Changes in pH and Bacterial Populations in Sewage Sludge and Mixture of Sewage Sludge With Rice Husk Silica to Remove H2S Pollution

authors:

avatar Seyed Mahmoud Mehdinia 1 , * , avatar Puziah Binti Abdul Latif 2

Department of Environmental Health, Damghan Faculty of Health, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Damghan, IR Iran
Department of Environmental Sciences, Environmental Studies Faculty, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health: Vol.2, issue 1; e25892
published online: January 22, 2015
article type: Research Article
received: December 7, 2014
revised: January 4, 2015
accepted: February 3, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17795/mejrh-25892

how to cite: Mehdinia S M, Abdul Latif P B. Changes in pH and Bacterial Populations in Sewage Sludge and Mixture of Sewage Sludge With Rice Husk Silica to Remove H2S Pollution. Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud. 2015;2(1):e25892. https://doi.org/10.17795/mejrh-25892.

Abstract

Background:

The amount of bacterial population in the packing material of the biologic filter is very important to the treatment of air pollution. It is important to note that pH is a certain parameter in any biofiltration system application.

Objectives:

The main goal of this study was to investigate the changes in microbial population and pH value in the two new packing materials, namely sewage sludge (SS) and mixture of SS with rice husk silica (MSSRHS) to remove H2S pollution.

Martial and Methods:

The SS and MSSRHS packing materials were used into the two laboratory-scale filters (packed one litter). RHS was prepared at temperature of 800°C, after acid leaching. The SS was collected from the Putrajaya sewage treatment plant in Malaysia. The SS was mixed with RHS (50:50 volume) to be utilized as a packing material. This research was performed in two stages. In the first stage, the performance of the filters was evaluated during the start-up period at a constant empty bed residence time (EBRT) of 60 seconds and different inlet concentrations of H2S ranging from 10 to 300 ppm. In the second stage, the flow rate (L/min) was variable with different EBRTs ranging from 30 to 90 seconds and the concentration of H2S was fixed at 300 ppm.

Results:

In this study, after 53 days of operating time and 54 g/m3h mass loading, the pH values in the SS and MSSRHS packed filters were reduced from 6.8 to 1.8 and from 6.9 to 3.4, respectively. The MSSRHS packed filter showed more buffering capacity to resist pH changes. Therefore, in this packed filter, both sulfur bacteria, namely, Thiobacillus thioparus and Thiobacillus thiooxidans, could grow and oxidize H2S better than SS packed filter could. These are very important in maintaining microorganisms’ activity for long-term biofilter operation to remove air pollutants.

Conclusions:

The MSSRHS could be considered as a more suitable packing material for long-term biofilter operation to remove H2S pollution.

1. Background

There is an increasing concern over environmental pollutions because during the recent decades, human activities have led to a considerable increase in air pollution. The control and treatment of air pollutants are among the most important environmental challenges today. Therefore, the need to treat and control air pollution and serious health and environmental concerns has emerged these years. Air is a vital element to many living things. People may survive for two weeks without food and for two days without water; however, without air, a person may only survive for two minutes. In daily life, an average person consumes approximately 1 kg of food, 2 kg of water, and 20 kg of air (1). Industrial growth has led to emission of different kinds of pollutants into the air (2, 3). The need to control and air pollution treatment has become an emerging environmental and health concern for the past forty years (4). As information about the hazardous effects of contaminants increases, industry is facing new regulations for contaminated air discharged from different activities (5). It is important to note that the malodor caused by H2S has been an environmental and public nuisance in the recent years. Of particular significance are the malodors emanating from the food processing industry, common effluent treatment systems, night soil and solid waste processing plants. In particular, inhalation of low concentrations of hydrogen sulfide can cause headache, dizziness, nausea, cramps, staggering, excitability, and drowsiness. In actual situations such as industrial emissions, the strong odor threshold and vapor density cause them to travel several kilometers from the emission site (6). In order to solve environmental problems more effectively, researchers need to focus on design and optimization of the treatment processes for environmental pollution (7). Biofiltration is one of the earliest biological processes developed for the removal of gaseous compounds. This system is becoming more and more popular because it is a green technology that neither uses chemicals nor produces wastes that are potentially dangerous for the environment. This process is essentially based on the ability of microorganisms to transform organic and inorganic pollutants into less toxic and odorless compounds (8).

2. Objectives

The amount of bacterial population in the packing material of the biologic filter is very important to the treatment of air pollution (9). It is important to note that pH is a certain parameter in any biofiltration system application (10, 11). Therefore, the main goal of this study was to investigate the changes in microbial population and pH value in the two new packing materials, namely, sewage sludge (SS) and mixture of SS with rice husk silica (MSSRHS) to remove H2S pollution.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Preparation of Packing Materials

This work was a lab-scale study that was performed in the laboratory of Environmental Studies Faculty at the University Putra Malaysia. Two packing materials, namely, SS and MSSRHS were used as packing material to remove H2S. The SS with mixed microbial culture was collected from a sewage treatment plant (Putrajaya STP 2) in Malaysia. The rice husk silica (RHS) was prepared according to the method proposed by Jamwal and Mantri (12). The rice husk was first washed with tap water to remove dirt and other contaminants. It was then dried in an oven at about 110°C for about 24 hours. The husk was then subjected to acid leaching by refluxing it in 3% (v/v) chloridric acid and 10% (v/v) sulfuric acid for two hours at a ratio of 50 g husk/L. After acid leaching, the husk was thoroughly washed with distilled water and then dried in an air oven at 100°C. An incineration temperature of 800°C was chosen to incinerate the cleaned rice husk inside a muffle furnace for four hours in static air. Finally, RHS was prepared with a length of 0.5 to 1.5 mm. The SS was mixed with RHS (50:50 volume) to be used as a packing material. Some important properties of the dried SS used in this study are shown in Table 1.

3.2. Operation of the System

Two filters were made from PVC, with 50 cm in height and 7.5 cm in filters internal diameter (packing material volume of the filters were 1.0 L). A porous plate was used in the bottom of each filter’s bed to support the packing materials. The schematic flow diagram of this pilot is shown in Figure 1.

This research was performed in two stages. In the first stage, the performance of the filters was evaluated during the start-up period at a constant empty bed residence time (EBRT) of 60 seconds and different inlet concentrations of H2S ranging from 10 to 300 ppm. According to the study by Jeong et al. in order to adapt the microorganisms in the filters, the tested H2S gas was introduced in the filters at low concentration of 10 ppm for one week (6). After the adaptation period, H2S concentration at the inlet was increased in weekly increments. In the second stage, the flow rate (L/min) was variable with different EBRTs ranging from 30 to 90 seconds (EBRTs of 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 seconds) and the concentration of H2S was fixed at 300 ppm.

In this study, the system operated under different conditions of two parameters, i.e. different inlet gas concentration and different inlet gas flow rate. The inlet and outlet concentrations of H2S were measured using H2S detector (model ppb RAE 3000, the United States). Removal efficiency (RE) and elimination capacity (EC) were used as performance of filters according to the following equations:

Equation 1.
Equation 2.

Where Q is the gas flow rate (m3/h), Vf is the volume of the filter bed (m3), and CGi and CGo are the respectively inlet and outlet H2S concentration (ppm; g/m3) (13-17).

In order to investigate the changes in the bacterial population of the packing material, the cultivation of microorganisms were done at the beginning, at the middle, and at the end of the operation system. To cultivate different bacteria, three different media were used as following: (i) the tryptic soy agar (TSA) for the cultivation of heterotrophic bacteria, (ii) thiosulfate oxidizing medium for the cultivation of Thiobacillus thioparus, and (iii) sulfur medium for the cultivation of Thiobacillus thiooxidans. The compositions of the basic media for the cultivation of microorganisms are listed in Table 2.

The thiosulfate oxidizing and sulfur media were prepared according to the pertinent listed in the reference called the Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (18). In order to prepare the thiosulfate oxidizing medium, the pH value was adjusted to 7.8 after sterilization. Meanwhile, sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3) and ammonium sulfate [(NH4)2SO4] were separately sterilized and added before use. For the preparation of the sulfur medium, the pH value was adjusted to 4.8 after sterilization. The sterilization was done in an autoclave at 121°C for 20 minutes.

3.3. Determination of Bacterial Population and pH Values

According to statement of Hirai et al. "about 10 g (wet weight) of the samples was collected and homogenized in 90 mL sterilized water at 10000 rpm for 10 minutes". After the preparation of the serial dilutions from 10-10 to 10-1 a mixed and homogenized sample was cultivated in each of the three media through the spreading technique. The media were then put in an incubator at 37°C for 48 hours. Subsequently, the bacterial populations were expressed in colony forming unit per gram (CFU/g) (19).

In this study, the pH values of the filter’s packing materials were measured every five days. Based on the study by Taghipour, 5 g of the packing material from the three sampling ports of each filter was collected. The samples were then mixed with 50 mL of distilled water using a magnetic stirrer for 30 minutes at 350 rpm (20). Then the pH values were measured using a digital pH meter (THERMO, Star Series).

The Schematic Flow Diagram of the Pilot Study
The Schematic Flow Diagram of the Pilot Study
Figure 1.

The Schematic Flow Diagram of the Pilot Study

Table 1.

Some Important Properties of the Dried Sewage Sludge Used as a Packing Material

PropertiesAmount
Particles size
< 2 mm0%
2 - 4 mm22%
4 - 6 mm24%
6 - 8 mm21%
8 - 15 mm33%
> 15 mm0
Density, kg/m3634
pH6.8
Analysis of Elements
Carbon3.56%
Hydrogen6.98%
Nitrogen0.45%
Sulfur0.043%
Table 2.

The Compositions of the Basic Media for the Cultivation of Microorganisms

MediaAmount, g
TSA medium (heterotrophic bacteria)
Tryptic soy agarNAa
Thiosulfate Oxidizing Medium (Thiobacillusthioparus)
Na2S2O3.5H2O10.0
Dipotassium hydrogen phosphate (K2HPO4)2.0
Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4.7H2O)0.1
Calcium chloride (CaCl2.2H2O)0.1
Ferric chloride (FeCl2.6H2O)0.02
Agar20.0
Reagent-grade water (1 L)NAa
Sulfur Medium (Thiobacillusthiooxidans)
Sulfur, elemental10.0
Potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4)3.0
Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4.7H2O)0.5
Ammonia sulfate (NH4)2SO40.3
Calcium chloride (CaCl2.2H2O)0.25
Ferric chloride (FeCl2.6H2O)0.02
Agar20.0
Reagent-grade water (1 L)NAa

aNot applicable.

4. Results

In order to investigate the performance of the two packing materials, namely SS and MSSRHS, the RE and EC of H2S were assessed. The result of RE and EC of H2S versus different EBRTs and different mass loading rate of H2S in the SS and MSSRHS packed filters are shown in Figure 2 and 3, respectively.

In order to investigate the changes in the bacterial population in the packing material, the cultivation of the microorganisms in the three different media (i.e. tryptic soy agar, thiosulfate oxidizing, and sulfur medium) was done at the beginning, at the middle, and at the end of the operation system. The bacterial populations were expressed in CFU/g. The results of the bacterial populations at defined points of the operating time are summarized in Table 3.

Changes in the pH values versus operating time (day) and different inlet concentrations of H2S in the SS and MSSRHS) packed filters are shown in Figure 4.

Changes in the pH value versus operating time (day) and different mass loading rates (g/m3h) in the SS and MSSRHS packed filters are shown in Figure 5.

The Removal Efficiency of Hydrogen Sulfide vs Empty Bed Residence Time and Different Mass Loading Rate of Hydrogen Sulfide in the Sewage Sludge and Mixture of Sewage Sludge with Rice Husk Silica Packed Filters
The Removal Efficiency of Hydrogen Sulfide vs Empty Bed Residence Time and Different Mass Loading Rate of Hydrogen Sulfide in the Sewage Sludge and Mixture of Sewage Sludge with Rice Husk Silica Packed Filters
Figure 2.

The Removal Efficiency of Hydrogen Sulfide vs Empty Bed Residence Time and Different Mass Loading Rate of Hydrogen Sulfide in the Sewage Sludge and Mixture of Sewage Sludge with Rice Husk Silica Packed Filters

The Elimination capacity of Hydrogen Sulfide vs Empty Bed Residence Time and Different Mass Loading Rate of Hydrogen Sulfide in the Sewage Sludge and Mixture of Sewage Sludge with Rice Husk Silica Packed Filters
The Elimination capacity of Hydrogen Sulfide vs Empty Bed Residence Time and Different Mass Loading Rate of Hydrogen Sulfide in the Sewage Sludge and Mixture of Sewage Sludge with Rice Husk Silica Packed Filters
Figure 3.

The Elimination capacity of Hydrogen Sulfide vs Empty Bed Residence Time and Different Mass Loading Rate of Hydrogen Sulfide in the Sewage Sludge and Mixture of Sewage Sludge with Rice Husk Silica Packed Filters

The Changes in pH Values vs Operating Time and Different Inlet Concentrations of Hydrogen Sulfide (10 - 300 ppm) With Fixed Empty Bed Residence Time of 60 Seconds in the Sewage Sludge and Mixture of Sewage Sludge with Rice Husk Silica Packed Filters
The Changes in pH Values vs Operating Time and Different Inlet Concentrations of Hydrogen Sulfide (10 - 300 ppm) With Fixed Empty Bed Residence Time of 60 Seconds in the Sewage Sludge and Mixture of Sewage Sludge with Rice Husk Silica Packed Filters
Figure 4.

The Changes in pH Values vs Operating Time and Different Inlet Concentrations of Hydrogen Sulfide (10 - 300 ppm) With Fixed Empty Bed Residence Time of 60 Seconds in the Sewage Sludge and Mixture of Sewage Sludge with Rice Husk Silica Packed Filters

The Changes in pH Values vs. Operating Time (Day) and Different Mass Loading Rates in the Sewage Sludge and Mixture of Sewage Sludge with Rice Husk Silica Packed Filters
The Changes in pH Values vs. Operating Time (Day) and Different Mass Loading Rates in the Sewage Sludge and Mixture of Sewage Sludge with Rice Husk Silica Packed Filters
Figure 5.

The Changes in pH Values vs. Operating Time (Day) and Different Mass Loading Rates in the Sewage Sludge and Mixture of Sewage Sludge with Rice Husk Silica Packed Filters

Table 3.

A Summary of the Results Gathered for the Bacterial Population in the Biological and Physico-Biologic Filters a

MediaSampling Time
BeginningMiddleEnd
Sewage Sludge Packed Filter
Tryptic soy agar medium8.6 × 1094.6 × 10129.7 × 105
Thiosulfate oxidizing medium4.8 × 1036.1 × 1052.3 × 102
Sulfur medium6.2 × 1036.4 × 1066.8 × 103
Mixed Sewage Sludge With Rice Husk Silica Packed Filter
Tryptic soy agar medium8.9 ×1079.5 × 10128.7 × 109
Thiosulfate oxidizing medium2.3 ×1022.6 × 1053.4 × 103
Sulfur medium7.6 ×1028.4 × 1068.7× 105

aData are presented as CFU/g (colony forming count per gram).

5. Discussion

In this study, after 53 days of operating time and 54 g/m3h mass loading, the pH values in the SS and MSSRHS packed filters were reduced from 6.8 to 1.8 and 6.9 to 3.4, respectively. The reduction of pH values was due to the production of sulfuric acid by sulfur bacteria. Shinabe et al. indicated that sulfuric odorants, such as hydrogen sulfide and methanethiol, are oxidized into sulfuric acid by sulfur bacteria that use these compounds as energy sources (21). Meanwhile, Yang and Allen reported that the "pH at the inlet to their biofilter decreased from 8.0 to 2.5 after 32 days operating time" (22). McNevin and Barford, observed a decrease in the pH value (from 6.5 to 3.5) after 60 days of operating time for their activated sludge biofilter (23). Cho et al. described, deodorizing microorganisms can degrade malodorous gases such as H2S and converted them to the acidic form. Decreasing of pH values into inhabitation level for deodorizing microorganism's activity reduce the deodorization efficiency significantly. Thus, buffering capacity of packing material for biofilter to resist pH changes, are very important in maintaining microorganism activity for long-term biofilter operation (11). In MSSRHS packed filter, sulfur bacteria (both Thiobacillus thioparus and Thiobacillus thiooxidans that have been studied in this study) could grow and oxidize H2S better than SS packed filter could.

In conclusion, the RE and EC of H2S were higher when using MSSRHS as packing material in comparison to SS packing material. This result could be because of lower changes in pH value and higher bacterial population in MSSRHS packing material during the system’s operation.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Zhang Y. Indoor Air Quality Engineering. Florida, USA: Taylor & Francis; 2005.

  • 2.

    Aina M, Matejka G, Mama D, Yao B, Moudachirou M. Characterization of stabilized waste: Evaluation of pollution risk. Int J Environ Sci Tech. 2009;6(1):159-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326070.

  • 3.

    Karbassi AR, Jafari HR, Yavari AR, Hoveidi H, Kalal HS. Reduction of environmental pollution through optimization of energy use in cement industries. Int J Environ Sci Tech. 2009;7(1):127-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03326124.

  • 4.

    Kun E. Development of a Foamed Emulsion Bioreactor for Air Pollution Control. University of California Riverside. UAS. 2005.

  • 5.

    Barona A, Elías A, Arias R, Cano I, González R. Biofilter response to gradual and sudden variations in operating conditions. Biochem Eng J. 2004;22(1):25-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2004.07.006.

  • 6.

    Jeong GT, Lee GY, Cha JM, Park DH. Comparison of packing materials in biofilter system for the biological removal of hydrogen sulfide: Polypropylene fibrils and volcanic stone. Korean J Chem Eng. 2008;25(1):118-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-008-0021-6.

  • 7.

    Zhang XX, Zhao DY, Wang ZX, Wu B, Li WX, Cheng SP. Environmental biological model based on optimization of activated sludge process. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2008;6(1):69-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03326061.

  • 8.

    Hort C, Gracy S, Platel V, Moynault L. Evaluation of sewage sludge and yard waste compost as a biofilter media for the removal of ammonia and volatile organic sulfur compounds (VOSCs). Chem Eng J. 2009;152(1):44-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.03.026.

  • 9.

    Mehdinia SM, Latif PA, Abdullah AM, Taghipour H. Synthesize and Characterization of Rice Husk Silica to Remove the Hydrogen Sulfide through the Physical Filtration System. Asian J Sci Res. 2011;4(3):246-54. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajsr.2011.246.254.

  • 10.

    Elias A, Barona A, Arreguy A, Rios J, Aranguiz I, Peñas J. Evaluation of a packing material for the biodegradation of H2S and product analysis. Process Biochem. 2002;37(8):813-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0032-9592(01)00287-4.

  • 11.

    Cho KS, Ryu HW, Lee NY. Biological deodorization of hydrogen sulfide using porous lava as a carrier of Thiobacillus thiooxidans. J Biosci Bioeng. 2000;90(1):25-31. [PubMed ID: 16232813].

  • 12.

    Jamwal RS, Mantri S. Utilisation of rice husk for derivation chemicals. Nandini Consultancy; 2007. Available from: http://www.nandinichemical.com/2007febjournal.html.

  • 13.

    Taghipour H, Shahmansoury MR, Bina B, Movahdian H. Comparison of the biological NH3 removal characteristics of a three stage biofilter with a one stage biofilter. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2006;3(4):417-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03325951.

  • 14.

    Oyarzún P, Arancibia F, Canales C, Aroca GE. Biofiltration of high concentration of hydrogen sulphide using Thiobacillus thioparus. Process Biochem. 2003;39(2):165-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0032-9592(03)00050-5.

  • 15.

    Onundi YB, Mamun AA, Khatib MFA, Ahmed YM. Adsorption of copper, nickel and lead ions from synthetic semiconductor industrial wastewater by palm shell activated carbon. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2010;7(4):751-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03326184.

  • 16.

    Zvinowanda CM, Okonkwo JO, Shabalala PN, Agyei NM. A novel adsorbent for heavy metal remediation in aqueous environments. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2009;6(3):425-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03326081.

  • 17.

    Filho JLRP, Sader LT, Damianovic MHRZ, Foresti E, Silva EL. Performance evaluation of packing materials in the removal of hydrogen sulphide in gas-phase biofilters: Polyurethane foam, sugarcane bagasse, and coconut fibre. Chem Eng J. 2010;158(3):441-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.01.014.

  • 18.

    Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Rice EW, Greenberg AE, Franson MAH. American Public Health Association (APHA). Washington, DC, USA; 2005.Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater.

  • 19.

    Hirai M, Kamamoto M, Yani M, Shoda M. Comparison of the biological H2S removal characteristics among four inorganic packing materials. J Biosci Bioeng. 2001;91(4):396-402. [PubMed ID: 16233011].

  • 20.

    Taghipour H. [Survey of biological ammonia removal by three layers and single layer biofiltration from gas stream and hydrogen sulfide effect on ammonia removal process]. Isfahan, Iran: Isfahan Medical Sciences University; 2005.

  • 21.

    Shinabe K, Oketani S, Ochi T, Kanchanatawee S, Matsumura M. Characteristics of hydrogen sulfide removal in a carrier-packed biological deodorization system. Biochem Eng J. 2000;5(3):209-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1369-703x(00)00061-9.

  • 22.

    Yang Y, Allen ER. Biofiltration Control of Hydrogen Sulfide 1. Design and Operational Parameters. Air Waste. 1994;44(7):863-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/1073161x.1994.10467287.

  • 23.

    McNevin D, Barford J. Biofiltration as an odour abatement strategy. Biochem Eng J. 2000;5(3):231-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1369-703x(00)00064-4.