Comparative Profile of Celiac Disease Between Children and Adults in Western Algeria Region

authors:

avatar Douniazad El Mehadji 1 , avatar Harir Noria ORCID 1 , * , avatar Djamila Yekrou 2 , avatar Latroche Charef 3 , avatar Karim Bouziane Nedjadi 3 , avatar Siheme Ouali ORCID 1 , avatar Walid Hassene Hamri 1 , avatar Zahira Benaissa 1 , avatar Feriel Sellam ORCID 4

Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, Proteomics and Health, Department of Biology, Djillali Liabes University of Sidi Bel Abbes, Sidi Bel Abbes, Algeria
Department of Medical Oncology, Anti-Cancer Center of Sidi Bel Abbes, Sidi Bel Abbes, Algeria
Department of Pediatrics, Oran University Hospital Center, Oran, Algeria
National Center for Biotechnology Research, Constantine, Algeria

How To Cite El Mehadji D, Noria H, Yekrou D, Charef L, Bouziane Nedjadi K, et al. Comparative Profile of Celiac Disease Between Children and Adults in Western Algeria Region. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2023;25(3):e126906. https://doi.org/10.5812/zjrms-126906.

Abstract

Background:

This study was performed to describe the main differences and similarities of celiac disease according to age and highlight the clinical features, diagnosis, associations of the disease, complications, and response to a gluten-free diet in children and adults.

Methods:

A retrospective study was conducted on a series of patients (n = 223) diagnosed with celiac disease during infancy (< 2 years) and childhood (≥ 2 years) versus a series of adult patients (≥ 17 years).

Results:

A total of 223 patients were included in this study, 40, 109, and 74 of whom were infants, children, and adults, respectively. The age of diagnosis was delayed in adults, with a mean value of 21.07 ± 12.49 years versus 03.37 ± 3.93 and 6.53 ± 3.77 years in infants and children, respectively (P < 0.001). The clinical manifestations in infants and children were defined as digestive disorders, mainly chronic diarrhea (P = 0.004), similar in adults. Nevertheless, the extra digestive manifestations were predominant in adults, and anemia was the most frequent manifestation (51.4%) versus 30% (n = 12) and 33.9% (n = 37) in infants and children, respectively (P = 0.026), while weight loss in adults affected 52.7% (P for the difference between the three age groups = 0.004). In adults, there was a higher frequency of associated autoimmune diseases, including hypothyroidism (8.1% versus 4.6% in children), Crohn’s disease (5.4% versus 0.0% in children), and lupus (0.9% versus 0.0% in children) (P < 0.001). Serology was strongly positive in all three age groups but with no significant difference between them (P = 0.184). The difference between the three age groups concerning the immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-transglutaminase (a-tTG) assay positivity was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The partial grade of villous atrophy was dominant in all three groups. Good adherence to the diet was more noticeable in children than adults (P = 0.001).

Conclusions:

Celiac disease presents differences between adults and children. The atypical clinical presentation is dominant in adults. Children present a positive serology and good adherence to the diet.

1. Background

Celiac disease or gluten-sensitive enteropathy is a chronic inflammatory systemic disease of autoimmune origin in genetically predisposed individuals (1). Celiac disease affects approximately 1 - 2% of the general population of all races and countries, with a homogeneous distribution worldwide, and diminishes with age (2, 3). Celiac disease leads to important morbidity but very low mortality (4).

Celiac disease can be diagnosed at any age (5). The disease is seen in both children and adults, and most individuals consider the disease in children and adults to be basically the same (4, 6). Pediatric celiac disease is characterized by predominantly digestive characteristics with a typical malabsorption syndrome associated with digestive disorders (7). Nevertheless, adult celiac disease is presented in atypical forms characterized by extra digestive symptoms (5, 8).

The current diagnostic strategy for celiac disease is based on clinical suspicion and confirmed by serological and histological tests. However, the screening and diagnosis of celiac disease are relatively well-established (9, 10). The treatment of celiac disease is essentially based on a gluten-free diet that remains the only effective treatment (11).

2. Objectives

This study aimed to describe the main differences and similarities of celiac disease according to age and highlight the clinical features, diagnosis, associations of the disease, complications, and response to a gluten-free diet in infants, children, and adults.

3. Methods

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on 223 patients diagnosed with celiac disease in the Pediatrics Department of the Oran University Hospital Center and the Gastroenterology Department of Tlemcen University Hospital Center (Western Algeria). The patients’ recruitment was carried out at the level of (1) the Pediatrics Department of the Oran University Hospital Center; (2) the Gastroenterology Department of Tlemcen University Hospital Center; and (3) the National Association of Celiac Protection in the Sidi Bel Abbes. Three groups were selected according to age, including infants < 2 years, children or adolescents ≥ 2 years, and adults ≥ 17 years. The current epidemiological survey was conducted over 2 years (2019 - 2021). The data were collected from the records of celiac patients and, according to the inclusion criterion, a histological and/or serological diagnosis of the disease with full respect for the confidentiality of the data and patients. All celiac cases lost to follow-up were excluded. The aforementioned criteria were applied to both genders and all age categories.

3.1. Statistical Data

The description, processing, and analysis of statistical data in the studied sample were carried out via SPSS software (version 22.0; Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, IBM Corporation; Chicago, IL. August 2013). Moreover, the data were presented in rates and cross-tabulations. The results were expressed as frequencies, means, and standard deviations. A Pearson’s chi-square test (χ2) was used to evaluate clinical symptoms and diseases associated with celiac disease according to the age group, and ANOVA test to evaluate an anthropometric parameter according to the age group. The statistical level of significance was P < 0.05. The reference values for the comparison between age groups were made using a 95% confidence interval.

4. Results

Among the 223 celiac patients enrolled in this study, 40 (17.9%), 109 (48.9%), and 74 (33.2%) subjects were infants < 2, children ≥ 2, and adults ≥ 17 years, respectively. There was a predominance of female gender with a gender ratio of 1.62. The average age was 15.17 ± 15.76 years in all patients, with 1.68 ± 0.38, 7.04 ± 3.68, and 34.44 ± 12.66 years in infants, children, and adults, respectively. A significant difference was noted in this regard (P < 0.001). The mean values of age at diagnosis and age of gluten-free diet were 10.79 ± 10.72 and 9.23 ± 9.93 years in all patients, respectively. A significant difference was observed in this regard (P < 0.001).

The mean body mass index (BMI) in the studied sample was 15.79 ± 2.47 kg/m2. The mean BMI values of children, adults, and infants were 15.13 ± 1.99, 16.74 ± 3.03, and 15.86 ± 1.90 kg/m2, respectively, with a significance of P < 0.001 in all age groups. The average hemoglobin level at diagnosis in all patients was 10.63 ± 1.89 g/dL, with 10.66 ± 1.89, 10.66 ± 2.00, and 10.52 ± 1.73 g/dL in children, adults, and infants, respectively, with no significant difference between the three age groups (P = 0.92) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Clinical Presentations According to Age Groups at Celiac Disease Diagnosis a

CharacteristicsAll Patients (n = 223)CI 95%Infants (< 2 Years) (n = 40)CI 95%Children (≥ 2 Years) (n = 109)CI 95%Adults (≥ 17 Years) (n = 74)CI 95%P-ValueP-Value
Age (y)15.17 ± 15.7613.09 - 17.251.68 ± 0.381.56 - 1.817.04 ± 3.686.34 - 7.7434.44 ± 12.6631.51 - 37.38< 0.001 b< 0.001 c (infants vs. children); < 0.001 c (infants vs. adults); < 0.001 c (adults vs. children)
Age at first diagnosis (y)10.79 ± 10.729.37 - 12.2003.37 ± 3.932.11 - 4.636.53 ± 3.775.81 - 7.2421.07 ± 12.4918.18 - 23.97< 0.001 b0.68 (infants vs. children); < 0.001 c (infants vs. adults); < 0.001 c (adults vs. children)
Age of gluten - free diet (y)9.23 ± 9.937.92 - 10.541.80 ± 0.681.58 - 2.025.94 ± 3.375.30 - 6.5818.09 ± 12.5215.19 - 20.99< 0.001 b0.08 (infants vs. children); < 0.001 c (infant vs. adults); < 0.001 c (adults vs. children)
BMI (kg/m2) during the diagnosis15.79 ± 2.4715.47 - 16.1215.86 ± 1.9015.25 - 16.4715.13 ± 1.9914.75 - 15.5116.74 ± 3.0316.03 - 17.44< 0.001 b0.197 (infants vs. children); 0.114 (infants vs. adults); < 0.001 c (adults vs. children)
Hb (g/dL) during the diagnosis10.63 ± 1.8910.38 - 10.8810.52 ± 1.739.97 - 11.0810.66 ± 1.8910.30 - 11.0110.66 ± 2.0010.19 - 11.120.920.916 (infants vs. children); 0.943 (infants vs. adults); 0.998 (adults vs. children)

The symptomatological diversification assessment showed that the clinical features of the disease were defined as digestive disorders (n = 109, 48.9%) in all patients, with 56 (25.1%), 29 (13.0%), and 24 (10.8%) subjects in children, adults, and infants, respectively. The most common digestive disorder noted in the children group (≥ 2 years) were chronic diarrhea, abdominal bloating, abdominal pain, and vomiting in 59 (54.1%) (P = 0.004), 35 (32.1%) (P < 0.001), 64 (63.3%) (P = 0.026), and 39 (35.6%) (P = 0.183) patients, respectively. However, vomiting was frequent in infants (< 2 years) with 52.5%. Nevertheless, abdominal distension and epigastralgia were the most frequent digestive disorders noted in adults, with a frequency of 19 (25.7%) (P = 0.001) and 3 (4.1%) (P = 0.442) patients, respectively.

Weight loss (52.7%), anemia (51.4%), and asthenia (37.8%) were the main extra digestive disorders in the adult group, with statistically significant differences of P = 0.026, P = 0.008, and P = 0.004, respectively. However, stunting was the most extra digestive disorder noted in the children group, with a frequency of 32.1% and a significant difference of P = 0.016. Nonetheless, in the infant group, anemia was the most frequent extra digestive disorder in 39% of the patients (Table 2).

Table 2.

Main Findings of Symptomatology According to Age at Celiac Disease Diagnosis a

CharacteristicsAll Patients (n = 223)Infants (< 2 Years) (n = 40)Children (≥ 2 Years) (n = 109)Adults (≥ 17 Years) (n = 74)P-Value
Digestive disorders
Chronic diarrhea142 (63.7)33 (82.5)59 (54.1)50 (67.6)0.004 b
Abdominal bloating55 (24.7)17 (42.5)35 (32.1)3 (4.1)< 0.001 b
Abdominal pain142 (63.7)19 (47.5)64 (63.3)54 (73.0)0.026 b
Constipation28 (12.6)6 (15.0)19 (17.4)3 (4.1)0.024 b
Vomiting90 (40.4)21 (52.5)39 (35.8)30 (40.5)0.183
Abdominal distension30 (13.5)3 (7.5)8 (7.3)19 (25.7)0.001 b
Epigastralgia06 (2.7)0 (0.0)3 (2.8)3 (4.1)0.442
Extra digestive disorders
Anemia87 (39)12 (30)37 (33.9)38 (51.4)0.026 b
Anorexia23 (10.3)6 (15.0)11 (10.1)6 (8.1)0.511
Asthenia56 (25.1)7 (17.5)21 (19.3)28 (37.8)0.008 b
Staturo-ponderal delay56 (25.1)11 (27.5)35 (32.1)10 (13.5)0.016 b
Weight loss90 (40.4)19 (47.5)32 (29.4)39 (52.7)0.004 b
Pallor63 (28.3)12 (30.0)25 (22.9)26 (35.1)0.191
Weakness and muscle cramps23 (10.3)1 (2.5)6 (5.5)16 (21.6)< 0.001 b
Depressed state5 (2.2)0 (0.0)1 (0.9)4 (5.4)0.075
Skin rash13 (5.8)3 (7.5)2 (1.8)8 (10.8)0.035 b
Splenomegaly2 (0.9)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)2 (2.7)0.131
Oral aphthosis7 (3.1)2 (5.0)2 (1.8)3 (4.1)0.530

The comorbidity of celiac disease in the patients was noted in this study. An anemia rate of 16.5% was observed in the children group. Nevertheless, a hypothyroidism rate of 8.1% was noticed in the adult group. Other autoimmune diseases were also noted in the adult group as Crohn’s disease (5.4%) and lupus (0.9%), with a significant difference (P = 0.001). However, allergy was present in the infant group with 22.5% (Table 3).

Table 3.

Celiac Patients According to Comorbidity a

CharacteristicsAll Patients (n = 223)Infants (< 2 Years) (n = 40)Children (≥ 2 Years) (n = 109)Adults (≥ 17 Years) (n = 74)P-Value
Comorbidity0.001 b
Allergy15 (6.7)9 (22.5)6 (5.5)0 (00.0)
Anemia28 (12.6)8 (20.0)18 (16.5)2 (2.7)
Asthma4 (1.8)1 (2.5)3 (2.8)0 (0.0)
Type 1 diabetes5 (2.2)1 (2.5)4 (3.7)0 (00.0)
Lupus2 (0.9)0 (00.0)0 (00.0)2 (0.9)
Crohn’s disease idism4 (1.8)0 (00.0)0 (00.0)4 (5.4)
Osteoporosis2 (0.9)0 (0.0)1 (0.9)1 (1.4)
Hypothyro13 (5.8)2 (5.0)5 (4.6)6 (8.1)

The results of serological tests of all patients with positive disease serology were 90.0% and 80.7% in infants and children, respectively, versus 89.2% in the adult group. No significant difference was recorded with serology (P = 0.184). This study also determined differences in the frequency of immunoglobulin G (IgG) at anti-transglutaminase (a-tTG) refers to assay positivity (P < 0.001) for all age groups. However, the immunoglobulin A-type (IgA) assay positivity was dominant in all the age groups.

The histological examination (at the time of diagnosis) according to the degree of severity of the lesion of the intestinal mucous membrane showed that 45.3% were grade partial villous atrophy. It was predominant in adults at 48.6% vs. 47.5% and 42.2% in infants and children, respectively. The total grade was dominant in adults (18.9%). There was no significance between the three age groups (P = 0.097) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Main Diagnostic Criteria a

CharacteristicsAll Patients (n = 223)Children (< 2 Years) (n = 40)Children (≥ 2 Years) (n = 109)Adults (≥ 17 Years) (n = 74)P-Value
Serological tests
Positive190 (85.2)36 (90.0)88 (80.7)66 (89.2)0.184
Negative33 (14.8)04 (10.0)21 (19.3)8 (10.8)0.184
IgA a-tTG assay positivity (U/mL)161 (72.2)29 (72.5)77 (70.6)55 (74.3)0.091
IgG a-tTG assay positivity (U/mL)43 (19.3)15 (37.5)28 (25.7)00 (0.0)< 0.001 b
IgA AGA assay positivity (U/mL)86 (38.6)21 (52.5)40 (36.7)25 (33.8)0.145
IgA EmA assay positivity (U/mL)20 (9.0)05 (12.5)08 (7.3)07 (9.5)0.609
Histological tests0.097
Partial to subtotal15 (6.7)05 (12.5)10 (9.2)00 (0.0)
Partial101 (45.3)19 (47.5)46 (42.2)36 (48.6)
Subtotal69 (30.9)11 (27.5)36 (33.0)22 (29.7)
Subtotal to total02 (0.9)00 (0.0)00 (0.0)02 (2.7)
Total36 (16.1)05 (12.5)17 (15.6)14 (18.9)
Gluten-free diet adherence0.001 b
Good adhesion141 (63.2)25 (62.5)81 (74.3)35 (47.3)
Poor adhesion82 (36.8)15 (37.5)28 (25.7)39 (52.7)

The gluten-free diet with good adherence was noted in 63.2% of all patients, with 62.5% and 74.3% in infants and children, respectively, versus 47.3% in adults. There was a significant difference in this regard (P = 0.001).

5. Discussion

The current study analyzed the differences between pediatric and adult celiac disease, and the obtained results showed that pediatric and adult celiac disease is characterized by a female predominance in all age groups with a gender ratio of 1.62. This predominance was also suggested by other studies (12, 13). In the present series, the mean age of celiac patients was 15.17 ± 15.76 years. The mean age at disease diagnosis was 10.79 ± 10.72 and 21.07 ± 12.49 years in children and adults, respectively. This issue is confirmed by other studies (14), as the disease can be diagnosed at any age. Therefore, the starting age for the gluten-free diet was 9.23 ± 9.93 years in all patients and 1.80 ± 0.68 years in infants. This suggests that the development of the disease is related to the cessation of breastfeeding and the early introduction of cereals containing gluten, confirmed by Poddar’s study results (6).

The mean BMI in the current sample was 15.79 ± 2.47 kg/m2; all the patients were malnourished (BMI < 16.5 kg/m2). This finding is similar to the findings of other studies conducted on Indian children indicating that growth retardation was a frequent manifestation of the disease (6). In a comparable way to adults, the present study’s results demonstrated an increase in the rate of BMI (> 16.5 kg/m2) comparable to a study by Dickey and Kearney (15), who showed that few celiac patients were underweight at diagnosis.

The clinical symptomatology of the disease was characterized by classic forms that are defined as digestive disorders, which were predominant in children (69%), mainly chronic diarrhea (54.1%), abdominal pain (63.3%), and abdominal bloating (32.1%), with a significant difference (P = 0.004; P = 0.026, and P < 0.001, respectively), which is consistent with a study by Rodrigo-Saez et al. (16) who noted that chronic diarrhea was the main feature of the disease in children. On the other hand, adults also expressed chronic diarrhea as the main symptom of the disease. The current study’s results are confirmed by Sood et al.’s study (17), in which chronic diarrhea was present in adults, in contradiction with other studies’ results (18). Therefore, the present study’s results underline that extra digestive manifestations are quite common in adults with celiac disease, such as weight loss (52.7%), anemia (51.4%), and asthenia (37.8%), with a significant difference (P = 0.004, P = 0.026, and P = 0.026, respectively). The current study’s results are suggested by several compliance studies (6). Although weight loss was the principal extra digestive manifestation (P = 0.004) in the infant group, the stature weight delay was dominant in children (P = 0.016). The aforementioned data are similar to those of Vivas et al.’s study (18).

In the present study, there were many diseases associated with celiac disease in children and adults; however, in the adult group, Crohn’s disease and hypothyroidism seem to be more frequent, as noted in the results of studies by Doya et al. (19) and Baharvand et al. (20). Rodrigo-Saez et al. (16) suggested that most associated diseases in adults are of autoimmune origin. Unlike in the infant group, where allergy was followed by anemia as the main associated disease, Vivas et al. (18) suggest that anemia is one of the associated diseases in infants and children. Anemia, hypothyroidism, and type 1 diabetes were the main associated comorbidities confirmed by the results of El Mehadji et al.’s study (21). In addition, the literature has shown that celiac disease is associated with autoimmune diseases, mainly type 1 diabetes and hypothyroidism (22, 23).

The serological tests were necessary for the diagnosis of the disease, although the current study’s results showed that serology was positive in 85.2% of celiac patients. The present study’s results are similar to the results of other studies (21, 24), recalling that even in infants (90.0%), children (80.7%), and (89.2%) adults, the tests mainly (IgA and IgG a-tTG, IgA endomysial antibodies, and IgA antigliadin antibodies) were significantly higher for children than adults, which underlines an excellent predictive value to confirm the diagnosis (25, 26). A study by Roujon et al. (24) showed that anti-endomysium and tissue transglutaminase IgA antibodies represent the most specific and sensitive markers, with the exception of IgA-deficient patients. Further search for IgG is recommended. The present study’s results are concordant with other studies' results (27) concerning the use of anti-transglutaminase assays. Nevertheless, the present study showed a significant difference in anti-transglutaminases of IgG (P < 0.001).

The histological test defined by a duodenal biopsy remains an examination of reference to confirm the diagnosis of celiac disease. That is why all the studied patients underwent a biopsy with the presence of villous atrophy of partial grade (Marsh = 3), which was dominant in all the patients. Moreover, the total grade (Marsh ≥ 3) was present in adults more frequently than in children. The aforementioned results were also reported by other studies (21, 27).

The response to the gluten-free diet is also necessary to confirm the diagnosis of celiac disease (26). Therefore, good adherence to the gluten-free diet was higher in children than in adults, with a significant difference (P = 0.001), which is consistent with another study’s results (28). Poor adherence to the gluten-free diet and/or lack of clinical and histological response favors the development of refractory sprue, as confirmed by Leffler et al. (28) and Abdulkarim et al. (29).

5.1. Conclusions

Celiac disease in the western Algeria region presents many differences between children and adults. In adults, the presentation of the disease is marked during childhood and is characterized by the presence of atypical and typical forms. Additionally, comorbidity was in the form of autoimmune diseases in adults. Adherence to the gluten-free diet has been well established in children than adults.

References

  • 1.

    Guandalini S, Assiri A. Celiac disease: a review. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(3):272-8. [PubMed ID: 24395055]. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.3858.

  • 2.

    Barada K, Bitar A, Mokadem MA, Hashash JG, Green P. Celiac disease in Middle Eastern and North African countries: a new burden? World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(12):1449-57. [PubMed ID: 20333784]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2846249]. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i12.1449.

  • 3.

    Cummins AG, Roberts-Thomson IC. Prevalence of celiac disease in the Asia-Pacific region. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24(8):1347-51. [PubMed ID: 19702902]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05932.x.

  • 4.

    Hallert C, Gotthard R, Jansson G, Norrby K, Walan A. Similar prevalence of coeliac disease in children and middle-aged adults in a district of Sweden. Gut. 1983;24(5):389-91. [PubMed ID: 6840611]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1419980]. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.24.5.389.

  • 5.

    Fasano A, Catassi C. Coeliac disease in children. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;19(3):467-78. [PubMed ID: 15925850]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2005.01.008.

  • 6.

    Poddar U. Pediatric and adult celiac disease: similarities and differences. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2013;32(5):283-8. [PubMed ID: 23715643]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-013-0339-9.

  • 7.

    Savilahti E, Kolho KL, Westerholm-Ormio M, Verkasalo M. Clinics of coeliac disease in children in the 2000s. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99(7):1026-30. [PubMed ID: 20199495]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01740.x.

  • 8.

    Thomson AB. Small intestinal disorders in the elderly. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23(6):861-74. [PubMed ID: 19942164]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2009.10.009.

  • 9.

    Verkarre V, Brousse N. [Histopathology of coeliac disease]. Pathol Biol (Paris). 2013;61(2):e13-9. French. [PubMed ID: 21620589]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patbio.2011.03.003.

  • 10.

    McNeish AS, Harms HK, Rey J, Shmerling DH, Visakorpi JK, Walker-Smith JA. The diagnosis of coeliac disease. A commentary on the current practices of members of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (ESPGAN). Arch Dis Child. 1979;54(10):783-6. [PubMed ID: 507902]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1545649]. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.54.10.783.

  • 11.

    AGA Institute. AGA Institute Medical Position Statement on the Diagnosis and Management of Celiac Disease. Gastroenterology. 2006;131(6):1977-80. [PubMed ID: 17087935]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2842922]. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.003.

  • 12.

    Kivela L, Kaukinen K, Lahdeaho ML, Huhtala H, Ashorn M, Ruuska T, et al. Presentation of Celiac Disease in Finnish Children Is No Longer Changing: A 50-Year Perspective. J Pediatr. 2015;167(5):1109-15-e1. [PubMed ID: 26316370]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.07.057.

  • 13.

    Kang JY, Kang AH, Green A, Gwee KA, Ho KY. Systematic review: worldwide variation in the frequency of coeliac disease and changes over time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;38(3):226-45. [PubMed ID: 23782240]. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.12373.

  • 14.

    Makharia GK, Baba CS, Khadgawat R, Lal S, Tevatia MS, Madan K, et al. Celiac disease: variations of presentations in adults. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2007;26(4):162-6. [PubMed ID: 17986741].

  • 15.

    Dickey W, Kearney N. Overweight in celiac disease: prevalence, clinical characteristics, and effect of a gluten-free diet. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(10):2356-9. [PubMed ID: 17032202]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00750.x.

  • 16.

    Rodrigo-Saez L, Fuentes-Alvarez D, Perez-Martinez I, Alvarez-Mieres N, Nino-Garcia P, de-Francisco-Garcia R, et al. Differences between pediatric and adult celiac disease. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2011;103(5):238-44. [PubMed ID: 21619387].

  • 17.

    Sood A, Midha V, Sood N, Malhotra V. Adult celiac disease in northern India. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2003;22(4):124-6. [PubMed ID: 12962433].

  • 18.

    Vivas S, Vaquero L, Rodriguez-Martin L, Caminero A. Age-related differences in celiac disease: Specific characteristics of adult presentation. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2015;6(4):207-12. [PubMed ID: 26558154]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4635160]. https://doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v6.i4.207.

  • 19.

    Doya LJ, Naamah M, Karkamaz N, Hajo N, Bijow FW, Ibrahim A, et al. An unusual case of chronic abdominal pain: an association between Celiac disease and Crohn's disease. Oxf Med Case Reports. 2021;2021(4):omab008. [PubMed ID: 33948181]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8081011]. https://doi.org/10.1093/omcr/omab008.

  • 20.

    Baharvand P, Hormozi M, Aaliehpour A. Comparison of thyroid disease prevalence in patients with celiac disease and controls. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2020;13(1):44-9. [PubMed ID: 32190224]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7069534].

  • 21.

    El Mehadji DZ, Zemri K, Mehida H, Harir N, Yekrou D, Nedjadi KB, et al. Epidemiological, Clinical, Histological, Serological and Therapeutic Study of Children Celiac Disease in Western Algeria Region. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2020;10(5):6-10. https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v10i5.4344.

  • 22.

    Lundin KE, Wijmenga C. Coeliac disease and autoimmune disease-genetic overlap and screening. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;12(9):507-15. [PubMed ID: 26303674]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2015.136.

  • 23.

    Lauret E, Rodrigo L. Celiac disease and autoimmune-associated conditions. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:127589. [PubMed ID: 23984314]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3741914]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/127589.

  • 24.

    Roujon P, Sarrat A, Contin-Bordes C, Pellegrin I, Guidicelli G, Taupin JL, et al. [Serological diagnosis of celiac disease]. Pathol Biol (Paris). 2013;61(3):e39-46. French. [PubMed ID: 21621349]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patbio.2011.03.013.

  • 25.

    Nachman F, Maurino E, Vazquez H, Sfoggia C, Gonzalez A, Gonzalez V, et al. Quality of life in celiac disease patients: prospective analysis on the importance of clinical severity at diagnosis and the impact of treatment. Dig Liver Dis. 2009;41(1):15-25. [PubMed ID: 18602354]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2008.05.011.

  • 26.

    Nachman F, Sugai E, Vazquez H, Gonzalez A, Andrenacci P, Niveloni S, et al. Serological tests for celiac disease as indicators of long-term compliance with the gluten-free diet. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;23(6):473-80. [PubMed ID: 21537123]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0b013e328346e0f1.

  • 27.

    Castro-Antunes MM, Magalhaes R, Nobre JM, Duarte BP, Silva GA. Celiac disease in first-degree relatives of patients. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2010;86(4):331-6. [PubMed ID: 20711550]. https://doi.org/10.2223/JPED.2013.

  • 28.

    Leffler DA, Dennis M, Hyett B, Kelly E, Schuppan D, Kelly CP. Etiologies and predictors of diagnosis in nonresponsive celiac disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(4):445-50. [PubMed ID: 17382600]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2006.12.006.

  • 29.

    Abdulkarim AS, Burgart LJ, See J, Murray JA. Etiology of nonresponsive celiac disease: results of a systematic approach. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(8):2016-21. [PubMed ID: 12190170]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05917.x.