https://doi.org/10.5812/thritaj.40547

Extensor Tendon and Coverage Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defect in a Case of Trauma to Dorsal Hand

authors:

avatar Azade Riyahi 1 , * , avatar Hosseinali Abdolrazaghi 2

Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, IR Iran
Department of Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
Thrita: Vol.5, issue 3; e40547
published online: September 3, 2016
article type: Case Report
received: July 2, 2016
revised: August 9, 2016
accepted: August 15, 2016

how to cite: Riyahi A, Abdolrazaghi H. Extensor Tendon and Coverage Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defect in a Case of Trauma to Dorsal Hand. Thrita J Neu. 2016;5(3):e40547. https://doi.org/10.5812/thritaj.40547.

Abstract

A case of soft tissue defect of dorsal hand due to crush injury in a 37-year-old female is reported here. The reconstructive surgery was performed for the hand soft-tissue defect. Among different flaps used in the surgery, the regional flap such as radial forearm flap can be done. But usually it is not accepted by patient because of cosmetic appearance. Therefore, random pattern abdominal flap and extensor tendon reconstruction were done concurrently.

1. Introduction

Crush injuries of upper extremity always disable patients and might involve many organs such as finger arm hand or might involve all of them together.

Mangling injuries effect daily activities of patients; such injuries may also affect the family members of the patients (1).

Priorities in treating mangling injuries include treating the life threatening injuries, preserving the injured limb and restoring of its function (2).

The life threatening injuries in other parts of body such as hands, neck, or abdomen can be cured. Then the wound excision skeletal fixation tendon, neurovascular reconstruction and soft tissue coverage are made for limb (3-5); crushed intrinsic muscle should be debrided to prevent contracture. Routinely repairing both the flexor digitorum sublimis and flexor digitorum profundus is made unless gliding is comprised of case repairing only flexor digitorum profondus is done (6). If primary repair is not possible, two-stage reconstruction by tendon rod is done. For soft tissue, the coverage of joint, tendon, bone and neurovascular with local flap, regional flap, distant flap or free tissue transfer should be considered (7-9).

2. Case Presentation

Here is the case of a 37-year-old female with crushed hands injury in dorsal hand due to accident. In primary evaluation, she had no life threatening injury; in the past medical history, she had allergic asthma and hyperthyroidism (Figure 1A).

A, Crush Injury; B, Inserting the Silicon Rods; C, Abdominal Flap
A, Crush Injury; B, Inserting the Silicon Rods; C, Abdominal Flap
Figure 1.

A, Crush Injury; B, Inserting the Silicon Rods; C, Abdominal Flap

In the physical exam, there was a soft tissue defect in dorsal hand. She could not extend the left 3rd, 4th and 5th fingers. Distal pulse and capillary refill were normal. There was no bone injury; there were extensor tendons defect about 6 cm length and soft tissue defect about 6 - 12 cm. The wound was dirty and full of debris. After serial irrigation and debridement of necrotic tissue and foreign body, the injection of antibiotic and tetanus prophylaxis, the patient was scheduled for flap. There are two options to reconstruct extensor tendons: covering soft tissue alone and postponing tendon reconstruction, extensor tendon reconstruction with silicon rod and soft tissue coverage concurrently (10).

Although the latter method had a few proponents, the second method was employed. Therefore, silicon rod was inserted for extensor tendons and then random pattern abdominal flap was inserted (Figure 1B and 1C); three weeks later the pedicle of flap was separated and three months later silicon rods were removed. Therefore, extensor tendons with palmaris longus and plantaris tendon graft were reconstructed (Figure 2A). Silicon produces pseudosheet around flexor sheet to prevent subsequent adhesion.

A, Tendon Reconstruction With Palmaris Longus and Plantaris Tendon Graft; B, Reconstruction After Debulking (Finger Flex); C, Reconstruction After Debulking (Finger Ext)
A, Tendon Reconstruction With Palmaris Longus and Plantaris Tendon Graft; B, Reconstruction After Debulking (Finger Flex); C, Reconstruction After Debulking (Finger Ext)
Figure 2.

A, Tendon Reconstruction With Palmaris Longus and Plantaris Tendon Graft; B, Reconstruction After Debulking (Finger Flex); C, Reconstruction After Debulking (Finger Ext)

3. Discussion

There are many options such as regional flap, distant flap or free flap to cover the dorsal hand soft tissue. Some of them need microsurgery skills and take a long time (11-14). Regional forearm flap causes extensive scar in the donor site.

It was not accepted by the patient, and on the other hand regional forearm flap is used for small soft tissue defect (15). Totally, there was a concern about risk of infection due to silicon rod in acute setting; the second method was employed to lessen several surgeries and avoid adhesion.

Advantages of this method are: no need to microsurgery skills, no need to long time operations, no need to extensive scars in upper limb and prevention of extra operation for extensor reconstruction. Disadvantages of this method are: possibility of infection, possibility of need to debulking.

The first stage for debulking was made three months later, a half of flap was debulked and then three months later the other half was debulked again.

Finally, the patient could extend her fingers and gradually, the range of motion increased (Figure 2B, 2C).

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Ozkan O, Ozgentas HE, Dikici MB. Flow-through, functioning, free musculocutaneous flap transfer for restoration of a mangled extremity. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2005;21(3):167-72. [PubMed ID: 15880295]. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-869822.

  • 2.

    Kesiktas E, Yavuz M, Dalay C, Kesiktas N, Ozerdem G, Acarturk S. Upper extremity salvage with a flow-through free flap. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;58(6):630-5. [PubMed ID: 17522485]. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000248142.29126.b9.

  • 3.

    Wolfe SW, Pederson WC, Hotchkiss RN, Kozin SH, Cohen MS. Green's Operative Hand Surgery. Netherlands: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010.

  • 4.

    Parrett BM, Bou-Merhi JS, Buntic RF, Safa B, Buncke GM, Brooks D. Refining outcomes in dorsal hand coverage: consideration of aesthetics and donor-site morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(5):1630-8. [PubMed ID: 21042118]. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ef8ea3.

  • 5.

    Ozakpinar HR, Tellioglu AT, Eryilmaz T, Durgun M, Inozu E, Oktem F. A reliable option for wrist soft tissue defects: adipofascial flaps for immediate and late reconstruction. Int Wound J. 2013;10(6):661-5. [PubMed ID: 22846405]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01041.x.

  • 6.

    Chen C, Tang P, Zhang L, Li X, Zheng Y. Repair of multiple finger defects using the dorsal homodigital island flaps. Injury. 2013;44(11):1582-8. [PubMed ID: 23810451]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.05.019.

  • 7.

    Lin CT, Chen SG, Chen TM, Dai NT, Chang SC. Free fasciocutaneous flaps for reconstruction of complete circumferential degloving injury of digits. Microsurgery. 2013;33(3):191-7. [PubMed ID: 23255329]. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.22064.

  • 8.

    Derderian CA, Olivier WA, Baux G, Levine J, Gurtner GC. Microvascular free-tissue transfer for traumatic defects of the upper extremity: a 25-year experience. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2003;19(7):455-62. [PubMed ID: 14634908]. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-44633.

  • 9.

    Pederson WC. Upper extremity microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(6):1524-37. [PubMed ID: 11335829].

  • 10.

    Bullocks J, Naik B, Lee E, Hollier L. Flow-through flaps: a review of current knowledge and a novel classification system. Microsurgery. 2006;26(6):439-49. [PubMed ID: 16924625]. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20268.

  • 11.

    Yunchuan P, Jiaqin X, Sihuan C, Zunhong L. Use of the lateral intercostal perforator-based pedicled abdominal flap for upper-limb wounds from severe electrical injury. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56(2):116-21. [PubMed ID: 16432316]. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000189705.09281.5a.

  • 12.

    Fotopoulos P, Holmer P, Leicht P, Elberg JJ. Dorsal hand coverage with free serratus fascia flap. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2003;19(8):555-9. [PubMed ID: 14722843]. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-815642.

  • 13.

    Xu G, Lai-jin L. Coverage of skin defects in spaghetti wrist trauma: application of the reverse posterior interosseous flap and its anatomy. J Trauma. 2007;63(2):402-4. [PubMed ID: 17693843]. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318124fe14.

  • 14.

    Stecco C, Tiengo C, Stecco A, Porzionato A, Macchi V, Stern R, et al. Fascia redefined: anatomical features and technical relevance in fascial flap surgery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013;35(5):369-76. [PubMed ID: 23266871]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-012-1058-0.

  • 15.

    Hallock GG. The utility of both muscle and fascia flaps in severe upper extremity trauma. J Trauma. 2002;53(1):61-5. [PubMed ID: 12131391].