With the spread of prenatal diagnoses, termination of the second trimester of pregnancy is a very important issue in the treatment of patients. Termination of pregnancy is faster with surgery but is associated with more complications such as rupture and perforation of the uterus, intrauterine or intra-abdominal adhesions, cervical insufficiency in subsequent pregnancies, and severe bleeding (
8,
19). Using the medical method is both less costly and decreases surgical complications such as bleeding and infection, as well as patients’ stress (
20). Therefore, the present study aimed to compare the effects of Miso alone or in combination with Lam.
The results of our study showed that the factors of age, GA, and BMI of patients were not significantly different in the two groups, and all patients were studied on equal means in terms of statistical data. In the study of Behrashi et al., similar to the results of our study, which compared the effect of laminaria with misoprostol, the mean age of patients was 25.4 ± 3.09 in the laminaria group and 26.4 ± 3.05 in the misoprostol group (
21). Also, in the study of Allameh et al., there was no significant relationship between the group receiving Miso and the group receiving Miso + letrozole (
11).
Also, based on the results of our study, the need for surgery and blood transfusion was zero in both groups. However, the number of cases requiring curettage, the mean length of hospital stay, and the duration of labor were statistically significant in the two groups, and the Miso + Lam group showed better results than the group of Miso alone. In a similar study to ours, Salari et al. reported that the cases requiring curettage during treatment, and the mean length of hospital stay was lower in the Miso + Lam group than in the group of Miso alone, and the difference was statistically significant (
22). The number of curettages in the Miso + Lam group was 47.5% of the total 40 patients, and it was 12.5% of the total 40 patients in the group of Miso alone. Also, the duration of hospitalization of patients in the group receiving Miso + Lam was 1.48 ± 0.59 days and 1.63 ± 0.49 days in the group receiving Miso. Therefore, they stated that adding Lam to Miso to induce abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy not only reduces the time interval between the start of treatment and fetal expulsion but also reduces the need for curettage during treatment and also reduces treatment costs by decreasing the required Miso dose and the number of days hospitalized (
22). On the other hand, in terms of the duration of patients’ stay in labor, the results of Paz et al. were similar to the present study, and the duration of labor in the group receiving Lam was shorter than in the group receiving Miso alone (
23). While in a study comparing the effects of Lam and Miso alone in the second trimester of pregnancy, Sagiv et al. showed that Lam could not make a shorter time in labor compared to the group of misoprostol alone and that the labor time was shorter in the Miso group (
24).
In addition, previous researches have revealed different results after vaginal consumption of Miso alone or in combination with other drugs. For instance, a study indicated 56.3% complete abortion after the first vaginal injection of 800 μg Miso, and 92.4% after the second dose (1600 μg) (
25). Torky et al. demonstrated a complete abortion rate of 78% after 10 mg of letrozole administration twice a day for three days, followed by 800 μg of vaginal misoprostol administration in comparison to a rate of 39% after the misoprostol administration alone (
26). Also, in Edelman et al.’s study, adding Lam to Miso at 19 weeks or more of GA exacerbated the effects of Miso, whereas these effects were not seen at GA s less than 19 weeks (
27).
According to the results of our study, there was no significant complication in the patients, and there were several cases of fever and chills, diarrhea, and headache, which were resolved quickly. In the study by Salari et al., only one patient needed analgesics to control the side effects of the drug, which was in the group of Miso alone (
22). In the study by Borgatta et al., adding Lam to Miso increased the use of analgesics (
28). Also in our study, no patient required blood transfusion and surgery during treatment, which to other studies (
22,
23,
27).
In general, according to the results of the present study, the simultaneous use of Miso and Lam is strongly recommended for abortion in the second trimester, and obstetricians can use a combination of these two drugs so that in addition to enjoying their beneficial effects, they can decrease the treatment costs of patients and save time. Furthermore, the present study had limitations, including the long time to obtain a sufficient sample size and excluding people with any underlying disease or risk factor led to bleeding and reduced the sample size. Therefore, to achieve more definite results, it is recommended to conduct similar studies in this field in larger sample sizes and consider the age and gender of the fetus (due to hormonal effects).
5.1. Conclusions
Our results showed that curettage cases, labor duration, and length of hospital stay decreased in the Miso + Lam group. Therefore, it can be concluded that adding Lam to the process of therapeutic abortion can help reduce labor time, duration of hospitalization, and the need for curettage.