An elevated TID ratio is closely associated with the presence of epicardial coronary stenosis and severe CAD, as a sensitive and specific quantitative indicator. Previous studies have clearly shown that the TID ratio can provide important predictive and prognostic information for identification of severe and extensive CAD as well as future cardiac events such as non-fatal myocardial infarction or cardiac death (
5,
8-
10,
19,
20). On the other hand, information on the use of TID ratio in patients undergoing CR is limited to a few studies. In the most notable, the authors (
13) viewed the role of TID to determine presence of severe CAD and poor prognosis in patients with revascularization and without revascularization. They concluded that TID could be connected with high frequency of non-fatal MI and used as a predictor of multi-vessel CAD. They also suggested that it might be associated with a good clinical outcome in patients with CR. Some authors (
16) have stated that patients with transient LV dysfunction might benefit from revascularization due to presence of reversibility.
Upper normal limit of TID was provided by several researchers to define significant CAD. However, range of normal limits and applicable threshold value can vary due to variables such as gender, type of the imaging protocol and automated software, characteristics of the patient cohort, etc. Abidov et al. (
19) described that the TID ratio, measured automatically, is a good indicator of serious and widespread CAD. They found that a 1.36 threshold value for TID obtained from a stress SPECT MPI test in low risk patients had high sensitivity (73%) and specificity (88%) to demonstrate severe and common CAD. In addition, ratio of serious and common CAD in patients, who have no abnormal TID value and perfusion defects, was found to be low (1.3%), yet, otherwise it was significantly higher (65%). Mazzanti et al. (
20) also defined TID as a clinical marker of serious and widespread CAD with a high sensitivity (74%) and specificity (95%). In this series, the best cut-off of TID was found to be 1.21. There was also a strong correlation between the size of perfusion defects and the TID measurement levels. Another study (
21) was performed on 547 patients with suspected and known CAD, using 99mTc-MIBI rest/stress protocol to determine normal limit values of TID. For a group of patients with low-risk, the upper limit value of TID was calculated as 1.19 for an ungated study and 1.23 for a gated study. They found that the incidence of high TID value was 2% in normal patients, yet, increased to 36% in patients with severe CAD. A 1.19 threshold value was also determined by Kakhki et al. (
9), using the Emory Cardiac Toolbox to be the upper normal limit of TID ratio in a 2-day dipyridamole stress/rest SPECT MPI test using 99mTc-MIBI. They reported that higher TID ratios were measured in cases with partial reversible defects or multi-vessel disease or perfusion abnormalities on the LAD artery territory. A high TID ratio was found to be an independent predictor of ischemia and territory perfusion abnormality. Duarte et al. (
10) measured TID values of the LV on the stress/rest 99mTc-MIBI SPECT MPIs, using Auto QUANT software in patients with low probability and significant transient defect. The TID limits were between 0.13 and 1.01 for low-risk patients and between 0.17 and 1.18 for patients with significant transient defect. However, the highest positive predictive value to detect the widespread myocardial ischemia was obtained when the TID ratio was more than 1.25. Azambuja et al. (
11) evaluated the difference for the average TID values between exercise stress testing and pharmacologic stress testing by the 4D-MSPECT software. In this study, 200 patients were studied in 2 groups of patients having similar properties. Mean values of TID were calculated to be 1.06 ± 0.23 for exercise stress testing and 1.10 ± 0.22 for dipyridamole stress testing and there was no a statistically significant difference between the values. In the current study (
12), the usefulness of TID to determine significant obstructive of CAD in patients with prior coronary revascularization was evaluated. It was found that a 1.20 threshold of TID was a robust indicator of restenosis and had an accuracy of 87%.