Treatment of Advanced Prostate Carcinoma in Kyrgyzstan

Authors

Kubat Iyazaliev1,*, Michael Siegsmund2, Hans Leweling3
1National Cancer Research Center, Department of Urology, Tynystanov, Street 64-27, [email protected], Kyrgyzstan
2Department of Urology, University of Heliosweg, Germany
33Department of Internal Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Germany
*Corresponding Author: National Cancer Research Center, Department of Urology, Tynystanov, Street 64-27, [email protected], Kyrgyzstan. Email: [email protected]

Nephro-Urology Monthly:Vol. 2, issue 1; 255-264
Published online:Jan 31, 2010
Article type:Research Article
Received:May 04, 2009
Accepted:Jul 15, 2009
How to Cite:Iyazaliev K, Siegsmund M, Leweling H. Treatment of Advanced Prostate Carcinoma in Kyrgyzstan. Nephro-Urol Mon. 2010;2(1):. doi:

Abstract

Background and Aims: We compared two treatment methods on patients with advanced prostatic carcinoma in two treatments groups: primary metastatic prostatic carcinoma and metastasized recurrent tumor after primary treatment.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed on a total 302 patients with distant metastases between 1986  and 1995: 146 patients with systemically recurrent prostate cancer (group 1) and 156 patients with primary metastasized carcinoma (group 2). In each group the patients were treated by chemo-hormonal therapy or only by hormonal therapy. In Group 1 patients were treated with hormone deprivation alone by fosfestrol (n=68) and a combination of polychemotherapy and fosfestrol (n=78). In Group 2 only hormonal treatment had 62 (39.7 %) and a combined chemo-hormonal therapy had 94 (60.3%) patients. The patients were also grouped by the load of metastases, in low (< 5 metastases), intermediate (> 5 metastases confined to one organ or skelet) and high (multiorgan metastasis).

Results: A statistically significant prolonged survival was found in Group 1 patients treated with chemo-hormonal therapy compared to the patients treated with hormonal therapy alone. The median survival in the chemo-hormonal group was 24.5 months compared to 8 months in hormone group (p < 0.0001). The amount of metastases did not change the significant disease specific survival advantage of the combined chemo-hormonal treatment. The same significant survival advantage was demonstrated in Group 2 for the combination treatment compared to estrogen treatment alone. The median overall survival in the chemo-hormonal group was 25 months, compared to the 10.5 months for the patients treated with hormone ablation alone (p < 0.0001). This difference was also maintained after stratification for tumor grade or metastasis load.

Conclusions: Chemo-hormonal therapy significantly prolonged overall and disease specific survival over hormonal therapy alone in recurrent metastasized and primary metastasized cancers. Combined chemo-hormonal treatment should be started early in metastasized cancer, before the outgrow of hormone refractory tumor cell clones.

Highlights

Full Text

Full text is available in PDF

Copyright

© 2010, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

28
Feb
2014

Imaging Evaluation of Recurrence in Treated Prostate Cancer

Mahyar Ghafoori

Ghafoori M. Imaging Evaluation of Recurrence in Treated Prostate Cancer. I J Radiol. 2014;11(30th Iranian Congress of Radiology):e21413. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.21413

14
Jul
2020
Comparison of Survival Between Hypofractionated and Conventional Radiotherapy in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort

Comparison of Survival Between Hypofractionated and Conventional Radiotherapy in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort

Afshin Rakhsha,
Bahram Mofid,
Amir Shahram Yousefi Kashi,
Farzad Taghizadeh-Hesary,
Massumeh Sajjadi rad

Rakhsha A, Mofid B, Yousefi Kashi AS, Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Sajjadi rad M. Comparison of Survival Between Hypofractionated and Conventional Radiotherapy in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort. Int J Cancer Manag. 2020;13(7):e105762. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijcm.105762

30
Sep
2008

Evaluation of Prognostic Factors In Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

Hamid Saeidi Saedi,
M Seilanian Toosi,
M Mirsadraei,
S Roodbari

Saeidi Saedi H, Seilanian Toosi M, Mirsadraei M, Roodbari S. Evaluation of Prognostic Factors In Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer. Int J Cancer Manag. 2008;1(3):e80475. doi:

31
Mar
2018

A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Mohamad Javad Foroughi Moghadam,
Saeed Taheri,
Farzad Peiravian

Foroughi Moghadam MJ, Taheri S, Peiravian F. A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Iran J Pharm Res. 2018;17(Suppl):e124754. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2018.2217

30
Jun
2012

Comparison of Hormone Receptor Status in Primary and Recurrent Breast Cancer

Hamid Saeedi Saedi,
Mohammad-Reza Ghavam Nasir,
Soodabeh ShahidSales,
Ali Taghizadeh,
Nama Mohammadian

Saeedi Saedi H, Ghavam Nasir M, ShahidSales S, Taghizadeh A, Mohammadian N. Comparison of Hormone Receptor Status in Primary and Recurrent Breast Cancer. Int J Cancer Manag. 2012;5(2):e80803. doi:

More by these authors

Kubat IyazalievPubMedScholar
Michael SiegsmundPubMedScholar
Hans LewelingPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics