Relationship between primitive reflexes and fine motor skills in children with specific learning disorders

How to Cite:Hossein AlibakhshiMasoomeh SalmaniZahra AhmadizadehMona SiminghalamRelationship between primitive reflexes and fine motor skills in children with specific learning disorders.koomesh.20(3):e152982.

Abstract

Introduction: One of the most important problems in children with learning disabilities is weakness in fine motor skills. This highlights problems associated with learning difficulties and other activities of daily life and must be considered in treatment and rehabilitation programs. The present study examined the relationship between the persistence of primary reflexes and fine motor skills, in children with specific learning disorders. Materials and Methods: In this cross - sectional study, 39 children with learning disability aged 9-7 years old were selected randomly for the target group and 38 healthy children aged 7-9 years old were matched with target group in age, sex and educational status were selected as control group. Primitive reflexes include Asymmetrical Tonic Neck Reflex, Symmetrical Tonic Neck Reflex and Tonic Labyrinthine Reflex were evaluated and for the fine motor, Purdue pegboard test was used. Results: The results showed the persistence of primary reflexes in target group (p0.01). Conclusion: Persistence of primary reflexes in children with learning disabilities can lead to poor performance of fine motor skills, and thus offering treatment plans for primary reflex inhibition can be useful to improve motor function in these children. Also it seems that persistence of ATNR effects on fine motor skills and inhibition of this reflex can improve fine motor skills.

Keywords

References

1.
Association AP. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM 5: bookpointUS; 2013.
2.
Westendorp M, Hartman E, Houwen S, Huijgen BC, Smith J, Visscher C. A longitudinal study on gross motor development in children with learning disorders. Res Dev Disabil 2014; 35: 357-363.
3.
Henderson A, Pehoski C. Hand Function in the Child: Foundations for Remediation: Mosby Elsevier; 2006.
4.
Illingworth RS. The Development of the Infant and the Young Child-E-Book: Normal and Abnormal: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.
5.
Zafeiriou DI. Primitive reflexes and postural reactions in the neurodevelopmental examination. Pediatr Neurol 2004; 31: 1-8.
6.
Leisman G, Braun-Benjamin O, Melillo R. Cognitive-motor interactions of the basal ganglia in development. Front Syst Neurosci 2014; 8: 16.
7.
McPhillips M, Hepper P, Mulhern G. Effects of replicating primary-reflex movements on specific reading difficulties in children: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. The Lancet 2000; 355: 537-541.
8.
Jooste E. The effect of unintegrated primitive postural reflexes of children with learning problems. MSc Thesis on Occupational therapy, Medicine Faculty, Witwatersrand Univ;1989.
9.
Rider BA. Relationship of postural reflexes to learning disabilities. Am J Occup Ther 1972; 26: 239-243.
10.
JordanBlack JA. The effects of the Primary Movement programme on the academic performance of children attending ordinary primary school. J Re Spec Educ Needs 2005; 5: 101-111.
11.
McPhillips M, Jordan-Black JA. Primary reflex persistence in children with reading difficulties (dyslexia): A cross-sectional study. Neuropsychologia 2007; 45: 748-754.
12.
McPhillips M, Sheehy N. Prevalence of persistent primary reflexes and motor problems in children with reading difficulties. Dyslexia 2004; 10: 316-338.
13.
Blythe SG. Neuro-motor Maturity as an Indicator of Developmental Readiness for Education. InInstitute for Neuro-Physiological Psychology Conference, Miami, Florida ;2010.
14.
Smits-Engelsman BCM, Wilson PH, Westenberg Y, Duysens J. Fine motor deficiencies in children with developmental coordination disorder and learning disabilities: An underlying open-loop control deficit. Hum Mov Sci 2003; 22: 495-513.
15.
McHale K, Cermak SA. Fine motor activities in elementary school: Preliminary findings and provisional implications for children with fine motor problems. Am J Occup Ther 1992; 46: 898-903.
16.
Radomski MV, Latham CAT. Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
17.
McPhillips M, Hepper PG, Mulhern G. Effects of replicating primary-reflex movements on specific reading difficulties in children: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. The Lancet 2000; 355: 537-541.
18.
Blythe SG. Assessing neuromotor readiness for learning: the INPP developmental screening test and school intervention programme: John Wiley & Sons; 201.2.
19.
Gieysztor EZ, Choiska AM, Paprocka-Borowicz M. Persistence of primitive reflexes and associated motor problems in healthy preschool children. Age [years] 2016; 4: 6.
20.
HaddersAlgra M. The neuromotor examination of the preschool child and its prognostic significance. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2005; 11: 180-188.
21.
Niklasson M. Could motor development be an emergent property of vestibular stimulation and primary reflex inhibition? A tentative approach to sensorimotor therapy: INTECH Open Access Publisher; 2012.
22.
Bilbilaj S, Aranit G, Fatlinda S. Measuring primitive reflexes in children with learning disorders. Eur J Multidis Studi 2017; 5: 285-298.
23.
Shaheen HA. Reversing letters, asymmetric tonic neck, neck retraction reflexes and apraxia are predictive of dyslexia. Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery. 2010;47:453-9.
24.
DeGangi GA, Berk RA, Larsen LA. The measurement of vestibular-based functions in pre-school children. Am J Occup Ther 1980; 34: 452-459.
25.
Freides D, Barbati J, van Kampen-Horowitz LJ, Sprehn G, Iversen C, Silver JR, et al. Blind evaluation of body reflexes and motor skills in learning disability. J Autism Dev Disord 1980; 10: 159-171.##.

comments