This study compared the AFP level in the second trimester in mothers of neonates with and without congenital heart defects (CHDs) based on fetal echocardiography in the second trimester. So, AFP level was measured in the second trimester and mothers underwent fetal echocardiography.
CHD was diagnosed in fetuses of 90 pregnant women (171 were healthy). According to the findings, AFP level was lower in mothers of neonates with CHD (P = 0.004). The level of AFP was not associated with the mother's age and gestational age. In women with 3 parity and more, there was a significant difference regarding the mean level of AFP in cases with and without CHD (P = 0.003). There was a significant difference concerning the mean level of AFP in mothers of a neonate with critical and noncritical CHD (P > 0.001), and between mothers of the neonate with critical CHD and without CHD (P < 0.001). The level of AFP in women with and without maternal and neonatal complications was also significant (P = 0.044). In mothers of an infant with CHD admitted to NICU, AFP level was lower than that of mothers of an infant without CHD admitted to NICU (P < 0.001). At the second trimester, an AFP level lower than 1 was associated with an increased chance of (by 11-fold) having an infant with CHD (Exp. B = 11.081, P < 0.001).
Few studies have investigated the results of screening tests in the second trimester and their association with congenital heart diseases. For instance, Borelli et al. investigated the association between the risk of CHDs with serum biomarkers levels that are routinely measured in the first and second trimesters. They studied 118194 pregnant women and reported that 284 newborns with CHD were born (
1). In mothers with β-HCG below the 10th percentile, the chance of having a neonate with CHDs was 1.6 times lower than that of others; in cases with an NT higher than the 95th percentile, the chance of having a neonate with congenital heart disease was 2 times more than others. Among those with CHD-related risk factors, only 21.8% were suffering from the disease; therefore, the presence of risk factors alone has no sensitivity and specificity in early diagnosis of CHD; thus, concerning the significant association between serum biomarkers and CHD, measurement of these biomarkers and their association with CHD is necessary, even in women without any risk factors (
1).
We evaluated the level of AFP in mothers with and without an infant suffering from congenital heart disease, and a significant difference was found between the study groups. In addition, other maternal factors did not play a role in the incidence of CHDs.
In this study, there was a significant difference between AFP levels in mothers with at least 3 parities; however, it was not significant in mothers with parities less than 3. In addition, the incidence of congenital heart disease in infants of mothers with AFP levels of more than 1 was higher by 11-folds.
Alves Rocha et al. reviewed the articles that investigated the screening of congenital heart disease in the second trimester. They reported that although various tools are available for screening of CHD such as echocardiography, ultrasound, and color Doppler, but, due to the high cost, these methods are not routinely performed and sometimes are ignored, especially in mothers without risk factors for CHD like diabetes. Therefore, it is necessary to use an inexpensive and accessible tool for CHD screening. The authors point out that ultrasound and fetal echocardiography should be used as a means for confirmation of CHD and other screening methods. They consider the second trimester as the best time for screening and diagnosis of fetal heart defects (
20).
In our study, screening tests (AFP levels) were performed in the second trimester, and complementary diagnostic techniques were conducted in the third trimester. The results of our study indicated that the mean level of AFP was lower in mothers of an infant with CHD, with due attention to an 11-fold increase in the incidence of CHD in mothers with AFP level less than 1 in the second trimester, this test is suitable for CHD screening. Jelliffe-Pawlowski et al. evaluated the prediction power of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG), AFP, and unconjugated estriol (uE3) in the second trimester for CHD in 19402 pregnant women without chromosomal abnormalities in the fetus. The results showed that the measurement of biomarkers in the second trimester can be used as a useful tool for the early diagnosis of CHD in cases without chromosomal abnormalities (
6). In the same vein, Jelliffe-Pawlowski et al. also reported similar results (
6). In our study, an AFP level less than "1" was associated with an 11-fold increase in the risk of CHD in infants, and according to the results, it can be used as a maternal screening test to determine the probability of congenital heart disease in infants.
In another study, Jelliffe-Pawlowski et al. evaluated screening findings in the second trimester and the association between ultrasound findings and the fetal CHD and reported that 42.7% of all CHD cases were in mothers with a β-HCG level above the 95th percentile. In 92.9% of patients with both CHD and trisomy 18, the β-HCG values were lower than the fifth percentile. This study suggests that, considering the association between CHD and chromosomal abnormalities in neonates, screening tests in the second trimester can be an effective tool for predicting and diagnosing neonates with CHD, especially in mothers without risk factors who are neglected for fetal heart defects (
15). It should be noted that this study has applied a methodology similar to our research, but we evaluated the AFP level in the second trimester. In our study, the AFP level was less than 1 in 73.3% of mothers who had a neonate with CHD. Our findings also indicated that the AFP level could be considered as a proper biomarker for CHD screening. A few studies have evaluated the value of screening tests in the second trimester and their association with CHD (
21-
23). The results of our study indicate the value of maternal AFP level in the second trimester as a screening test to predict the incidence of CHD. Suard et al. reported that the diagnostic value of maternal screen tests in the diagnosis of congenital heart disease to be 71.5% (
22).
5.1. Conclusions
This study intended to compare the maternal AFP level in the second trimester between mothers of neonates with and without congenital heart defects (CHD). Although a significant difference was observed, a prospective study with a larger study with more participants can better confirm the results of this study. The results showed that maternal AFP level in the second trimester is a proper screening test to predict the incidence of CHD in neonates. The maternal AFP level in the second trimester less than 1 is associated with an 11-fold increase in the incidence of CHD.