Relationship between rapid naming, phonological awareness and spelling in Farsi normally developing children

authors:

avatar Zahra Soleymani , * , avatar Mohyeddin Teimourisangani , avatar Salman Abdi , avatar Seyyed Sadegh Rahimi Garagiye

Koomesh: Vol.21, issue 4; 674-678
published online: December 08, 2019
article type: Research Article
received: January 02, 2018
accepted: May 08, 2019

how to cite: Soleymani Z, Teimourisangani M, Abdi S, Rahimi Garagiye S S. Relationship between rapid naming, phonological awareness and spelling in Farsi normally developing children. koomesh. 2019;21(4):e153131. 

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to investigate relationship among phonological awareness, rapid naming and spelling in normally developing Farsi speaking children. Materials and Methods: In this description- analytical cross sectional study 30 normally developing students randomly selected from Tehran (Iran). The students performed Nama reading and dyslexia, rapid automatized naming, phonological awareness, and spelling tests. Results: There were significant relationships between intra syllabic awareness and rapid colors, numbers, and letters naming respectively and between total score of phonological awareness and rapid letters naming. Among different sub-tests of phonological awareness, the significant relationship was just between syllabic awareness and spelling. Among different sub-tests of rapid atomized naming the significant relationship was between rapid numbers naming and spelling (p

References

  • 1.

    Vaessen A, Gerretsen P, Blomert L. Naming problems do not reflect a second independent core deficit in dyslexia: Double deficits explored. J Exp Child Psychol 2009; 103: 202-221.

  • 2.

    Savage R, Pillay V, Melidona S. Deconstructing rapid automatized naming: Component processes and the prediction of reading difficulties. Learn Individ Differ 2007; 17: 129-146.

  • 3.

    Sunseth K, Greig Bowers P. Rapid naming and phonemic awareness: Contributions to reading, spelling, and orthographic knowledge. Sci Stud Read 2002; 6: 401-429.

  • 4.

    Wagner RK, Torgesen JK, Rashotte CA. Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Dev Psychol 1994; 30: 73.

  • 5.

    Soleymani Z, Mahmoodabadi N, Nouri MM. Language skills and phonological awareness in children with cochlear implants and normal hearing. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 83: 16-21.

  • 6.

    Schatschneider C, Carlson CD, Francis DJ, Foorman BR, Fletcher JM. Relationship of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness in early reading development implications for the double-deficit hypothesis. J Learn Disabil 2002; 35: 245-256.##.

  • 7.

    Furnes B, Samuelsson S. Phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming predicting early development in reading and spelling: Results from a cross-linguistic longitudinal study. Learn Individ Differ 2011; 21: 85-95.

  • 8.

    Pennington BF, Cardoso-Martins C, Green PA, Lefly DL. Comparing the phonological and double deficit hypotheses for developmental dyslexia. Read Writ 2001; 14: 707-755.

  • 9.

    Savage R, Pillay V, Melidona S. Rapid serial naming is a unique predictor of spelling in children. J Learn Disabil 2008; 41: 235-250.

  • 10.

    Landerl K, Wimmer H. Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. J Educ Psychol 2008; 100: 150.

  • 11.

    Wolf M, Bowers PG. The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexia. J Educ Psychol 1999; 91: 415.

  • 12.

    Wolf M, Bowers PG, Biddle K. Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. J Learn Disabil 2000; 33: 387-407.

  • 13.

    Torppa M, Georgiou G, Salmi P, Eklund K, Lyytinen H. Examining the double-deficit hypothesis in an orthographically consistent language. Sci Stud Read 2012; 16: 287-315.

  • 14.

    Verhagen W, Aarnoutse C, Van Leeuwe J. Spelling and word recognition in Grades 1 and 2: Relations to phonological awareness and naming speed in Dutch children. Appl Psycholinguist 2010; 31: 59. ##.

  • 15.

    Soleymani Z, Arami A, Mahmoudi BakhtiyarI B, Jalaei S. Relationship of phonological awareness and dictation score in second grade primary school children. Adv Cogn Sci 2008; 10: 21-28. (Persian).

  • 16.

    Soltaninejad N, Soltaninejad F, Ashtab F, Mohammadi M. Relationship between phonological awareness and spelling proficiency in first-grade students. Bimonthly Audiol Tehran Univ Med Sci 2014; 23: 78-85. (Persian).

  • 17.

    Mortimore T. Dyslexia and learning style: a practitioner's handbook: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.

  • 18.

    R. Karami-Nouri, A. Moradi. Nama reading test. Iranian academic center for education, Culture and Research, Tehran (2008). (Persian).

  • 19.

    Soleymani Z, Barkhordar A, Moradi A, Jalaie Sh. Designing and measuring the validity and reliability of rapid automatized naming test in the first grade students. J Mod Rehabil 2007; 1: 1-6. (Persian).

  • 20.

    Shultz KS, Whitney DJ, Zickar MJ. Measurement theory in action: Case studies and exercises. Routledge 2013.

  • 21.

    Georgiou GK, Tziraki N, Manolitsis G, Fella A. Is rapid automatized naming related to reading and mathematics for the same reason (s)? A follow-up study from kindergarten to grade 1. J Exp Child Psychol 2013; 115: 481-496.

  • 22.

    Steacy LM, Kirby JR, Parrila R, Compton DL. Classification of double deficit groups across time: an analysis of group stability from kindergarten to second grade. Sci Stud Read 2014; 18: 255-273.

  • 23.

    Vellutino FR, Fletcher JM, Snowling MJ, Scanlon DM. Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2004; 45: 2-40.

  • 24.

    Teimouri sangani M, Soleymani Z, Jalai Sh, Abdi S. Relationship between phonemic awareness and naming speed in second and third grade primary school students. Koomesh 2016; 17: 464-470. (Persian).

  • 25.

    Ahadi H, Mokhlesin M. Correlation between phonological working memory, phonological awareness and language proficiency in Tehran preschoolers. Koomesh 2016; 17: 620-626. (Persian).##.