-37. (Persian).

  • 46.

    Moeini B, Hazavehei SMM, Bashirian S, Soltanian A, Mousali AA, Kafami V. Effect of educational program to encourage safe sexual behaviors among addicted men refered to substance abuse treatment centers in Hamadan, Western Iran: Applying the theory of planned behavior. J Educ Community Health 2014; 1: 1-10. (Persian).##.