Vocal complaints and risk factors in practitioners of speech-language pathology

Sedighe Safaeyan; Mohammad-Sadegh Jenabi; Mohammad Kamali; Masoud Roudbari; Younes Amiri Shavaki

Koomesh

Journal of Semnan University of Medical Sciences

Current Issue Archive In Press Accepted Manuscripts Search

Journal Information Editors & Boards Indexing and Listing Sources Journal Metrics Open Peer Review (OPR)Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement Support Contact Us Reviewer and AE Registration Form

APC

Authors Guide Submit Manuscript

Vocal complaints and risk factors in practitioners of speech-language pathology

Author(s):

Sedighe Safaeyan,

Mohammad-Sadegh Jenabi,

Mohammad Kamali,

Masoud Roudbari,

Younes Amiri Shavaki

^,*

Koomesh:Vol. 20, issue 4; 650-656

Published online:Mar 09, 2018

Article type:Research Article

Received:Sep 01, 2017

Accepted:Apr 09, 2018

How to Cite:Sedighe SafaeyanMohammad-Sadegh JenabiMohammad KamaliMasoud RoudbariYounes Amiri ShavakiVocal complaints and risk factors in practitioners of speech-language pathology.koomesh.20(4):e153007.

Abstract

Introduction: Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs) are a group of professional voice users which their main professional tool is their voice. With respect to the dependence of their professional continuity and quality of life to their optimal voice, the research aim selected as study of frequency of vocal complaints and its relation with risk factors. Materials and Methods: Risk factors and vocal complaints;#39 data of 71 employed SLPs (14 men and 57 women) with at least 3 years of clinical experience gathered with two questionnaires. Face and content validity of the Questionnaires was confirmed with item effect and Lawshe methods, respectively. Reliability confirmed with internal consistency method. Participants divided into two groups with and without vocal complaints, by having at least one complaint or not, respectively. Descriptive and logistic regression was used by SPSS21. Results: Frequency of vocal complaints was 73.2%, and most frequent was hoarseness (52.1%). Most frequent risk factors were psychological problems (60%), talking a lot (59.6%), and digestive problems (34.6%). Frequency of digestive problems were significantly more in vocal complaint group (P=0.014). History of digestive problems was a predictor of vocal complaint (P = 0.048, OR = 8.5). Conclusion: SLPs experience a lot of psychological and digestive problems and also talking a lot. Presence of digestive problems can increase the probability of vocal complaint. Compatibility of these findings with findings of some other researches shows the necessity of more attention to these factors

Keywords

Speech Language Pathology

Risk Factors

Digestive System Abnormalities

Hoarseness

آسیب‌شناسی گفتار و زبان

عوامل خطر

مشکلات سیستم گوارش

گرفتگی صوت

References

1.
Vilkman E. Voice problems at work: a challenge for occupational safety and health arrangement. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2000; 52: 120-125.
2.
Hazlett D, Duffy O, Moorhead S. Review of the impact of voice training on the vocal quality of professional voice users: implications for vocal health and recommendations for further research. J Voice 2011; 25: 181-191.
3.
Piwowarczyk TC, Oliveira G, Loureno L, Behlau M. Vocal symptoms, voice activity, and participation profile and professional performance of call center operators. J Voice 2012; 26: 194-200.
4.
Gottliebson RO, Lee L, Weinrich B, Sanders J. Voice problems of future speech-language pathologists. J Voice 2007; 21: 699-704.
5.
Available from: http://www.asha.org/slp/. Available from: http://www.asha.org/slp/.
6.
Timmermans B, De Bodt MS, Wuyts FL, Van de Heyning PH. Training outcome in future professional voice users after 18 months of voice training. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2004; 56: 120-129.
7.
Hoffman-Ruddy B, Lehman J, Crandell C, Ingram D, Sapienza C. Laryngostroboscopic, acoustic, and environmental characteristics of high-risk vocal performers. J Voice 2001; 15: 543-552.
8.
Kasbi F, Asadi M, Mirmohammad Khani M. Risk factors causing voice problems in primary school teachers in Semnan, Iran. Koomesh 2015; 160-169. (Persian).
9.
Garrett CG, Ossoff RH. Hoarseness. Med Clin North Am 1999; 83: 115-123.
10.
Johnson A. Disorders of speaking in the professional voice user. Vocal Arts Medicine: The Care and Prevention of Professional Voice Disorders: Thieme, New York, NY; 1994.
11.
Ross J-A, Noordzji JP, Woo P. Voice disorders in patients with suspected laryngo-pharyngeal reflux disease. J Voice 1998; 12: 84-88.
12.
Van Mersbergen M, Ostrem J, Titze IR. Preparation of the speech-language pathologist specializing in voice: an educational survey. J Voice 2001; 15: 237-250.
13.
Asadi M, Mokhlessin M, AsadollahPoor F, Kaviyani S, Noruzi R, MirmohammadKhani M, Kasbi F. The impact of voice problems on emotions, job performance, social and communicative abilities of primary school teachers. Koomesh 2016; 265-275. (Persian).
14.
Darooifard A, Ahmadi P, Janghorban P, Memarian A, Abnavi F, Ostadi M. The relationship between the voice handicap index and the years of service in speech and language pathologists. 2016; 12: 48-53. (Persian).
15.
Kasbi F, Roohani M, Gharai Z, Gelab NF, Ghorbani R. The effect of clinical practicum on voice quality of speech therapy students in Semnan city 2012; 1: 12-20. (Persian).
16.
Van Lierde KM, dHaeseleer E, Deley S, Luyten A, Baudonck N, Claeys S, Wuyts FL. The impact of a voice counseling procedure to select students with normal vocal characteristics for starting a Master Program in Speech Language Pathology: a pilot study. J Voice 2012; 26: 623-628.
17.
Searl J, Bailey E. Vocal behaviors of student actors and student speech-language pathologists. Voice Speech Rev 2014; 8: 5-26.
18.
Van Lierde KM, D'haeseleer E, Wuyts FL, De Ley S, Geldof R, De Vuyst J, Sofie C. The objective vocal quality, vocal risk factors, vocal complaints, and corporal pain in Dutch female students training to be speech-language pathologists during the 4 years of study. J Voice 2010; 24: 592-598.
19.
Casper JK, Leonard R. Understanding voice problems: A physiological perspective for diagnosis and treatment: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
20.
Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Person Psychol 1975; 28: 563-575.
21.
Shakeri N, Khoddami SM, Radaee M, Jahani Y. Voice problems and its risk factors in primary school teachers. J Modern Rehabil 2015; 9: 35-43.
22.
Boone D, MacFarlane S, Von Berg S, Zraick R. The voice and voice therapy,(8th eds.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2009.
23.
Weiner GM, Batch A, Radford K. Dysphonia as an atypical presentation of gastro-oesophageal reflux. J Laryngol Otol 1995; 109: 1195-1196.
24.
DeBoer KL, Shealy RT. The effect of voice lessons on the clinical and perceptual skills of graduate students in speech-language pathology. J Voice 1995; 9: 118-126.
25.
Gates R, Forrest LA, Obert K. The owner's manual to the voice: a guide for singers and other professional voice users: Oxford University Press; 2013.

comments