Evaluation of Medical Insertion of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters

Authors

Tahawar A Rana1,*, Hilary Cramp2, Jacob A Akoh2
1South West Transplant Centre, Directorate of Surgery & Renal Services, Plymouth , Hospitals NHS Trust, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth PL6 8DH, [email protected], United Kingdom
2South West Transplant Centre, Directorate of Surgery & Renal Services, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth PL6 8DH, United Kingdom
*Corresponding Author: South West Transplant Centre, Directorate of Surgery & Renal Services, Plymouth , Hospitals NHS Trust, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth PL6 8DH, [email protected], United Kingdom. Tel: +44 1752 439798. Fax: +44 1752 774651. Email: [email protected]

Nephro-Urology Monthly:Vol. 3, issue 1; 46-53
Published online:Jan 31, 2011
Article type:Research Article
Received:Feb 02, 2010
Accepted:Apr 16, 2010
How to Cite:Rana T, Cramp H, Akoh J. Evaluation of Medical Insertion of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters. Nephro-Urol Mon. 2011;3(1):. doi:

Abstract

Background and Aims: Percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheters (PDC) by nephrologists is gradually gaining favour due to its convenience for patients and financial benefits. This study was carried out to determine the outcomes of this procedure and to compare it with catheters inserted by surgeons during the same period.

Methods: A retrospective review of PDC insertion by percutaneous (medical) and open (surgical) techniques was carried out in a Renal Unit at a University Teaching Hospital serving a population of 450,000. All patients going onto peritoneal dialysis were considered for medical insertion of PDC, except for those with previous PDC insertions, abdominal operations or obesity. All patients who had PDC insertions for peritoneal dialysis between January 2005 and September 2008 were included and followed up to the completion of the study. The main outcome measures were technique success, primary failure (failure within the first month) and complications beyond the first month.

Results: One hundred and twenty PDCs were inserted (69 medical, 51 surgical) in 97 patients. The primary failure rate for first insertions was 16.7% for medical and 10.5% for surgical insertions, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.72). Peritonitis, the most common complication, was treated successfully in 25 of 30 patients. Secondary blockage was similar for medical (13%) and surgical insertions (12%). Exit site infections were significantly higher in the surgical group (P = 0.04), while PD peritonitis was more common with medical group (P = 0.47). The number of PDC removed due to complications was higher in the medical (23%) than the surgical group (16%), but not significantly (P = 0.38). Median survival of PDC was similar in both groups.

Conclusions: Percutaneous insertion of a PDC by a motivated and suitably experienced nephrologist offers significant advantages provided careful patient selection is applied. Medical insertion of PDC is safe and reduces pressure on precious operating theatre time.

Full Text

Full text is available in PDF

Copyright

© 2011, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

1
Aug
2017

Surgical Outcome of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion in Pediatric Patients: An Experience in Iran

Fariba Jahangiri,
Nakysa Hooman,
Nasibeh Khaleghnejad-Tabari

Jahangiri F, Hooman N, Khaleghnejad-Tabari N. Surgical Outcome of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion in Pediatric Patients: An Experience in Iran. Inn J Pediatr. 2017;27(5):e9728. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp.9728

30
May
2026
Comparison of Complications of Conventional Peritoneal Catheters with Nephrostomy Catheters in Children with Acute Kidney Failure Undergoing Acute Peritoneal Dialysis

Comparison of Complications of Conventional Peritoneal Catheters with Nephrostomy Catheters in Children with Acute Kidney Failure Undergoing Acute Peritoneal Dialysis

Sara Saadat,
Hossein Akhavan,
Elham Bakhtiari,
Yasamin Nakhaee Moghaddam

Saadat S, Akhavan H, Bakhtiari E, Nakhaee Moghaddam Y. Comparison of Complications of Conventional Peritoneal Catheters with Nephrostomy Catheters in Children with Acute Kidney Failure Undergoing Acute Peritoneal Dialysis. Inn J Pediatr. 2026;36(4):e164181. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpediatr-164181

29
Dec
2012

Outcome of Immediate Use of the Permanent Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter in Children with Acute and Chronic Renal Failure

Ahmad-Ali Nikibakhsh,
Hashem Mahmoodzadeh,
Mohamad Vali,
Ali Enashaei,
Abdolreza Asem,
Zahra Yekta

Nikibakhsh A, Mahmoodzadeh H, Vali M, Enashaei A, Asem A, et al. Outcome of Immediate Use of the Permanent Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter in Children with Acute and Chronic Renal Failure. Inn J Pediatr. 2013;23(2):. doi:

31
Jan
2011

Factors Involved in Cuffed Catheter-Related Infections in Hemodialysis Patients

Amer A Al-Kinani,
Fayez Hejaili,
Ahmed Flaiw,
Salim Qurashi,
Ghormullah Ghamdi,
Ibtesam Mahmoud
,et al.

Al-Kinani A, Hejaili F, Flaiw A, Qurashi S, Ghamdi G, et al. Factors Involved in Cuffed Catheter-Related Infections in Hemodialysis Patients. Nephro-Urol Mon. 2011;3(1):. doi:

19
Dec
2021
Causes and Risk Factors of Hemodialysis Catheter Infection in Dialysis Patients: A Prospective Study

Causes and Risk Factors of Hemodialysis Catheter Infection in Dialysis Patients: A Prospective Study

Ebrahim Nasiri,
Mohammad Hossein Rafiei,
Yusef Mortazavi,
Pouya Tayebi,
Mehdi Ghasemzadeh Bariki

Nasiri E, Rafiei MH, Mortazavi Y, Tayebi P, Ghasemzadeh Bariki M. Causes and Risk Factors of Hemodialysis Catheter Infection in Dialysis Patients: A Prospective Study. Nephro-Urol Mon. 2022;14(1):e117820. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly.117820

More by these authors

Tahawar RanaPubMedScholar
Hilary CrampPubMedScholar
Jacob AkohPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics