The purpose of this study was to determine the advantages of cystoscopy for the diagnosis of urinary tract disorders in females with recurrent UTI. Although the majority of urinary tract disorders could be identified via imaging examinations, some abnormalities could be diagnosed more efficiently via cystoscopy.
In the present study, among 88 patients undergoing cystoscopy, 19 (21.5%) cases had significant abnormalities in cystoscopy, including 14 cases of urethral stricture, one case of mesh erosion in the urethra, one case of periurethral gland abscess, two cases of bladder diverticulum, and one case of refluxing ureteral orifice.
Lawrentschuk et al. retrospectively investigated the diagnostic yield of cystoscopy in 118 patients with recurrent UTI. Nine (8%) females had clinically significant abnormalities, including urethral stricture (six), bladder calculus (one), bladder diverticulum (one), and colovesical fistula (one) (
16).
Moreover, in the mentioned study, only one case was missed by imaging; therefore, when compared to cystoscopy, imaging had a high negative predictive value (99%), indicating that imaging may be useful in contributing to a decision not to perform cystoscopy if the findings are normal. Additionally, the authors noted that the positive predictive value was low for risk factors in predicting cystoscopy findings and concluded that females without clinical risk factors for recurrent UTI and with normal imaging findings could omit cystoscopy. However, the authors mentioned that cystoscopy should be considered if the females were in a subgroup having clinical risk factors or abnormal imaging results.
In the current study, patients with recurrent UTI, who had normal imaging (ultrasonography) results were evaluated via cystoscopy; however, although the imaging results were normal, this research detected a significant abnormality in 21.5% of these patients, indicating that even when ultrasonography findings are normal, cystoscopy findings can be abnormal.
In another study by Howles et al., the diagnostic performance of flexible cystoscopy in patients with profound lower urinary tract symptoms, recurrent urinary tract infection, and pain were examined retrospectively (
17). Thirteen (11.5%) out of 113 patients had significant cystoscopy findings, including bladder cancer (
1), urethral stricture (
9), and intravesical calculi (
4). Clinically relevant abnormalities were found in 11.5%, 19.3%, and 0% of patients with profound lower urinary tract symptoms, recurrent UTI, and pain, respectively. In cases with recurrent UTI (15 females and eight males), bladder calculi were diagnosed in two and urethral stricture in three male patients, and only one significant abnormality (urethral stricture) was diagnosed in the subgroup of females, resulting in a 6.7-% diagnostic yield for this group.
In the mentioned study, cystoscopy was recommended for patients with profound lower urinary tract symptoms and recurrent UTI. In addition, the frequency of urinary tract disorders was significantly higher in males (
17).
Additionally, malignancy was only reported in one patient with profound lower urinary tract symptoms. In comparison, no malignancy was reported in the current study, although three patients had pre-malignancy findings, including cystitis cystica (two cases) and cystitis glandularis (one case), which required further follow-ups; in fact, the authors would not have been able to diagnose these conditions without cystoscopy.
In a recent study, Pagano et al. reported the overall yield of cystoscopy in detecting clinically significant pathology when compared to imaging alone in females with recurrent UTI. A total of 163 patients underwent cystoscopy, among whom 133 were assessed via imaging modalities (renal/bladder ultrasound or abdominopelvic Computed Tomography (CT). Among the patients subjected to imaging, 21 significant abnormalities were noted in 18 patients (13.6%). Overall, cystoscopy identified nine (5.5%) significant clinical findings (non-specific findings, such as cystitis cystica were not considered positive findings); of these, only five (3.8%) cases were uniquely identified by cystoscopy and were missed by imaging modalities (one case of bladder diverticulum, two cases of urethral stenosis, one case of a foreign body with intravesical suture material, and one case of carcinoma in situ) (
18).
In that study, abdominopelvic imaging was recommended to all patients, and the findings were compared with cystoscopy results. In contrast, in the current study, only patients with normal imaging (ultrasound) were recruited, and patients with abnormal imaging were excluded from the study. Moreover, in the mentioned study, patients in the high-risk group (kidney transplant, immunodeficiency, previous urogenital surgeries, and urinary tract stones) were not associated with a higher risk of abnormal cystoscopy or a higher risk of abnormal imaging. Similarly, in the current study, the authors did not find an association between risk factors, such as pelvic organ prolapse or prior urogynecologic surgery and abnormal cystoscopy.
Some causes of recurrent UTI are curable, and the aim of evaluating females with bacterial persistence is to discover these correctable causes. In the present study, 17 of 36 patients with abnormal cystoscopy findings were fully recovered after treatment, showing the effectiveness of cystoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of some patients with recurrent UTI.
Moreover, one patient, who had received different treatments for recurrent UTI without any improvement, was referred to the clinic of the current research. After confirming the erosion of sub-urethral mesh into the urethra, the patient underwent surgical treatment and was cured. This case demonstrates that some causes of infection are treatable in patients with complaints of recurrent UTI.
On the other hand, two patients had small bladder diverticula without the need for intervention, and 17 of 36 patients had non-specific cystoscopy findings, of whom 11 underwent bladder biopsy, including seven cases of squamous metaplasia, two cases of cystitis cystica, one case of chronic cystitis, and one case of cystitis glandularis. These patients did not need clinical intervention.
Considering the scarcity of cystoscopy findings, which are not reported in imaging assessments, determining the importance of cystoscopy in cases with recurrent UTI requires further analysis.
Although cystoscopy seems to cause discomfort, pain, hematuria, infection, and anesthesia-related complications in patients, cystoscopy could help discover some curable causes of recurrent UTI, especially in patients with atypical presentations, such as obstructive symptoms or urinary incontinence. The current researchers suggest that a large cohort study of cystoscopy be conducted on patients with recurrent UTI and that different risk factors are examined to define the predictive value of risk factors for abnormal findings in cystoscopy and to define when cystoscopy is necessary for recurrent UTI.
5.1. Conclusions
Although the majority of cystoscopy findings in recurrent UTI are normal, the diagnosis of some urinary tract disorders is not possible through common imaging procedures; therefore, cystoscopy can be effective in some cases of recurrent UTI. In particular, this modality can be useful for patients, who are referred to urological clinics due to persistent infections that do not respond to common forms of therapy or for patients with atypical presentation. Cystoscopy can demonstrate some curable causes of recurrent UTI and determine possible pre-malignancies or malignant lesions and guide patient follow-ups.