1
NA
References
-
1.
Pinto A, Brunese L, Pinto F, Acampora C, Romano L. E-learning and education in radiology. Eur J Radiol. 2011;78(3):368-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.029.
-
2.
Pinto A, Selvaggi S, Sicignano G, Vollono E, Iervolino L, Amato F, et al. E-learning tools for education: regulatory aspects, current applications in radiology and future prospects. Radiol Med (Torino). 2008;113(1):144-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-008-0227-z.
-
3.
Boulos MN, Maramba I, Wheeler S. Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-6-41.
-
4.
Baldwin A, Webb R, Gainsborough N, Howlett D, Inglis C. Provision of electronic learning resources by UK medical schools for final year students. Med Teach. 2011;33(4):325-7. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.513718.
-
5.
Ward JP, Gordon J, Field MJ, Lehmann HP. Communication and information technology in medical education. Lancet. 2001;357(9258):792-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04173-8.
-
6.
Hurmusiadis V, Rhode K, Schaeffter T, Sherman K. Virtual arthroscopy trainer for minimally invasive surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;163:236-8.
-
7.
Hansen MM. Versatile, immersive, creative and dynamic virtual 3-D healthcare learning environments: a review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. [Review]. 2008;10(3):e26. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1051.
-
8.
Horstmann M, Renninger M, Hennenlotter J, Horstmann CC, Stenzl A. Blended E-learning in a Web-based virtual hospital: a useful tool for undergraduate education in urology. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2009;22(2):269.
-
9.
Horstmann M, Renninger M, Hennenlotter J, Horstmann CC, Stenzl A. Web-based patient simulation in a virtual department of urology in undergraduate education. Med Teach. [Letter]. 2009;31(9):872-3.
-
10.
Wunschel M, Leichtle U, Wulker N, Kluba T. Using a web-based orthopaedic clinic in the curricular teaching of a German university hospital: analysis of learning effect, student usage and reception. Int J Med Inform. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 2010;79(10):716-21.
-
11.
Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Triola MM. Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Acad Med. [Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t Review]. 2010;85(10):1589.
-
12.
Ghaderi I, Vaillancourt M, Sroka G, Kaneva PA, Seagull FJ, George I. Performance of simulated laparoscopic incisional hernia repair correlates with operating room performance. Am J Surg. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 2011;201(1):40-5.
-
13.
Seixas-Mikelus SA, Stegemann AP, Kesavadas T, Srimathveeravalli G, Sathyaseelan G, Chandrasekhar R. Content validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator. BJU Int. 2011;107(7):1130-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09694.x.
-
14.
Ahmed K, Jawad M, Abboudi M, Gavazzi A, Darzi A, Athanasiou T, et al. Effectiveness of Procedural Simulation in Urology: A Systematic Review. J Urol. 2011;186(1):26-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.2684.
-
15.
Seabra D, Srougi M, Baptista R, Nesrallah LJ, Ortiz V, Sigulem D. Computer aided learning versus standard lecture for undergraduate education in urology. J Urol. 2004;171(3):1220-2. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000114303.17198.37.
-
16.
Weller JM. Simulation in undergraduate medical education: bridging the gap between theory and practice. Med Educ. 2004;38(1):32-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2004.01739.x.