Is there a relationship between body mass index and postural deviations in overweight and obese powerlifting athletes?

authors:

avatar Cyrus Taghizadeh Delkhoush , avatar Hadi Fahrvandi ORCID , * , avatar Raheb Ghorbani ORCID


How To Cite Delkhoush C T, Fahrvandi H, Ghorbani R. Is there a relationship between body mass index and postural deviations in overweight and obese powerlifting athletes?. koomesh. 2020;22(3):e153202. 

Abstract

Introduction: Postural deviations are one of the musculoskeletal disorders. It seems that some exercises and body mass index could affect postural conditions. Therefore, the purposes of the present study was to determine and compare the postural deviations in obese and overweight powerlifting athletes. Materials and Methods: The male powerlifting athletes aged 18 to 35 years old entered to one of two groups based on their body mass index, 25 athletes for obese group (BMI: ≥ 30) and 50 athletes for overweight group (BMI: 25-29.9). The Sagittal and Frontal planes were photographed using a plumb line and a symmetrograph®, and then deviations of the postural key points were investigated on the images. Results: Athletes in both groups only had normal posture in the head, cervical and lumbar vertebral levels in the frontal plane, and also the deviations in obese athletes in the sagittal plane at the level of the thoracic vertebral (P=0.008), and in the frontal plane at the level of the leg (P=0.019) and the scapula (P=0.029) were significantly lower than those of overweight athletes. Conclusion: It is demonstrated that Postural deviations in powerlifting athletes with higher body mass index were lower in some levels. Interestingly, it seems that, the obese athletes may be protected against the injurious forces due to the greater muscle mass.  

References

  • 1.

    Schwanke NL, Pohl HH, Reuter CP, Borges TS, de Souza S, Burgos MS. Differences in body posture, strength and flexibility in schoolchildren with overweight and obesity: a quasi-experimental study. Man Ther 2016; 22: 138-144.

  • 2.

    Zeller M. Postural impairments--a disease of civilization. Zentralbl Arbeitsmed Arbeitsschutz Prophyl Ergonomie 1982; 32: 324-326.

  • 3.

    Lee P. The economic impact of musculoskeletal disorders. Qual Life Res 1994; 3: S85-S91.

  • 4.

    Latalski M, Bylina J, Fatyga M, Repko M, Filipovic M, Jarosz MJ, et al. Risk factors of postural defects in children at school age. Ann Agric Environ Med 2013; 20: 583-587.

  • 5.

    Malepe M, Goon D, LO AFA. The relationship between postural deviations and body mass index among university students. Biomed Res 2015; 26.

  • 6.

    Tower LE, Schiller D, Fernandez ME. Women court-ordered for domestic violence: Improvements in depression. J Agg Maltreat Trauma 2008; 16: 40-54.

  • 7.

    Juskeliene V, Magnus P, Bakketeig LS, Dailidiene N, Jurkuvenas V. Prevalence and risk factors for asymmetric posture in preschool children aged 67 years. Int J Epidemiol 1996; 25: 1053-1059.

  • 8.

    Ehsani F, Mohseni Bandpei MA, Aminiafar A, Bakhtiary A. Prevalence and associate risk factors of upper limb disorders in school teachers in Semnan (Iran). Koomesh 2016; 17: 880-887. (Persian).

  • 9.

    Fabris de Souza SA, Faintuch J, Valezi AC, Sant'Anna AF, Gama-Rodrigues JJ, de Batista Fonseca IC, de Melo RD. Postural changes in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg 2005; 15: 1013-1016.

  • 10.

    Muyor J, Lpez-Miarro P, Alacid F. A comparison of the thoracic spine in the sagittal plane between elite cyclists and non-athlete subjects. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2011; 24: 129-135.

  • 11.

    Grabara M. Postural variables in girls practicing sport gymnastics. Biom Human Kinet 2010; 2: 74-77.

  • 12.

    Grabara M, Hadzik A. Postural variables in girls practicing volleyball. Biom Human Kinet 2009; 1: 67-71.

  • 13.

    Garhammer J. A review of power output studies of olympic and powerlifting: methodology, performance prediction, and evaluation tests. J Strength Cond Res 1993; 7: 76-89.

  • 14.

    Bird S, Barrington-Higgs B. Exploring the deadlift. Strength Cond J 2010; 32: 46-51.

  • 15.

    Spencer K, Cross M. The effect of increasing loading on powerlifting movement form during the squat and deadlift. 2015.

  • 16.

    Cutrufello PT, Gadomski SJ, Ratamess NA. An evaluation of agonist: antagonist strength ratios and posture among powerlifters. J Strength Cond Res 2017; 31: 298-304.

  • 17.

    Grabara M. Analysis of body posture between young football players and their untrained peers. Human Mov 2012; 13: 120-126.

  • 18.

    Kortt M, Baldry J. The association between musculoskeletal disorders and obesity. Aust Health Rev 2002; 25: 207-214.

  • 19.

    Peltonen M, Lindroos AK, Torgerson JS. Musculoskeletal pain in the obese: a comparison with a general population and long-term changes after conventional and surgical obesity treatment. Pain 2003; 104: 549-557.

  • 20.

    Jonnalagadda SS, Skinner R, Moore L. Overweight athlete: fact or fiction? Curr Sports Med Rep 2004; 3: 198-205.

  • 21.

    Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG, Rodgers M, Romani WA. Muscles: testing and function, with posture and pain (Kendall, Muscles): Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.

  • 22.

    Penha PJ, Joo SMA, Casarotto RA, Amino CJ, Penteado DC. Postural assessment of girls between 7 and 10 years of age. Clinics 2005; 60: 9-16.

  • 23.

    Penha PJ, Casarotto RA, Sacco I, Marques A, Joo SM. Qualitative postural analysis among boys and girls of seven to ten years of age. Braz J Phys Ther 2008; 12: 386-391.

  • 24.

    Munro BH. Statistical methods for health care research: lippincott williams & wilkins; 2005.

  • 25.

    Lichota M, Plandowska M, Mil P. The shape of anterior-posterior curvatures of the spine in athletes practising selected sports. Polish J Sport Tourism 2011; 18: 112-116.

  • 26.

    Kritz MF, Cronin J. Static posture assessment screen of athletes: Benefits and considerations. Strength Cond J 2008; 30: 18-27.

  • 27.

    Wearing SC, Hennig EM, Byrne NM, Steele JR, Hills AP. Musculoskeletal disorders associated with obesity: a biomechanical perspective. Obes Rev 2006; 7: 239-250.