Musculoskeletal Disorders Among the United Arab Emirates Healthcare Professionals: Ergonomics Knowledge and Practice Study

authors:

avatar Umama Bushra Fatima 1 , avatar Husna Yoosuf 1 , avatar Nainika Mohammed 1 , avatar Hanin Hussain 1 , avatar Shatha Saeed Hamed Al-Sharbatti ORCID 1 , * , avatar Ramprasad Muthukrishnan ORCID 1

Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates

How To Cite Fatima U B, Yoosuf H, Mohammed N, Hussain H, Al-Sharbatti S S H, et al. Musculoskeletal Disorders Among the United Arab Emirates Healthcare Professionals: Ergonomics Knowledge and Practice Study. Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud. 2025;12(1):e148302. https://doi.org/10.5812/mejrh-148302.

Abstract

Background:

Healthcare professionals (HCPs) are particularly vulnerable to musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) due to job demands such as prolonged standing, patient handling, and awkward postures.

Objectives:

This study aimed to assess the prevalence of MSDs among HCPs, examine the association between ergonomic knowledge and practices with MSDs, and identify predictors of ergonomic knowledge.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study was conducted among HCPs, including doctors and nurses, working in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The prevalence of MSDs was determined using the Nordic Questionnaire. Ergonomic knowledge and practice were assessed through a validated questionnaire covering sociodemographic and work-related factors, ten knowledge items, and fifteen practice items. A scoring system was used, where correct answers received a score of one, and incorrect answers received a score of zero. Ergonomic knowledge and practices were considered inadequate when participant scores fell below the median values of six for knowledge and eight for practice. The calculated sample size was 398, with a response rate of 96%, resulting in 380 participants. The chi-square test, binary, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.

Results:

The twelve-month prevalence of MSDs was 90.4%, with the highest percentage reported in the lower back (56%), followed by the upper back (43.4%), neck (39.2%), shoulder (38.9%), and elbow (21.3%). Inadequate ergonomic knowledge and incorrect ergonomic practices were found in 61.8% and 36.3% of HCPs, respectively. A significant association was observed between inadequate ergonomic knowledge (P < 0.001) and practice (P = 0.035) and the presence of MSDs. Significant predictors of inadequate ergonomic knowledge included the number of years worked (OR: 1.9; 95%CI: 1.00 - 3.5, P = 0.049), the provision of ergonomics training and awareness at the workplace (OR: 3.7; 95%CI: 1.9 - 7.2, P < 0.001), and inadequate ergonomic practices (OR: 1.9; 95%CI: 1.1 - 3.0, P = 0.014).

Conclusions:

A very high prevalence of MSDs was found among HCPs, with the lower back being the most commonly affected site. Significant predictors of inadequate ergonomic knowledge included the number of years worked, the availability of ergonomics training at the workplace, and inadequate ergonomic practices. This study underscores the need for ergonomic training programs and ergonomically friendly workplaces to equip HCPs with the knowledge and practices necessary to prevent MSDs.

1. Background

The global burden of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) is increasing (1). Musculoskeletal disorders often affect workers who engage in repetitive tasks, adopt awkward postures, or perform heavy lifting (2). Among healthcare professionals (HCPs), work-related MSDs are common, with documented rates over a one-year period ranging from 28% to 96% (3). A positive correlation has been identified between the severity of low back pain and factors such as work demands, job characteristics, ergonomics, posture, and worker activities (4).

Human factors engineering, or ergonomics, examines how humans interact with technology, systems, and their environment. Ergonomics applies theories and approaches to optimize both system performance and human well-being (5). A study conducted in Oman among biomedical scientists revealed that 54.5% had good knowledge of ergonomics, despite 93.6% possessing high qualifications (6). This finding exceeds the 25.5% reported in a Nigerian study on the ergonomics knowledge of medical laboratory scientists (7). Additionally, 41.2% of nurses were found to have limited knowledge of ergonomic principles (8). In Pakistan, 40.1% of dental practitioners were reported to have poor ergonomic knowledge (9). Another Nigerian study showed that although 96.4% of surgeons and physicians had high ergonomics knowledge, only 13.9% implemented ergonomic practices (10). A study from Iran demonstrated an inverse relationship between ergonomics knowledge and MSDs among physiotherapists (11). Furthermore, personalized ergonomic interventions for nurses significantly reduced ergonomic risks, as measured by rapid entire body assessment (REBA) scores (12). Similarly, a study in Thailand showed that ergonomics interventions reduced MSDs in the arm, upper back, and lower back regions (13). However, there is limited data on the prevalence of MSDs and the level of ergonomic knowledge and practices among HCPs in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

2. Objectives

This study aims to assess the prevalence of MSDs among HCPs, explore the association between ergonomic knowledge, practice, and MSDs, and identify predictors of ergonomic knowledge.

3. Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among doctors and nurses in the northern Emirates of the UAE from September 4, 2022, to December 30, 2022. Participants were 18 years or older, of any gender or nationality, and provided informed consent. Healthcare professionals who were unavailable, declined consent, or had pre-existing degenerative musculoskeletal diseases were excluded.

3.1. Sample Size Determination and Sampling

Convenience sampling was employed. The sample size was calculated using the formula n = Z2pq/L2, where n represents the sample size, p is the estimated proportion of HCPs with MSDs, taken as 0.38 based on a study in the UAE (14), q is 0.62, L is the desired margin of error (0.05), and Z corresponds to a 95% confidence level (1.96). Considering a potential 10% refusal rate, the calculated sample size was 398. When the eligible participants were approached, 18 declined, resulting in a response rate of 96%, with 380 participants included in the study.

3.2. Instrument for Data Collection, Validation, and Pilot Testing

Data was collected using a self-administered questionnaire consisting of two parts: The first part was developed by the research team and covered socio-demographics, nutrition, job characteristics, and ergonomic knowledge and practices. The second part comprised the standardized Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ) (15). Content validation of the first part was performed by experts, including an orthopedic surgeon, a community medicine specialist, and two musculoskeletal and sports physiotherapists. After validation, the final questionnaire was used for data collection.

3.3. Ethical Considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB/COM/STD/81/April-2022). Permissions were secured from the data collection sites, and participants' privacy was maintained throughout the study. Participants were approached in person, provided with informed consent, and informed of their right to decline participation. The researchers ensured confidentiality and anonymity, and access to the data was limited to IRB members and the research team.

3.4. Statistical Analysis

Data was analyzed using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS version 28). The chi-square test was used to assess associations, while binary and multivariable logistic regression models were employed to identify predictors of ergonomic knowledge. Significant factors from the binary regression analysis were further analyzed using multivariable logistic regression to control for potential confounding factors. By directly approaching potential participants and using a concise questionnaire, the nonresponse rate was minimized to about 4%.

Ergonomic knowledge and practice questions were scored, with correct answers receiving one point and incorrect answers receiving zero. Ergonomic knowledge and practices were considered inadequate when participant scores fell below the median values of six for knowledge and eight for practice.

4. Results

4.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics

Table 1 presents the demographic and job characteristics of the participants. The majority of participants were under 35 years old, predominantly female, and from South-East Asia World Health Organization (WHO) Region countries. Most participants held qualifications below a master’s degree (such as a bachelor's or higher diploma) and were classified as either overweight or obese.

Table 1.

Demographics and Job-related Variables (n = 380)

Variable and SubcategoriesNo. (%)
Age category (y)
< 35191 (50.3)
≥ 35189 (49.7)
Gender
Male92 (24.2)
Female288 (75.8)
Nationality (WHO regions)
South-East Asia 278 (73.2)
Eastern Mediterranean 56 (14.7)
Others46 (12.1)
Level of education
Below master’s degree 270 (71.1)
Master’s degree and above110 (28.9)
Body mass index categories
Normal (18.5 - 24.9)162 (42.6)
Underweight (< 18.5)12 (3.2)
Overweight/obese (> 24.9)206 (54.2)
Job
Doctor139 (36.6)
Nurse241 (63.4)
Specialty (doctor)
GP/emergency31 (22)
Physician38 (27)
Surgeon40 (28.4)
Dentist12 (8.5)
Others20 (14.2)
Total years of experience
≤ 5 86 (22.6)
6 - 15 197 (51.8)
> 1597 (25.5)
Total working hours per week
≤ 48338 (88.9)
> 4842 (11.1)
Workplace provided ergonomics training and promote awareness
No332 (87.4)
Yes48 (12.6)

Most HCPs had between 6 - 15 years of experience and worked 48 hours or less per week. Additionally, 87.4% of the participants reported that their workplaces did not provide ergonomics training or awareness programs.

4.2. The Prevalence and Sites of Musculoskeletal Disorders

Figure 1 illustrates the prevalence of MSDs among the studied HCPs. Nearly 91% of participants experienced MSDs in at least one body part over the past twelve months.

The prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in at least one body site among healthcare professionals during the past twelve-months
The prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in at least one body site among healthcare professionals during the past twelve-months

Figure 2 presents the prevalence of MSDs at various body sites. The lower back was the most affected area, with 56% of participants reporting discomfort, followed by the upper back (43.4%), neck (39.2%), shoulder (38.9%), and elbow (21.3%).

Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders at different body sites among healthcare professionals during the past twelve-months
Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders at different body sites among healthcare professionals during the past twelve-months

4.3. The Ergonomic Knowledge, Practice and Musculoskeletal Disorders

The analysis revealed that 61.8% (n = 235) of HCPs had inadequate ergonomic knowledge, while 63.7% (n = 242) practiced correct ergonomic techniques. Table 2 shows a significant association between MSDs and both ergonomic knowledge and practices. The incidence of MSDs was notably higher among participants with inadequate ergonomic knowledge and incorrect practices.

Table 2.

The Association Between Musculoskeletal Disorders and Knowledge and Practice of Ergonomics

Variables and SubcategoriesHas MSDs aNo MSDs aTotal (n)P-Value b
Knowledge of ergonomics< 0.001
Inadequate 223 (94.9)12 (5.1)235
Adequate 122 (84.1)23 (15.9)145
Practice of ergonomics0.035
Incorrect 131 (94.9)7 (5.1)138
Correct 214 (88.4)28 (11.6)242

4.4. The Predictors of Inadequate Ergonomics Knowledge

Table 3 shows the predictors of inadequate ergonomic knowledge. Initially, nurses were found to be 3.3 times more likely than doctors to have inadequate ergonomic knowledge, but this association became insignificant after adjusting for other variables. Healthcare professionals with less than 15 years of experience were at a higher risk of having inadequate ergonomic knowledge. Additionally, professionals working in environments where ergonomics training and awareness were not promoted were 3.7 times more likely to lack ergonomic knowledge. Moreover, HCPs with incorrect ergonomic practices were about 90% more likely to have inadequate ergonomic knowledge.

Table 3.

Predictors of Inadequate Ergonomics Knowledge

Variables and SubcategoryNo.Crude Odds RatioConfidence IntervalP-Value aAdjusted Odds RatioConfidence IntervalP-Value b
Age
< 351911.91.22.80.0041.10.62.00.886
≥ 3518911
Gender
Male9211
Female2882.71.74.4< 0.0011.70.92.90.069
Education
Below masters 2702.91.84.6< 0.0011.10.42.50.886
Masters and above11011
Job
Doctor13911
Nurse2413.32.15.1< 0.0012.00.94.60.081
Number of years worked
≤ 5862.11.23.90.0121.60.73.80.286
6 - 151972.71.64.4< 0.0011.91.03.50.049
> 159711
Workplace provide ergonomic training and promote awareness
No3323.51.96.6< 0.0013.71.97.2< 0.001
Yes4811
Practice ergonomic
No1382.51.63.9< 0.0011.91.13.00.014
Yes24211

5. Discussion

5.1. The Prevalence and Sites of Musculoskeletal Disorders

We found a high prevalence of MSDs (91%) among HCPs, which is consistent with the studies by Zayed et al. (92.7%) and Elghazally et al. (88%) (16, 17). Previous studies attributed this high prevalence to a heavy workload and a lack of awareness about preventive approaches.

The lower back was the most affected site (56.1%), while the elbow was the least affected (21.3%). These findings align with Zayed et al., who reported 56.5% and 18.5%, respectively, for the same sites (16), and Alrimali et al., who found 68.9% and 16.9%, respectively (18). Additionally, our study found knee and ankle/feet MSD pain at 38.7% and 23.9%, which differs from Aleid et al., who reported 20.0% and 25.0%, respectively, among nurses in critical care units (19).

5.2. The Ergonomic Knowledge and Practice

Most of the HCPs in our study (68%) demonstrated inadequate ergonomics knowledge, which aligns with findings from Nigeria (74.5%) (7) and Iran (77.3%) (8). However, Saremi et al.'s study in Iran reported good ergonomic knowledge among HCPs (20). This difference could be attributed to variations in the study population and the assessment tools used.

Our study also revealed lower MSD rates among participants with adequate ergonomic knowledge and practices, consistent with findings from other researchers who reported a negative correlation between ergonomic knowledge and MSDs (8).

5.3. The Predictors of Ergonomic Knowledge

The current findings are consistent with Alwahaibi et al.'s study in Oman, which found no association between age, gender, education level, and job type with ergonomic knowledge among biomedical scientists (6). We discovered that HCPs under the age of 35 were more likely to have inadequate ergonomic knowledge, similar to a study from India, where younger dental practitioners were at a higher risk of poor or fair ergonomic knowledge (21).

Initially, lower educational levels appeared to increase the risk of inadequate knowledge by 2.9 times. However, this effect became insignificant after adjusting for other variables, aligning with a Saudi study that showed higher education improves ergonomic knowledge. The Saudi study found that Board-certified employees had 3.6 times better ergonomic knowledge than bachelor's degree holders (22).

Contrary to Oladeinde et al.'s study (7), which found that males were more likely to have lower ergonomic knowledge than females, our study suggests that gender differences are influenced by other variables, which may explain the inconsistent findings across studies.

Regarding job type, we found that nurses were 3.3 times more likely than doctors to have lower ergonomic knowledge, but this difference became insignificant after controlling for other variables in multivariable logistic regression. This may be due to inadequate ergonomic training for nurses, which tends to focus primarily on clinical skills, a trend observed in a similar study (22).

Our study also found that participants whose facilities did not provide ergonomics training had a higher risk of inadequate ergonomic knowledge. This aligns with Alruwaili et al.'s study in Saudi Arabia, which showed that ergonomic training reduced the risk of MSDs (23). Furthermore, our results demonstrated that ergonomic knowledge and practice are interconnected and significantly related to MSDs. This contrasts with Moosa and Bhayat's study from South Africa, which found no correlation between ergonomic knowledge and practice among dental students (24), while an Egyptian study among dentists did report a significant correlation (25).

Theories suggest that MSDs result from workplace exposures that lead to cumulative injuries and fatigue, emphasizing the importance of ergonomics in designing safer work environments (26). Individual and environmental factors may modify the cumulative workload, potentially explaining the varying results observed across different studies (5).

The present study underscores the need to provide ergonomic knowledge and ensure that ergonomic principles are practiced to reduce MSDs among HCPs. Hospital-wide ergonomics interventions, coupled with staff education, are essential strategies for mitigating MSDs. A systems-thinking approach can help understand the complex relationship between ergonomic knowledge, ergonomic practices, and the prevalence of MSDs (27). By considering these factors holistically, we can better address and mitigate MSDs in healthcare settings.

However, it is equally important to identify the root causes of MSDs, implement targeted interventions, and evaluate their effectiveness over time, while also considering the role of organizational culture. Longitudinal studies could provide valuable insights into these areas and inform more effective prevention strategies.

5.4. Limitation

We cannot generalize the findings since the sample was selected from a limited number of healthcare facilities and because a convenience sampling method was used to recruit participants. Additionally, there is the potential for recall bias due to the self-reported nature of the data. The cross-sectional study design also limits the ability to establish causal relationships between variables. A longitudinal study with a randomly selected sample would provide a deeper understanding of the dynamic relationships between the variables and offer more robust insights into the causal factors.

5.5. Conclusions

A very high prevalence of MSDs was observed among HCPs, with the lower back being the most commonly affected site. Significant predictors of inadequate ergonomic knowledge included the number of years worked, the presence of ergonomics training in the workplace, and inadequate ergonomic practice. This study highlights the need for targeted ergonomic-focused training programs to ensure HCPs are knowledgeable about and consistently practicing proper techniques to prevent MSDs.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Joshipura M, Gosselin RA. Surgical Burden of Musculoskeletal Conditions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. World J Surg. 2020;44(4):1026-32. [PubMed ID: 30238386]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4790-8.

  • 2.

    Lop NSB, Salleh NM, Zain FMY, Saidin MT. Ergonomic Risk Factors (ERF) and their Association with Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) among Malaysian Construction Trade Workers: Concreters. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. 2019;9(9):1269-82. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i9/6420.

  • 3.

    Anderson SP, Oakman J. Allied Health Professionals and Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review. Saf Health Work. 2016;7(4):259-67. [PubMed ID: 27924228]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5127976]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2016.04.001.

  • 4.

    Habibi E, Pourabdian S, Atabaki AK, Hoseini M. Evaluation of Work-related Psychosocial and Ergonomics Factors in Relation to Low Back Discomfort in Emergency Unit Nurses. Int J Prev Med. 2012;3(8):564-8. [PubMed ID: 22973487]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3429804].

  • 5.

    Sujan M, Pickup L, Bowie P, Hignett S, Ives F, Vosper H, et al. The contribution of human factors and ergonomics to the design and delivery of safe future healthcare. Future Healthc J. 2021;8(3):e574-9. [PubMed ID: 34888444]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8651318]. https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2021-0112.

  • 6.

    Alwahaibi N, Abri IA, Sadairi MA, Rawahi SA. Ergonomics knowledge, attitude, and practice among biomedical scientists. New Zealand J Med Lab Sci. 2022;76(3):129-34.

  • 7.

    Oladeinde BH, Ekejindu IM, Omoregie R, Aguh OD. Awareness and Knowledge of Ergonomics Among Medical Laboratory Scientists in Nigeria. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2015;5(6):423-7. [PubMed ID: 27057381]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4804654]. https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.177989.

  • 8.

    Bahrami A, Afshar M, Hamedian N. Relationship between knowledge of ergonomics and workplace condition with musculoskeletal disorders among nurses. Int Arch Health Sci. 2019;6(3):121. https://doi.org/10.4103/iahs.iahs_10_19.

  • 9.

    Siddiqui TM, Wali A, Hameed Khan O, Khan M, Zafar F. Assessment of knowledge, practice, and work environment related to ergonomics among dental students and dental practitioners. Int J Contemp Dent Med Rev. 2016;2016:40316.

  • 10.

    Ephraim-Emmanuel BC, Ogbomade R, Ugwoke I, Idumesaro BN. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Preventing the Occurrence of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Doctors in University of Port-Harcourt Teaching Hospital. J Med Res Innov. 2019;3(2). e000161. https://doi.org/10.32892/jmri.161.

  • 11.

    Rahimi Moghadam S, Mohamadyan M, Emkani M, Zarei NS. [Awareness of Ergonomics and its Relationship with the Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders: a study on physiotherapists in Shiraz, Iran]. Health Dev J. 2018;6(4):279-89. FA. https://doi.org/10.22062/jhad.2018.91265.

  • 12.

    Ratzon NZ, Bar-Niv NA, Froom P. The effect of a structured personalized ergonomic intervention program for hospital nurses with reported musculoskeletal pain: An assigned randomized control trial. Work. 2016;54(2):367-77. [PubMed ID: 27372892]. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162340.

  • 13.

    Chanchai W, Songkham W, Ketsomporn P, Sappakitchanchai P, Siriwong W, Robson MG. The Impact of an Ergonomics Intervention on Psychosocial Factors and Musculoskeletal Symptoms among Thai Hospital Orderlies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(5). [PubMed ID: 27153076]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4881089]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13050464.

  • 14.

    Shaikh S, Siddiqui AA, Alshammary F, Amin J, Agwan MAS. Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Healthcare Workers: Prevalence and Risk Factors in the Arab World. In: Laher I, editor. Handbook of Healthcare in the Arab World. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74365-3_129-1.

  • 15.

    Crawford JO. The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire. Occup Med. 2007;57(4):300-1. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqm036.

  • 16.

    Zayed HA, Saied SM, El-Sallamy RM, Shehata WM. Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Nursing Staff of Tanta University Hospitals: Pattern, Risk Factors, and Coping Strategies. Egypt J Community Med. 2019;37(4):51-61. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejcm.2019.54290.

  • 17.

    Elghazally SA, Mahran SA, Zayet HH, Shaker IS. Patterns of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Nurses. Egypt J Occup Med. 2023;47(3):33-48. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejom.2022.170933.1297.

  • 18.

    Alrimali AM, Alreshidi NM, Alshammari AA, Alenzy AR, Thomas R, Dinoy MA, et al. Patterns of Musculoskeletal Disorders among Staff Nurses in the Emergency Department in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-sectional Study. Nurse Media J Nurs. 2024;14(1):74-84. https://doi.org/10.14710/nmjn.v14i1.62203.

  • 19.

    Aleid AA, Eid Elshnawie HA, Ammar A. Assessing the Work Activities Related to Musculoskeletal Disorder among Critical Care Nurses. Crit Care Res Pract. 2021;2021:8896806. [PubMed ID: 34306750]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8263225]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8896806.

  • 20.

    Saremi M, Fallah Madvari R, Akhlaghi Pirposhte E, Mohammad Hosseini A, Laal F, Adineh HA. The relationship between knowledge of ergonomic science and occupational injuries in nurses. Journal of Patient Safety & Quality Improvement. 2019;7(2):47-51. https://doi.org/10.22038/psj.2019.34104.1189.

  • 21.

    Galla A, Chowdhry A, Bagga A, Moradia L, Tadikonda A, Pentapati K, et al. Dental practitioners' knowledge, attitudes, and practices of ergonomics - a cross-sectional web-based survey. Acta Biomed. 2022;93(S2). e2022048. [PubMed ID: 35545983]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9534214]. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v93iS2.12908.

  • 22.

    Al Hazim SS, Al-Otaibi ST, Herzallah NH. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Ergonomic Hazards Among Healthcare Workers in a Saudi Government Hospital. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022;15:1771-8. [PubMed ID: 36042943]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9420414]. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S371361.

  • 23.

    Alruwaili SH, Thirunavukkarasu A, Alanazi RM, Alsharari AY, Alruwaili DK, Alenzi HA, et al. Prevalence, Patterns, and Associated Factors for Musculoskeletal Disorders Among the Healthcare Workers of Northern Saudi Arabia: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study. J Pain Res. 2023;16:3735-46. [PubMed ID: 37954475]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10638934]. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S415919.

  • 24.

    Moosa UK, Bhayat A. The Ergonomic Knowledge and Practice of Dental Students in a Tertiary Institution in South Africa. Int J Dent. 2022;2022:4415709. [PubMed ID: 35910088]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9329027]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4415709.

  • 25.

    Salah D, Khattab N, Ahmed W. Dental ergonomics knowledge, practice, and attitude assessment of dentists in Upper Egypt: A cross‐sectional study. Egypt Dent J. 2021;67(2):1009-16. https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2021.55010.1458.

  • 26.

    Karsh BT. Theories of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: Implications for ergonomic interventions. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2006;7(1):71-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220512331335160.

  • 27.

    Goode N, Newnam S, Salmon PM. Musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace: Development of a systems thinking-based prototype classification scheme to better understand the risks. Saf Sci. 2019;120:146-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.037.