The prevalence rate of UTI was 18.7% in this study. Sorto et al. reported the incidence of UTI at 35.8% (
11). In a similar study, the rate of UTI was reported at 37% (
12). In Iran Shams et al. reported it at 22.7% (
13). Nevertheless, Lim et al. discovered no link between the occurrence of UTI and the recipient’s gender (
14). The proportion of affected females in our patients was larger than that of afflicted males (37% vs. 11%, P = 0.001).
We observed no correlation between the prevalence of UTI and advanced age. This finding is compatible with a study by Shams et al. in 2017 (
13). However, some studies found increasing UTI rates in older age groups and even recognized old age as a risk factor for UTI, contradicting this finding (
15,
16). In our study, there was no statistically significant difference in the recipients’ location and accessibility of medical services between UTI and non-UTI groups. Also, we found recipients with analgesic nephropathy and lupus nephritis as underlying causes of renal failure were more susceptible to UTI than other causes, including diabetes mellitus and hypertension. In a previous study that was matched, there was no correlation between the incidence rate of UTI and comorbidities such as diabetes (
8,
17). In contrast, in a study by Lim et al., diabetes mellitus was a major predisposing factor for UTI among kidney transplant recipients (
14).
Receiving kidney from a cadaveric donor was reported as a risk factor for UTI in kidney transplant recipients in some studies (
18). However, in the current study and other studies, including Gozdowska et al. and Elkehili et al.; there was no significant difference between living and cadaveric donors for increasing risk of UTI (
8,
19). We did not find a correlation between history of pre-transplant dialysis and the prevalence of UTI. However, Lim et al. showed dialysis before kidney transplantation was significantly higher in the UTI group than in the control group (
14). Gram-negative bacteria, including
E. coli,
Klebsiella, and
Enterobacter cloacae, were reported as the commonest causative organisms (
16,
20). In our country, Shams et al. (
13) showed
E. coli as the most prevalent bacteria, causing UTI among kidney transplant recipients compatible with the current study.
In the present study, antibiograms for UTIs were performed to provide patients with more appropriate treatment options. They are useful to improve antibiotic therapy for kidney transplanted patients. Pourmand et al.’s study in Tehran in 2013 reported most isolates from kidney transplant recipients were more resistant to co-trimoxazole and tetracycline and the lowest resistance were related to imipenem (
18). In a similar study, Khameneh and Afshar showed
E. coli had more resistant to co-trimoxazole and ampicillin compared with nitrofurantoin and nalidixic acid (
21). However, in Rivera-Sanchez et al.’s study, 22% of isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin. In addition, resistance to ampicillin was found in 33% of Gram-negative bacteria (
12). Our study expressed a high degree of sensitivity to nitrofurantoin and meropenem for
E. coli in comparison to other antibiotics such as co-trimoxazole.
5.1. Conclusions
Urinary tract infection was more common in women and patients with analgesic nephropathy and lupus nephritis in our population of renal transplant recipients, which is similar to those studies described by other researchers. The most common causative organism was E. coli. Also, meropenem and nitrofurantoin were the most effective drug choices. More studies concerning the predisposing factors are very important to avoid UTI after kidney transplantation. A long-term follow-up among renal transplant recipients should be considered to give accurate picture of UTI after kidney transplant.