ssessing the performance of comprehensive health care centers in Aradan district based on the national accreditation model

authors:

avatar Farid Gharibi , avatar Jafar Jandaghi , avatar esmaeil moshiri ORCID , *

Koomesh: Vol.23, issue 5; 617-626
article type: issue_documents_importer
received: March 03, 2021
accepted: July 03, 2021

how to cite: Gharibi F, Jandaghi J, moshiri E. ssessing the performance of comprehensive health care centers in Aradan district based on the national accreditation model. koomesh. 2021;23(5):e153294. 

Abstract

Introduction: Accreditation is the most common approach in evaluating and improving health care performance due to its dramatic positive effects on improving performance areas such as quality and safety. Considering the development of a national accreditation model for primary health care, the present study was conducted to assess the performance of Aradan comprehensive health service centers (Semnan, Iran) based on the national accreditation model. Materials and Methods: Four comprehensive health service centers in the Aradan district participated in this cross-sectional study during fall 1399. The research tool was a checklist consisting of 39 standards and 231 evaluation measures defined in twelve performance dimensions extracted from the national accreditation model to comprehensive health care centers. The study was conducted in two stages of self-assessment and external assessment after educating managers and staff of healthcare canters regarding the nature of accreditation, contents of the assessment tool and method of completing it. The performance level of healthcare centers was determined based on compliance of accreditation requirements, which is embedded in the used model. In this regards, the scores of 1, 0.5 and 0 were allocated to "full compliance", "partially compliance" and "no compliance" respectively therefore, the level of compliance of embedded requirements from healthcare centers in each measure, standard and dimension were calculated as a percentage. Results: The compliance rate of comprehensive health service centers with accreditation standards/measures in the “self-assessment” and “external evaluation” are 71.47 and 15.43 percent, respectively. The “community-centered services” dimension with a score of 93.75% and the “service delivery evaluation” dimension with a score of 0, had the highest and lowest performance levels in terms of compliance with accreditation standards in the self-assessment part while in the external evaluation part, the “service continuity” dimension with 29.63% and the dimensions of “community-centered services”, “quality and safety of services” and “health systems research” with a score of 0, had the highest and lowest level of performance, respectively. Conclusion: The performance of the centers, which took part in this study, has notable weaknesses, which emphasizes the need to design and implement promotional interventions with the participation of experts and process owners.  

References

  • 1.

    Tabrizi JS, Gharibi F, Pirahary S. Developing of national accreditation model for rural health centers in Iran health system. Iranian J Publ Health 2013; 42: 1438-1445. (Persian).

  • 2.

    Rooney AL, van Ostenberg PR. Licensure, accreditation and certification: approaches to health services quality; quality assurance methodology refinement series. 1999, Bethesda: Center for Human Services, Quality Assurance Project.

  • 3.

    Braithwaite J, Shaw CD, Molodovan M, Greenfield D, Hinchcliff R, Mumford V, et al. Comparison of health service accreditation programs in low- and middle- income countries with those in higher income countries: a cross-sectional study. Int J Qual Health Care 2012; 24: 568-577.

  • 4.

    Greenfield D, Braithwaite J. Developing the evidence base for accreditation of healthcare organisations: a call for transparency and innovation. Qual Saf Health Care 2009; 18: 162-163.

  • 5.

    Tabrizi JS, Gharibi F, Dadgar E. Developing a departmental accreditation model for primary healthcare in Iran. Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud 2021; 8: e110127.

  • 6.

    Smits PA, Champagne F, Contandriopoulos D, Sicotte C, Prval J. Conceptualizing performance in accreditation. Int J Qual Heal Care 2008; 20: 47-52.

  • 7.

    Saut AM, Berssaneti FT, Moreno MC. Evaluating the impact of accreditation on Brazilian healthcare organizations: A quantitative study. Int J Qual Health Care 2017; 29: 713-721.

  • 8.

    Braithwaite J, Westbrook J, Pawsey M, Greenfield D, Naylor J, Iedema R, et al. A prospective, multi-method, multi-disciplinary, multi-level, collaborative, social-organisational design for researching health sector accreditation. BMC Health Serv Res 2006; 6: 1-10.##https://doi.org/10.1258/095148406775322016.

  • 9.

    Greenfield D, Braithwaite J. Health sector accreditation research: a systematic review. Int J Qual Heal Care 2008; 20: 172-183.

  • 10.

    Shaw Charles, D. Toolkit for accreditation programs. 2004, Melbourne: the international society for Quality in Health Care.

  • 11.

    Schmaltz SP, Williams SC, Chassin MR, Loeb JM, Wachter RM. Hospital performance trends on national quality measures and the association with Joint Commission accreditation. J Hosp Med 201; 6: 454-461.

  • 12.

    Chen J, Rathore SS, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM. JCAHO accreditation and quality of care for acute myocardial infarction. Health Aff (Millwood) 2003; 22: 243-254.

  • 13.

    Merkow RP, Chung JW, Paruch JL, Bentrem DJ, Bilimoria KY. Relationship between cancer center accreditation and performance on publicly reported quality measures. Ann Surg 2014; 259: 1091-1097.

  • 14.

    Chandra A, Glickman SW, Ou FS, Peacock WF, McCord JK, Cairns CB, et al. An analysis of the association of society of chest pain centers accreditation to American college of cardiology/American heart association non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction guideline adherence. Ann Emerg Med 2009; 54: 17-25.

  • 15.

    Lee M. Motivations to pursue accreditation in children's mental health care: a multiple case study. Nonprof Manag Leadersh 2014; 24: 399-415.

  • 16.

    Song P, Li W, Zhou Q. An outpatient antibacterial stewardship intervention during the journey to JCI accreditation. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 2014; 15: 1-9.

  • 17.

    Liu SH, Wu JN, Day JD, Muo CH, Sung F, Kao CH, et al. Mortality and cost of radiation therapy for oesophageal cancer according to hospital accreditation level: a nationwide population-based study. Eur J Cancer Care 2015; 24: 333-339.

  • 18.

    Fortune T, O'Connor E, Donaldson B. Guidance on designing healthcare external evaluation programmes including accreditation. 2015, Dublin, Ireland: International Society for Quality in Healthcare (ISQua).

  • 19.

    Buetow SA, Wellingham J. Accreditation of general practices: challenges and lessons. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12: 129-135.

  • 20.

    O'Beirne M, Zwicker K, Sterling PD, Lait J, Lee Robertson H, Oeike ND. The status of accreditation in primary care. Qual Prim Care 2013; 21: 23-31.

  • 21.

    The World Health Organization. The World Health Report. Primary healthcare: now more than ever. 2008, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization Publisher.

  • 22.

    The World Health Organization. Quality improvement in primary health care: a practical guide. 2004, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization Publisher.

  • 23.

    Nekoei Moghadam M, Sadeghi V, Parva S. Weaknesses and challenges of primary healthcare system in Iran: a review. Int J Health Plann Mgmt 2012; 27: 121-131.

  • 24.

    Gharibi F, Kassaeian SS, Kahouei M, Valinezhadi A. Effectiveness of health communicators program in promoting of community knowledge, attitude and practice in Iran through educational interventions: A systematic review. Koomesh 2020; 22: 563-573. (Persian).

  • 25.

    Soleimaninejad A, TaheriTanjani P, Abolfathi Momtaz Y, Khodakarim S. Relationship between malnutrition and depression among Iranian elderly population. Koomesh 2020; 22: 467-476. (Persian).

  • 26.

    The World Health Organization. Quality and accreditation in health care services: a global review. 2003, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization Publisher.

  • 27.

    Tabrizi JS, Gharibi F. Systematic survey of accreditation models for designing a national model. Sci J Kurdistan Med Sci 2011; 26: 95-109.

  • 28.

    Tabrizi JS, Gharibi F. Primary healthcare accreditation standards: a systematic review. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2019; 32: 310-320.

  • 29.

    Tabrizi JS, Gharibi F. Developing national functional accreditation model for primary healthcare with emphasis on family practice in Iran. Korean J Family Med 2021; 42: 1-10.##.