Effect of Ankle Kinesio Taping on Unaffected Foot in Stand-to-Sit Position in Patients with Chronic Stroke

authors:

avatar Majid Menhaj 1 , avatar Roghayeh Mohammadi ORCID 2 , * , avatar Abbas Ziari ORCID 3 , avatar Kazem Malmir 4

Student Research Committe, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
Rehabilitation Faculty, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health Studies: Vol.7, issue 2; e100235
published online: April 12, 2020
article type: Research Article
received: December 16, 2019
revised: February 29, 2020
accepted: March 4, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/mejrh.100235

how to cite: Menhaj M, Mohammadi R, Ziari A, Malmir K. Effect of Ankle Kinesio Taping on Unaffected Foot in Stand-to-Sit Position in Patients with Chronic Stroke. Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud. 2020;7(2):e100235. https://doi.org/10.5812/mejrh.100235.

Abstract

Objectives:

The current study aimed at investigating the effect of applied Kinesio tape on the affected ankle on the amount of exerting force by the non-affected foot in patients with chronic stroke during the stand to sit task.

Methods:

The current quasi-experimental clinical trial was conducted on 26 patients with chronic stroke. The stand-to-sit task was performed in three positions (symmetric foot placement, and placing the unaffected foot ahead of the affected foot and the unaffected foot behind the affected one), and the vertical axis of the ground reaction force was recorded instantly by a force plate at three time points of 2, 5, and 8 seconds of the stand-to-sit task. Then, Appropriate taping was applied on subjects` affected ankles and all measurements were repeated.

Results:

At the time points of 2 and 5 seconds, the main effect of foot positions was significant (P = 0.002 and P < 0.0001, respectively); when the tested foot was placed behind, the main effect was significantly different from those of other positions (P = 0.018). However, the main and interactive effect of the tape was not significant (P > 0.05). At the second eight, no significant change was observed (P > 0.05).

Conclusions:

The current study findings showed that placing the unaffected foot behind the affected one led to more force and there was no significant difference between the forces with and without using the tape.

1. Background

Stroke is one of the leading causes of mortality in developed countries and disability in industrialized regions (1). Following the stroke, patients lose their balance, which is associated with asymmetry in weight distribution, postural stability, and narrower stability range. Inadequate balance leads to a reduction in the independent function of individuals and increased risk of falling (2). Change from sitting to standing position and vice versa is one of the essential activities in daily life (3), which is the basis of moving from bed to chair and chair to toilette (4); it is a fundamental requirement for walking and mobility and requires a reasonable functional ability of lower limbs and postural control (5).

Previous studies showed that the change of foot positions majorly affects the force of foot in patients with stroke during sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit tasks (6-9). The important finding is that positioning the affected foot behind improves the symmetry of vertical reaction force or both-side extension torque. Liu et al. (10), found that positioning the affected foot behind is effective in controlling balance in such patients. Most studies evaluate the sit-to-stand properties of patients with stroke (6, 7, 11-13), but few studies are conducted on stand-to-sit positioning and the force applied on unaffected foot. Many studies found the role of ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) in the functional and postural stability of patients with stroke (14-17). In other studies, ankle-foot kinesio tape was used to improve stability during standing (18-20).

Studies showed that ankle-foot kinesio tape through correct positioning of the foot resulted from the increase in sensory input can effectively improve the function, increase the range of motion (21, 22), and cause increased stability (20).

2. Objectives

Besides, using the tape is easy and cost-effective and the results are achieved soon. Therefore, the current study aimed to examine the effect of applied Kinesio tape to the affected ankle on the amount of exerting force by the non-affected foot in patients with chronic stroke during the stand-to-sit task in different positioning of feet (affected foot placed behind, non-affected foot placed behind, and both feet positioned symmetrically).

3. Methods

3.1. Participants

he current study was conducted on 26 patients with chronic stroke with a mean age of 59.73 ± 9.97 years and a mean body mass index of 27.72 ± 4.09 kg/m2 (Table 1). Inclusion criteria were at least six months passed since brain injury, no other specific diseases impairing walking and stability, ability to change position from standing to sitting and vice versa, and age 40 - 70 years. Exclusion criteria were no major cognitive defects and severe aphasia, urinary incontinence, unstable medical conditions, skin sensitivity, history of eczema or skin rash related to tape, and history of falling. The current study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Semnan University of Medical Sciences; the participants signed informed consent forms.

Table 1.

Participants’ Characteristicsa

VariableValues
Age, y59.73 ± 9.93
Height, cm167 ± 7.63
Weight, kg74.86 ± 8.83
BMI, kg/m227.72 ± 4.09
Gender, %
Female20
Male80
Time passed since stroke month27.84 ± 24.38
Fugle-Mayer score2.3 ± 28.15
Berg balance scale2.8 ± 48.38
Modified Ashworth scale0.63 ± 1.65

aValues are expressed as mean ± SD.

3.2. Protocol

Before performing the intervention, patients were assessed for lower limb function using the motor function domain of the Fugl-Meyer scale including 34 scores. Also, the spasticity of the affected plantar flexor muscles was assessed by the modified Ashworth scale, and the Berg balance scale was also used to investigate the balance of the participants.

Then the individuals underwent the main intervention, and the vertical axis of the ground reaction force was measured by a force plate (Kistler, model: 5533A2, Switzerland) during stand-to-sit task. Participants were randomly assessed in three different foot positions from standing to sitting (the foot out of the force plate was 50% in front of the foot on the plate/both feet were placed shoulder width apart/the foot out of the force plate was 50% behind the foot on the plate). To sit on the chair, its height was pre-adjusted based on the individual's height, and the thigh of the individual was positioned parallel to the ground. The movement was done normally and easily, and the patient was asked to look at the target located at the 3-m distance. Then the patient repeated the above stages after kinesio taping of the affected ankle. Totally, each position was performed twice and the mean values were used for analysis. It should be noted that at least a two-minute rest was considered between each movement to prevent fatigue. The kinesio taping of the affected ankle was performed in four stages as follows: The 1st stage was in the prone position and three other stages were performed in supine position. The 1st tape was used to inhibit gastrocnemius muscle; it was initiated from the heel of the patient and was connected to the inner and outer head of the gastrocnemius muscle. The 2nd tape was to assist ankle dorsiflexion; it was initiated from the anterior toes and was connected to the anterior tibia as a functional correction application technique. The 3rd tape was for subtalar eversion; it was initiated from medial malleolus and with the maximum length, the tape was extended approximately 10 cm over the lateral malleolus. The 4th tape was to correct the distal head of fibular, and the initiation was from the anterior surface of the foot; it was connected to the posterior surface of the ankle with maximum length from the lateral surface of the ankle.

3.3. Statistical Analysis

Repeated measure ANOVA was employed to analyze data by SPSS software version 23.

4. Results

The analysis was done separately at three time points of 2, 5, and 8 seconds considering the utilization of the tape (with or without tape) and the position of the foot (affected foot placed behind, feet in the symmetric position, affected foot ahead). At second two, interaction between the tape and the position of the foot was not significant (df = 2, f = 0.99, and P = 0.37); in addition, the main effect of tape was insignificant (df = 1, f = 1.67, and P = 0.20), but the main effect of foot position was significant (df = 2, f = 9.86, and P = 0.000). The Bonferroni adjustment showed that in the position while the tested foot was placed behind, the effect was significantly different from those of other positions despite using or not using the tape (P = 0.018 and 0.001) (Figure 1).

Comparing applied force on the unaffected foot in different foot positions with and without taping at second 2
Comparing applied force on the unaffected foot in different foot positions with and without taping at second 2
Figure 1.

Comparing applied force on the unaffected foot in different foot positions with and without taping at second 2

At second five, interaction between the tape and foot position was not significant (df = 2, f = 0.49, and P = 0.61); in addition, the main effect of the affected foot-ankle tape was insignificant (df = 1, f = 3.40, and P = 0.07), but the main effect of the foot position was significant (df = 2, f = 7.04, and P = 0.002). The Bonferroni adjustment showed that the effect of the position in which the tested foot was placed ahead was significantly different from those of other positions, and the foot bore less weight (P = 0.006 and 0.01, respectively) (Figure 2).

Comparing applied force on the unaffected foot in different foot positions with and without taping at second 5
Comparing applied force on the unaffected foot in different foot positions with and without taping at second 5
Figure 2.

Comparing applied force on the unaffected foot in different foot positions with and without taping at second 5

At second eight, interaction between the tape and foot position (df = 2, f = 0.46, and P = 0.63) as well as the main effect of foot position and the tape was insignificant (df = 2, f = 0.81, and P = 0.44 and df = 1, f = 0.73, and P = 0.39, respectively).

5. Discussion

The current study showed the effect of different positions of feet on the rate of applied force on the unaffected foot of patients with chronic stroke. When the patient changed his feet positions from standing to sitting, at second two, the rate of applied force on unaffected foot was higher when the unaffected foot was placed behind the affected foot. The effect of this position did not differ from that of kinesio taping of the affected ankle. This indicated that kinesio taping of the affected ankle had no additional effects on weight-bearing at second two. It might be due to lack of simultaneous record of forces in both feet. At the second five of the stand-to-sit task, the rate of applied force on the unaffected foot was lower when the unaffected foot was in front of the affected one. The effect of this position did not differ from that of the kinesio taping of the affected ankle. This indicated that when the unaffected foot was ahead of the affected one, it bore lower force than the two other positions. At the second eight, the effect of foot position did not differ from the rate of applied force on unaffected foot. It seems that weight distribution at second eight or last seconds of stand-to-sit task was borne by other body regions such as buttocks.

Despite the fact that many studies used ankle kinesio tape to improve stability during standing and reported desirable results (18-20), the current study did not find that using affected ankle-joint kinesio tape changes the rate of applied force on unaffected side of the body during stand-to-sit position; hence, the functionality level of patients with stroke in the current study was high (Fugl-Meyer = 28), and they could independently take a few steps and sit down and stand up on the chair. If the functionality level of patients was low, or they were in the acute stage of the disease, using affected ankle-joint kinesio tape would have more effects on the rate of applied force on foot. In the current study, the use of kinesio tape was instant and did not affect the applied load, and if the kinesio tape was used for a longer time, the results might be different.

A normal healthy individual can easily regulate the weight of his body through the capability of dynamic balance and symmetric weight support at both sides in standing posture. Therefore, patients with stroke probably use the support of more weight on their unaffected foot, and load less weight on their affected foot (23, 24); probably due to this issue, using kinesio tape once did not affect the results.

Also, delay in muscular activity was reported in movements and during walking under different conditions in patients with stroke. The results showed that muscular activity in both sides of the lower limb during performing the stand-to-sit movements is defective mostly in the affected side. Abnormalities in muscular coordination are observed on both sides. Muscles of the affected side cannot timely activate the muscles to achieve muscular activity to perform a stand-to-sit movement, but major compensation occurs in the unaffected side of the patient’s body (25). The other issue was positioning the affected foot during stand-to-sit task, which can play a role in the change of muscles activity of the affected side. Researchers found that when the affected foot was placed behind the unaffected one in patients with chronic stroke during sit-to-stand task, erector spinae and gluteus maximus showed more activity in comparison with the position of symmetric feet, and the position that the unaffected foot was placed behind (26). In the current study, positioning the tested foot behind led to increasing the applied force at the two and five seconds of sitting and this did not differ between the unaffected and affected feet; in each posture, positioning of the foot behind applied more force on the metatarsus.

5.1. Limitations

Using two force plates to evaluate applied force on both feet leads to reporting more accurate information during translocations of feet. In the current study, due to the lack of two force plates, the unaffected foot was assessed separately.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Schmidt H, Werner C, Bernhardt R, Hesse S, Kruger J. Gait rehabilitation machines based on programmable footplates. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2007;4:2. [PubMed ID: 17291335]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1804273]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-4-2.

  • 2.

    Sackley CM. Falls, sway, and symmetry of weight-bearing after stroke. Int Disabil Stud. 1991;13(1):1-4. [PubMed ID: 1917796]. https://doi.org/10.3109/03790799109166267.

  • 3.

    Khemlani MM, Carr JH, Crosbie WJ. Muscle synergies and joint linkages in sit-to-stand under two initial foot positions. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999;14(4):236-46. [PubMed ID: 10619111]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0268-0033(98)00072-2.

  • 4.

    Tiedemann A, Shimada H, Sherrington C, Murray S, Lord S. The comparative ability of eight functional mobility tests for predicting falls in community-dwelling older people. Age Ageing. 2008;37(4):430-5. [PubMed ID: 18487264]. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afn100.

  • 5.

    Lee CC, Wang RY, Yang YR. Correlations among balance and mobility measures for patients with stroke. Formos J Phys Ther. 2003;28:139-46.

  • 6.

    Roy G, Nadeau S, Gravel D, Malouin F, McFadyen BJ, Piotte F. The effect of foot position and chair height on the asymmetry of vertical forces during sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit tasks in individuals with hemiparesis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006;21(6):585-93. [PubMed ID: 16540217]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.01.007.

  • 7.

    Roy G, Nadeau S, Gravel D, Piotte F, Malouin F, McFadyen BJ. Side difference in the hip and knee joint moments during sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit tasks in individuals with hemiparesis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007;22(7):795-804. [PubMed ID: 17512648]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.03.007.

  • 8.

    Brunt D, Greenberg B, Wankadia S, Trimble MA, Shechtman O. The effect of foot placement on sit to stand in healthy young subjects and patients with hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(7):924-9. [PubMed ID: 12098151]. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.3324.

  • 9.

    Lecours J, Nadeau S, Gravel D, Teixera-Salmela L. Interactions between foot placement, trunk frontal position, weight-bearing and knee moment asymmetry at seat-off during rising from a chair in healthy controls and persons with hemiparesis. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(3):200-7. [PubMed ID: 18292922]. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0155.

  • 10.

    Liu M, Chen J, Fan W, Mu J, Zhang J, Wang L, et al. Effects of modified sit-to-stand training on balance control in hemiplegic stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(7):627-36. [PubMed ID: 26316551]. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215515600505.

  • 11.

    Cheng PT, Liaw MY, Wong MK, Tang FT, Lee MY, Lin PS. The sit-to-stand movement in stroke patients and its correlation with falling. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(9):1043-6. [PubMed ID: 9749681]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90168-x.

  • 12.

    Eriksrud O, Bohannon RW. Relationship of knee extension force to independence in sit-to-stand performance in patients receiving acute rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2003;83(6):544-51. [PubMed ID: 12775200].

  • 13.

    Lomaglio MJ, Eng JJ. Muscle strength and weight-bearing symmetry relate to sit-to-stand performance in individuals with stroke. Gait Posture. 2005;22(2):126-31. [PubMed ID: 16139747]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3167866]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.08.002.

  • 14.

    Rao N, Aruin AS. Role of ankle foot orthoses in functional stability of individuals with stroke. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(7):595-8. [PubMed ID: 25826046]. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2015.1027300.

  • 15.

    Chen CL, Yeung KT, Wang CH, Chu HT, Yeh CY. Anterior ankle-foot orthosis effects on postural stability in hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(12):1587-92. [PubMed ID: 10597811]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90335-0.

  • 16.

    Lee Y, Her JG, Choi Y, Kim H. Effect of ankle-foot orthosis on lower limb muscle activities and static balance of stroke patients authors' names. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(2):179-82. [PubMed ID: 24648626]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3944283]. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.179.

  • 17.

    Tyson SF, Kent RM. Effects of an ankle-foot orthosis on balance and walking after stroke: A systematic review and pooled meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(7):1377-85. [PubMed ID: 23416220]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.12.025.

  • 18.

    Nam CW, Lee JH, Cho SH. The effect of non-elastic taping on balance and gait function in patients with stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(9):2857-60. [PubMed ID: 26504310]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4616111]. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.2857.

  • 19.

    de-la-Torre-Domingo C, Alguacil-Diego IM, Molina-Rueda F, Lopez-Roman A, Fernandez-Carnero J. Effect of kinesiology tape on measurements of balance in subjects with chronic ankle instability: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(12):2169-75. [PubMed ID: 26360974]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.06.022.

  • 20.

    Rojhani-Shirazi Z, Amirian S, Meftahi N. Effects of ankle kinesio taping on postural control in stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(11):2565-71. [PubMed ID: 26321149]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.07.008.

  • 21.

    Wilkerson GB. Biomechanical and neuromuscular effects of ankle taping and bracing. J Athl Train. 2002;37(4):436-45. [PubMed ID: 12937565]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC164375].

  • 22.

    Nishikawa T, Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Lundin TM, Grabiner MD. Effects of prophylactic ankle supports on pronation during gait. Int Orthop. 2002;26(6):381-5. [PubMed ID: 12466874]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3620980]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-002-0362-4.

  • 23.

    Andersson P, Franzen E. Effects of weight-shift training on walking ability, ambulation, and weight distribution in individuals with chronic stroke: A pilot study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2015;22(6):437-43. [PubMed ID: 25921061]. https://doi.org/10.1179/1074935715Z.00000000052.

  • 24.

    Cheng PT, Wu SH, Liaw MY, Wong AM, Tang FT. Symmetrical body-weight distribution training in stroke patients and its effect on fall prevention. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(12):1650-4. [PubMed ID: 11733877]. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.26256.

  • 25.

    Prudente C, Rodrigues-de-Paula F, Faria CD. Lower limb muscle activation during the sit-to-stand task in subjects who have had a stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92(8):666-75. [PubMed ID: 23370586]. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e318282c87a.

  • 26.

    Nam I, Shin J, Lee Y, Lee MY, Chung Y. The effect of foot position on erector spinae and gluteus maximus muscle activation during sit-to-stand performed by chronic stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(3):571-3. [PubMed ID: 25931683]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4395667]. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.571.