Comparing auditory sustained attention in children with auditory processing disorder and normal children

authors:

avatar Afsoon Arabi , avatar Saeedeh Mehrkian , * , avatar Hooshang Mirzaie ORCID , avatar Enayatollah Bakhshi


how to cite: Arabi A, Mehrkian S, Mirzaie H, Bakhshi E . Comparing auditory sustained attention in children with auditory processing disorder and normal children. koomesh. 2020;22(4):e153225. 

Abstract

Introduction: Auditory processing disorder (APD) is a type of abnormal perceptual processing of auditory information within the central auditory nervous system that could be influenced by cognitive factors, such as attention. Attention is one of most important cognitive functions in the development of learning in children, so it is important to recognize and evaluate a variety of attention deficits in children with auditory processing disorder with a reliable test. The aim of this study was to compare the auditory sustained attention in children with auditory processing disorder and normal children with Test of Everyday Attention for children. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 45 students aged 7-11 years, 23 normal children (mean age, 9.88, SD 1.5) and 22 children with a diagnosed APD (mean age, 9.32, SD 1.2). Remarkably, test of Everyday Attention for children with five subtest (Score, Score Dual Task, Code Transmission, Sky Search Dual Task, Walk, Don’t Walk) in sustained attention domain was performed in the both groups. The mean scores of the two groups were compared in each of the sub-tests. Results: The results of Mann-Whitney U test indicated that there were significant difference in two groups in all of the subtests (Score, Score dual task, Code Transmission, Sky Search dual task, Walk, Don’t Walk) (P

References

  • 1.

    Musiek FE, Chermak GD. Handbook of central auditory processing disorder, volume I: Auditory neuroscience and diagnosis: Plural Publishing; 2013.

  • 2.

    Miller CA, Wagstaff DA. Behavioral profiles associated with auditory processing disorder and specific language impairment. J Commun Disord 2011; 44: 745-763.

  • 3.

    Moore DR, Cowan JA, Riley A, Edmondson-Jones AM, Ferguson MA. Development of auditory processing in 6-to 11-yr-old children. Ear Hear 2011; 32: 269-285.

  • 4.

    Dawes P, Bishop D. Auditory processing disorder in relation to developmental disorders of language, communication and attention: A review and critique. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2009; 44: 440-465.

  • 5.

    Rosen S, Cohen M, Vanniasegaram I. Auditory and cognitive abilities of children suspected of auditory processing disorder (APD). Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 74: 594-600.

  • 6.

    Moore DR. Listening difficulties in children: Bottom-up and top-down contributions. J Commun Disord 2012; 45: 411-418.

  • 7.

    Hahn B, Wolkenberg FA, Ross TJ, Myers CS, Heishman SJ, Stein DJ, et al. Divided versus selective attention: evidence for common processing mechanisms. Brain Res 2008; 1215: 137-146.

  • 8.

    Sarter M, Hasselmo ME, Bruno JP, Givens B. Unraveling the attentional functions of cortical cholinergic inputs: interactions between signal-driven and cognitive modulation of signal detection. Brain Res Rev 2005; 48: 98-111.

  • 9.

    Martin J, Jerger J, Mehta J. Divided-attention and directed-attention listening modes in children with dichotic deficits: An event-related potential study. J Am Acad Audiol 2007; 18: 34-53.

  • 10.

    Gyldenkrne P, Dillon H, Sharma M, Purdy SC. Attend to this: The relationship between auditory processing disorders and attention deficits. J Am Acad Audiol 2014; 25: 676-687.

  • 11.

    Sarter M, Givens B, Bruno JP. The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: where top-down meets bottom-up. Brain Res Rev 2001; 35: 146-160.

  • 12.

    Stavrinos G, Iliadou V-M, Edwards L, Sirimanna T, Bamiou DE. The relationship between types of attention and auditory processing skills: Reconsidering auditory processing disorder diagnosis. Front Psychol 2018; 9: 34.

  • 13.

    Amiriani F, Tahaei AA, Kamali M. Comparative evaluation of auditory attention in 7 to 9 year old learning disabled students. 2011. (Persian).

  • 14.

    Verstraeten K, Vasey MW, Claes L, Bijttebier P. The assessment of effortful control in childhood: Questionnaires and the Test of Everyday Attention for Children compared. Personal Indiv Differ 2010; 48: 59-65.

  • 15.

    Tomlin D, Dillon H, Sharma M, Rance G. The impact of auditory processing and cognitive abilities in children. Ear Hear 2015; 36: 527-542.

  • 16.

    Stokkereit Mattsson T, Follestad T, Andersson S, Lind O. Normative data for diagnosing auditory processing disorder in Norwegian children aged 7-12 years. Int J Audiol 2017; 57: 1-11.

  • 17.

    Domitz DM, Schow RL. A new CAPD battery--multiple auditory processing assessment: factor analysis and comparisons with SCAN. Am J Audiol 2000; 9: 101-111.

  • 18.

    Moossavi A, Mehrkian S, Lotfi Y, Faghihzadeh S, sajedi H. The relation between working memory capacity and auditory lateralization in children with auditory processing disorders. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 78: 1981-1986.

  • 19.

    Manly T, Robertson I, Anderson V, Nimmo-Smith I. The test of everyday attention for children (TEA-Ch). Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company. 1999.

  • 20.

    Fathi N, Mehraban AH, Akbarfahimi M, Mirzaie H. Validity and reliability of the test of everyday attention for children (TEACh) in Iranian 8-11 year old normal students. Iran J Psychiatr Behav Sci 2017; 11. (Persian).

  • 21.

    Heaton SC, Reader SK, Preston AS, Fennell EB, Puyana OE, Gill N, et al. The test of everyday attention for children (TEA-Ch): patterns of performance in children with ADHD and clinical controls. Child Neuropsychol 2001; 7: 251-264.

  • 22.

    Kasirian N, Mirzaie H, Pishyareh E, Farahbod M. Investigating the patterns of attention performance in children with mathematical learning disorder, with Using "Test of Everyday Attention for Children. Arch Rehabil 2018; 19: 76-85. (Persian).##.