A Comparison of the Anesthesia Efficacy of Articaine and Articaine plus  Morphine for Buccal Infiltration in Mandi bular Posterior Teeth  with Irriversible  Pulpitis

Narges Farhadmollashahi; Eshagh Ali Saberi; Tahere  Aliabadi

Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences

The Official Journal of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences

Current Issue All Issues In Press Articles Accepted Manuscripts Search

Journal Information Boards and Committees Indexing and Listing Sources Journal Metrics Open Peer Review (OPR)Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement Contact Us Support Reviewer and AE Registration Form

APC

Authors Guide Submit Manuscript

A Comparison of the Anesthesia Efficacy of Articaine and Articaine plus Morphine for Buccal Infiltration in Mandi bular Posterior Teeth with Irriversible Pulpitis

Author(s):

Narges Farhadmollashahi¹,

Eshagh Ali Saberi²,

Tahere Aliabadi^2,*

1Zahedan, Iran

2Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Zahe dan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran

Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences:Vol. 16, issue 7

Published online:Dec 11, 2013

Article type:Research Article

Received:May 14, 2013

Accepted:Jul 02, 2013

How to Cite: Narges FarhadmollashahiEshagh Ali SaberiTahere AliabadiA Comparison of the Anesthesia Efficacy of Articaine and Articaine plus Morphine for Buccal Infiltration in Mandi bular Posterior Teeth with Irriversible Pulpitis.Zahedan J Res Med Sci.16(7):null-null.

Abstract

Background: Successful local anesthesia is the bedrock of pain control in endodontics. Pain control is essential to reduce fear and anxiety associated with endodontic procedure. The aim of study was, identifying and comparison of the anesthesia efficacy of articaine and articaine plus morphine for buccal infiltration in mandibular posterior teeth with irriversible pulpitis.

Materials and Methods: This randomized double-blind clinical trial included 75 patients with symtomatically irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth. Patient divided 3 groups randomly received either a buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with 1:100000 epinephrine or articaine morphine with 1:100000 epinephrine or IAN block of 2% lidocaine with 1:800000 epinephrine. Self-reported pain response was recorded on VAS scale before and after local anesthetic injection during access preparation. For statistical analysis were used χ2, t-test, one way ANOVA and Mann Whitney.

Results: Statistical analysis result show success rate of articaine (68%), articaine morphine (52%) and lidocaine (64%). There was no statistically difference in the success rate between groups.

Conclusion: Addition of the morphine to articaine does not increase success rate of buccal infiltration.

Keywords

Fulltext

Fulltext is availale in the PDF.

References

1.
Refrences are available in PDF.

comments